GroEL-mediated protein folding: Making the impossible, possible

Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 211-239

  Lin, Zong ^a   Rye, Hays ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chaperonin; GroEL; GroES; Hsp60; Molecular chaperone; Protein folding

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CHAPERONIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 60; OLIGOMER; WATER;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CATALYSIS; CIS ISOMER; ENERGY METABOLISM; HUMAN; KINETICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; MOLECULAR SIZE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN ISOLATION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; STIMULATION; THERMODYNAMICS; TRANS ISOMER;

GROEL PROTEIN; GROES PROTEIN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 33746265142     PISSN: 10409238     EISSN: 15497798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10409230600760382     Document Type: Review

References (210)

1. Agard, D.A. 1993. To fold or not to fold. Science 260:1903-1904.
2. Anfinsen, C.B. 1973. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181:223-230.
3. Aoki, K., Taguchi, H., et al. 1997. Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein binding reaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction. J Biol Chem 272:32158-32162.
4. Ashcroft, A.E., Brinker, A., et al. 2002. Structural plasticity and noncovalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain. A study using electrospay ionization mass spectrometry and fluorescence binding studies. J Biol Chem 277:33115-33126.
5. Badcoe, I.G., Smith, C.J., et al. 1991. Binding of a chaperonin to the folding intermediates of lactate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 30:9195-9200.
6. Baldwin, R.L. 1986. Temperature dependence of the hydrophobic interaction in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:8069-8072.
7. Baumketner, A., Jewett, A., et al. 2003. Effects of confinement in chaperonin assisted protein folding: rate enhancement by decreasing the roughness of the folding energy landscape. J Mol Biol 332:701-713.
8. Betancourt, M.R. and Thirumalai, D. 1999. Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity. J Mol Biol 287:627-644.
9. Bhutani, N. and Udgaonkar, J.B. 2000. A thermodynamic coupling mechanism can explain the GroEL-mediated acceleration of the folding of barstar. J Mol Biol 297:1037-1044.
10. Bhutani, N. and Udgaonkar, J.B. 2001. GroEL channels the folding of thioredoxin along one kinetic route. J Mol Biol 314:1167-1179.
11. Bochkareva, E.S., Lissin, N.M., et al. 1992. Positive cooperativity in the functioning of molecular chaperone GroEL. J Biol Chem 267:6796-6800.
12. Braig, K., Adams, P.D., et al. 1995. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A resolution [see comments]. Nat Struct Biol 2:1083-1094.
13. Braig, K., Otwinowski, Z., et al. 1994. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A [see comments]. Nature 371:578-586.
14. Braig, K., Simon, M., et al. 1993. A polypeptide bound by the chaperonin groEL is localized within a central cavity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:3978-3982.
15. Brazil, B.T., Cleland, J.L., et al. 1997. Model peptide studies demonstrate that amphipathic secondary structures can be recognized by the chaperonin GroEL (cpn60). J Biol Chem 272:5105-5111.
16. Brinker, A., Pfeifer, G., et al. 2001. Dual function of protein confinement in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Cell 107:223-233.
17. Brunschier, R., Danner, M., et al. 1993. Interactions of phage P22 tailspike protein with GroE molecular chaperones during refolding in vitro. J Biol Chem 268:2767-2772.
18. Buchberger, A., Schroder, H., et al. 1996. Substrate shuttling between the DnaK and GroEL systems indicates a chaperone network promoting protein folding. J Mol Biol 261:328-333.
19. Buchner, J., Schmidt, M., et al. 1991. GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation. Biochemistry 30(6):1586-1591.
20. Buckle, A.M., Zahn, R., et al. 1997. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:3571-3575.
21. Bukau, B. and Horwich, A.L. 1998. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell 92:351-366.
22. Burston, S.G., Ranson, N.A., et al. 1995. The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J Mol Biol 249:138-152.
23. Burston, S.G., Weissman, J.S., et al. 1996. Release of both native and non-native proteins from a cis-only GroEL ternary complex. Nature 383:96-99.
