On the scholarly use of electronic journals: Trends and issues from the mid 1990s

Library and Information Science

Volumn , Issue 51, 2004, Pages 17-39

  Mine, Shinji ^a  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21144431850     PISSN: 03734447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Kling, Rob; Callahan, Ewa. Electronic journals, the internet, and scholarly communication. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. vol. 37, 2003, p. 127-177.
2. Tenopir, Carol; King, Donald W. Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers. Washington, D.C., Special Libraries Association, 2000, 488 p.
3. Tenopir, Carol. Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources; An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. 〈http://www.clir.org/ pubs/reports/pub120/pub120.pdf〉 [2004/10/26]
4. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. The Implications of Information Technology for Scientific Journal Publishing: A Literature Review. NSF 03-323, Science Applications International Corporation, 2003.
5. Pullinger, David; Baldwin, Christine. Electronic Journals and User Behaviour: Learning for the Future from the Super Journal Project. Cambridge, Deedot Press, 2002, 145 p.
6. Friedlander, Arny. Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information Environment Introduction to a Data Set. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources. 〈http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub110/contents. html〉 [2004/10/26]
7. E-Journal User Study Report of First Survey Mar. 02. 〈http://ejust. stanford.edu/findings/ survey1.pdf) [2004/10/26]
8. E-Journal User Study Report of the Second Survey: The Feature User Survey Nov. 02. 〈http://ejust.stanford.edu/findings2/report_survey2.pdf〉 [2004/10/26]
9. E-Journal User Study Report of the Third (Follow-Up) Survey Nov. 02. 〈http://ejust.stanford.edu/findings3/report_survey3.html〉 [2004/10/26]
10. E-journal Usage and Scholarly Practice an Ethnographic Perspective on the Role and Impact of E-journal Usage Among Users of Biomedical Literature. 〈http://ejust.stanford.edu/findings/fullcover_0801.pdf〉 [2003/10/26]
11. Sanville, T. J. "Changing patterns of E-journal use at OhioLINK. Making waves: New serials landscapes in a sea of change". In Joseph C. Harmon and P. Michelle Fiander, eds. Proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group, Inc., in San Diego, California, June 22-25. New York, Haworth Information Press, 2000, p. 129-155.
12. Cook, C.; F. Heath. Users' perceptions of library service quality: A 'LibQUAL + TM' qualitative study. Library Trends, vol. 49, no. 4, 2001, p. 548-584.
13. Schonfeld, Roger C. JSTOR: A history. New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 2003, 412 p.
14. Mahe, Annaig; Andrys, Christine; Chartron, Ghislaine. How French research scientists are making use of electronic journals: A Case study conducted at Pierre et Marie Curie University and Denis Didrot University. Journal of Information Science. vol. 26, no. 5, 2000, p. 291-302.
15. Mahe, Annaig. Beyond usage: Understanding the use of electronic journals on the basis of information activity analysis. Information Research. vol. 9, no. 4, 2004. 〈http://informationr.net/ir/9-4/paper186.html〉 [2004/10/25]
16. Oh, Kyung-Mook; Meadows, Jack. Use of communication technologies in South Korean universities. Journal of Information Science, vol. 24, no. 1, 1998, p. 33-38.
17. Uddin, Mohammad Nasir. Internet use by university academics: A bipartite study of information and communication needs. Online Information Review. vol. 27, no. 4, 2003, p. 225-237.
18. Costa, Sely; Meadows, Jack. The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists. Journal of Information Science. vol. 26, no. 4, 2000, p. 255-262.
19. Ehikhamenor, Fabian A. Internet resource and productivity in scientific research in Nigerian universities. Journal of Information Science. vol.29, no.2, 2003, p. 107-116.
20. Bar-Ilan, Judit; Peritz, Bluma C.; Wolman, Yecheskel. A survey of the use of electronic databases and electronic journals accessed through the Web by the academic staff of Israeli universities. Journal of Academic Librarianship. vol. 29, no. 6, 2003, p. 346-361.
21. Ibrahim, Ahmed Elhafiz. Use and user perception of electronic resources in the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU). Libri. vol. 54, 2004, p. 18-29.
22. Budd, John M.; Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. University faculty and networked information: Results of a survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 48, no. 9, 1997, p. 843-852.
23. Tomney, Hilary; Burton, Paul F. Electronic journals: A study of usage and attitudes among academics. Journal of Information Science. vol. 24, no. 6, 1998, p. 419-429.
24. Voorbij, Henk, J. Searching scientific information on the internet: A Dutch academic user survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. vol. 50, no.7, 1999, p. 596-615.
25. Lenares, Deborah. "Faculty use of electronic journals at research institutions: Racing toward tomorrow". Proceedings of the 9th National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries. 1999, pp. 329-334. Hugh A. Thompson, ed. Chicago, Ill.: Association of College and Research Libraries.
