GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings

Cell

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 325-338

  Rye, Hays S ^a,b   Roseman, Alan M ^c,d   Chen, Shaoxia ^c   Furtak, Krystyna ^a,b   Fenton, Wayne A ^a   Saibil, Helen R ^c   Horwich, Arthur L ^a,b  

^a HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONIN; POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENERGY TRANSFER; FLUORESCENCE; HYDROLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

EID: 0033617129     PISSN: 00928674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80742-4     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Badcoe, I.G., Smith, C.J., Wood, S., Halsall, D.J., Holbrook, J.J., Lund, P., and Clarke, A.R. (1991). Binding of a chaperonin to the folding intermediates of lactate dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 30, 9195-9200.
2. Brünger, A.T. (1992). X-PLOR v. 3.1 Manual (New Haven, CT: Yale University).
3. Buckle, A.M., Zahn, R., and Fersht, A.R. (1997). A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3571-3575.
4. Burston, S.G., Ranson, N.A., and Clarke, A.R. (1995). The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 249, 138-152.
5. Chen, S., Roseman, A.M., Hunter, A.S., Wood, S.P., Burston, S.G., Ranson, N.A., Clarke, A.R., and Saibil, H.R. (1994). Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 371, 261-264.
6. 2 complexes in molecular chaperone activity. Fold. Des. 1, 265-273.
7. Fenton, W.A., Kashi, Y., Furtak, K., and Horwich, A.L. (1994). Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371, 614-619.
8. Frank, J., Radermacher, M., Penczek, P., Zhu, J., Li, Y., Ladjadj, M., and Leith, A. (1996). SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 190-199.
9. Goldberg, M.S., Zhang, J., Sondek, S., Matthews, C.R., Fox, R.O., and Horwich, A.L. (1997). Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1080-1085.
10. Gutfreund, H. (1995). Kinetics for the Life Sciences (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press).
11. Inbar, E., and Horovitz, A. (1997). GroES promotes the T to R transition of the GroEL ring distal to GroES in the GroEL-GroES complex. Biochemistry 36, 12276-12281.
12. Itzhaki, L.S., Otzen, D.E., and Fersht, A.R. (1995). Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry 34, 14581-14587.
13. Jones, T.A., Zou, J.-Y., Cowan, S.W., and Kjeldgaard, M. (1991). Improved methods for building models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A47, 110-119.
14. Kad, N.M., Ranson, N.A., Cliff, M.J., and Clarke, A.R. (1998). Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings. J. Mol. Biol. 278, 267-278.
15. Katsumata, K., Okazaki, A., and Kuwajima, K. (1996). Effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of alpha-lactalbumin. J. Mol. Biol. 258, 827-838.
16. Lin, Z., Schwartz, F.P., and Eisenstein, E. (1995). The hydrophobic nature of GroEL-substrate binding. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1011-1014.
17. Llorca, O., Marco, S., Carrascosa, J.L., and Valpuesta, J.M. (1994). The formation of symmetrical GroEL-GroES complexes in the presence of ATP. FEBS Lett. 345, 181-186.
18. Lorimer, G.H. (1996). A quantitative assessment of the role of the chaperonin proteins in protein folding in vivo. FASEB J. 10, 5-9.
19. Lorimer, G. (1997). Protein folding. Folding with a two-stroke motor. Nature 388, 720-721.
20. Murai, N., Makino, Y., and Yoshida, M. (1996). GroEL locked in a closed conformation by an interdomain cross-link can bind ATP and polypeptide but cannot process further reaction steps. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28229-28234.
21. Ranson, N.A., Burston, S.G., and Clarke, A.R. (1997). Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. J. Mol. Biol. 266, 656-664.
22. Roseman, A.M., Chen, S., White, H., Braig, K., and Saibil, H.R. (1996). The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell 87, 241-251.
23. Roy, H., Kupferschmid, M., and Bell, J.A. (1992). Theory of chaperonin action: inertial model for enhancement of prokaryotic Rubisco assembly. Protein Sci. 1, 925-934.
24. Rye, H.S., Burston, S.G., Fenton, W.A., Beechem, J.M., Xu, Z., Sigler, P.B., and Horwich, A.L. (1997). Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 388, 792-798.
25. Sigler, P.B., Xu, Z., Rye, H.S., Burston, S.G., Fenton, W.A., and Horwich, A.L. (1998). Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 581-608.
26. Smith, K.E., and Fisher, M.T. (1995). Interactions between the GroE chaperonins and rhodanese. Multiple intermediates and release and rebinding. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21517-21523.
27. Sparrer, H., and Buchner, J. (1997). How GroES regulates binding of nonnative protein to GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14080-14086.
28. Sparrer, H., Lilie, H., and Buchner, J. (1996). Dynamics of the GroEL-protein complex: effects of nucleotides and folding mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 258, 74-87.
29. Staniforth, R.A., Burston, S.G., Atkinson, T., and Clarke, A.R. (1994). Affinity of chaperonin-60 for a protein substrate and its modulation by nucleotides and chaperonin-10. Biochem. J. 300, 651-658.
30. Taguchi, H., and Yoshida, M. (1995). Chaperonin releases the substrate protein in a form with tendency to aggregate and ability to rebind to chaperonin. FEBS Lett. 359, 195-198.
31. Todd, M.J., Viitanen, P.V., and Lorimer, G.H. (1994). Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science 265, 659-666.
32. 2 heterooligomers involved in protein release during the chaperonin cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16180-16186.
33. Van der Meer, B.W., Cocker, G.I., and Chen, S.Y.S. (1994). Resonance Energy Transfer: Theory and Data (New York, NY: VCH Publishers, Inc.).
34. van Heel, M., Harauz, G., and Orlova, E.V. (1996). A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 17-24.
35. Weissman, J.S., Kashi, Y., Fenton, W.A., and Horwich, A.L. (1994). GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell 78, 693-702.
36. Weissman, J.S., Hohl, C.M., Kovalenko, O., Kashi, Y., Chen, S., Braig, K., Saibil, H.R., Fenton, W.A., and Horwich, A.L. (1995). Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83, 577-587.
37. Weissman, J.S., Rye, H.S., Fenton, W.A., Beechem, J.M., and Horwich, A.L. (1996). Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 84, 481-490.
38. 7, chaperonin complex. Nature 388, 741-750.