DNA mismatch repair system: Classical and fresh roles

FEBS Journal

Volumn 273, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1609-1619

  Jun, Sung Hoon ^a   Kim, Tae Gyun ^a   Ban, Changill ^a  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Antibody diversification; DNA damage response; DNA mismatch repair; MutL; MutS

Indexed keywords

CISPLATIN; TEMOZOLOMIDE;

DNA DAMAGE; EUKARYOTE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MISMATCH REPAIR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLEIOTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SHORT SURVEY; YEAST;

ANIMALS; BASE PAIR MISMATCH; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; HUMANS; MUTS DNA MISMATCH-BINDING PROTEIN; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; PROTEINS;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 33646872909     PISSN: 1742464X     EISSN: 17424658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05190.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (89)

1. Wagner R Meselson M 1976 Repair tracts in mismatched DNA heteroduplexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73, 4135 4139.
2. Cox EC Degnen GE Scheppe ML 1972 Mutator gene studies in Escherichia coli: the mutS gene. Genetics 72, 551 567.
3. Modrich P Lahue R 1996 Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination, and cancer biology. Annu Rev Biochem 65, 101 133.
4. Wang H Yang Y Du Schofield MJC Fridman Y Lee SD Larson ED 2003 DNA bending and unbending by MutS govern mismatch recognition and specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 14822 14827.
5. Obmolova G Ban C Hsieh P Yang W 2000 Crystal structures of mismatch repair protein MutS and its complex with a substrate DNA. Nature 407, 703 710.
6. Lamers MH Perrakis A Enzlin JH Winterwerp HH de Wind N Sixma TK 2000 The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding to a GT mismatch. Nature 407, 711 717.
7. Junop MS Obmolova G Rausch K Hsieh P Yang W 2001 Composite active site of an ABC ATPase: MutS uses ATP to verify mismatch recognition and authorize DNA repair. Mol Cell 7, 1 12.
8. Lamers MH Winterwerp HH Sixma TK 2003 The alternating ATPase domains of MutS control DNA mismatch repair. EMBO J 22, 746 756.
9. Lamers MH Georgijevic D Lebbink JH Winterwerp HH Agianian B de Wind N Sixma TK 2004 ATP increases the affinity between MutS ATPase domains. J Biol Chem 279, 43879 43885.
10. Lebbink JH Georgijevic D Natrajan G Fish A Winterwerp HH Sixma TK de Wind N 2006 Dual role of MutS glutamate 38 in DNA mismatch discrimination and in the authorization of repair. EMBO J 25, 409 419.
11. Kunkel TA Erie DA 2005 DNA mismatch repair. Annu Rev Biochem 74, 681 710.
12. Sancar A Hearst JE 1993 Molecular matchmakers. Science 259, 1415 1420.
13. Galio L Bouquet C Brooks P 1999 ATP hydrolysis-dependent formation of a dynamic ternary nucleoprotein complex with MutS and MutL. Nucleic Acids Res 27, 2325 2331.
14. Hall MC Matson SW 1999 The Escherichia coli MutL protein physically interacts with MutH and stimulates the MutH-associated endonuclease activity. J Biol Chem 274, 1306 1312.
15. Dao V Modrich P 1998 Mismatch-, MutS-, MutL-, and helicase II-dependent unwinding from the single-strand break of an incised heteroduplex. J Biol Chem 273, 9202 9207.
16. Hall MC Jordan JR Matson SW 1998 Evidence for a physical interaction between the Escherichia coli methyl-directed mismatch repair proteins MutL and UvrD. EMBO J 17, 1535 1541.
17. Ban C Yang W 1998 Crystal structure and ATPase activity of MutL: implications for DNA repair and mutagenesis. Cell 95, 541 552.
18. Ban C Junop M Yang W 1999 Transformation of MutL by ATP binding and hydrolysis: a switch in DNA mismatch repair. Cell 97, 85 97.
19. Guarne A Ramon-Maiques S Wolff EM Ghirlando R Hu X Miller JH Yang W 2004 Structure of the MutL C-terminal domain: a model of intact MutL and its roles in mismatch repair. EMBO J 23, 4134 4145.
20. Au KG Welsh K Modrich P 1992 Initiation of methyl-directed mismatch repair. J Biol Chem 267, 12142 12148.