24. Cecconi, C., Shank, E.A., et al. 2005. Direct observation of the three-state folding of a single protein molecule. Science. 309:2057-2060.
25. Chan, H.S. and Dill, K.A. 1996. A simple model of chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proteins 24:345-351.
26. Chandrasekhar, G.N., Tilly, K., et al. 1986. Purification and properties of the groES morphogenetic protein of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 261:12414-12419.
27. Chaudhry, C., Farr, G.W., et al. 2003. Role of the gamma-phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL-GroES: function, structure and energetics. Embo J 22:4877-4887.
28. Chaudhuri, T.K., Farr, G.W., et al. 2001. GroEL/GroES-mediated folding of a protein too large to be encapsulated. Cell 107:235-246.
29. Chen, J., Walter, S., et al. 2001. Folding of malate dehydrogenase inside the GroEL-GroES cavity. Nat Struct Biol 8:721-728.
30. Chen, L. and Sigler, P.B. 1999. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell 99:757-768.
31. Chen, S., Roseman, A.M., et al. 1994. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 371:261-264.
32. Cheng, M.Y., Hartl, F.U., et al. 1989. Mitochondrial heat-shock protein hsp60 is essential for assembly of proteins imported into yeast mitochondria. Nature 337:620-625.
33. Cheung, M.S., Garcia, A.E., et al. 2002. Protein folding mediated by solvation: water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:685-690.
34. Clark, A.C. and Frieden, C. 1997. GroEL-mediated folding of structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases. J Mol Biol 268:512-525.
35. Corrales, F.J. and Fersht, A.R. 1995. The folding of GroEL-bound barnase as a model for chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:5326-5330.
36. Corrales, F.J. and Fersht, A.R. 1996. Kinetic significance of GroEL14.(GroES7)2 complexes in molecular chaperone activity. Fold Des 1:265-273.
37. Coyle, J.E., Jaeger, J., et al. 1997. Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by GroEL. Fold Des 2:R93-104.
38. Coyle, J.E., Texter, F.L., et al. 1999. GroEL accelerates the refolding of hen lysozyme without changing its folding mechanism. Nat Struct Biol 6:683-690.
39. Csermely, P. 1999. Chaperone-percolator model: a possible molecular mechanism of Anfinsen-cage-type chaperones. Bioessays. 21:959-965.
40. Daggett, V. and Fersht, A.R. 2003. Is there a unifying mechanism for protein folding?. Trends Biochem Sci 28:18-25.
41. DeLano, W.L. 2002. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. San Carlos, CA: DeLano Scientific.http://www.pymol.org.
42. Deuerling, E. and Bukau, B. 2004. Chaperone-assisted folding of newly synthesized proteins in the cytosol. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 39:261-277.
43. Dill, K.A. and Chan, H.S. 1997. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat Struct Biol 4:10-19.
44. Dobson, C.M. 2001. The structural basis of protein folding and its links with human disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356:133-145.
45. Dougan, D.A., Mogk, A., et al. 2002. Protein folding and degradation in bacteria: to degrade or not to degrade? That is the question. Cell Mol Life Sci 59:1607-1616.
46. Dubaquie, Y., Looser, R., et al. 1998. Identification of in vivo substrates of the yeast mitochondrial chaperonins reveals overlapping but nonidentical requirement for hsp60 and hsp10. Embo J 17:5868-5876.
47. Edsall, J.T. and McKenzie, H.A. 1978. Water and proteins. I. The significance and structure of water; its interaction with electrolytes and non-electrolytes. Adv Biophys 10:137-207.
48. Eggers, D.K. and Valentine, J.S. 2001. Crowding and hydration effects on protein conformation: a study with sol-gel encapsulated proteins. J Mol Biol 314:911-922.
