The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 562-573

  Van Der Vaart, Arjan ^a,b   Ma, Jianpeng ^c,d   Karplus, Martin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Rice University   (United States)

^d BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN GROEL; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; THIOSULFATE SULFURTRANSFERASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 3042856284     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.037333     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Anfinsen, C. 1973. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science. 181:223-230.
2. Betancourt, M., and D. Thirumalai. 1999. Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity. J. Mol. Biol. 287:627-644.
3. 1-ATP synthase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:198-202.
4. Boisvert, D., J. Wang, Z. Otwinowski, A. Horwich, and P. Sigler. 1996. The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:170-177.
5. Brinker, A., G. Pfeifer, M. Kerner, D. Naylor, F. Hartl, and M. Hayer-Hartl. 2001. Dual function of protein confinement in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Cell. 107:223-233.
6. Brooijmans, N., K. Sharp, and I. Kuntz. 2002. Stability of macromolecular complexes. Proteins. 48:645-653.
7. Brooks, B., R. Bruccoleri, B. Olafson, D. States, S. Swaninathan, and M. Karplus. 1983. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy minimization and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4:187-217.
8. Buckle, A., R. Zahn, and A. Fersht. 1997. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:3571-3575.
9. Chan, H., and K. Dill. 1996. A simple model of chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proteins. 24:345-351.
10. Chaudhuri, T., G. Farr, W. Fenton, S. Rospert, and A. Horwich. 2001. GroEL/GroES-mediated folding of a protein too large to be encapsulated. Cell. 107:235-246.
11. Chen, J., S. Walter, A. Horwich, and D. Smith. 2001. Folding of malate dehydrogenase inside the GroEL-GroES cavity. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:721-728.
12. Chen, L., and P. Sigler. 1999. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: Plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell. 99:757-768.
13. Chen, S., A. Roseman, A. Hunter, S. Wood, S. Burston, N. Ranson, A. Clarke, and H. Saibil. 1994. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature. 371:261-264.
14. Dobson, C. 2002. Getting out of shape. Nature. 418:729-730.
15. Ellis, R., and F. Hartl. 1999. Principles of protein folding in the cellular environment. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:102-110.
16. Farr, G., K. Furtak, M. Rowland, N. Ranson, H. Saibil, T. Kirchhausen, and A. Horwich. 2000. Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell. 100:561-573.
17. Fenton, W., Y. Kashi, K. Furtak, and A. Horwich. 1994. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:614-619.
18. Gliubich, F., M. Gazerro, G. Zanotti, S. Delbono, G. Bombieri, and R. Berni. 1996. Active site structural features for chemically modified forms of rhodanese. J. Biol. Chem. 271:21054-21061.
19. Grallert, H., and J. Buchner. 2001. Review: A structural view of the GroE chaperone cycle. J. Struct. Biol. 135:95-103.
20. Groß, M., C. Robinson, M. Mayhew, F. Hartl, and S. Radford. 1996. Significant hydrogen exchange protection in GroEL-bound DHFR is maintained during iterative rounds of substrate cycling. Prot. Science. 5:2506-2513.
21. Hammarström, P., M. Persson, and U. Carlsson. 2001. Protein compactness measured by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J. Biol. Chem. 276:21765-21775.
22. Hammarström, P., M. Persson, R. Owenius, M. Lindgren, and U. Carlsson. 2000. Protein substrate binding induces conformational changes in the chaperonin GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 275:22832-22838.
23. Hartl, F. 1996. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature. 381:571-580.
24. Houry, W., D. Frishman, C. Eckerskorn, F. Lottspeich, and F. Hartl. 1999. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 402:147-154.
25. Humphrey, W., A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. 1996. VMD - Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14:33-38.
26. Inobe, T., M. Arai, M. Nakao, K. Ito, K. Kamagata, T. Makio, Y. Amemiya, H. Kihara, and K. Kuwajima. 2003. Equilibrium and kinetics of the allosteric transition of GroEL studied by solution X-ray scattering and fluorescence spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 327:183-191.
