The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 41, Issue , 2004, Pages 20-30

  Fry, Jenny ^a   Talja, Sanna ^b  

^a Networked Research and Digital Information   (Netherlands)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247390702     PISSN: 15508390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450410103     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Barry, C. (1995). Critical issues in evaluating the impact of IT on information activity in academic research: Developing a qualitative research solution. Library & Information Science Research, 17, 107-134.
2. Bates, M. J. (2002). Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution. In Bruce, H., R. Fidel, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.) Emerging Frameworks and Methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS 4), July 21-25, Seattle, WA. Libraries Unlimited, Greenwood Village, 137-149.
3. nd ed.) Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.
4. Blake, C., & Pratt, W. (2002). Collaborative information synthesis. In Toms, E.G. (Ed.) ASIST 2002: Proceedings of the 65th ASIST Annual Meeting. Medford, NJ:Information Today.
5. Brockman, W. S., Neumann, L., Palmer, C. L. & Tidline, T. J. (2001). Scholarly Work in the Humanities and the Evolving Information Environment. Retrieved 14 January, 2002, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub104/ contents.html.
6. Brown, C. M. (1999). Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 929-943.
7. Covi, L. M. (1999). Material mastery: Situating digital library use in university research practices. Information Processing & Management, 35, 293-316.
8. Curtis, K.L., Weller, A.C., & Hurd, J. (1997). Information-seeking behavior of health sciences faculty: The impact of new information technologies. Bulletin of Medical Library Association, 85, 402-408.
9. Eason, K., Richardson, S., & Yu, L. (2000). Patterns of use of electronic journals. Journal of Documentation, 49, 356-369.
10. Fry, J. (2003). The cultural shaping of scholarly communication within academic specialisms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Brighton.
11. Hjoørland, B. (2000). Documents, memory institutions and information science. Journal of Documentation, 56, 27-41.
12. Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 257-270.
13. Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 400-425.
14. Kling, R., & Covi, L. (1997). Digital libraries and the Practices of Scholarly Communication: Report of a Project. Retrieved 13 September, 2000 from http://www.slisl.indiana.edu/kling/SCIT/SCIT97.htm.
15. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1306-1320.
16. Kling, R., Spector, L., & McKim, G. (2002). Locally controlled scholarly publishing via the Internet: The Guild Model. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 8(1). Available at: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/08-01/ kling.html
17. Knorr Cetina, K.D. (2000) (2nd ed.). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. London: Harvard University Press.
18. Mahe, A., Andrys, C., & Chartron, G. (2000). How French research scientists are making use of electronic journals: A case study conducted at Pierre et Marie Curie University and Denis Diderot University. Journal of Information Science, 26, 291-302.
19. Mote, L.J.B. (1962). Reasons for the variation of information needs of scientists. Journal of Documentation, 18, 169-175.
20. Packer, K. H., & Soergel, D. (1979). The importance of SDI for current awareness in fields with severe scatter of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30, 125-135.
21. Palmer, C. L. (1999). Aligning studies of information seeking and use with domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1139-1140.
22. Palmer, C.L., & Neumann, L.J. (2002). The information work of interdisciplinary humanities scholars: Exploration and translation. Library Quarterly, 72, 85-117.
23. Pullinger, D. (1999). Academics and the new information environment: The impact of local factors on the use of e-journals. Journal of Information Science, 25, 164-172.
24. Talja, S. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3, 143-160.
25. Talja, S., & Maula, H. (2003). Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines. Journal of Documentation, 59, 673-691.
26. Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved January 1, 2004, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub120abst.html.
27. Tenopir, C., & King, D.W. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Washington, D.C.: Special Libraries Association.
28. Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Boyce, P., Grayson, M., & Paulson, K-L. (2003a). Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers. Retrieved January 1, 2004, http://web.utk.edu/~tenopir/eprints/index.html.
29. Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Boyce, P., Grayson, M., Zhang, Y., & Ebuen, M. (2003b). Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (5). Retrieved 7 January, 2004 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may03/king/05king.html.
30. Tenopir, C., King, D.W., & Bush, A. (2003c). Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: Changes over time and comparison with other scientists. Retrieved January 1, 2004 from http://web.utk.edu/~tenopir/eprints/ index.html.
31. Tomney, H., & Burton, P. (1998). Electronic journals: A study of usage and attitudes among academics. Journal of Information Science, 24, 419-429.
32. Tuominen, K., Talja, S., & Savolainen, R. (2003). Multiperspective digital libraries: The implications of constructionism for the development of digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 561-569.
33. nd ed.) The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
34. Zhang, Yin (2001). Scholarly use of Internet-based electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 628-654.