49. Ellis, R.J. 1994. Molecular chaperones. Opening and closing the Anfinsen cage. Curr Biol 4:633-635.
50. Ellis, R.J. 2001. Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem Sci 26:597-604.
51. Ellis, R.J. and van der Vies, S.M. 1991. Molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem 60:321-347.
52. Ewalt, K.L., Hendrick, J.P., et al. 1997. In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system. Cell 90:491-500.
53. Falke, S., Tama, F., et al. 2005. The 13 angstroms structure of a chaperonin GroEL-protein substrate complex by cryo-electron microscopy. J Mol Biol 348:219-230.
54. Farr, G.W., Fenton, W.A., et al. 2003. Folding with and without encapsulation by cis- and trans-only GroEL-GroES complexes. Embo J 22:3220-3230.
55. Farr, G.W., Furtak, K., et al. 2000. Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell 100:561-573.
56. Fayet, O., Ziegelhoffer, T., et al. 1989. The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J Bacteriol 171:1379-1385.
57. Fenton, W.A. and Horwich, A.L. 1997. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci 6:743-760.
58. Fenton, W.A. and Horwich, A.L. 2003. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: fate of substrate polypeptide. Q Rev Biophys 36:229-256.
59. Fenton, W.A., Kashi, Y., et al. 1994. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release [see comments]. Nature 371:614-619.
60. Fisher, M.T. 1992. Promotion of the in vitro renaturation of dodecameric glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli in the presence of GroEL (chaperonin-60) and ATP. Biochemistry 31:3955-3963.
61. Frydman, J. 2001. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem 70:603-647.
62. Garel, J. 1992. Folding of large proteins: multidomain and multisubunit proteins. In: Creishton, T.E. ed. Protein Folding. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 405-454.
63. Gervasoni, P., Staudenmann, W., et al. 1996. beta-Lactamase binds to GroEL in a conformation highly protected against hydrogen/deuterium exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:12189-12194.
64. Gillespie, B. and Plaxco, K.W. 2004. Using protein folding rates to test protein folding theories. Annu Rev Biochem 73:837-859.
65. Goldberg, M.S., Zhang, J., et al. 1997. Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:1080-1085.
66. Goloubinoff, P., Christeller, J.T., et al. 1989a. Reconstitution of active dimeric ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from an unfoleded state depends on two chaperonin proteins and Mg-ATP. Nature 342:884-889.
67. Goloubinoff, P., Gatenby, A.A., et al. 1989b. GroE heat-shock proteins promote assembly of foreign prokaryotic ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oligomers in Escherichia coli. Nature 337:44-47.
68. Gomez-Puertas, P., Martin-Benito, J., et al. 2004. The substrate recognition mechanisms in chaperonins. J Mol Recognit 17:85-94.
69. Gordon, C.L., Sather, S.K., et al. 1994. Selective in vivo rescue by GroEL/ES of thermolabile folding intermediates to phage P22 structural proteins. J Biol Chem 269:27941-27951.
70. Gorse, D. 2001. Global minimization of an off-lattice potential energy function using a chaperone-based refolding method. Biopolymers 59:411-426.
71. Grantcharova, V., Alm, E.J., et al. 2001. Mechanisms of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 11(1):70-82.
72. Gray, T.E. and Fersht, A.R. 1991. Cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis by GroEL is increased by GroES [published erratum appears in FEBS Lett 1992 Sep 21;310(1):99]. FEBS Lett 292:254-258.
73. Gray, T.E. and Fersht, A.R. 1993. Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE. J Mol Biol 232:1197-1207.
74. Gross, M., Robinson, C.V., et al. 1996. Significant hydrogen exchange protection in GroEL-bound DHFR is maintained during iterative rounds of substrate cycling. Protein Sci 5:2506-2513.
75. Gulukota, K. and Wolynes, P.G. 1994. Statistical mechanics of kinetic proofreading in protein folding in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:9292-9296.
76. Guo, W., Lampoudi, S., et al. 2003. Posttransition state desolvation of the hydrophobic core of the src-SH3 protein domain. Biophys J 85:61-69.
