RoMEO Studies 3: How academics expect to use openaccess research papers

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 171-187

  Gadd, Elizabeth ^a   Oppenheim, Charles ^a   Probets, Steve ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Loughborough University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141815487     PISSN: 09610006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0961000603353005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Brown, C.M. (1999) Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (10), 929-943
2. Carr, L. et al. (2000). A usage-based analysis of CoRR: a commentary on 'CoRR: a Computing Research Repository' by Joseph Y. Holpern. [Self-archived] Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://cosprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ archive/00001645/00/harnad00.halpern.htm
3. Cowhig, J. (2001) Electronic article' and journal usage statistics (EAJUS): proposal for an industry-wide standard. Learned Publishing, 14 (3), 233-236
4. Eason, K., Richardson, Sue and Yu, Liangzhi (2000) Patterns of use of electronic journals. Journal of Documentation, 56 (5), 477-504
5. Eason, K. and Harker, Susan (2000) Psychological processes in the use of electronic journals. Serials, 13 (2), 67-72
6. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, Charles and Probets, Steve (2003a) RoMEO Studies 1: The impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation, 59 (3), 243-277
7. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, Charles and Probets, Steve (2003b) RoMEO Studies 2: How academics want to protect their open-access research papers. Journal of Information Science, 29 (5) [In press]
8. Great Britain (1988) Copyright, designs and patents Act 1988, Elizabeth II. London: HMSO
9. Gutwirth, S. (2002) Privacy and the information age. Lanham, Md, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield
10. Harnad, S. (2001) For whom the gate tolls? How and why to free the refereed research literature online through author/institution self-archiving, now. Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://cogprints.soton. ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/39/ index.html
11. Hunt, C. (2002) Archive user survey. Southampton: Electronics and Computer Science Department, Southampton University. Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://www.eprints.org/results/
12. ICOLC (2001) Guidelines for statistical measures of usage of web-based indexed, abstracted and full-text resources. Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://www. library.yale.edu/consortia/2001webstats.htm
13. Kidd, T. (2002) Electronic journal usage statistics in practice. Serials, 15 (1), 11-17
14. Lessig, L. (2002). Free culture. Keynote paper presented at the Open Source Convention, 22-26 July, 2002, San Diego, CA. Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://www. oreillynet.com/pub/a/policy/2002/08/15/ lessig.html
15. Luther, J. (2000) White Paper on electronic journal usage statistics. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub94/ contents.html
16. Meek, J. (2002) Nobel Prize for British and US scientists who used worms to decode the book of life. The Guardian, 8 October. Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/ 0,3858/4517292,00.html
17. Nicholas, D. and Huntington, P. (2002) Big deals: results and analysis from a pilot analysis of web log data. London: Ciber
18. Open Digital Rights Language (2002) Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://odrl.net/
19. Olsen, J. (1994) Electronic journal literature: implications for scholars. London: Mecklermedia
20. Pinfield, S. (2001) How do physicists use an e-print archive? Implications for institutional e-print services. D-Lib Magazine, 7 (12). Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december01/ pinfield/12pinfield.html
21. Project COUNTER (2003) Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://www.projectcounter.org/
22. Richardson, R.J. (1981) End-user online searching in a high-technology environment. Online, 54, 44-57
23. Schauder, D. (1994) Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communications industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45 (2), 73-100
24. Shackel, B. (1991) BLEND-9: overview and appraisal. British Library Research Paper 82. London: British Library Research and Development Department
25. Simpson, A. (1988) Academic journal usage. British Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3 (1), 25-36
26. Sturges, P. (2002) Privacy in the digital library environment. Boston Spa: Resource
27. SuperJournal Project (1999) Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://www.mimas.ac.uk/sj/
28. Swan, A. (2002) Authors and electronic publishing: the ALPSP research study on authors' and readers' views of electronic research communication. West Sussex: ALPSP.
29. Tenopir, C. and King, Donald W. (2002) Reading behaviour and electronic journals. Learned Publishing, 15 (4), 259-265
30. Tenopir, C. and King, Donald W. (2001) Electronic journals: how user behavior is changing. In Proceedings of Online Information 2001, London, 4-6 December, ed. C. Graham, pp. 175-182. Oxford: Learned Information Europe
31. Tenopir, C. and King, Donald W. (2000) Towards electronic journals: realities for scientists, librarians and publishers. Washington: Special Libraries Association
32. Torii (2003) Access the digital research community. Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://tips.sissa.it/docs/ booklet.pdf
33. Tuck, B. et al. (1990) Project Quartet. Library and Information Research Report 76. London: British Library
34. Virtual Research Environment Project (2003) Retrieved 9 June 2003 at http://www.external.ull.ac.uk/elpt/ VRE_Project/index.asp
35. Woodward, H. et al. (1997) Café Jus: commercial and free electronic journals user study. Research and Innovation Report. London: British Library, 1-52
36. Yu, L. and Apps, Ann (2000) Studying e-journal user behavior using log files: The experience of SuperJournal. Library & Information Science Research, 22 (3), 311-338