21. Ban C Yang W 1998 Structural basis for MutH activation in E. coli mismatch repair and relationship of MutH to restriction endonucleases. EMBO J 17, 1526 1534.
22. Burdett V Baitinger C Viswanathan M Lovett ST Modrich P 2001 In vivo requirement for RecJ, ExoVII, ExoI, and ExoX in methyl-directed mismatch repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 6765 6770.
23. Kolodner RD 1996 Biochemistry and genetics of eukaryotic mismatch repair. Genes Dev 10, 1433 1442.
24. Reenan RAG Kolodner RD 1992 Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. Genetics 132, 975 985.
25. Ross-Macdonald P Roeder GS 1994 Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 79, 1069 1080.
26. Marsischky GT Filosi N Kane MF Kolodner R 1996 Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair. Genes Dev 10, 407 420.
27. Genschel J Littman SJ Drummond JT Modrich P 1998 Isolation of MutSβ from human cells and comparison of the mismatch repair specificities of MutSβ and MutSα. J Biol Chem 273, 19895 19901.
28. Umar A Risinger JI Glaab WE Tindall KR Barrett JC Kunkel TA 1998 Functional overlap in mismatch repair by human MSH3 and MSH6. Genetics 148, 1637 1646.
29. Kramer W Kramer B Williamson MS Fogel S 1989 Cloning and nucleotide sequence of DNA mismatch repair gene PMS1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: homology of PMS1 to procaryotic MutL and HexB. J Bacteriol 171, 5339 5346.
30. Prolla T Christie DM Liskay RM 1994 Dual requirement in yeast DNA mismatch repair for MLH1 and PMS1, two homologs of the bacterial mutL gene. Mol Cell Biol 14, 407 415.
31. Wang TF Kleckner N Hunter N 1999 Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: Evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 13914 13919.
32. Harfe BD Minesinger BK Jinks-Robertson S 2000 Discrete in vivo roles for the MutL homologs Mlh2p and Mlh3p in the removal of frameshift intermediates in budding yeast. Curr Biol 10, 145 148.
33. Guarne A Junop MS Yang W 2001 Structure and function of the N-terminal 40 kDa fragment of human PMS2: a monomeric GHL ATPase. EMBO J 20, 5521 5531.
34. Hafe BD Robertson SJ 2000 DNA mismatch repair and genetic instability. Annu Rev Genet 34, 359 399.
35. Holmes J Clark S Modrich P 1990 Strand-specific mismatch correction in nuclear extracts of human and Drosophila melanogaster cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87, 5837 5841.
36. Iams K Larson ED Drummond JT 2002 DNA template requirements for human mismatch repair in vitro. J Biol Chem 277, 30805 30814. q3
37. q4 Ayyagari R Impellizzeri KJ Yoder BL Gary SL Bergers PM 1995 A multinational analysis of the yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen indicates distinct roles in DNA replication and DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 15, 4420 4429.
38. Umar A Buermeyer AB Simon JA Thomas DC Clark AB Liskay RM Kunkel TA 1996 Requirement for PCNA in DNA mismatch repair at a step preceding DNA resynthesis. Cell 87, 65 73.
39. Flores-Rozas H Clark D Kolodner RD 2000 Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Msh2p-Msh6p interact to form an active mispair recognition complex. Nat Genet 26, 375 378.
40. Lau PJ Kolodner RD 2003 Trnasfer of the MSH2-MSH6 complex from proliferating cell nuclear antigen to mispaired bases in DNA. J Biol Chem 278, 14 17.
41. Genschel J Modrich P 2003 Mechanism of 5′ directed excision in human mismatch repair. Mol Cell 12, 1077 1086.
42. Guo S Presnell SR Yuan F Zhang Y Gu L Li GM 2004 Differential requirement for proliferating cell nuclear antigen in 5′-and 3′ nick-directed excision in human mismatch repair. J Biol Chem 279, 16912 16917.
43. Lin YL Shivji MKK Chen C Kolodner R Wood RD Dutta A 1998 The evolutionarily conserved zinc finger motif in the largest subunit of human replication protein A is required for DNA replication and mismatch repair but not for nucleotide excision repair. J Biol Chem 273, 1453 1461.
44. Ramilo C Gu L Guo S Zhang X Patrick SM Turchi JJ Li GM 2002 Partial reconstitution of human DNA mismatch repair in vitro: characterization of the role of human replication protein A. Mol Cell Biol 22, 2037 2046.
