Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by GroEL

Folding and Design

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 1997, Pages

  Coyle, Joseph E ^a,b   Jaeger, Joachim ^a,b   Gro, Michael ^a,b   Robinson, Carol V ^a,b   Radford, Sheena E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; PEPTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; GROEL PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0031297406     PISSN: 13590278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00046-1     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Fenton, W.A. & Horwich, A.L. (1997). GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 6, 743-760.
2. Fayet, O., Ziegelhoffer, T. & Georgopoulos, C. (1989). The GroES and GroEL heat-shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J. Bacterial. 171, 1379-1385.
3. Martin, J., Mayhew, M., Langer, T. & Hartl, F.D. (1993). The reaction cycle of GroEL and GroES in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Nature 366, 228-233.
4. Mayhew, M., et al., & Hartl, F.D. (1996). Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL:GroES chaperonin complex. Nature 379, 420-426.
5. Rye, H.S., et al., & Norwich, A.L. (1997). Distinct actions of cis and Irans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 388, 792-798.
6. Weissman, J.S., ef al., & Norwich, A.L. (1995). Mechanism of GroEL action - productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83, 577-587.
7. Hartl, F.U. (1996). Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 381, 571-580.
8. Corrales, F.J. & Fersht, A.R. (1996). Toward a mechanism for GroEL:GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and pulsed folding and annealing cage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 4509-4512.
9. Ellis, R.J. & Hartl, F.U. (1996). Protein folding in the cell - competing models of chaperonin function. FASEB J. 10, 20-26.
10. Ellis, R.J. (1996). Revisiting the Anfinsen cage. Fold. Des. 1, R9-R15.
11. Buckle, A.M., Zahn, R. & Fersht, A.R. (1997). A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3571-3575.
12. Xu, Z., Horwich, A.L. & Sigler, P.B. (1997). The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388, 741-750.
13. Boisvert, D.C., Wang, J.M., Otwinowski, Z., Horwich, A.L. & Sigler, P.B. (1996). The 2.4 A crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPgS. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 170-177.
14. Braig, K., et al., & Sigler, P.B. (1994). The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature 371, 578-586.
15. Braig, K., Adams, P.D. & Brünger, AT. (1995). Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 1083-1094.
16. Langer, T., Pfeifer, G., Martin, J., Baumeister, W. & Hartl, F.U. (1992). Chaperonin-mediated protein folding - GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. EMBO J. 11, 4757-4765.
17. Braig, K., Simon, M., Furuya, F., Hainfeld, J.F. & Horwich, A.L. (1993). A polypeptide bound by the chaperonin GroEL is localised within a central cavity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3978-3982.
18. Chen, S., et al., & Saibil, H.R. (1994). Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryoelectron microscopy. Nature 371, 261-264.
19. Thiyagarajan, P., Henderson, S.J. & Joachimiak, A. (1996). Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron-scattering. Structure 4, 79-88.
20. Fenton, W.A., Kashi, Y., Furtak, K. & Horwich, A.L. (1994). Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371, 614-619.
21. Roseman, A.M., Chen, S.X., White, H., Braig, K. & Saibil, H.R. (1996). The chaperonin ATPase cycle - mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate binding domains in GroEL. Cell 87, 241-251.
22. Saibil, H.R., et al., & Ellis, RJ. (1993). ATP induces large quaternary rearrangements in a cage-like chaperonin structure. Curr. Biol. 3, 265-273.
23. Hunt, J.F., Weaver, A.J., Landry, S.J., Gierasch, L. & Deisenhofer, J. (1996). The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 379, 37-45.
24. Mande, S.C., Mehra, V., Bloom, B.R. & Hol, W.G.J. (1996). Structure of the heat-shock protein chaperonin-10 of Mycobacterium leprae. Science 271, 203-207.
25. Burston, S.G., Ranson, N.A. & Clarke, A.R. (1995). The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 249, 138-152.
26. Hayer-Hartl, M.K., Martin, J. & Hartl, F.U. (1995). Asymmetrical interaction of GroEL and GroES in the ATPase cycle of assisted protein folding. Science 269, 836-841.
27. Hayer-Hartl, M.K., Weber, F. & Hartl, F.U. (1996). Mechanism of chaperonin action - GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. EMBO J. 15, 6111-6121.
28. Todd, M.J., Viitanen, P.V. & Lorimer, G.H. (1994). Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle - implications for facilitated protein folding. Science 265, 659-666.
29. Weissman, J.S., Rye, H.S., Fenton, W.A., Beechem, J.M. & Horwich, A.L. (1996). Characterisation of the active intermediate of a GroEL:GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 84, 481-490.
