The place of e-prints in the publication patterns of physical scientists

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 59-85

  Manuel, Kate ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E prints; Electronic publishing; Preprints; Scholarly publishing; Scientific communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035737353     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J122v20n01_04     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Artus, H. 1994. Grey literature and the author/respondent relationship. In Conference proceedings. First International Conference on Grey Literature. Amsterdam: TransAtlantic | GreyNet.
2. Auger, C. P. 2000. Information sources in grey literature. London: Bowker-Saur.
3. Bachrach, Steven. 2000. Posting to CHMINF-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU on 24 August.
4. Bahr, Alice Harrison, and Mickey Zemon. 2000. Collaborative authorship in the journal literature: Perspectives for academic librarians who wish to publish. College and Research Libraries 61, no. 5 (September): 410-419.
5. Bederson, Ben. 1994. Introduction to the APS E-Print Workshop. Available at http:// publish.aps.org/EPRINT/KATHD/bederson.html.
6. Berrie, Morris S. 2000. Posting to CHMINF-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU on 3 April.
7. Blume, Harvey. 2000. Open science online. The American Prospect 11, no. 10. Available at http://www.americanprospect.com/archives/V11-10/blume-h.html.
8. Boyce, Peter S. 2000. For better or worse: Preprint servers are here to stay. College and Research Libraries News 61, no. 5 (May): 404-407, 414.
9. Bradley, David. 1999. E-publish and don't be damned. The Alchemist, 14 June. Available at http://chemweb.com/alchem/1999/news/nw_990614_epub.html.
10. Braun, Tibor, Wolfgang Glanzel, and Andras Schubert. 1985. Scientometric indicators: A 32-country comparative evaluation of publishing performance and citation impact. Philadelphia: World Scientific.
11. Brent, Doug. 1995. Stevan Harnad's 'Subversive Proposal': Kick-starting electronic scholarship - a summary and analysis. The Information Society 11, no. 4: 275-283.
12. Burke, Marianne. 2000. PubMed Central: Be careful what you ask for. College and Research Libraries News 61, no. 1 (January): 21-23.
13. Carroll, Bonnie C., and Gladys A. Cotter. 1994. A new generation of grey literature: The impact of advanced information technologies. In Conference proceedings, First International Conference on Grey Literature. Amsterdam: TransAtlantic | GreyNet.
14. Crane, Diane. 1972. Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Crawford, Susan Y., Julie M. Hurd, and Ann C. Weller. 1996. From print to electronic: The transformation of scientific communication. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
16. Dallman, D., M. Draper, and S. Schwarz. 1994. Electronic pre-publishing for worldwide access: The case of high energy physics. Interlending & Document Supply 22, no. 2: 3-7.
17. Dore, Jean-Christopher, Tiiu Ojasoo, Yoshiko Okubo, Thomas Durand, Gerard Dudognon, and Jean-Francois Miquel. 1996. Correspondence factor analysis of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981-1992. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47, no. 8: 588-602.
18. Doty, Philip, Ann P. Bishop, and Charles R. McClure. 1991. Scientific norms and the use of electronic research networks. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 28: 24-38.
19. Dow, Ronald F. 2000. Editorial gatekeepers confronted by the electronic journal. College and Research Libraries 61, no. 2 (March): 146-154.
20. Doyle, Mark. 2000. Posting to SLAPAM-L@lists.yale.edu on 23 March.
21. Edge, David. 1979. Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science 17: 102-134.
22. Eysenbach, Gunther. 2000. The impact of preprint servers and electronic publishing on biomedical research. Current Opinion in Immunology 12, no. 5: 499-503.
23. Garfield, Eugene. 1979. Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
24. Ginsparg, Paul. 1994. First steps toward electronic research communication. Computers in Physics 8, no. 4 (July/August): 390-396.
25. _. 1997. Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian 30, no. 3/4: 83-95.
26. Ginsparg, Paul, Joe Halpern, Carl Lagoze, Stevan Harnad, Wendy Hall, and Les Carr. 2000. Integrating and navigating e-print archives through citation-linking. Available at http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/citation.html.
27. Gould, Constance G., and Karla Pierce. 1991. Information needs in the sciences: An assessment. Mountain View, CA: The Research Libraries Group.
28. Griffith, Belver C. 1990. Understanding science: Studies of information and communication. In Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park: Sage.
29. Guterman, Lila. 2000. As experts call for a chemistry preprint server, Elsevier unveils its own. The Chronicle of Higher Education [Online], 22 August. Available at http://chronicle.com/free/2000/08/2000082201t.htm.
30. Halpern, Joseph Y. 2000. CoRR: A computing research repository. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation 24, no. 2 (May): 41-48.
31. Hanish, Bob. 1994. Panel discussion: Current thinking. Available at http.//publish. aps.org/EPRINT/KATHD/hanisch.html.
32. Harnad, Stevan. 1993. Implementing peer review on the net: Scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals. In Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference on Refereed Electronic Journals. Winnipeg, Canada: The University of Manitoba Libraries and The University of Manitoba.
33. _. 1995. Electronic scholarly publication: Quo vadis? Serials Review 21, no. 1 (Spring): 78-80.
34. _. 1995. The postGutenberg galaxy: How to get there from here. The Information Society 11, no. 4: 285-291.
35. _. 1997. How to fast-forward learned serials to the inevitable and the optimal for scholars and scientists. The Serials Librarian 30, no. 3/4: 73-81.