45. Tran HT Gordenin DA Resnick MA 1999 The 3′→5′ exonucleases of DNA polymerases δ and ε and the 5′→ 3′ exonuclease Exo1 have major roles in postreplication mutation avoidance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19, 2000 2007.
46. Huang KN Symington LS 1993 A 5′→3′ exonuclease from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for in vitro recombination between linear DNA molecules with overlapping homology. Mol Cell Biol 13, 3125 3134.
47. Tran PT Simon JA Liskay RM 2001 Interactions of Exo1p with components of MutLα in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 9760 9765.
48. Genschel J Bazemore LR Modrich P 2002 Human exonuclease I is required for 5′- and 3′ mismatch repair. J Biol Chem 277, 13302 13311.
49. Dzantiev L Constantin N Genschel J Iyer RR Burgers PMJ Modrich P 2004 A defined human system that supports bidirectional mismatch-provoked excision. Mol Cell 15, 31 41.
50. Longley MJ Pierce AJ Modrich P 1997 DNA polymerase δ is required for human mismatch repair in vitro. J Biol Chem 272, 10917 10921.
51. Gu L Hong Y McCulloch S Watanabe H Li GM 1998 ATP-dependent interaction of human mismatch repair proteins and dual role of PCNA in mismatch repair. Nucleic Acids Res 26, 1173 1178.
52. Branch P Aquilina G Bignami M Karran P 1993 Defective mismatch binding and a mutator phenotype in cells tolerant to DNA damage. Nature 362, 652 654.
53. Fink D Aebi S Howell SB 1998 The role of DNA mismatch repair in drug resistance. Clin Cancer Res 4, 1 6.
54. Hawn MT Umar A Carethers JM Marra G Kunkel TA Boland CR Koi M 1995 Evidence for a connection between the mismatch repair system and the G2 cell cycle checkpoint. Cancer Res 55, 3721 3725.
55. Tominaga Y Tsuzuki T Shiraishi A Kawate H Sekiguchi M 1997 Alkylation-induced apoptosis of embryonic stem cells in which the gene for DNA-repair, methyltransferase, had been disrupted by gene targeting. Carcinogenesis 18, 889 896.
56. Ko LJ Prives C 1996 P53: puzzle and paradigm. Genes Dev 10, 1054 1072.
57. Johnstone RW Ruefli AA Lowe SW 2002 Apoptosis: a link between cancer genetics and chemotherapy. Cell 108, 153 164.
58. Flores ER Tsai KY Crowley D Sengupta S Yang A McKeon F Jacks T 2002 P63 and p73 are required for p53-dependent apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Nature 416, 560 564.
59. Jost C Marin M Kaelin W 1997 p73 is a human p53-related protein that can induce apoptosis. Nature 389, 191 194.
60. Duckett DR Bronstein SM Taya Y Modrich P 1999 hMutSα and hMutLα-dependent phosphorylation of p53 in response to DNA methylator damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 12384 12388.
61. Peters AC Young LC Maeda T Tron VA Andrew SE 2003 Mammalian DNA mismatch repair protects cells from UVB-induced DNA damage by facilitating apoptosis and p53 activation. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 2, 427 435.
62. Gong JG Costanzo A Yang HQ Melino G Kaelin WG Jr. Levrero M Wang JY 1999 The tyrosine kinase c-Abl regulates p73 in apoptosis response to cisplatin-induced DNA damage. Nature 399, 806 809.
63. Shimodaira H Yamashita AY Kolodner RD Wang JYJ 2003 Interaction of mismatch repair protein PMS2 and the p53-related transcription factor p73 in apoptosis response to cisplatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 2420 2425.
64. Kat A Thilly WG Fang WH Longley MJ Li GM Modrich P 1993 An alkylation-tolerant, mutator human cell line is deficient in strandspecific mismatch repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90, 6424 6428.
65. Nyberg KA Michelson RJ Putnam CW Weinert TA 2002 Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu Rev Genet 36, 617 656.
66. Cejka P Stojic L Mojas N Russell AM Heinimann K Cannavo E di Pietro M Marra G Jiricny J 2003 Methylation-induced G(2)/M arrest requires a full complement of the mismatch repair protein hMLH1. EMBO J 22, 2245 2254.
67. Stojic L Mojas N Cejka P Di Pietro M Ferrari S Marra G Jiricny J 2004 Mismatch repair-dependent G2 checkpoint induced by low doses of SN1 type methylating agents requires the ATR kinase. Genes Dev 18, 1331 1344.