27. Inobe, T., T. Makio, E. Takasu-Ishikawa, T. Terada, and K. Kuwajima. 2001. Nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL: non-cooperative binding of ATP analogs and ADP, and cooperative effect of ATP. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1545:160-173.
28. Lazaridis, T., and M. Karplus. 1999. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins. 35:133-152.
29. Lee, B., and F. Richards. 1971. The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55:379-400.
30. Llorca, O., S. Marco, J. Carrascosa, and J. Valpuesta. 1997. Conformational changes in the GroEL oligomer during the functional cycle. J. Struct. Biol. 118:31-42.
31. Ma, J., and M. Karplus. 1998. The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: A dynamic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:8502-8507.
32. Ma, J., P. B. Sigler, Z. Xu, and M. Karplus. 2000. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 302:303-313.
33. Ranson, N., G. Farr, A. Roseman, B. Gowen, W. Fenton, A. Horwich, and H. Saibil. 2001. ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell. 107:869-879.
34. Roseman, A., S. Chen, H. White, K. Braig, and H. Saibil. 1996. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: Mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell. 87:241-251.
35. Ryckaert, J., G. Ciccotti, and H. Berendsen. 1977. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23:327-341.
36. Rye, H., S. Burston, W. Fenton, J. Beechem, Z. Xu, P. Sigler, and A. Horwich. 1997. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 388:792-798.
37. Rye, H., A. Roseman, S. Chen, K. Furtak, W. Fenton, H. Saibil, and A. Horwich. 1999. GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. Cell. 97:325-338.
38. Saibil, H. 2000. Molecular chaperones: Containers and surfaces for folding, stabilising or unfolding proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:251-258.
39. Saibil, H., A. Horwich, and W. Fenton. 2002. Allostery and protein substrate conformational change during GroEL/GroES-mediated protein folding. Adv. Prot. Chem. 59:45-72.
40. Schlitter, J., M. Engels, P. Krüger, E. Jacoby, and A. Wollmer. 1993. Targeted molecular dynamics simulation of conformational change-application to the T ↔ R transition in insulin. Mol. Simulat. 10:291-308.
41. Sfatos, C., A. Gutin, V. Abkevich, and E. Shakhnovich. 1996. Simulations of chaperone-assisted folding. Biochemistry. 35:334-339.
42. Shtilerman, M., G. Lorimer, and S. Englander. 1999. Chaperonin function: Folding by forced unfolding. Science. 284:822-825.
43. Stan, G., D. Thirumalai, G. Lorimer, and B. Brooks. 2003. Annealing function of GroEL: Structural and bioinformatic analysis. Biophys. Chem. 100:453-467.
44. Thirumalai, D., and G. Lorimer. 2001. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:245-269.
45. Todd, M., G. Lorimer, and D. Thirumalai. 1996. Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: Optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:4030-4035.
46. Todd, M. J., P. V. Viitanen, and G. H. Lorimer. 1994. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: Implications for facilitated protein folding. Science. 265:659-666.
47. Veselovsky, A., Y. Ivanov, A. Ivanov, A. Archakov, P. Lewi, and P. Janssen. 2002. Protein-protein interactions: Mechanisms and modification by drugs. J. Mol. Recognit. 15:405-422.
48. Walter, S., G. Lorimer, and F. Schmid. 1996. A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:9425-9430.
49. 14 at 2.0 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 327:843-855.
50. Weissman, J., Y. Kashi, W. Fenton, and A. Horwich. 1994. GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell. 78:693-702.
51. Weissman, J., H. Rye, W. Fenton, J. Beechem, and A. Horwich. 1996. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell. 84:481-490.
52. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:741-750.
53. 1-ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:874-879.
54. Yifrach, O., and A. Horovitz. 1996. Allosteric control by ATP of nonfolded protein binding to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 255:356-361.
55. Zahn, R., S. Perrett, and A. Fersht. 1996a. Conformational states bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB: A hidden unfolding (annealing) activity. J. Mol. Biol. 261:43-61.
56. Zahn, R., S. Perrett, G. Stenberg, and A. Fersht. 1996b. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science. 271:642-644.