77. Hammarstrom, P., Persson, M., et al. 2001. Protein compactness measured by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Human carbonic anhydrase ii is considerably expanded by the interaction of GroEL. J Biol Chem 276:21765-21775.
78. Hartl, F.U. and Hayer-Hartl, M. 2002. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295:1852-1858.
79. Haustein, E. and Schwille, P. 2004. Single-molecule spectroscopic methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14:531-540.
80. Hayer-Hartl, M.K., Ewbank, J.J., et al. 1994. Conformational specificity of the chaperonin GroEL for the compact folding intermediates of alpha-lactalbumin. Embo J 13:3192-3202.
81. Hayer-Hartl, M.K., Weber, F., et al. 1996. Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. Embo J 15:6111-6121.
82. Hlodan, R., Tempst, P., et al. 1995. Binding of defined regions of a polypeptide to GroEL and its implications for chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Nat Struct Biol 2:587-595.
83. Hohfeld, J., Cyr, D.M., et al. 2001. From the cradle to the grave: molecular chaperones that may choose between folding and degradation. EMBO Rep 2:885-890.
84. Holl-Neugebauer, B., Rudolph, R., et al. 1991. Reconstitution of a heat shock effect in vitro: influence of GroE on the thermal aggregation of alpha-glucosidase from yeast. Biochemistry 30:11609-11614.
85. Horovitz, A., Fridmann, Y., et al. 2001. Review: allostery in chaperonins. J Struct Biol 135:104-114.
86. Horst, R., Bertelsen, E.B., et al. 2005. Direct NMR observation of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:12748-12753.
87. Horwich, A. 2002. Protein aggregation in disease: a role for folding intermediates forming specific multimeric interactions. J Clin Invest 110:1221-1232.
88. Horwich, A.L., Low, K.B., et al. 1993. Folding in vivo of bacterial cytoplasmic proteins: role of GroEL. Cell 74:909-917.
89. Horwich, A.L., Weber-Ban, E.U., et al. 1999. Chaperone rings in protein folding and degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:11033-11040.
90. Houry, W.A., Frishman, D., et al. 1999. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 402:147-154.
91. Huang, Y.S. and Chuang, D.T. 1999. Mechanisms for GroEL/GroES-mediated folding of a large 86-kDa fusion polypeptide in vitro. J Biol Chem 274:10405-10412.
92. Hubbard, T.J. and Sander, C. 1991. The role of heat-shock and chaperone proteins in protein folding: possible molecular mechanisms. Protein Eng 4:711-717.
93. Hunt, J.F., Weaver, A.J., et al. 1996. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 379:37-45.
94. Hutchinson, J.P., Oldham, T.C., et al. 1997. Electrostatic as well as hydrophobic interactions are important for the association of Cpn60 (groEL) with peptides. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 2:279-288.
95. Ishii, N., Taguchi, H., et al. 1994. Folding intermediate binds to the bottom of bullet-shaped holo- chaperonin and is readily accessible to antibody. J Mol Biol. 236:691-696.
96. Itzhaki, L.S., Otzen, D.E., et al. 1995. Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry 34:14581-14587.
97. Jackson, G.S., Staniforth, R.A., et al. 1993. Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry 32:2554-2563.
98. Jackson, S.E. 1998. How do small single-domain proteins fold?. Fold Des 3:R81-91.
99. Jaenicke, R. and Lilie, H. 2000. Folding and association of oligomeric and multimeric proteins. In: Mathews, C.R. ed. Protein Folding Mechansims. San Diego: Academic Press, 329-401.
100. Jewett, A.I., Baumketner, A., et al. 2004. Accelerated folding in the weak hydrophobic environment of a chaperonin cavity: creation of an alternate fast folding pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:13192-13197.
101. Kad, N.M., Ranson, N.A., et al. 1998. Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings. J Mol Biol 278:267-278.
102. Katsumata, K., Okazaki, A., et al. 1996. Effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of alpha-lactalbumin. J Mol Biol 258:827-838.
