Chaperone-percolator model: A possible molecular mechanism of anfinsen-cage-type chaperones

BioEssays

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 959-965

  Csermely, Peter ^a  

^a SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; CHAPERONIN; WATER;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; REVIEW;

CHAPERONIN 60; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; WATER;

EID: 0033231417     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199911)21:11<959::AID-BIES8>3.0.CO;2-1     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Thirumalai D, Guo Z. Nucleation mechanism for protein folding and theoretical predictions for hydrogen-exchange labeling experiments. Biopolymers 1994;35:137-140.
2. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 1995;21:167-195.
3. Dill KA, Bromberg S, Yue K, Fiebig KM, Yee DP, Thomas PD, Chan HS. Principles of protein folding: a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Science 1995;4:561-602.
4. Ptitsyn OB. Structures of folding intermediates. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:74-78.
5. Harpaz Y, Gerstein M, Chothia C. Volume changes on protein folding. Structure 1994;2:641-649.
6. Gerstein M, Chothia C. Packing at the protein-water interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:10167-10172.
7. Chan HS, Bromberg S, Dill KA. Models of cooperativity in protein folding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 1995;348:61-70.
8. Hartl F-U. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 1996; 381:571-580.
9. Ranson NA, White HE, Saibil HR. Chaperonins. Biochem J 1998;333:233-242.
10. Xu Z, Sigler PB. GroEL/GroES: structure and function of a two-stroke folding machine. J Struct Biol 1 1998;24:129-141.
11. Rye HS, Roseman AM, Chen S, Furtak C, Fenton WA, Saibil, HR, Horwich AL. GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alteration of folding-active rings. Cell 1999;97:325-338.
12. Sigler PB, Xu Z, Rye HS, Burston SG, Fenton WA, Horwich A. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem 1998;67:581-608.
13. Roseman AM, Chen S, White H, Braig K, Saibil HR. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell 1996;87:241-251.
14. Wiggins PM, MacClement BAE. Two states of water found in hydrophobic clefts: their possible contribution to mechanisms of cation pumps and other enzymes. Int Rev Cytol 1987;108:249-303.
15. Ernst JA, Clubb RT, Zhou H-X, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. Demonstration of positionally disordered water within a protein hydrophobic cavity by NMR. Science 1995;267:1813-1817.
16. Pertsemlidis A, Saxena AM, Soper AK, Head-Gordon T, Glaeser RM. Direct evidence for modified solvent structure within the hydration shell of a hydrophobic amino acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:10769-10774.
17. Yu B, Blaber M, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM, Caspar DLD. Disordered water within a hydrophobic cavity visualized by x-ray crystallography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:103-108.
18. Löffler G, Schreiber H, Steinhauser O. Calculations of the dielectric properties of a protein and its solvent: theory and case study. J Mol Biol 1997;270:520-534.
19. Zhang L, Hermans J. Hydrophobicity of cavities in proteins. Proteins 1996;24:433-438.
20. Klibanov AM. What is remembered and why? Nature 1995;374:596.
21. Rupley JA, Careri G. Protein hydration and function. Adv Protein Chem 1991;41:37-172.
22. Wüthrich K. Hydration of biological macromolecules in solution: surface structure and molecular recognition. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 1993;58:149-157.
23. Barron LD, Hecht L, Wilson G. The lubricant of life: a proposal that solvent water promotes extremely fast conformational fluctuations in mobile heteropolypeptide structure. Biochemistry 1997;36:13143-13147.
24. Zhu X, Zhao X, Burkholder WF, Gragerov A, Ogata CM, Gottesman ME, Hendrickson WA. Structural analysis of a substrate binding by the molecular chaperone DnaK. Science 1996;272:1606-1614.
25. Hubbard TJP, Sander C. The role of heat-shock and chaperone proteins in protein folding: possible molecular mechanisms. Protein Eng 1991;4:711-717.
26. Todd MJ, Lorimer GH, Thirumalai D. Chaperonin-facilitated protein-folding: optimization of rate by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:4030-4035.
27. Chan HS, Dill KA. A simple model of chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proteins 1996;24:345-351.
28. Gulukota K, Wolynes PG. Statistical mechanics of kinetic proofreading in protein folding in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:9292-9296.
29. Walter S, Lorimer GH, Schmid FX. A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:9425-9430.
30. Subramaniam V, Bergenhem NCH, Gafni A, Steel DG. Phosphorescence reveals a continued slow annealing of the protein core following reactivation of Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase. Biochemistry 1995;34:1133-1136.
31. Buckle AM, Zahn R, Fersht AR. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:3571-3575.
32. Gorovits BM, Horowitz PM. The molecular chaperonin cpn60 displays local flexibility that is reduced after binding with an unfolded protein. J Biol Chem 1995;270:13057-13062.
33. Hlodan R, Tempst P, Hartl F-U. Binding of defined regions of a polypeptide to GroEL and its implications for chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Nature Struct Biol 1995;2:587-595.
34. Rye HS, Burston SG, Fenton WA, Beechem JM, Xu Z, Sigler PB, Horwich AL. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 1997;388:792-798.
35. Persson M, Hammarström P, Lindgren M, Jonsson B-H, Svensson M, Carlsson U. EPR mapping of interactions between spin-labeled variants of human carbonic anhydrase II and GroEL: evidence for increased flexibility of the hydrophobic core by the interaction. Biochemistry 1999;38:432-441.
36. Qu Y, Bolen CL, Bolen DW. Osmolyte-driven contraction of a random coil protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:9268-9273.
37. Shtilerman M, Lorimer GH, Englander SW. Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. Science 1999;284:822-825.
38. Zahn R, Spitzfaden C, Ottiger M, Würtlich K, Plückthun A. Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL. Nature 1994;368:261-265.
39. Robinson CV, Gross M, Eyles SJ, Ewbank JJ, Mayhew M, Hartl FU, Dobson CM, Radford SE. Conformation of GroEL-bound α-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry. Nature 1994;372:646-651.
40. Gervasoni P, Staudenmann W, James P, Gehring P, Plückthun A. β-lactamase binds to GroEL in a conformation highly protected against hydrogen/ deuterium exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:12189-12194.
41. Zahn R, Perrett S, Stenberg G, Fersht AR. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science 1996;271:642-645.
42. Goldberg MS, Zhang J, Sondek S, Matthews CR, Fox RO, Horwich AL. Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:1080-1085.
43. Denisov VP, Johnsson BH, Halle B, Hydration of denatured and molten globule proteins. Nature Struct Biol 1999;6:253-260.