30. Ishii, N., Taguchi, H., Sasabe, H. & Yoshida, M. (1994). Folding intermediate binds to the bottom of bullet-shaped holo-chaperonin and is readily accessible to antibody. J. Mol. Biol. 236, 691-696.
31. Zahn, R., et al., & Fersht, A.R. (1996). Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 15024-15029.
32. Zhu, XT., et al., & Hendrickson, W.A. (1996). Structural analysis of substrate binding by the molecular chaperone DnaK. Science 272, 1606-1614.
33. Madden, D.R., Garboczi, D.N. & Wiley, D.C. (1993). The antigenic identity of peptide-MHC complexes: a comparison of the conformation of five viral peptides presented by HLA-A2. Cell 75, 693-708.
34. Kuehn, M J., et al., & Hultgren, S.J. (1993). Structural basis of pilus subunit recognition by the PapD chaperone. Science 262, 1234-1241.
35. Stern, L.J., et al., & Wiley, D.C. (1994). Crystal structure of the human class II MHC protein HLA-DR1 complexeed with an influenza virus peptide. Nature 368, 215-221.
36. Yifrach, O. & Horovitz, A. (1994). 2 lines of allosteric communication in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL are revealed by the single mutation arg196-ala. J. Mol. Biol. 243, 397-401.
37. Yifrach, O. & Horovitz, A. (1995). Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34, 5303-5308.
38. Yifrach, O. & Horovitz, A. (1996). Allosteric control by ATP of nonfolded protein-binding to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 255, 356-361.
39. Ranson, N.A., Dunster, N.J., Burston, S.G. & Clarke, A.R. (1995). Chaperonins can catalyse the reversal of early aggregation steps when a protein misfolds. J. Mol. Biol. 250, 581-586.
40. Smith, K.E. & Fisher, M.T. (1995). Interactions between the GroE chaperonins and rhodanese - multiple intermediates and release and rebinding. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21517-21523.
41. Taguchi, H. & Yoshida, M. (1995). Chaperonin releases the substrate protein in a form with tendency to aggregate and ability to rebind to chaperonin. FEBS Lett. 359, 195-198.
42. Zahn, R., et al., & Plückthun, A. (1994). Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL .1. GroEL recognises the signal sequences of β-lactamase precursor. J. Mol. Biol. 242, 150-164.
43. Zahn, R. & Pluβckthun, A. (1994). Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. 2. GroEL recognises thermally unfolded mature β-lactamase. J. Mol. Biol. 242, 165-174.
44. Lin, Z.L, Schwarz, F.P. & Eisenstein, E. (1995). The hydrophobic nature of GroEL-substrate binding. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1011-1014.
45. Itzhaki, L.S., Otzen, D.E. & Fersht, A.R. (1995). Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry 34, 14581-14587.
46. Hutchinson, J.P., Oldham, T.C., Elthaher, T.S.H. & Miller, A.D. (1997). Electrostatic as well as hydrophobic interactions are important for the association of cpn60 (GroEL) with peptides. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 279-288.
47. Dessauer, C.W. & Bartlett, S.G. (1994). Identification of a chaperonin binding site in a chloroplast precursor protein. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19766-19776.
48. Landry, S.J. & Gierasch, L.M. (1991 ). The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an α-helical conformation. Biochemistry 30, 7359-7362.
49. Landry, SJ., Jordan, R., McMacken, R. & Gierasch, L.M. (1992). Different conformations for the same polypeptide bound to chaperones DnaK and GroEL. Nature 355, 455-457.
50. Landry, S.J., Taher, A., Georgopoulos, C. & Van der Vies, S.M. (1996). Interplay of structure and disorder in co-chaperonin mobile loops. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11622-11627.
51. Brazil, B.T., et al., & Horowitz, P.M. (1997). Model peptide studies demonstrate that amphipathic secondary structures can be recognised by the chaperonin GroEL (cpn60). J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5105-5111.
52. Pease, J.H.B., Storrs, R.W. & Wemmer, D.E. (1990). Folding and activity of hybrid, disulphide stabilised peptides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 5643-5647.
53. Hlodan, R., Tempst, P. & Hartl, F.D. (1995). Binding of defined regions of a polypeptide to GroEL and its implications for chaperoninmediated protein folding. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 587-595.
54. Schmidt, M. & Buchner, J. (1992). Interaction of GroE with an all betaprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16829-16833.
55. Richarme, G. & Kohiyama, M. (1994). Amino acid specificity of the Escherichia coli chaperone GroEL (heat-shock protein-60). J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7095-7098.
