Annotation of unknown yeast ORFs by correlation analysis of microarray data and extensive literature searches

Yeast

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 553-571

  Pir, Pinar ^a,b   Ülgen, Kutlu Ö ^a   Hayes, Andrew ^b   Önsan, Ilsen ^a   Kirdar, Betül ^a   Oliver, Stephen G ^b  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Correlation analysis; Functional annotation; GO mapping; Linear modelling; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Transcriptome

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOWN REGULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; LITERATURE; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; UPREGULATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; MODELS, GENETIC; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OPEN READING FRAMES; RNA, FUNGAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33745187154     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1375     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Affymetrix. 2000-2003. Affymetrix GeneChip Expression Analysis Technical Manual. Affymetrix Inc, Santo Clara, California, USA.
2. Akache B, Wu K, Turcotte B. 2001. Phenotypic analysis of genes encoding yeast zinc cluster proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 2181-2190.
3. Allocco DJ, Kohane IS, Butte AJ. 2004. Quantifying the relationship between co-expression, co-regulation and gene function. BMC Bioinform 5: 18.
4. Baganz F, Hayes A, Marren D, Gardner DCJ, Oliver SG. 1997. Suitability of replacement markers for functional analysis studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16: 1563-1573.
5. Baxter SM, Rosenblum JS, Knutson S, et al. 2004. Synergistic computational and experimental proteomics approaches for more accurate detection of active serine hydrolases in yeast. Mol Cell Proteom 3: 209-225.
6. Boer VM, de Winde JH, Pronk JT, Piper MD. 2003. The genomewide transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on glucose in aerobic chemostat cultures limited for carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or sulfur. J Biol Chem 5: 3265-3274.
7. 2 zinc finger motif in the yeast genome and classification of yeast zinc finger proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 2464-2469.
8. Bro C, Regenberg B, Lagniel G, et al. 2003. Transcriptional, proteomic, and metabolic responses to lithium in galactose-grown yeast cells. J Biol Chem 34: 32 141-32 149.
9. Brun C, Herrmann C, Guenoche A. 2004. Clustering proteins from interaction networks for the prediction of cellular functions. BMC Bioinformat 5: 95.
10. Buschlen S, Amillet JM, Guiard B, et al. 2003. The S. cerevisiae HAP complex, a key regulator of mitochondrial function, coordinates nuclear and mitochondrial gene expression. Comp Funct Genom 4: 37-46.
11. Caba E, Dickinson DA, Warnes GR, Aubrecht J. 2005. Differentiating mechanisms of toxicity using global gene expression analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 575: 34-46.
12. Chen Y, Xu D. 2004. Global protein function annotation through mining genome-scale data in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 6414-6424.
13. Cho Y, Walbot V. 2001. Computational methods for gene annotation: the Arabidopsis genome. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12: 126-130.
14. Crespo JL, Hall MN. 2002. Elucidating TOR signalling and rapamycin action: lessons from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66: 579-591.
15. Curwen V, Eyras ET, Andrews D, et al. 2004. The Ensembl Automatic Gene Annotation System. Genome Res 14: 942-950.
16. Datta K, Fuentes JL, Maddock JR. 2005. The yeast GTPase Mtg2p is required for mitochondrial translation and partially suppresses an rRNA methyltransferase mutant, mrm2. Mol Biol Cell 16: 954-963.
17. De Hertogh B, Carvajal E, Talla E, et al. 2002. Phylogenetic classification of transporters and other membrane proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Funct Integr Genomics 2: 154-170.
18. Delneri D, Tomlin GC, Wixon JL, et al. 2000. Exploring redundancy in the yeast genome: an improved strategy for use of the cre-loxP system. Gene 252: 127-135.
19. Deng M, Tu Z, Sun F, Chen T. 2004. Mapping gene ontology to proteins based on protein-protein interaction data. Bioinformatics 20: 895-902.
20. Deng Y, He T, Wu Y, et al. 2005. Computationally analyzing the possible biological function of YJL103C - an ORF potentially involved in the regulation of energy process in yeast. Int J Mol Med 15: 123-127.
21. DeRisi JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO. 1997. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278: 680-686.
22. Dolinski K, Balakrishnan R, Christie KR, et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database. http://www.yeastgenome.org/ [accessed November 2005].
23. Erasmus DJ, van der Merwe GK, van Vuuren HJ. 2003. Genome-wide expression analyses: metabolic adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high sugar stress. FEMS Yeast Res 3: 375-399.
24. Galitski T, Saldanha AJ, Styles CA, Lander ES, Fink GR. 1999. Ploidy regulation of gene expression. Science 285: 251-254.
25. Gardner RG, Nelson ZW, Gottschling DE. 2005. Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus. Cell 120: 803-815.
26. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, et al. 2002. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415: 141-147.
27. Giaever G, Flaherty P, Kumm J, et al. 2004. Chemogenomic profiling: identifying the functional interactions of small molecules in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 793-798.
28. Grotkjaer T. 2005. Bioinformatics Tools in Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PhD Thesis, DTU, Denmark.
29. Güldener U, Munsterkotter M, Kastenmuller G, et al. 2005. CYGD: the Comprehensive Yeast Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res 33: (database issue): D364-368.
30. Haurie V, Perrot M, Mini T, et al. 2001. The transcriptional activator Cat8p provides a major contribution to the reprogramming of carbon metabolism during the diauxic shift in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 276: 76-85.
31. Hayes A, Zhang N, Wu J, et al. 2002. Hybridization array technology coupled with chemostat culture: tools to interrogate gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 26: 281-290.
32. Hazbun TR, Malmstrom L, Anderson S, et al. 2003. Assigning function to yeast proteins by integration of technologies. Mol Cell 12: 1353-1365.
33. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, et al. 2002. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415: 180-183.
34. Holstege FC, Jennings EG, Wyrick JJ, et al. 1998. Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 95: 717-728.
35. Hughes TR, Marton MJ, Jones AR, et al. 2000. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102: 109-126.
36. Huh WK, Falvo JV, Gerke LC, et al. 2003. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425: 686-691.
37. Ideker T, Thorsson V, Ranish JA, et al. 2001. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 292: 929-934.
38. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, et al. 2001. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 4569-4574.
39. Jiang T, Keating AE. 2005. AVID: an integrative framework for discovering functional relationships among proteins. BMC Bioinformat 6: 136.
40. Joshi T, Chen Y, Becker JM, Alexandrov N, Xu D. 2004. Genome-scale gene function prediction using multiple sources of high-throughput data in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. OMICS 8: 322-333.
41. Kaniak A, Xue Z, Macool D, Kim JH, Johnston M. 2004. Regulatory network connecting two glucose signal transduction pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 3: 221-231.
42. Katz M, Frejd T, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. 2003. Efficient anaerobic whole cell stereoselective bioreduction with recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 84: 573-582.
43. Katz M, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. 2003. Screening of two complementary collections of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify enzymes involved in stereo-selective reductions of specific carbonyl compounds: an alternative to protein purification. Enzyme Microb Technol 33: 163-172.
44. Khan S, GangSitu G, Decker K, Schmidt CJ. 2003. GoFigure: automated gene ontology annotation. Bioinformatics 19: 2484-2485.
45. Koski LB, Gray MW, Lang BF, Burger G. 2005. AutoFACT: an automatic functional annotation and classification tool. BMC Bioinformat 6: 151.
46. Kwasnicka DA, Krakowiak A, Thacker C, Brenner C, Vincent SR. 2003. Coordinate expression of NADPH-dependent flavin reductase, Fre-1, and Hint-related 7meGMP-directed hydrolase, DCS-1. J Biol Chem 278: 39 051-39 058.
47. Li B, Trueb B. 2000. DRG represents a family of two closely related GTP-binding proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1491: 196-204.
48. Marks VD, van der Merwe GK, van Vuuren HJ. 2003. Transcriptional profiling of wine yeast in fermenting grape juice: regulatory effect of diammonium phosphate. FEMS Yeast Res. 3: 269-287.
49. Martin DE, Hall MN. 2005. The expanding TOR signalling network. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17: 158-166.
50. Martin DM, Berriman M, Barton GJ. 2004. GOtcha: a new method for prediction of protein function assessed by the annotation of seven genomes. BMC Bioinformat 5: 178.
51. Martinez MJ, Roy S, Archuletta AB, et al. 2004. Genomic analysis of stationary-phase and exit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: gene expression and identification of novel essential genes. Mol Biol Cell 15: 5295-5305.
52. Mills R, Rozanov M, Lomsadze A, Tatusova T, Borodovsky M. 2003. Improving gene annotation of complete viral genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 7041-7055.
53. Ohlmeier S, Kastaniotis AJ, Hiltunen JK, Bergmann U. 2004. The yeast mitochondrial proteome: a study of fermentative and respiratory growth. J Biol Chem 279: 3956-3979.
54. Oliver SG. 1996. From DNA sequence to biological function. Nature 379: 597-600.
55. Onda M, Ota K, Chiba T, Sakaki Y, Ito T. 2004. Analysis of gene network regulating yeast multidrug resistance by artificial activation of transcription factors: involvement of Pdr3 in salt tolerance. Gene 332: 51-59.
56. Pedruzzi I, Burckert N, Egger P, De Virgilio C. 2000. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ras/cAMP pathway controls post-diauxic shift element-dependent transcription through the zinc finger protein Gis1. EMBO J 19: 2569-2579.
