Online journals: Impact on print journal usage

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 372-378

  De Groote, Sandra L ^a,b   Dorsch, Josephine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LIBRARY; LIBRARY SCIENCE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STATISTICS; TIME; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; ILLINOIS; INTERLIBRARY LOANS; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; LIBRARY SURVEYS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PERIODICALS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035495170     PISSN: 00257338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. MILLSON-MARTULA C. Use studies and serials rationalization: a review. Serials Libr 1988;15(1-2):121-36.
2. MILNE D, TIFFANY B. A cost-per-use method for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of serials: a detailed discussion of methodology. Serials Rev 1991 Summer;17(2):7-19.
3. BLECIC DD. Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlation between three methods. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1999 Jan;87(1):20-5.
4. YOUNG IR. The use of a general periodicals bibliographic database transaction log as a serials collection management tool. Serials Rev 1992 Winter;18(4):49-60.
5. MILTON S. Has the availability of electronic journals in full text affected interlibrary loan usage? ALKI 1998 Mar;14(1): 18-9.
6. BANE AF. Business periodicals Ondisc: how full-text availability affects the library. Comput Libr 1995 May;15(5):54-6.
7. PESSAH R, VENTURELLA K. Document delivery: St. John's University's experience with full-text services. Libr Software Rev 1995 Winter;14(4):212-4.
8. GREFSHEIM S, FRANKLIN J, CUNNINGHAM D. Biotechnology awareness study, part 1: where scientists get their information. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1991 Jan;79(1):36-44.
9. HURD JM, WELLER AC. From print to electronic: the adoption of information technology by academic chemists. Sci Tech Libr 1997;16(3-4):147-70.
10. CURTIS KL, WELLER AC, HURD JM. Information-seeking behavior of health sciences faculty: the impact of new information technologies. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1997 Oct;85(4): 402-10.
11. PELZER NL, WIESE WH, LEYSEN JM. Library use and information-seeking behavior of veterinary medical students revisited in the electronic environment. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1998 Jul;86(3):346-55.
12. JOSWICK KE, STIERMAN JK. The core list mirage: comparison of the journals frequently consulted by faculty and students. Coll Res Libr 1997 Jan;58(1):48-55.
13. ROGERS SA. Electronic journal usage at Ohio State University. Coll Res Libr 2001 Jan;62(1):25-34.
14. MORSE DH, CLINTWORTH WA. Comparing patterns of print and electronic journal use in an academic health science library. Issues Sci Technol Librarianship 2000 Fall(28). (Available from http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/00-fall/refereed.html; cited 18 April 2001.)
15. LUTHER J. White paper on electronic journal usage statistics. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, Oct 2000. (Available from http://www.clir.org/ pubs/abstract/pub94abst.html; cited 28 Nov 2000.)
16. MILNE, op. cit.
17. MAXFIELD MW, DICARLO R, DICARLO MA. Decreasing use of monthly serials after publication date. Serials Libr 1995;27(4):71-6.
18. IBID.
19. BANE, op. cit.
20. PESSAH, op. cit.
21. MILTON, op. cit.
22. HURD, op. cit.
23. CURTIS, op. cit.
24. GREFSHEIM, op. cit.
25. PELZER, op. cit.
26. JACKSON EC, BROOK J, SISK F. Full text: convenience or quality? Georgia Librarian 1999 Summer;36(2):5-8.
27. MILTON, op. cit.
28. IBID.
29. BANE, op. cit.
30. PESSAH, op. cit.
31. IBID.
32. MILTON, op. cit.