Electronic journals, the internet, and scholarly communication

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 37, Issue , 2003, Pages 127-177

  Kling, Rob ^a   Callahan, Ewa ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037237110     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.1440370105     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Amiran, E., Orr, E., & Unsworth, J. (1991). Refereed electronic journals and the future of scholarly publishing. In J. A. Hewitt (Ed.), Advances in library automation and networking (pp. 25-53). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Anderson, K., Sack, J., Krauss, L., & O'Keefe, L. (2001, March). Publishing online-only peer-reviewed biomedical literature: Three years of citation, author perception, and usage experience. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 6. Retrieved April 24, 2001, from http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/06-03/anderson.html.
3. Arms, W. Y. (1999, December). Preservation of scientific serials: Three current examples. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 5. Retrieved May 1, 2001, from http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/05-02/arms.html.
4. Armstrong, C. J. (2001, April 2). Collection management and scholarly electronic publishing resource. Retrieved July 19, 2001, from http://www.i-a-l.co.uk/CM_SEP1.htm.
5. Bailey, C. W. Jr. (2002, February 22). Scholarly electronic publishing bibliography. Retrieved April 10, 2002, from http://info.lib.uh.edu/sepb/sepb.html.
6. Bannon, L. J., & Schmidt, K. (1991). CSCW: Four characters in search of a context. In J. Bowers & S. Benford (Eds.), Studies in computer supported cooperative work: Theory, practice and design (pp. 3-16). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
7. Björk, B.-C., & Turk, Z. (2000). A survey of the impact of the Internet on scientific publishing in construction IT and construction management. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 5. Retrieved May 1, 2001, from http://www.itcon.org/2000/5.
8. Borgman, C. L. (2000). From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Borgman, C. L. & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
10. Bot, M., Burgemeester, J., & Roes, H. (2000, November). The cost of publishing an electronic journal: A general model and a case study. D-Lib Magazine, 11. Retrieved November 16, 2001, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november98/11roes.html.
11. Brown, C. M. (1999). Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 929-943.
12. Brown, E. W., & Duda, A. L. (1996, Fall). Electronic publishing programs in science and technology part 1: The journals. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Retrieved April 11, 2002, from http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/96-fall/brown-duda.html.
13. Buckley, C., Burright, M., Prendergast, A., Sapon-White, R., & Taylor, A. (1999, Spring). Electronic publishing of scholarly journals: A bibliographic essay of current issues. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 22. Retrieved November 16, 2001, from http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/99-spring/article4.html.
14. Butler, H. J. (1995). Research into the reward system of scholarship: Where does scholarly electronic publishing get you? In A. Okerson (Ed.), Filling the Pipeline and Paying the Piper: Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium (pp. 167-177). Washington, DC: Office of Scientific and Academic Publishing, Association of Research Libraries.
15. Crawford, W. (1998, January). Paper persists: Why physical library collections still matter. Online, 22. Retrieved July 17, 2001, from http://www.onlinemag.net/OL1998/crawford1.html.
16. Crawford, W. (2002). Free electronic refereed journals: Getting past the are of enthusiasm. Learned Publishing, 15, 117-123.
17. Cronin, B., & Overfelt, K. (1995). E-journals and tenure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46, 700-703.
18. Cronin, B., Snyder, H. W., Rosenbaum, H., Martinson, A., & Callahan, E. (1998). Invoked on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1319-1328.
19. Dalton, M. S. (1995). Refereeing of scholarly works for primary publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 30, 213-250.
20. Denning, P. J. (1995). Plagiarism in the Web. Communications of the ACM, 38, 29.
21. Eason, K. (1988). Information technology and organizational change. London: Taylor & Francis.
22. Fisher, J. (1997). Comparing electronic journals to print journals: Are there savings? Paper presented at Scholarly Communication and Technology Conference organized by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation at Emory University, April 24-25, 1997. Retrieved November 17, 2000, from http://www.arl.org/scomm/scat/fisher.html.
23. Ford, C. E., Harter, S. P. (1998). The downside of scholarly electronic publishing: Problems in accessing electronic journals through online directories and catalogs. College & Research Libraries, 59, 335-346.
24. Harnad, S. (1995). The postGutenberg galaxy: How to get there from here. Information Society, 11, 285-292.
25. Harnad, S. (1996). Implementing peer review on the Net: Scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals. In R. P. Peek & G. B. Newby (Eds.), Scholarly publishing: The electronic frontier (pp. 103-108). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
26. Harrassowitz. (2000, May 4). Electronic journals: A selected resource guide. Retrieved February 20, 2001, from http://www.harrassowitz.de/top_resources/ejresguide.html.
27. Harter, S. P. (1996). The impact of electronic journals on scholarly communication: A citation analysis. The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 7. Retrieved January 16, 2001, from http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v7/n5/hart7n5.html.
28. Holoviak, J., & Seitter, K. L. (1997, September). Transcending the limitations of the printed page. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 3. Retrieved September 5, 2000, from http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/03-01/EI.html.
29. King, D. W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423-477.
30. Kirkpatrick, D. D. (2000, November 3). As publishers perish, libraries feel the pain: Mergers keep pushing up journal costs. The New York Times, pp. C1, C5.
31. Kling, R., & Covi, L. (1995). Electronic journals and legitimate media in the systems of scholarly communication. The Information Society, 11, 261-271.
32. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1997). A typology for electronic journals: Characterizing scholarly journals by their distribution forms. (Working Paper No.WP-97-07) Indiana University, Bloomington, Center for Social Informatics. Retrieved November 16, 2001, from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/csi/wp97-07.html.
33. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 890-906.
34. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1306-1320.
35. Kling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. (2001). A bit more to IT: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. (Working Paper No.WP-01-02) Indiana University, Bloomington, Center for Social Informatics. Retrieved November 16, 2001, from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/csi/wp01-02.html.