56. Martin, J., et al., & Hartl, F.D. (1991 ). Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of GroEL through a molten globule-like intermediate. Nature 352, 36-42.
57. Mendoza, J.A., Butler, M.C. & Horowitz, P.M. (1992). Characterisation of a stable, reactivatable complex between chaperonin-60 and mitochondrial rhodanese. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24648-24654.
58. Hayer-Hartl, M.K., Ewbank, J.J., Creighton, T.E. & Hartl, F.D. (1994). Conformational specificity of the chaperonin GroEL for the compact folding intermediates of alpha-lactalbumin. EMBOJ. 13, 3192-3202.
59. Viitanen, P.V., Donaldson, G.K., Lorimer, G.H., Lubben, T.H. & Gatenby, A.A. (1991). Complex interactions between the chaperonin60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate-reductase. Biochemistry 30, 9716-9723.
60. Clark, A.C., Hugo, E. & Frieden, C. (1996). Determination of regions in the dihydrofolate-reductase structure that interact with the molecular chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 35, 5893-5901.
61. Groß, M., Robinson, C.V., Mayhew, M., Hartl, F.U. & Radford, S.E. (1996). Significant hydrogen exchange protection in GroEL-bound DHFR is maintained during iterative rounds of substrate cycling. Protein Sci. 5, 2506-2513.
62. Goldberg, M.S., et al., & Horwich, A.L. (1997). Native-like structure of a protein folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA 94, 1080-1085.
63. Zahn, R., Spitzfaden, C., Ottiger, M., Wüthrich, K. & Plückthun, A. (1994). Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL. Nature 368, 261-265.
64. Gervasoni, P., Staudenmann, W., James, P., Gehrig, P. & Plückthun, A. (1996). Beta-lactamase binds to GroEL in a conformation highly protected against hydrogen/deuterium exchange. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA93, 12189-12194.
65. Robinson, C.V., et al., & Radford, S.E. (1994). Conformation of GroEL-bound alpha-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry. Nature 372, 646-651.
66. Ewbank, JJ. & Creighton, T.E. (1993). Structural characterisation of the disulphide folding intermediates of bovine alpha-lactalbumin. Biochemistry 32, 3694-3707.
67. Jennings, P.A., Finn, P.A., Jones, B.E. & Matthews, C.R. (1993). A reexamination of the folding mechanism of dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli: verification and refinement of a four-channel-model. Biochemistry 32, 3783-3789.
68. Zahn, R., Perrett, S., Stenberg, G. & Fersht, A.R. (1996). Catalysis of amide proton-exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science 271, 642-645.
69. Perrett, S., Clarke, J., Hounslow, A.M. & Fersht, A.R. (1995). Relationship between equilibrium amide proton-exchange behaviour and the folding pathway of barnase. Biochemistry 34, 9288-9298.
70. Clarke, J., Hounslow, A.M., Bycroft, M. & Fersht, A.R. (1993). Local breathing and global unfolding in hydrogen-exchange of barnase and its relation to protein folding pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9837-9841.
71. Gray, T.E. & Fersht, A.R. (1993). Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE. J. Mol. Biol. 232, 1197-1207.
72. Badcoe, I.G., et al., & Clarke, A.R. (1991). Binding of a chaperonin to the folding intermediates of lactate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 30, 9195-9200.
73. Gray, T.E., Eder, J., Bycroft, M., Day, A.G. & Fersht, A.R. (1993). Refolding of barnase mutants and pro-barnase in the presence and absence of GroEL. EMBO J. 12, 4145-4150.
74. Lilie, H. & Buchner, J. (1995). Interaction of GroEL with a highly structured folding intermediate - iterative binding cycles do not involve unfolding. Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA 92, 8100-8104.
75. Lilie, H., Jaenicke, R. & Buchner, J. (1995). Characterisation of a quaternary-structured folding intermediate of an antibody Fabfragment. Protein Sci. 4, 917-924.
76. Lilie, H., Rudolph, R. & Buchner, J. (1995). Association of antibody chains at different stages of folding - prolyl isomerisation occurs after formation of quaternary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 248, 190-201.
77. Katsumata, K., Okazaki, A. & Kuwajima, K. (1996). Effect of GroEL on the refolding kinetics of alpha-lactalbumin. J. Mol. Biol. 258, 827-838.
78. Perrett, S., Zahn, R., Stenberg, G. & Fersht, A.R. (1997). Importance of electrostatic interactions in the rapid binding of polypeptides to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 269, 892-901.
79. Rudiger, S., Germeroth, L., Schneider Mergener, J. & Bukau, B. (1997). Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose-bound peptide libraries. EMBO J. 16, 1501-1507.
