The chaperonin folding machine

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 627-632

  Saibil, Helen R ^a   Ranson, Neil A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; CHAPERONE; CHAPERONIN;

ALLOSTERISM; BINDING SITE; CELL VIABILITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN SECRETION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

HARNESS;

EID: 0036899202     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)02211-9     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Bukau B., Horwich A.L. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell. 92:1998;351-366.
2. Frydman J. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70:2001;603-647.
3. Sigler P.B., et al. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:1998;581-608.
4. Horovitz A., et al. Allostery in chaperonins. J. Struct. Biol. 135:2001;104-114.
5. Thirumalai D., Lorimer G.H. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:2001;245-269.
6. Georgopoulos C.P., Hohn B. Identification of a host protein necessary for bacteriophage morphogenesis (the groE gene product). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75:1978;131-135.
7. Hemmingsen S.M., et al. Homologous plant and bacterial proteins chaperone oligomeric protein assembly. Nature. 333:1988;330-334.
8. Houry W.A., et al. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 402:1999;147-154.
9. Willison K.R. Composition and function of the eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin-containing TCP1. Bukau B. Molecular Chaperones and Folding Catalysts. 1999;555-571 Harwood Academic Publishers.
10. Leroux M.R., Hartl F.U. Protein folding: versatility of the cytosolic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Curr. Biol. 10:2000;R260-R264.
11. Braig K., et al. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
12. Xu Z., et al. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
13. Ma J., et al. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 302:2000;303-313.
14. Ranson N.A., et al. ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell. 107:2001;869-879.
15. Fenton W.A., et al. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:1994;614-619.
16. Buckle A.M., et al. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:1997;3576-3578.
17. Chen L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell. 99:1999;757-768.
18. Saibil H.R., et al. Allostery and protein substrate conformational change during GroEL/GroES-mediated protein folding. Adv. Protein Chem. 59:2001;45-72.
19. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Two lines of allosteric communication in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL are revealed by the single mutation Arg196→Ala. J. Mol. Biol. 243:1994;397-401.
20. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Nested co-operativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 34:1995;5303-5308.
21. Burston S.G., et al. The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 249:1995;138-152.
22. Rye H.S., et al. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 388:1997;792-798.
23. Kad N.M., et al. Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings. J. Mol. Biol. 278:1998;267-278.
24. Boisvert D.C., et al. The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:1996;170-177.
25. Roseman A., et al. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell. 87:1996;241-251.
26. Ditzel L., et al. Crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal chaperonin and homolog of CCT. Cell. 93:1998;125-138.
27. Chen S., et al. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature. 371:1994;261-264.
28. Murai N., et al. GroEL locked in a closed conformation by an interdomain cross-link can bind ATP and polypeptide but cannot process further reaction steps. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1996;28229-28234.
29. Shiseki K., et al. Synchronized domain-opening motion of GroEL is essential for communication between the two rings. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;11335-11338.
30. Farr G.W., et al. Multivalent binding of non-native substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell. 100:2000;561-573.
31. Brinker A., et al. Dual function of protein confinement in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Cell. 107:2001;223-233.
32. Shtilerman M., et al. Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. Science. 284:1999;822-825.
33. Chen J., et al. Folding of malate dehydrogenase inside the GroEL-GroES cavity. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:2001;721-728.
34. Chaudhuri T.K., et al. GroEL/GroES-mediated folding of a protein too large to be encapsulated. Cell. 107:2001;235-246.
35. Kraulis P.J. Molscript - A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24:1991;946-950.
36. Merritt E.A., Murphy M.E.P. Raster3d version-2.0 - A program for photorealistic molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. 50:1994;869-873.
37. Esnouf R.M. An extensively modified version of Molscript that includes greatly enhanced colouring capabilities. J. Mol. Graph. 15:1997;132-134.