26. Tenner, Elka and Zheng Ye (Lan) Yang. End-user acceptance of electronic journals: A case study from a major academic research library. Technical Services Quarterly. vol. 17, no. 2, 1999, p. 1-11.
27. Rogers, Sally A. Electronic journal usage at Ohio State University. College & Research Libraries. vol. 62, no. 1, 2000, p. 25-34.
28. Speier, Cheri; Palmer, Jonathan; Wren, Daniel; Hahn, Susan. Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication: A question of prestige and legitimacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 50, no. 6, 1999, p. 537-543.
29. Pedersen, Sarah; Stockdale, Rosemary. What do the readers think?: A look at how scientific journal users see the electronic environment. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, vol. 31, no. 1, 1999, p. 42-52.
30. Brown, Cecelia M. Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. vol.50, no. 10, 1999, p. 929-943.
31. Hewitson, Andrew. Use and awareness of electronic information services by academic staff at Leeds Metropolitan University: A qualitative study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, vol. 34, no. 1, 2002, p. 43-52.
32. Talja, Sanna; Maula, Hanni. Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and database: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines. Journal of Documentation. vol. 59, no. 6, 2003, p. 673-691.
33. Wolf, Martin. Electronic journals: Use, evaluation and policy. Information Services & Use. vol. 21, no. 3-4, 2001, p. 249-261.
34. Dillon, Irma F.; Hahn, Karla L. Are researchers ready for the electronic-only journal collection?: Results of a survey at the University of Maryland.? Portal: Libraries and the Academy, vol. 2, no. 3, 2002, p. 375-390.
35. Cochenour, Donnice; Moothart, Tom. E-journal acceptance at Colorado State University: A case study. Serials Review. vol. 29, no. 1, 2003, p. 16-25.
36. Smith, Erin T. Changes in faculty reading behaviors: The impact of electronic journals on the University of Georgia. Journal of Academic Librarianship. vol. 29, no. 3, 2003, p. 162-168.
37. Marcum, Deanna B.; George, Gerald. Who uses what?: Report on a national survey of information users in colleges and universities. D-Lib Magazine. vol. 9, no. 10, 2003. 〈http://www.dlib.org/dlib/October03/george/10george- html〉 [2004/10/26]
38. Sathe, Nila A.; Grady, Jennifer L.; Giuse, Nunzia B. Print versus electronic journals: A preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. Journal of the Medical Library Association. vol. 90, no. 2, 2002, p. 235-243.
39. Tenopir, Carol; King, Donald W.; Boyce, Peter; Grayson, Matt; Paulson, Keri-Lynn. Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. (in press).
40. Entlich, Richard; Garson, Lorrin; Lesk, Michael; Normore, Lorraine; Olsen, Jan; Weibel, Stuart. Testing a digital library: User response to the CORE Project. Library Hi Tech. vol.14, no. 4, 1996, p. 99-118.
41. Stewart, Linda. User acceptance of electronic journals: Interviews with chemists at Cornell University. College & Research Libraries. vol. 57, no. 4, 1996, p. 339-349.
42. Woodward, Hazel; Rowland, Fytton; McKnight, Cliff; Meadows, Jack; Pritchett, Carolyn. Electronic journals: Myths and realities. Library Management. vol. 18, no. 3, 1997, p. 155-162.
43. King, Donald W.; Montgomery, Carol Hansen. After migration to an electronic journal collection: Impact on faculty and doctoral students. D-Lib Magazine, vol. 8, no. 12, 2002. 〈http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december02/king/ 12king.html〉 [2004/10/26]
44. Cherry, Joan M.; Duff, Wendy M. Studying digital library users over time: A follow survey of early Canadian Online. Information Research. vol. 7, no. 2, 2002. 〈http://www.informationr.net/ir/7-2/paper123.html〉 [2004/10/26]
45. Duff, Wendy M.; Cherry, Joan M. Use of historical documents in a digital world: Comparisons with original materials and microfiche. Information Research. vol. 6, no. 1, 2001. 〈http://informationr.net/ir/6-1/paper86.html〉 [2004/10/26]
46. E-Journal User Study Report of Web Log Data Mining Dec. 02. 〈http://ejust.stanford.edu/logdata.pdf〉 [2004/10/26]
47. Davis, Philip M.; Solla, Leah R. An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. vol. 54, no. 11, 2003, p. 1062-1068.
48. Guthrie, Kevin M. Lessons from JSTOR: User behavior and faculty attitudes. Journal of Library Administration. vol. 36, no. 3, 2002, p. 109-120.