103. Kauzmann, W. 1959. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem 14:1-63.
104. Kerner, M.J., Naylor, D.J., et al. 2005. Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 122:209-220.
105. King, J., Haase-Pettingell, C., et al. 1996. Thermolabile folding intermediates: inclusion body precursors and chaperonin substrates. Faseb J 10:57-66.
106. Kirkpatrick, S. 1984. Optimization by simulated annealing: quantitative studies. J Stat Phys. 34:975-986.
107. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., et al. 1983. Optimazation by Simulated Annealing. Science 220:671-680.
108. Klimov, D.K., Newfield, D., et al. 2002. Simulations of beta-hairpin folding confined to spherical pores using distributed computing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:8019-8024.
109. Koo, E.H., Lansbury, Jr., P.T., et al. 1999. Amyloid diseases: abnormal protein aggregation in neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:9989-9990.
110. Kovacs, I.A., Szalay, M.S., et al. 2005. Water and molecular chaperones act as weak links of protein folding networks: energy landscape and punctuated equilibrium changes point towards a game theory of proteins. FEBS Lett 579:2254-2260.
111. Kuntz, Jr., I.D. and Kauzmann, W. 1974. Hydration of proteins and polypeptides. Adv Protein Chem 28:239-345.
112. Laminet, A.A., Ziegelhoffer, T., et al. 1990. The Escherichia coli heat shock proteins GroEL and GroES modulate the folding of the beta-lactamase precursor. Embo J 9:2315-2319.
113. Landry, S.J. and Gierasch, L.M. 1991. The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation. Biochemistry 30:7359-7362.
114. Landry, S.J., Jordan, R., et al. 1992. Different conformations for the same polypeptide bound to chaperones DnaK and GroEL. Nature 355:455-457.
115. Landry, S.J., Zeilstra-Ryalls, J., et al. 1993. Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES. Nature 364:255-258.
116. Langer, T., Pfeifer, G., et al. 1992. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. Embo J 11:4757-4765.
117. Lilie, H. and Buchner, J. 1995. Interaction of GroEL with a highly structured folding intermediate: iterative binding cycles do not involve unfolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:8100-8104.
118. Lin, Z. and Rye, H.S. 2004. Expansion and compression of a protein folding intermediate by GroEL. Mol Cell. 16:23-34.
119. Lin, Z., Schwartz, F.P., et al. 1995. The hydrophobic nature of GroEL-substrate binding. J Biol Chem. 270:1011-1014.
120. Mande, S.C., Mehra, V., et al. 1996. Structure of the heat shock protein chaperonin-10 of Mycobacterium leprae. Science. 271:203-207.
121. Martin, J., Langer, T., et al. 1991. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate [see comments]. Nature 352:36-42.
122. Martin, J., Mayhew, M., et al. 1993. The reaction cycle of GroEL and GroES in chaperonin-assisted protein folding [see comments]. Nature. 366:228-233.
123. Mayer, M.P. and Bukau, B. 2005. Hsp70 chaperones: cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:670-684.
124. Mayhew, M.C., da Silva, A.C., et al. 1996. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature. 379:420-426.
125. McKintosh, E., Tabrizi, S.J., et al. 2003. Prion diseases. J Neurovirol 9:183-193.
126. Mendoza, J.A., Butler, M.C., et al. 1992. Characterization of a stable, reactivatable complex between chaperonin 60 and mitochondrial rhodanese. J Biol Chem 267:24648-24654.
127. Mendoza, J.A., Rogers, E., et al. 1991. Chaperonins facilitate the in vitro folding of monomeric mitochondrial rhodanese. J Biol Chem 266:13044-13049.
128. Mizobata, T., Akiyama, Y., et al. 1992. Effects of the chaperonin GroE on the refolding of tryptophanase from Escherichia coli. Refolding is enhanced in the presence of ADP. J Biol Chem 267:17773-17779.
