Direct posterior resin composite restorations: Considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures

Quintessence International

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 359-366

  Ferreira, Reinaldo De Souza ^a   Lopes, Guilherme Carpena ^a,b,c   Baratieri, Luiz Narciso ^a  

^a Univ do Sul de Santa Catarina ^*  (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adhesive dentistry; Esthetic restoration, finishing polishing; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; FISSURE SEALANT; RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOFINISHING; BIOPOLISHING; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; DENTAL CARIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATRIX BANDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 1942535799     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB, Russel CM. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:251-255.
2. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. In vitro evaluations of OCA wear resistance of posterior composites. Dent Mater 1995;11:246-251.
3. Leinfelder KF. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:743-748.
4. Leinfelder KF. Current developments in posterior composite resins. Adv Dent Res 1988;2:115-121.
5. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:21E-26E.
6. Leinfelder KF, Lyles MB, Ritsco RG. A new polymer rigid matrix material. J Calif Dent Assoc 1996;24:78-82.
7. Leinfelder KF, Wilder AD Jr, Tekeira LC. Wear rates of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:829-833.
8. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins: The materials and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:663-676.
9. Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:275-281.
10. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1994;25:659-677.
11. Norman RD, Wright JS, Rydberg RJ, Felkner LL. A 5-year study comparing a posterior composite resin and an amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:523-529.
12. Leinfelder KF. Advances in biorestorative material - What does the future hold? J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:35-41.
13. Duncalf WV, Wilson NH. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Quintessence Int 2000;31:247-352.
14. Ferracane JL. Using posterior composites appropriately. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:53-58.
15. Leinfelder KF. Using composite resin as a posterior restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:65-70.
16. Wilson NHF, Dunne SM, Gainsford ID. Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth - Part 2: Resin composite systems. Int Dent J 1997;47:185-193.
17. Torres CRG, Torres ACM, Pagani C, Araújo MAM. Approximal contact in composite resin restorations: Evaluation of techniques and materials. Pós-Grad Rev Fac Odontol São José dos Campos 2000;3:69-80.
18. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16:33-40.
19. Liebenberg WH. Assuring restorative integrity in extensive posterior resin composite restorations: Pushing the envelope. Quintessence Int 2000;31:153-164.
20. Leinfelder KF, Roberson TM. Posterior composite resin - A clinical evaluation. J Dent 1983;32:276-280.
21. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on composite wear. Dent Mater 1993;9:108-113.
22. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:687-701.
23. Leinfelder KF, Yarnell G. Occlusion and restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am 1995;39:355-361.
24. Douglas WH. Posterior composites for modern operative dentistry. J Calif Dent Assoc 1996;24:44-47.
25. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Katoh Y. Effect of an adhesive bonding system on wear resistance of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1997;28:687-693.
26. Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:573-581.
27. Clinical Research Associates Newsletter. 1996;20(4):1-3.
28. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 1996;12:218-226.
29. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997;76:1405-1411.
30. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1993;24:885-890.
31. Hombrook DG. Optimizing form and function with the direct posterior composite resin: A case report. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;89:405-411.
32. Magne P, Dietschi D, Holz J. Esthetic restorations for posterior teeth: Practical and clinical considerations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:105-119.
33. Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994;10:325-330.
34. Yap AUJ, Lye KW, Sal CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997;22:260-265.
35. Maitland RI. Direct posterior Class II composites. Curr Opin Cosmet Dent 1994;1:40-46.
36. Kula K, McKinney JE, Kula TJ. Effects of daily topical fluoride gels on resin composite degradation and wear. Dent Mater 1997;13:305-311.
37. Christensen GJ. Overcoming challenges with resin in class II situations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:1579-1580.
38. Unterbrink GL, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995;23:183-189.
39. Losche GM. Marginal adaptation of a Class II composite filling: Guided polymerization vs. reduced light intensity. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:31-39.
40. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'sofstart-polymerization'. J Dent 1997;25:321-330.
41. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of resin composite adhesion on marginal degradation. Dent Mater J 1995;14:211-220.
42. Hoelscher D, Neme AML, Pink FE, Hughes PJ. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 1998;23:36-42.
43. Bryant RW, Hodge KLV. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations. Aust Dent J 1994;39:77-81.
44. Hondrum SO, Fernández R Jr. Contouring, finishing, and polishing class 5 restorative materials. Oper Dent 1997;22:30-36.
45. Kaplan BA, Goldstein GR, Vijayaraghavan TV, Nelson IK. The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: A profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:34-38.
46. Willems G. Composite resins, In: Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Andrada MAC, Vieira LCC, Cardoso AC, Ritter AV (eds). Esthetics: Direct Composite Restorations on Fractured Anterior Teeth. São Paulo: Quintessence, 1995:75-113.
47. Ratanapridakul K, Leinfelder KF, Thomas JP. Effect of finishing on the in vivo wear rate of a posterior composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:333-335.
48. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CF. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:74-80.
49. White SN. Posterior restorations: Change, challenge and controversy. J Calif Dent Assoc 1996;24:14-16.
50. Liebenberg WH. The axial bevel technique: A new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 2000;31:231-239.
51. Dunn JR. Direct composites in a contemporary restorative practice. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:271-281.
52. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV, Perdigão J, Felipe LA. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: Current concepts for the technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:875-886.
53. Baratieri LN. Direct posterior composite restoration. In: Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Andrada MAC, Vieira LCC, Ritter AV, Cardoso AC (eds). Restorative Dentistry-Basis and Possibilities. São Paulo: Quintessence, 2001.
54. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. Am J Dent 1999;12:123-130.
55. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 1995;8:173-178.
56. Mota CS. A Microleakage and Tensile Evaluation of Different Composite Resins [thesis]. Pelotas, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 2000.
57. Cilli R, Prakki A, Araújo MAJ. Microleakage comparison of Class II restorations with flowable composite as a liner: Condensable composites versus universal composite. Pós-Grad Rev Fac Odontol São José dos Campos 2000;3:25-29.
58. Lopes GC, Ferreira RS, Baratieri LN, Vieira LCC, Monteiro S Jr. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: New techniques and possibilities. Case reports. Quintessence Int 2002;33:337-346.
59. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, Andrada MAC, Vieira LCC. Dental adhesion: Present state of the art future perspectives. Quintessence Int 2002;33:213-224.
60. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Carmo ARP, Dutra HR. In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives. J Esthet Rest Dent 2002;14:31-38.
61. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001;26:302-307.
62. Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Localized three-body wear of resin composites. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch 1994;34:19-27.
63. Krejci I, Besek M, Lutz F. Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Am J Dent 1994;7:27-30.
64. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. 2-year clinical evaluation of Class I posterior composites. Am J Dent 1996;9:150-152.
65. Jung M. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments. Oper Dent 1997;22:98-104.
66. Lopes GC, Brand C, Vieira LCC. Effect of time and light intensity on microleakage of composite restorations [abstract 541]. J Dent Res 2001;80(4):1067.
67. Liebenberg WH. Successive cusp build-up: An improved placement technique for posterior direct resin restorations. J Can Dent Assoc 1996;62:501-507.
68. Liebenberg WH. Re-establishing occlusal anatomy: A new technique for direct tooth colored restorations. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1995;50:475-481.
69. Rasmusson CG, Lundin SA. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five-year results. Swed Dent J 1995;19:173-182.
70. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJ, Peters TCRB, Burgersdijk RC, Teunis M. Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive Class I resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 1996;12:230-235.
71. Ferracane JL, Condon JR, Mitchem JC. Evaluation of subsurface defects created during finishing of composites. J Dent Res 1992;71:1628-1632.
72. McKinney JE, Wu W. Relationship between subsurface damage on wear of dental restorative composites. J Dent Res 1982;61:1083-1088.
73. Ratanapridakul K, Leinfelder KF, Thomas JP. Effect of finishing on the wear rates of posterior composite resins [abstract 606]. J Dent Res 1987;6:192.
74. Braem M, Lambrechts P, van Doren V, Vanherle G. In vivo evaluation of five posterior composites: Quantitative wear measurements and clinical behavior. Dent Mater 1986;2:106-113.
75. Torres ACM, Pagani C, Araújo MAM. Surface sealant in composite resin restorations: Clinical and study models evaluation. Pós-Grad Rev Fac Odontol São José dos Campos 2000;3:108-120.