49. King, Donald W.; Tenopir, Carol; Montgomery, Carol Hansen; Aerni, Sarah E. Patterns of journal use by faculty at three diverse universities. D-Lib Magazine. vol. 9, no. 10, 2003. 〈http://wwwdlib.org/dlib/october03/king/ 10king.html〉 [2004/10/26]
50. Dilevko, Juris; Gottlieb, Lisa. Print sources in the electronic age: A vital part of the research process for undergraduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship. vol. 28, no. 6, 2002, p. 381-392.
51. Worlock, Kate. Electronic journals: User realities: The truth about content usage among the STM community. Learned Publishing. vol. 15, no. 3, 2002, p. 223-226.
52. Roes, Hans. Promotion of Electronic Journals to Users by Libraries: A Case Study of Tilburg University Library. 〈http://drcwww.kub.nlroes/ articles/london99.htm〉 [2004/10/26]
53. Tenopir, Carol; King, Donald W.; Boyce, Peter; Grayson, Matt.; Zhang, Yan.; Ebuen, Mercy. Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine. vol. 9, no. 5, 2003. 〈http://www.dlib. org/dlib/may03/king/05king.html〉 [2004/10/26]
54. Swan, Alma; Brown, Sheridan. The ALPSP Research Study on Authors' and Readers' Views of Electronic Research Communication. London, Key Perspectives Ltd, 2002, 36 p.
55. Manuel, Kate. The place of e-prints in the publication patterns of physical scientists. Science & Technology Libraries, vol. 20, no. 1, 2001, p. 59-85.
56. Brown, Cecelia M. The role of electronic preprint in chemical communication: Analysis of citation, usage, and acceptance in the journal literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 54, no. 5, 2003, p. 362-371.
57. DeGroote, Sandra L.; Dorsch, Josephine L. Online journals: Impact on print journal usage. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, vol. 89, no. 4, 2001, p. 372-378.
58. _. Gadd, Elizabeth; Oppenheim, Charles; Probets, Steve. RoMEO Studies 2: How academics wish to protect their open-access research paper. Journal of Information Science. vol. 29, no. 5, 2003, p. 333-356.
59. Gadd, Elizabeth; Oppenheim, Charles; Probets, Steve, RoMEO Studies 3: How academics expect to use open-access research papers. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, vol. 35, no. 3, 2003, p. 171-187.
60. Kidd, Tony. Electronic journal usage statistics in practice. Serials, vol. 15, no, 1, 2002, p. 11-17.
61. Rowley, Jenny. JISC user behaviour monitoring and evaluation framework. Ariadne. vol. 30, 2001. 〈http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue30/jisc/intro. html〉 [2004/10/26]
62. Walsh, John P.; Kucker, Stephanie; Maloney, Nancy G.; Gabbay, Shaul. Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. vol. 51, no. 14, 2000, p. 1295-1305.
63. Lawal, Ibironke. Scholarly communication: The use and non-use of E-print archives for the dissemination of scientific information. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship. no. 36, 2002. 〈http://www.istl.org/02-fall/ article3.html〉 [2004/10/26]
64. Hahn, Susan E.; Speier, Cheri; Palmer, Jonathan; Wren, Daniel. Advantages and disadvantages of electronic journals: Business school faculty views. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship. vol.5, no. 1, 1999, p. 19-31.
65. Antoir, Anat. Electronic journals in small libraries source. One-person Library. vol. 18, no. 1, 2001, p. 7-8.
66. Palmer, Janet P.; Sandier, Mark. What Do Faculty Want?. Netconnect. Winter, 2003, p. 26-28.
67. Brockman, William. S.; Neumann, Laura; Palmer, Carole L.; Tidline, Tonyia J. Scholarly Work in the Humanities and the Evolving Information Environment. 〈http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/publ04abst.html〉 [2004/10/26]
68. Davis, Philip M. Patterns in electronic journal usage: Challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College and Research Libraries. vol. 63, no. 6, 2002, p. 484-497.
69. Hiller, Steve. How Different are they?: A comparison by academic area of library use. priorities, and information needs at the University of Washington. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. no. 33, 2002. 〈http://www.istl.org/02-winter/article1.html〉 [2004/10/26]
70. Ke, Hao-Ren; Kwakkelaar, Rolf; Tai, Yu-Min; Chen, Li-Chun. Exploring behavior of E-journal users in science and technology: Transaction log analysis of Elsevier's Science Direct Onsite in Taiwan. Library and Information Science Research. Vol. 24, no. 3, 2002, p. 265-291.
71. Tenopir, Carol; Read, Eleanor. Patterns of database use in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries. vol. 61, no. 3, 2000, p. 234-246.
72. Tenopir, Carol; Read, Eleanor. Patterns of database use in public libraries. Reference and User Services Quarterly. vol. 40, no. 1, 2000, p. 39-52.