129. Motojima, F., Chaudhry, C., et al. 2004. Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:15005-15012.
130. Mok, Y.K., Kay, C.M., et al. 1999. NOE data demonstrating a compact unfolded state for an SH3 domain under non-denaturing conditions. J Mol Biol 289:619-638.
131. Myers, J.K. and Oas, T.G. 2002. Mechanism of fast protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem 71:783-815.
132. Onuchic, J.N., Luthey-Schulten, Z., et al. 1997. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu Rev Phys Chem 48:545-600.
133. Park, E.S., Fenton, W.A., et al. 2005. No evidence for a forced-unfolding mechanism during ATP/GroES binding to substrate-bound GroEL: no observable protection of metastable Rubisco intermediate or GroEL-bound Rubisco from tritium exchange. FEBS Lett 579:1183-1186.
134. Pelham, H.R. 1986. Speculations on the functions of the major heat shock and glucose-regulated proteins. Cell 46:959-961.
135. Peralta, D., Hartman, D.J., et al. 1994. Generation of a stable folding intermediate which can be rescued by the chaperonins GroEL and GroES. FEBS Lett 339:45-49.
136. Perrett, S., Zahn, R., et al. 1997. Importance of electrostatic interactions in the rapid binding of polypeptides to GroEL. J Mol Biol 269:892-901.
137. Persson, M., Hammarstrom, P., et al. 1999. EPR mapping of interactions between spin-labeled variants of human carbonic anhydrase II and GroEL: evidence for increased flexibility of the hydrophobic core by the interaction. Biochemistry 38:432-441.
138. Preuss, M., Hutchinson, J.P., et al. 1999. Secondary structure forming propensity coupled with amphiphilicity is an optimal motif in a peptide or protein for association with chaperonin 60 (GroEL). Biochemistry 38:10272-10286.
139. Privalov, P.L. 1992. Physical basis of the stability of the folded conformations of proteins. In: Creishton, T.E. ed. Protein Folding. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 83-126.
140. Prusiner, S.B., Scott, M.R., et al. 1998. Prion protein biology. Cell 93:337-348.
141. Radford, S.E. 2000. Protein folding: progress made and promises ahead. Trends Biochem Sci 25:611-618.
142. Ranson, N.A., Burston, S.G., et al. 1997. Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. J Mol Biol 266:656-664.
143. Ranson, N.A., Clare, D.K., et al. 2006. Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL-GroES complexes. Nat Struct Mol Biol (in press).
144. Ranson, N.A., Dunster, N.J., et al. 1995. Chaperonins can catalyse the reversal of early aggregation steps when a protein misfolds. J Mol Biol 250:581-586.
145. Reid, B.G. and Flynn, G.C. 1996. GroEL binds to and unfolds rhodanese posttranslationally. J Biol Chem 271:7212-7217.
146. Rief, M., Gautel, M., et al. 1997. Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. Science 276:1109-1112.
147. Riek, R., Pervushin, K., et al. 2000. TROSY and CRINEPT: NMR with large molecular and supramolecular structures in solution. Trends Biochem Sci 25:462-468.
148. Robinson, C.V., Gross, M., et al. 1994. Conformation of GroEL-bound alpha-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry. Nature 372:646-651.
149. Roseman, A.M., Chen, S., et al. 1996. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell 87:241-251.
150. Rothman, J.E. 1989. Polypeptide chain binding proteins: catalysts of protein folding and related processes in cells. Cell 59:591-601.
151. Rye, H.S., Burston, S.G., et al. 1997. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL [see comments]. Nature 388:792-798.
152. Rye, H.S., Roseman, A.M., et al. 1999. GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. Cell 97:325-338.
153. Saibil, H., Dong, Z., et al. 1991. Binding of chaperonins. Nature 353:25-26.
154. Saibil, H.R. and Ranson, N.A. 2002. The chaperonin folding machine. Trends Biochem Sci 27:627-632.
155. Saibil, H.R., Zheng, D., et al. 1993. ATP induces large quaternary rearrangements in a cage-like chaperonin structure. Curr Biol 3:265-273.
