Proteolysis: Anytime, any place, anywhere?

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 731-735

  Pines, Jonathon ^a   Lindon, Catherine ^a  

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEASOME; UBIQUITIN;

ACETYLATION; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; METHYLATION; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITINATION;

ANIMALS; CELL COMPARTMENTATION; CELL CYCLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SURFACE EXTENSIONS; CELLULAR STRUCTURES; HUMANS; ORGANELLES; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE COMPLEXES;

EID: 23144439184     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb0805-731     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Hershko, A. & Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425-479 (1998).
2. Baumeister, W., Walz, J., Zuhl, F. & Seemuller, E. The proteasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell 92, 367-380 (1998).
3. Voges, D., Zwickl, P. & Baumeister, W. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 1015-1068 (1999).
4. Pickart, C. M. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 503-533 (2001).
5. Glickman, M. H. & Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 82, 373-428 (2002).
6. Passmore, L. A. & Barford, D. Getting into position: the catalytic mechanisms of protein ubiquitylation. Biochem. J. 379, 513-525 (2004).
7. Pintard, L., Willems, A. & Peter, M. Cullin-based ubiquitin ligases: Cul3-BTB complexes join the family. EMBO J. 23, 1681-1687 (2004).
8. Kile, B. T. et al. The SOCS box: a tale of destruction and degradation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 235-241 (2002).
9. Hartmann-Petersen, R., Seeger, M. & Gordon, C. Transferring substrates to the 26S proteasome. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 26-31 (2003).
10. Koegl, M. et al. A novel ubiquitination factor, E4, is involved in multiubiquitin chain assembly. Cell 96, 635-644 (1999).
11. Kleijnen, M. F. et al. The hPLIC proteins may provide a link between the ubiquitination machinery and the proteasome. Mol. Cell 6, 409-419 (2000).
12. Wilkinson, K. D. Ubiquitination and deubiquitination: targeting of proteins for degradation by the proteasome. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 141-148 (2000).
13. Peters, J. M. The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol. Cell 9, 931-943 (2002).
14. Vodermaier, H. C. APC/C and SCF: controlling each other and the cell cycle. Curr. Biol. 14, R787-R796 (2004).
15. Melchior, F. SUMO - nonclassical ubiquitin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 591-626 (2000).
16. Verma, R. et al. Proteasomal proteomics: identification of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affinity-purified proteasomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3425-3439 (2000).
17. Xie, Y. & Varshavsky, A. Physical association of ubiquitin ligases and the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2497-2502 (2000).
18. Leggett, D. S. et al. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 10, 495-507 (2002).
19. Glotzer, M., Murray, A. W. & Kirschner, M. W. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 349, 132-138 (1991).
20. Verma, R. et al. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298, 611-615 (2002).
21. Kostova, Z. & Wolf, D. H. For whom the bell tolls: protein quality control of the endoplasmic reticulum and the ubiquitin-proteasome connection. EMBO J. 22, 2309-2317 (2003).
22. Mayer, T. U., Braun, T. & Jentsch, S. Role of the proteasome in membrane extraction of a short-lived ER-transmembrane protein. EMBO J. 17, 3251-3257 (1998).
23. Lee, R. J. et al. Uncoupling retro-translocation and degradation in the ER-associated degradation of a soluble protein. EMBO J. 23, 2206-2215 (2004).
24. Swanson, R., Locher, M. & Hochstrasser, M. A conserved ubiquitin ligase of the nuclear envelope/endoplasmic reticulum that functions in both ER-associated and Matα2 repressor degradation. Genes Dev. 15, 2660-2674 (2001).
25. Blondel, M. et al. Nuclear-specific degradation of Far1 is controlled by the localization of the F-box protein Cdc4. EMBO J. 19, 6085-6097 (2000).
26. Freedman, D. A. & Levine, A. J. Nuclear export is required for degradation of endogenous p53 by MDM2 and human papillomavirus E6. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 7288-7293 (1998).
27. Yu, Z. K., Geyer, R. K. & Maki, C. G. MDM2-dependent ubiquitination of nuclear and cytoplasmic p53. Oncogene 19, 5892-5897 (2000).
28. Xirodimas, D. P., Stephen, C. W. & Lane, D. P. Cocompartmentalization of p53 and Mdm2 is a major determinant for Mdm2-mediated degradation of p53. Exp. Cell Res. 270, 66-77 (2001).
29. Li, M. et al. Mono- versus polyubiquitination: differential control of p53 fate by Mdm2. Science 302, 1972-1975 (2003).
30. Hara, T., Kamura, T., Nakayama, K., Oshikawa, K. & Hatakeyama, S. Degradation of p27(Kip1) at the G(0)-G(1) transition mediated by a Skp2-independent ubiquitination pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 48937-48943 (2001).
31. Connor, M. K. et al. CRM1/Ran-mediated nuclear export of p27(Kip1) involves a nuclear export signal and links p27 export and proteolysis. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 201-213 (2003).
