Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering

Structure

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 79-88

  Thiyagarajan, P ^a   Henderson, S J ^b   Joachimiak, A ^a  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chaperonin; Conformational changes; GroEL solution structure; Rhodanese binding; SANS

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; THIOSULFATE SULFURTRANSFERASE;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; NEUTRON; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; RADIATION SCATTERING;

BINDING SITES; CHAPERONINS; GROEL PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEUTRONS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SCATTERING, RADIATION; THIOSULFATE SULFURTRANSFERASE;

EID: 0029643911     PISSN: 09692126     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00011-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Clore, G.M. & Gronenborn, A.M. (1994). Structure of larger proteins, protein-ligand and protein-DNA complexes by multidimensional heteronuclear NMR. Protein Sci, 3, 372-390.
2. Knott, R., Hansen, S. & Henderson, S.J. (1994). A small angle X-ray scattering study of the binding of cyclosporin-A to calmodulin. J. Struct. Bid. 112, 192-198.
3. Schiffer, M., Stevens, F.J., Westholm, F.A., Kim, S.S. & Carlson, R.D. (1982). Small angle neutron scattering study of Bence-Jones protein Mcg: comparison of structures in solution and in crystal. Biochemistry 21, 2872-2878.
4. Svergun, D.I., Koch, M.H.J., Pedersen, J.S. & Serdyuk, I.N. (1994). Structural model of the 50S subunit of Escherichia coli ribosomes from solution scattering. J. Mol. Biol. 240, 78-86.
5. Lawson, C.L., Zhang, R.-g., Schevitz, R.W., Otwinowski, Z., Joachimiak, A. & Sigler, P.B. (1988). Flexibility of the DNA-binding domains of trp repressor. Proteins 3, 18-31.
6. Staacke, D. Walter, B. Kisters-Woike, B. Wilcken-Bergmann, V.v. & Muller-Hill, B. (1990). How Trp repressor binds to its operator. EMBO J. 9, 1963-1967.
7. Haran, T.E., Joachimiak, A. & Sigler, P.B. (1992). The DNA target of the trp repressor. EMBO J. 11, 3021-3030.
8. Fayet, O., Ziegelhoffer, T. & Georgopoulos, C. (1989). The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 171, 1379-1385.
9. Hendrick, J.P. & Hartl, F.-U. (1993). Molecular chaperone functions of heat-shock proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62, 349-384.
10. Weissman, J.S. Kashi, Y., Fenton, W.A. & Norwich, A.L. (1994). GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release by nonnative forms. Cell 78, 693-702.
11. Braig, K., ef. al., & Sigler, P.B. (1994). The crystal structure of the bacterial GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature 371, 578-586.
12. Schmidt, M., et. al., & Buchner, J. (1994). Symmetric complexes of GroEL chaperonins as part of the functional cycle. Science 265, 656-659.
13. Chen, S., et al., & Saibil, H. (1994). Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 371, 261-264.
14. Langer, T., Pfeifer, G., Martin, J., Baumeister, W. & Hartl, F.-U. (1992). Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. EMBO. J. 11, 4757-4765.
15. Braig, K., Simon, M., Hainfield, J., Furuya, F. & Horwich, A.L. (1993). A polypeptide bound by the chaperonin GroEL is located within a central cavity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3978-3982.
16. Fenton, W.A., Kashi, Y., Furtak, K. & Horwich, A.L. (1994). Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371, 614-619.
17. Holdan, R., Tempst, P. & Hartl, U. (1995). Binding of defined regions of a polypeptide to GroEL and its implications for chaperonin-mediated protein folding, Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 587-595.
18. Mendoza, J.A., Lorimer, G.H. & Horowitz, P.M. (1991). Intermediates in the chaperonin-assisted refolding of rhodanese are trapped at low temperature and show a small stoichiometry. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 16973-16976.
19. Mendoza, J.A., Butler, M.C. & Horowitz, P.M. (1992). Characterization of a stable, reactivatable complex between chaperonin 60 and mitochondrial rhodanese. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24648-24654.
20. Feigin, L.A. & Svergun, P.I (1987). Structure Analysis by Small Angle X-ray and neutron scattering. (Taylor, J.W., ed), p. 94, Plenum Press, NY.
21. Horovitz, A., Bochkareva, E.S. & Girshovich, A.S. (1993). The N terminus of the molecular chaperonin GroEL is a crucial structural element for its assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9957-9959.
22. Horovitz, A., Bochkareva, E.S., Kovalenko, O. & Girshovich, A.S. (1993). Mutation Ala2→Ser destabilizes intersubunit interactions in the molecular chaperone GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 231, 58-64.
23. McLennan, N.F., Girshovich, A.S., Lissin, N.M., Charters, Y. & Masters, M. (1993). The strongly conserved carboxy-terminus glycine-methionine motif of the Escherichia coli GroEL chaperonin is dispensable. Mol. Microbiol. 7, 49-58.
24. Burnett, P.B., Norwich, A.L & Low, K.B. (1994). A carboxy-terminal deletion impairs the assembly of GroEL and coofers a pleiotropic phenotype in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 176, 6980-6985.
25. Zahn, J., Harris, R, Pfeifer, G., Pluckthun, A. & Baumeister, W. (1993). Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 229, 579-584.
26. Gorovits, B.M. & Horowitz, P.M. (1995). The molecular chaperonin cpn60 displays local flexibility that is reduced after binding with an unfolded protein. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13057-13062.
27. Taguchi, H., Makino, Y. & Yoshida, M. (1994). Monomeric chaperonin-60 and its 50-kDa fragment possess the ability to interact with nonnative proteins, to suppress aggregation, and promote protein folding. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 8529-8534.
28. Mendoza, J.A., Demler, B. & Horowitz, P.M. (1994). Alteration of the quaternary structure of cpn60 modulates chaperonin-assisted folding. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2447-2451.
29. Viitanen, P.V., et al., & Cowan, N.J. (1992). Mammalian mitochondrial chaperonin 60 functions as a single toroidal ring. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 695-698.
30. Lissin, N.M. (1995). In vitro dissociation and self-assembly of three chaperon 60s: the role of ATP. FEBS Lett. 361, 55-60.
31. +. FEBS Lett. 362, 121-125.
32. Quaite-Randall, E., Trent, J.D., Josephs, R. & Joachimiak, A. (1995). Conformational cycle of the archaeosome, a TCP1-like chaperonin from Sulfolobus shibatae. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1-6.
33. Igarashi, Y., et al., & Kihara, H. (1995). Solution X-ray scattering study on the chaperonin GroEL from Escherichia coli. Biophys. Chem. 53, 259-266.
34. Weiss, C. & Goloubinoff, P. (1995). A mutant at position 87 of the GroEL chaperonin is affected in protein binding and ATP hydrolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13956-13960.
35. Martin, J., Langer, T., Boteva, R., Schramel, A., Horwich, A.L. & Hartl, F.-U. (1991). Chaperonin mediated protein folding at the surface of GroEL through a "molten-globule"-like intermediate. Nature 352, 36-42.
36. Ishii, N., Taguchi, H., Sasabe, H. & Yoshida, M. (1994). Folding intermediate binds to the bottom of bullet-shaped holo-chaperonin and is readily accessible to antibody. J. Mol. Biol. 236, 691-696.
37. Wignall, G.D. & Bates, F.S. (1986). Absolute calibration of small-angle neutron scattering data. J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 28-40.