156. Sanders, C.R. and Nagy, J.K. 2000. Misfolding of membrane proteins in health and disease: the lady or the tiger?. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:438-442.
157. Schmidt, M., Buchner, J., et al. 1994. On the role of groES in the chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. Three case studies. J Biol Chem 269:10304-10311.
158. Schroder, H., Langer, T., et al. 1993. DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE form a cellular chaperone machinery capable of repairing heat-induced protein damage. Embo J 12:4137-4144.
159. Selkoe, D.J. 2002. Deciphering the genesis and fate of amyloid beta-protein yields novel therapies for Alzheimer disease. J Clin Invest 110:1375-1381.
160. Sharp, J.S., Forrest, J.A., et al. 2002. Surface denaturation and amyloid fibril formation of insulin at model lipid-water interfaces. Biochemistry 41:15810-15819.
161. Shtilerman, M., Lorimer, G.H., et al. 1999. Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. Science 284:822-825.
162. Sigler, P.B., Xu, Z., et al. 1998. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem 67:581-608.
163. Smith, K.E. and Fisher, M.T. 1995. Interactions between the GroE chaperonins and rhdanese. Multiple intermediates and release and rebinding. J Biol Chem 270:21517-21523.
164. Sparrer, H. and Buchner, J. 1997. How GroES regulates binding of nonnative protein to GroEL. J Biol Chem 272:14080-14086.
165. Sparrer, H., Lilie, H., et al. 1996. Dynamics of the GroEL-protein complex: effects of nucleotides and folding mutants. J Mol Biol 258:74-87.
166. Spiess, C., Meyer, A.S., et al. 2004. Mechanism of the eukaryotic chaperonin: protein folding in the chamber of secrets. Trends Cell Biol 14:598-604.
167. Staniforth, R.A., Burston, S.G., et al. 1994. Affinity of chaperonin-60 for a protein substrate and its modulation by nucleotides and chaperonin-10. Biochem J 300:651-658.
168. Swain, J.F. and Gierasch, L.M. 2005. First glimpses of a chaperonin-bound folding intermediate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:13715-13716.
169. Taguchi, H. and Yoshida, M. 1995. Chaperonin releases the substrate protein in a form with tendency to aggregate and ability to rebind to chaperonin. FEBS Lett 359:195-198.
170. Takagi, F., Koga, N., et al. 2003. How protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the chaperonin cage: molecular simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:11367-11372.
171. Thirumalai, D., Klimov, D.K., et al. 2003. Caging helps proteins fold. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:11195-11197.
172. Thirumalai, D. and Lorimer, G.H. 2001. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30:245-269.
173. Thiyagarajan, P., Henderson, S.J., et al. 1996. Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small- angle neutron scattering. Structure 4:79-88.
174. Thomas, P.J., Qu, B.H., et al. 1995. Defective protein folding as a basis of human disease. Trends Biochem Sci 20:456-459.
175. Tilly, K., Murialdo, H., et al. 1981. Identification of a second Escherichia coli groE gene whose product is necessary for bacteriophage morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:1629-1633.
176. Timasheff, S.N. 1993. The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes?. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 22:67-97.
177. Todd, M.J., Lorimer, G.H., et al. 1996. Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:4030-4035.
178. Todd, M.J., Viitanen, P.V., et al. 1994. Dynamics of the chaperon in ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science 265:659-666.
179. Tskhovrebova, L., Trinick, J., et al. 1997. Elasticity and unfolding of single molecules of the giant muscle protein titin. Nature 387:308-312.
180. van den Berg, B., Ellis, R.J., et al. 1999. Effects of macromolecular crowding on protein folding and aggregation. Embo J. 18:6927-6933.
181. van der Vaart, A., Ma, J., et al. 2004. The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate. Biophys J 87:562-573.