73. Boyce, Peter B. Use of Astronomy's Info System: The Highly Productive User. 〈http:// digital.casalini.it/retreat/2003docs/Boyce.pdf〉 [2004/10/26]
74. Butler, H. Julene. Where does scholarly electronic publishing get you?. Journal of Scholarly Publishing. vol. 26, no. 4, 1995, p. 174-186.
75. Kling, Rob; Lisa Covi. Electronic journals and legitimate media in the systems of scholarly communication. Information Society, vol. 11, no. 4, 1995, p. 261-271.
76. Harter, Stephen P. Scholarly communication and electronic journals: An impact study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. vol. 49, no. 6, 1998, p. 507-516.
77. Zhang, Yin. The impact of internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science: A citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, vol. 24, no. 4, 1998, p. 241-254.
78. Zhang, Yin. Scholarly use of internet-based electronic resources. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 8, 2001, p. 628-654.
79. Nelson, Dianne. The uptake of electronic journals by academic in the UK, their attitudes towards them and their potential impact on scholarly communication. Information Service & Use. vol. 21, no. 3/4, 2001, p. 205-214.
80. Liew, Chern Li; Foo, Schubert; Chennupati, K. R. A study of graduate student end-users' use and perception of electronic journals. Online Information Review, vol. 24, no. 4, 2000, p. 302-315.
81. Woodward, Hazel; Rowland, Fytton; McKnight, Cliff; Pritchett, Carolyn; Meadows, Jack. Cafe Jus: An electronic journals user survey. Journal of Digital Information, vol. 1, no. 3. 〈http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v01/i03/ Woodward/〉 [2004/10/26]
82. Rusch-Feja, Diann; Siebeky, Uta. Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals: Results of an electronic survey of Max Planck Society researchers including usage statistics from Elsevier, Springer and Academic Press. D-Lib Magazine. vol.5, no. 10, 1999. 〈http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-summary.html〉 [2004/10/26]
83. Maughan, Patricia Davitt. Library resources and services: A cross-disciplinary survey of faculty and graduate student use and satisfaction. Journal of Academic Librarianship. vol. 25, no. 5, 1999, p. 354-366.
84. Nicolaides, Fraser. Decomate-II; Developing the European Digital Library for Economics: User Studies: Final Report. 〈http://www.bib.uab.es/project/ eng/d82.pdf〉 [2004/10/26]
85. Chu, Heting. "Electronic journals in american academic libraries: A view from within". Proceedings of the International Conference on New Missions of Academic Libraries in the 21st Century. 〈http://www.lib.pku. edu.cn/98conf/paper/c/Heting_Chu.htm〉 [2004/10/ 26]
86. Bishop, Ann Peterson. "Making digital libraries go: Comparing use across genres". In 4th ACM Conference On Digital Libraries. 1999, p. 94-103.
87. TULIP: Final Report Elsevier Science. 〈http://www-elsevier.nl/ homepage/about/resproj/trmenu.htm〉 [2004/10/26].
88. Quigley, Jane; Peck, David R.; Rutter, Sara; Williams, Elizabeth McKee. Making choices: Factors in the selection of information resources among science faculty at the University of Michigan: Results of a survey conducted July-September, 2000. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. no. 34, 2002. 〈http://www.istl.org/02spring/refereed.html〉 [2004/10/26]
89. Costa, Sely. "Changes in the information dissemination process within the scholarly world: The impact of electronic publishing on scholarly communities of academic social scientists". Washington, D.C., ICCC Press, Electronic Publishing in the Third Millennium, 2000, p. 16-29.
90. Rowlands, Ian; Nicholas, Dave; Huntingdon, Paul. Scholarly communication in the digital environment: What do authors want?. Learned Publishing. vol. 17, no. 4, 2004, p. 261-273.
91. Key Perspectives Ltd. JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey Report 〈http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISCOAreport1.pdf〉 [2004/10/26]
92. Study Will Help Explain How People Use Electronic Information Resources. 〈http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/elecreso.htm〉 [2004/10/26]
93. Fry, Jenny; Talja, Sanna. "The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining E-journal use within and across academic fields". In: ASIST 2004: Proceedings of the 67 th ASIST Annual Meeting, vol. 41, Medford, NJ, Information Today, 2004, p. 1-11.
94. Fidel, Raya; Green, Maurice. The many faces of accessibility: Engineers' perception of information sources. Information Processing and Management. vol. 40, no. 3, 2004, p. 563-581.
95. Fidel, Raya.; Pejtersen, Annelise Mark.; Cleal, Bryan.; Bruce, Harry. A multidimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction: A case study of collaborative information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. vol. 55, no. 11, 2004, p. 939-953.
96. Fidel, Raya: Pejtersen, Annelise Mark. From information behaviour research to the design of information systems: The cognitive work analysis framework. Information Research. vol. 10, no. 1, 2004. 〈http:// informationr.net/ir/10-1/paper210.html〉 [2004/10/26]