80. Randall, L.L. (1992). Peptide binding by chaperone SecB -implications for recognition of non-native structure. Science 257, 241-254.
81. Csermely, P., Miyata, Y., Soti, C. & Yahara, I. (1997). Binding affinity of proteins to hsp90 correlates with both hydrophobicity and positive charges. A surface plasmon resonance study. Life Sci. 61, 411-418.
82. Martin, J., Horwich, A.L & Hartl, F.U. (1992). Prevention of protein denaturation under heat stress by the chaperonin hsp60. Science 258, 995-998.
83. Jenkins, A.J., March, J.B., Oliver, I.R. & Masters, M. (1986). A DNA fragment containing the groE genes can suppress mutations in the Escherichia coli dnaA gene. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202, 446-454.
84. Fayet, O., Louarn, J.M. & Georgopolous, C. (1986). Suppression of the Escherichia coli dnaA46 mutation by amplification of the groES and groEL genes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202, 435-445.
85. Gordon, C.L, Sather, S.K., Casjens, S. & King, J. (1994). Selective in vivo rescue by GroEL/ES of thermolabile folding intermediates to phage-p22 structural proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27941-27951.
86. Mendoza, JA, Lorimer, G.H. & Horowitz, P.M. (1992). Chaperonin cpn60 from Escherichia coli protects the mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese against heat inactivation and supports folding at elevated temperatures. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17631-17634.
87. VanDyk, T., Gatenby, A.A. & LaRossa, R.A. (1989). Demonstration by genetic suppression of interaction of GroE products with many proteins. Nature 342, 451-453.
88. Kandror, O., Busconi, L, Sherman, M. & Goldberg, A.L. (1994). Rapid degradation of an abnormal protein in Escherichia coli involves the chaperones GroEL and GroES. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23575-23582.
89. Jackson, G.S., et al., & Burston, S.G. (1993). Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry 32, 2554-2563.
90. Zahn, R., Perrett, S. & Fersht, A.R. (1996). Conformational states bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB - a hidden unfolding (annealing) activity. J. Mol. Biol. 261, 43-61.
91. Walter, S., Lorimer, G.H. & Schmid, F.X. (1996). A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9425-9430.
92. Clark, A.C. & Frieden, C. (1997). GroEL-mediated folding of structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 512-525.
93. Bycroft, M., Matouschek, A., Kellis, J.T., Serrano, L & Fersht, A.R. (1990). Detection and characterisation of a folding intermediate in barnase by NMR. Nature 346, 488-490.
94. Frieden, C. (1990). Refolding of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase - sequential formation of substrate binding sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4413-4416.
95. Weissman, J.S., Kashi, Y., Fenton, W.A. & Norwich, A.L. (1994). GroEL mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of non-native forms. Cell 78, 693-702.
96. Gorovits, B.M. & Horowitz, P.M. (1995). The molecular chaperonin cpn60 displays local flexibility that is reduced after binding with an unfolded protein. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13057-13062.
97. Yu, H., et al., & Schreiber, S.L. (1994). Structural basis for the binding of proline rich peptides to SH3 domains. Cell 76, 933-945.
98. Lee, C.H., et al., & Kuriyan, J. (1994). Crystal structures of peptide complexes of the amino-terminal SH2 domain of the Syp tyrosine phosphatase. Structure 2, 423-438.
99. Tame, J.R.H., et al., & Wilkinson, A. (1994). Structural basis of sequence-independent peptide binding by OppA protein. Science 264, 1578-1581.
100. Landry, S.J., Zeilstraryalls, J., Fayet, O., Georgopoulos, C. & Gierasch, L.M. (1993). Characterisation of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES. Nature 364, 255-258.
101. Ferrin, T.E., Huang, C.C., Jarvis, LE. & Langridge, R. (1988). The MIDAS display system. J. Mol. Graphics 6, 13-27.
102. Kraulis, P.J. (1991). Molscript - a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950.
103. Nicholls, A. & Honig, B. (1992). GRASP: graphical representation and analysis of surface properties. (Columbia University, New York).
104. Rosenberg, H.F., Ackeran, S.J. STenen, D.G. (1993). Characterisation of a distinct binding site for the prokaryotic chaperone, GroEL, on a human granulocyte ribonuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 25, 4499-4503.
105. Thompson, J., Higgins, D. & Gibson, T. (1994). Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.
106. Perkins, D. & Attwood, T. (1995). Vistas - a package for visualising structures and sequences of proteins. J. Mol. Graphics 13, 73-75.