182. van der Vies, S.M., Viitanen, P.V., et al. 1992. Conformational states of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase and their interaction with chaperonin 60. Biochemistry 31:3635-3644.
183. Vendruscolo, M. and Dobson, C.M. 2005. Towards complete descriptions of the free-energy landscapes of proteins. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 363:433-450; discussion 50-52.
184. Viitanen, P.V., Donaldson, G.K., et al. 1991. Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry 30:9716-9723.
185. Viitanen, P.V., Gatenby, A.A., et al. 1992. Purified chaperonin 60 (groEL) interacts with the nonnative states of a multitude of Escherichia coli proteins. Protein Sci 1:363-369.
186. Viitanen, P.V., Lubben, T.H., et al. 1990. Chaperonin-facilitated refolding of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase and ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60 (groEL) are K+ dependent. Biochemistry 29:5665-5671.
187. Walter, S., Lorimer, G.H., et al. 1996. A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:9425-9430.
188. Wang, J.D., Herman, C., et al. 2002. Directed evolution of substrate-optimized GroEL/S chaperonins. Cell 111:1027-1039.
189. Wang, J.D. and Weissman, J.S. 1999. Thinking outside the box: new insights into the mechanism of GroEL- mediated protein folding. Nat Struct Biol 6:597-600.
190. Wang, Z., Feng, H., et al. 1999. Basis of substrate binding by the chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 38:12537-12546.
191. Weissman, J.S., Hohl, C.M., et al. 1995. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83:577-587.
192. Weissman, J.S., Kashi, Y., et al. 1994. GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell 78:693-702.
193. Weissman, J.S., Rye, H.S., et al. 1996. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 84:481-490.
194. Weissmann, C. 2005. Birth of a prion: spontaneous generation revisited. Cell 122:165-168.
195. Wickner, S., Maurizi, M.R., et al. 1999. Posttranslational quality control: folding, refolding, and degrading proteins. Science 286:1888-1893.
196. Wolynes, P.G. 2005. Energy landscapes and solved protein-folding problems. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 363:453-464; discussion 64-67.
197. Xu, W.X., Wang, J., et al. 2005. Folding behavior of chaperonin-mediated substrate protein. Proteins 61:777-794.
198. Xu, Z., Horwich, A.L., et al. 1997. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex [see comments]. Nature 388:741-750.
199. Yifrach, O. and Horovitz, A. 1994. Two lines of allosteric communication in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL are revealed by the single mutation Arg196->Ala. J Mol Biol 243:397-401.
200. Yifrach, O. and Horovitz, A. 1995. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34:5303-5308.
201. Yifrach, O. and Horovitz, A. 2000. Coupling between protein folding and allostery in the GroE chaperonin system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:1521-1524.
202. Young, J.C., Agashe, V.R., et al. 2004. Pathways of chaperone-mediated protein folding in the cytosol. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:781-791.
203. Zahn, R., Axmann, S.E., et al. 1994a. Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. I. GroEL recognizes the signal sequences of beta-lactamase precursor. J Mol Biol 242:150-164.
204. Zahn, R., Perrett, S., et al. 1996a. Conformational states bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and secB: a hidden unfolding (annealing) activity. J Mol Biol 261:43-61.
205. Zahn, R., Perrett, S., et al. 1996b. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science 271:642-645.
206. Zahn, R. and Pluckthun, A. 1994. Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. II. GroEL recognizes thermally unfolded mature beta-lactamase. J Mol Biol 242:165-174.
207. Zahn, R., Spitzfaden, C., et al. 1994b. Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL. Nature 368:261-265.
208. Zhang, O. and Forman-Kay, J.D. 1997. NMR studies of unfolded states of an SH3 domain in aqueous solution and denaturing conditions. Biochemistry 36:3959-3970.
209. Zhou, H.X. and Dill, K.A. 2001. Stabilization of proteins in confined spaces. Biochemistry 40:11289-11293.
210. Zhuang, X. and Rief, M. 2003. Single-molecule folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13:88-97.