36. Kock, N. (1999). Acase of academic plagiarism. Communications of the ACM, 42(7), 96-104.
37. Lenares, D. (1999). Faculty use of electronic journals at research institutions. Paper presented at Racing Toward Tomorrow, ACRL Ninth National Conference, April 8-11, 1999, Detroit, Michigan. Retrieved November 16, 2001, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/lenares.pdf.
38. McCabe, M. J. (1998). The impact of publisher mergers on journal prices: A preliminary report. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, 200. Retrieved April 19, 2002, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/200/mccabe.html.
39. McCabe, M. J. (1999). The impact of publisher mergers on journal prices: An update. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, 207. Retrieved April 19, 2002, from http://www.arl.org/newsletr/207/mccabe.html.
40. Meadows, A. J. (1998). Communicating research. London: Academic Press.
41. Miller, R. H. (2000). Electronic resources and academic libraries, 1980-2000: A historical perspective. Library Trends, 48, 645-671.
42. Nadasdy, Z. (1997, September). Atruly all-electronic journal: Let democracy replace peer review. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 3. Retrieved April 24, 2001, from http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/03-01/EJCBS.html.
43. Noll, R. G. (1996). The economics of scholarly publications and the information superhighway (Brookings Discussion Papers in Domestic Economics). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Retrieved April 24, 2001, from http://www.brook.edu/Views/Papers/Domestic/003.htm.
44. Odlyzko, A. M. (1995). Tragic loss or good riddance: The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 71-122. Retrieved August 31, 1997, from http://www.dtc.umn.edu/̃odlyzko/doc/eworld.html.
45. Odlyzko, A. M. (2002). The rapid evolution of scholarly communication. Learned Publishing, 15, 7-19. Retrieved January 18, 2002, from http://www.dtc.umn.edu/̃odlyzko/doc/eworld.html.
46. Okerson, A. (1991). The electronic journal: What, whence, and when? The PublicAccess Computer Systems Review, 2. Retrieved April 2, 2002, from http://www.library.yale.edu/̃okerson/pacs.html.
47. Okerson, A. (2000). Are we there yet? Online e-resources ten years after. Library Trends, 48, 671-694.
48. Peek, R. P. & Pomerantz, J. P. (1998). Electronic scholarly journal publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 33, 321-356.
49. Protocol for Internet peer review study II (1998). Retrieved April 29, 2001, from http://www.mja.com.au/public/information/iprs2bod.html.
50. Schaffner, A. C. (1994). The future of scientific journals: Lessons from the past. Information Technology and Libraries, 13, 239-247.
51. Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 73-100.
52. Shivakumar, N. & Garcia-Molina, H. (1995, November). The SCAM approach to copy detection in digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 11. Retrieved July 17, 2001, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november95/scam/11shivakumar.html.
53. Smith, A. G. (2000, April). Search features of digital libraries. Information Research, 5. Retrieved November 16, 2001, from http://informationr.net/ir/53/paper73.html.
54. Sosteric, M. (1996). Electronic journals: The grand information future? Electronic Journal of Sociology, 2. Retrieved May 15, 2001, from http://www.sociology.org/vol002.002/Sosteric.article.1996.html.
55. Speier, C., Palmer, J., Wren, D., & Hahn, S. (1999). Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication: A question of prestige and legitimacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 537-543.
56. Stewart, L. (1996). User acceptance of electronic journals: Interviews with chemists at Cornell University. College & Research Libraries, 57, 339-349.
57. Sumner, T., & Shum, S. B. (1996). Open peer review and argumentation: Loosening the paper chains on journals. Ariadne, 5. Retrieved April 29, 2001, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue5/jime/.
58. Sweeney, A. E. (2000). Tenure and promotion: Should you publish in electronic journals? The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 6. Retrieved February 20, 2001, from http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/06-02/sweeney.html.
59. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians and publishers. Washington, D.C.: Special Libraries Association.
60. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2001). Lessons for the future of journals [Electronic edition]. Nature, 413, 672-674.
61. Tomney, H., & Burton, P. F. (1998). Electronic journals: A study of usage and attitudes among academics. Journal of Information Science, 24, 419-429.
62. Ulrich's international periodicals directory (2001). New Providence, NJ: Bowker.
63. Walker, T. J. (1998). Free Internet access to traditional journals [Electronic edition]. American Scientist, 86, 463-471.
64. Walsh, J. P., & Bayma, T. (1996). Computer networks and scientific work. Social Studies of Science, 26, 661-703.
65. Weller, A. C. (2001). Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
66. Wells, A. (1999). Advantages and disadvantages of electronic journals. In Exploring the development of the independent, electronic, scholarly journal. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Sheffield, UK. Retrieved May 15, 2001, from http://panizzi.shef.ac.uk/elecdiss/edl0001/ch0402.html.
67. Whisler, S. & Rosenblatt, S. F. (1997, April). The library and the university press: Two views of the current system of scholarly publishing. Paper presented at Scholarly Communication and Technology Conference organized by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation at Emory University. Retrieved November 16, 2001, from http://www.arl.org/scomm/scat/rosenblatt.html.
68. Wilkins, V. (1997). Cataloguing e-journals: Where are we now? Ariadne, 11. Retrieved November 25, 2000, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue11/survey.
69. Wilkinson, S. L. (1998, May 18). Electronic publishing takes journals into a new realm. Chemical & Engineering News. Retrieved November 16, 2001, from http://pubs.acs.org/hotartcl/cenear/980518/elec.html.
70. Wood, D., & Hurst, P. (2000). Online peer review: Perception in biological science. Learned Publishing, 13, 95-100.
71. Zhang, Y. (1998). The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science: A citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 24, 241-254.