32. Kamura, T. et al. Cytoplasmic ubiquitin ligase KPC regulates proteolysis of p27(Kip1) at G1 phase. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 1229-1235 (2004).
33. Carrano, A. C., Eytan, E., Hershko, A. & Pagano, M. SKP2 is required for ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 193-199 (1999).
34. Tsvetkov, L. M., Yeh, K. H., Lee, S. J., Sun, H. & Zhang, H. p27(Kip1) ubiquitination and degradation is regulated by the SCF(Skp2) complex through phosphorylated Thr187 in p27. Curr. Biol. 9, 661-664 (1999).
35. Furstenthal, L., Swanson, C., Kaiser, B. K., Eldridge, A. G. & Jackson, P. K. Triggering ubiquitination of a CDK inhibitor at origins of DNA replication. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 715-722. (2001).
36. Mendez, J. et al. Human origin recognition complex large subunit is degraded by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis after initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell 9, 481-491 (2002).
37. Lew, D. J. The morphogenesis checkpoint: how yeast cells watch their figures. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 648-653 (2003).
38. McMillan, J. N. et al. The morphogenesis checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cell cycle control of Swe1p degradation by Hsl1p and Hsl7p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6929-6939 (1999).
39. Longtine, M. S. et al. Septin-dependent assembly of a cell cycle-regulatory module in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 4049-4061 (2000).
40. Bartholomew, C. R., Woo, S. H., Chung, Y. S., Jones, C. & Hardy, C. F. Cdc5 interacts with the Wee1 kinase in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 4949-4959 (2001).
41. McMillan, J. N., Theesfeld, C. L., Harrison, J. C., Bardes, E. S. & Lew, D. J. Determinants of Swe1p degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3560-3575 (2002).
42. Musacchio, A. & Hardwick, K. G. The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 731-741 (2002).
43. Huang, J. Y. & Raff, J. W. The dynamic localisation of the Drosophila APC/C: evidence for the existence of multiple complexes that perform distinct functions and are differentially localised. J. Cell Sci. 115, 2847-2856 (2002).
44. Acquaviva, C., Herzog, F., Kraft, C. & Pines, J. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome is recruited to centromeres by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 892-898 (2004).
45. Vigneron, S. et al. Kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint proteins: who controls whom? Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 4584-4596 (2004).
46. Clute, P. & Pines, J. Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 82-87 (1999).
47. Huang, J. & Raff, J. W. The disappearance of cyclin B at the end of mitosis is regulated spatially in Drosophila cells. EMBO J. 18, 2184-2195 (1999).
48. Wakefield, J. G., Huang, J. & Raff, J. W. Centrosomes have a role in regulating the destruction of cyclin B in early Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol. 10, 1367-1370 (2000).
49. Raff, J. W., Jeffers, K. & Huang, J. Y. The roles of Fzy/Cdc20 and Fzr/Cdh1 in regulating the destruction of cyclin B in space and time. J. Cell Biol. 157, 1139-1149 (2002).
50. Mathe, E. et al. The E2-C vihar is required for the correct spatiotemporal proteolysis of cyclin B and itself undergoes cyclical degradation. Curr. Biol. 14, 1723-1733 (2004).
51. Rieder, C. L. et al. Mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells with two spindles: implications for the metaphase/anaphase transition checkpoint and cleavage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5107-5112 (1997).
52. Lindon, C. & Pines, J. Ordered proteolysis in anaphase inactivates Plk1 to contribute to proper mitotic exit in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 164, 233-241 (2004).
53. Amsterdam, A., Pitzer, F. & Baumeister, W. Changes in intracellular localization of proteasomes in immortalized ovarian granulosa cells during mitosis associated with a role in cell cycle control. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 99-103 (1993).
54. Tugendreich, S., Tomkiel, J., Earnshaw, W. & Hieter, P. CDC27Hs colocalizes with CDC16Hs to the centrosome and mitotic spindle and is essential for the metaphase to anaphase transition. Cell 81, 261-268 (1995).
55. Kraft, C. et al. Mitotic regulation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by phosphorylation. EMBO J. 22, 6598-6609 (2003).
56. Blondel, M. et al. Degradation of Hof1 by SCF(Grr1) is important for actomyosin contraction during cytokinesis in yeast. EMBO J. 24, 1440-1452 (2005).
57. Ehlers, M. D. Eppendorf 2003 prize-winning essay. Ubiquitin and the deconstruction of synapses. Science 302, 800-801 (2003).
58. Riechmann, V., Gutierrez, G. J., Filardo, P., Nebreda, A. R. & Ephrussi, A. Par-1 regulates stability of the posterior determinant Oskar by phosphorylation. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 337-342 (2002).
59. Raftopoulou, M. & Hall, A. Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. Dev. Biol. 265, 23-32 (2004).
60. Wang, H. R. et al. Regulation of cell polarity and protrusion formation by targeting RhoA for degradation. Science 302, 1775-1779 (2003).
61. Campbell, D. S. & Holt, C. E. Chemotropic responses of retinal growth cones mediated by rapid local protein synthesis and degradation. Neuron 32, 1013-1026 (2001).