36. _. 1999. Free at last: The future of peer-reviewed journals. D-Lib Magazine 5, no. 12 (December). Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad. html.
37. Harter, Stephen P. and Taemin Kim Park. 2000. Impact of prior electronic publication on manuscript consideration policies of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, no. 10: 940-948.
38. Holtkamp, Annette. 1994. Panel discussion: Current thinking. Available at http://publish. aps.org/EPRINT/KATHD/holtkamp.html.
39. Kelly, Julia Ann. 1998. Scientific meeting abstracts: Significance, access, and trends. Bulletin of the Medical Library Research Association 86, no. 1 (January): 68-76.
40. King, Bert TePaske. 1994. Panel discussion: Tracking of papers. Available at http:// publish.aps.org/EPRINT/KATHD/bert.html.
41. Kinne, Otto. 1999. Electronic publishing in science: Changes and risks. The Australian Library Journal 48, no. 4 (November): 311-318.
42. Kreitz, P.A., L. Addis, H. Galic, and T. Johnson. 1997. The virtual library in action: Collaborative international control of high-energy physics pre-prints. Publishing Research Quarterly 13, no. 2 (Summer): 24-33.
43. Langer, James. 2000. Physicists in the new era of electronic publishing. Physics Today Online 53, no. 8. Available at wysiwyg://295/http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-53/iss-8/ p35.html.
44. Lim, Edward. 1996. Preprint servers: A new model for scholarly publishing? Australian Academic & Research Libraries 27, no. 1 (1996): 21-30.
45. Luce, Richard E. 2000. The Open Archives Initiative: Forging a path toward author self-archiving systems. College and Research Libraries News 61, no. 3 (March): 184-186, 202.
46. Luzi, Daniela. 1998. E-print archives: A new communication pattern for grey literature. Interlending & Document Supply 26, no. 3: 130-139.
47. McGinty, Stephen. 1999. Gatekeepers of knowledge: Journal editors in the sciences and the social sciences. Westport, CT: Bergen & Garvey.
48. Meadows, A. J. 1998. Communicating research. San Diego: Academic Press.
49. Menzel, Herbert. 1966. Information needs and uses in science and technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 1: 41-69.
50. National Research Council. 1997. Bits of power. Issues in global access to scientific data. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
51. Odlyzko, Andrew. 1999. The economics of electronic journals. In Technology and scholarly communication. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52. Paisley, William. 1989. Bibliometrics, scholarly communication, and communication research. Communication Research 16, no. 5 (October): 701-717.
53. Perry, Jason K. 2000. Posting to CHMINFL@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU on 26 August.
54. Peskin, Michael E. 1994. Reorganisation of the APS journal for the era of electronic communication. 12 September. Available at http://aps.org/EPRINT/papers.html.
55. Pfander, Jeanne, and Jim Martin. 1999. SPARC 1999: Crafting new models of scholarly communication. College and Research Libraries News 61, no. 1 (January): 26-27.
56. Pikowsky, Robert A. 1997. Electronic journals as a potential solution to escalating serials costs. The Serials Librarian 32, no. 3/4: 31-55.
57. Posnett, N.W., and W.J. Baulkwill. 1982. Working with non-conventional literature. Journal of Information Science 5: 121-130.
58. Qin, Jian, F.W. Lancaster, and Bryce Allen. 1997. Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48, no. 10: 893-916.
59. Quinn, Frank. 1995. Roadkill on the electronic highway? The threat to mathematical literature. Publishing Research Quarterly 11, no. 2 (Summer): 20-28.
60. Resh, Vincent. 1998. Science and communication: An author/editor/user's perspective on the transition from paper to electronic publishing. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship (Summer). Available at http://www.library.ucsb.edn/istl/ 98-summer/ article3.html.
61. Rzepa, Henry. 1996. Chemistry and the World Wide Web. In The Internet: A guide for chemists. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
62. Singleton, Alan. 1997. Journals and the electronic programme of the Institute of Physics. The Serials Librarian 30, no. 3/4: 149-161.
63. Stankus, Tony. 1992. Making sense of journals in the physicals sciences, from specialty origins to contemporary assortment. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
64. _. 1999. A review of the print journal system in the sciences, with prospects for improvement in deficiencies and costs through electronic publishing: Practices and attitudes of publishers and printers, librarians, and scientific authors. Science & Technology Libraries 18, no. 2/3: 21-41.
65. Tomaiuolo, Nicholas G., and Joan G. Packer. 2000. Preprint servers: Pushing the envelope of electronic scholarly publishing. Searcher 8, no. 9 (1 October): 53-60.
66. Valauskas, Edward J. 1998. Electronic journals and their roles on the Internet. In E-Serials: Publishers, libraries, users, and standards. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
67. Van de Sompel, Herbert, and Carl Lagoze. 2000. The Santa Fe Convention of the Open Archives Initiative. D-Lib Magazine 6, no. 2 (February). Available at http://www. dlib.org/dlib/february2000/vandesompel-oai/02vandesompel-oai.html.
68. Walsh, John P., and Todd Bayma. 1996. The virtual college: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. The Information Society 12, no. 4: 343-363.
69. Web Server Statistics. 2000. Available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/show_stats.
70. Youngen, Gregory. 1998. Citation patterns to traditional and electronic preprints in the published literature. College and Research Libraries 59, no. 5 (September): 448-456.
71. Youngen, Ralph. 1996. Resources for mathematicians: The evolution of e-MATH. The Serials Librarian 28, no. 1/2: 129-134.