57. Piper MD, Daran-Lapujade P, Bro C, et al. 2002. Reproducibility of oligonucleotide microarray transcriptome analyses. An interlaboratory comparison using chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 277: 37 001-37 008.
58. Przybyla-Zawislak B, Gadde DM, Ducharme K, McCammon MT. 1999. Genetic and biochemical interactions involving tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) function using a collection of mutants defective in all TCA cycle genes. Genetics 152: 153-166.
59. Reekmans R, De Smet K, Chen C, Van Hummelen P, Contreras R. 2005. Old yellow enzyme interferes with Bax-induced NADPH loss and lipid peroxidation in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 5: 711-725.
60. Richard GF, Fairhead C, Dujon B. 1997. Complete transcriptional map of yeast chromosome XI in different life conditions. J Mol Biol 268: 303-321.
61. Schlitt T, Palin K, Rung J, et al. 2003. From gene networks to gene function. Genome Res 13: 2568-2576.
62. Shevchenko A, Jensen ON, Podtelejnikov AV, et al. 1996. Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two-dimensional gels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 14 440-14 445.
63. Sickmann A, Reinders J, Wagner Y, et al. 2003. The proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 13 207-13 212.
64. Tadi D, Hasan RN, Bussereau F, Boy-Marcotte E, Jacquet M. 1999. Selection of genes repressed by cAMP that are induced by nutritional limitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 1733-1745.
65. Tai SL, Boer VM, Daran-Lapujade P, et al. 2005. Two-dimensional transcriptome analysis in chemostat cultures. Combinatorial effects of oxygen availability and macronutrient limitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280: 437-447.
66. Tamames J. 2005. Text Detective: a rule-based system for gene annotation in biomedical texts. BMC Bioinformat 6(suppl 1): S10.
67. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. 2000. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 33-36.
68. Tran HG, Steger DJ, Iyer VR, Johnson AD. 2000. The chromo domain protein chd1p from budding yeast is an ATP-dependent chromatin-modifying factor. EMBO J 19: 2323-2331.
69. Troyanskaya OG, Dolinski K, Owen AB, Altman RB, Botstein D. 2003. A Bayesian framework for combining heterogeneous data sources for gene function prediction (in Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8348-8353.
70. Unno K, Juvvadi PR, Nakajima H, Shirahige K, Kitamoto K. 2005. Identification and characterization of rns4/vps32 mutation in the RNase T1 expression-sensitive strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence for altered ambient response resulting in transportation of the secretory protein to vacuoles. FEMS Yeast Res 5: 801-812.
71. Valencia A. 2005. Automatic annotation of protein function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15: 267-274.
72. van den Berg MA, de Jong-Gubbels P, Steensma HY. 1998. Transient mRNA responses in chemostat cultures as a method of defining putative regulatory elements: application to genes involved in Saccharomyces cerevisiae acetyl-coenzyme A metabolism. Yeast 14: 1089-1104.
73. Vinayagam A, Konig R, Moormann J, et al. 2004. Applying support vector machines for Gene Ontology-based gene function prediction. BMC Bioinformat 5: 116.
74. von Mering C, Jensen LJ, Snel B, et al. 2005. STRING: known and predicted protein-protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 33: (database issue): D433-437.
75. Wu J, Zhang N, Hayes A, Panoutsopoulou K, Oliver SG. 2004. Global analysis of nutrient control of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during growth and starvation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 3148-3153.
76. Wu K, Wu P, Aris JP. 2001. Nucleolar protein Nop12p participates in synthesis of 25S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 2938-2949.
77. Xie MW, Jin F, Hwang H, et al. 2005. Insights into TOR function and rapamycin response: chemical genomic profiling by using a high-density cell array method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 7215-7220.
78. Yeang CH, Mak HC, McCuine S, et al. 2000. The chromo domain protein chd1p from budding yeast is an ATP-dependent chromatin-modifying factor. EMBO J 19: 2323-2331.
79. Yeast Genome Deletion Project (http://www.sequence.stanford.edu/group/yeast_deletion_project/ deletions3.html) [accessed November 2005].
80. Young ET, Dombek KM, Tachibana C, Ideker T. 2003. Multiple pathways are co-regulated by the protein kinase Snf1 and the transcription factors Adr1 and Cat8. J Biol Chem 278: 26 146-26 158.
81. Zhou Y, Huang GM, Wei L. 2002a. UniBLAST: a system to filter, cluster, and display BLAST results and assign unique gene annotation. Bioinformatics 18: 1268-1269.
82. Zhou X, Kao MC, Wong WH. 2002b. Transitive functional annotation by shortest-path analysis of gene expression data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 12 783-12 788.