68. Adamson AW Beardsley DI Kim W Gao Y Baskaran R Brown KD 2005 Methylator-induced, mismatch repair-dependent G2 arrest is activated through Chk1 and Chk2. Mol Biol Cell 16, 1513 1526.
69. Hirose Y Katayama M Stokoe D Kogan DAH Berger MS Pieper RO 2003 The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway links the DNA mismatch repair system to the G2 checkpoint and to resistance to chemotherapeutic DNA-methylating agents. Mol Cell Biol 23, 8306 8315.
70. Brown KD Rathi A Kamath R Beardsley DI Zhan Q Mannino JL Baskaran R 2003 The mismatch repair system is required for S-phase checkpoint activation. Nat Genet 33, 80 84.
71. Wang Y Qin J 2003 MSH2 and ATR form a signaling module and regulate two brnaches of the damage response to DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 15387 15392.
72. Fang Y Tsao CC Goodman BK Furumai R Tirado CA Abraham RT Wang XF 2004 ATR functions as a gene dosage-dependent tumor suppressor on a mismatch repair-deficient background. EMBO J 23, 3164 3174.
73. Wang Y Cortez D Yazdi P Neff N Elledge SJ Qin J 2000 BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures. Genes Dev 14, 927 939.
74. Chen J Sadowski I 2005 Identification of the mismatch repair genes PMS2 and MLH1 as p53 target genes by using serial analysis of binding elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 4813 4818.
75. Luo Y Lin F Lin W 2004 ATM-mediated stabilization of hMutL DNA mismatch repair proteins augments p53 activation during DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 24, 6430 6444.
76. Tonegawa S 1983 Somatic generation of antibody diversity. Nature 302, 575 581.
77. MacLennan IC 1994 Germinal centers. Annu Rev Immunol 12, 117 139.
78. Rada C Ehrenstein MR Neuberger MS Milstein C 1998 Hot spot focusing of somatic hypermutation in MSH-deficient mice suggests two stages of mutational targeting. Immunity 9, 135 141.
79. Wiesendanger M Kneitz B Edelmann W Scharff MD 2000 Somatic mutation in MSH3, MSH6, and MSH3/MSH6-deficient mice reveals a role for the MSH2-MSH6 heterodimer in modulating the base substitution pattern. J Exp Med 191, 579 584.
80. Li Z Scherer SJ Ronai D Ussel MDI Peled JU Bardwell PD Zhuang M Lee K Martin A Edelmann W et al. 2004 Examination of Msh6- and Msh3-deficient mice in class switching reveals overlapping and distinct roles of MutS homologues in antibody diversification. J Exp Med 200, 47 59.
81. Martin A Li Z Lin D Bardwell PD Iglesias-Ussel MD Edelmann W Scharff MD 2003 Msh2 ATPase activity is essential for somatic hypermutation at A-T basepairs and for efficient class switch recombination. J Exp Med 198, 1171 1178.
82. Muramatsu M Kinoshita K Fagarasan S Yamada S Shinkai Y Honjo T 2000 Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102, 553 563.
83. Pham P Bransteitter R Petruska J Goodman M 2003 Processive AID-catalysed cytosine deamination on single-stranded DNA simulates somatic hypermutation. Nature 424, 103 107.
84. Storb U 1998 Progress in understanding the mechanism and consequences of somatic hypermutation. Immunol Rev 162, 5 11.
85. Bransteitter R Pham P Shcarff MD Goodman MF 2003 Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates deoxycytidine on single-stranded DNA but requires the action of Rnase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 4102 4107.
86. Chaudhuri J Tian M Khuong C Chua K Pinaud E Alt FW 2003 Transcription-targeted DNA deamination by the AID antibody diversification enzyme. Nature 422, 726 730.
87. Zeng X Winter DB Kasmer C Kraemer KH Lehmann AR Gearhart PJ 2001 DNA polymerase eta is an A-T mutator in somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin variable genes. Nat Immunol 2, 537 541.
88. Wilson TM Vaisman A Martomo SA Sullivan P Lan L Hanaoka F Yasui A Woodgate R Gearhart PJ 2005 MSH2-MSH6 stimulates DNA polymerase η, suggesting a role for A: T mutations in antibody genes. J Exp Med 201, 637 645.
89. Bardwell PD Woo CJ Wei K Li Z Martin A Sack SZ Parris T Edelmann W Scharff MD 2004 Altered somatic hypermutation and reduced class-switch recombination in exonuclease 1-mutant mice. Nat Immunol 5, 224 229.