Print versus electronic journals: A preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 235-243

  Sathe, Nila A ^a   Grady, Jenifer L ^a,b   Giuse, Nunzia B ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER; CONFERENCE PAPER; HYPOTHESIS; LEARNING; LIBRARY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL STUDENT; ONLINE SYSTEM; PILOT STUDY; PRINTING; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; RESIDENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSUMER; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLICATION; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CONSUMER SATISFACTION; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; JOURNALISM; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; LIBRARY MATERIALS; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; PERIODICALS; RESEARCH; TENNESSEE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036546832     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. HOUSETON B. ARL begins E-Metrics Project. [Web document]. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries [26 Jun 2000; last updated 17 Jul 2000; cited 1 Jun 2001] 〈http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/enmews.html〉.
2. LUTHER J. White paper on electronic journal usage statistics. 2d ed. [Web document]. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2001. [cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub94abst.html〉.
3. OLSEN J. Electronic journal literature: implications for scholars. Westport, CT: Mecklermedia, 1994.
4. STEWART L. User acceptance of electronic journals: interviews with chemists at Cornell University. Coll Res Libr 1996 Jul;57(4):339-49.
5. WOODWARD H, ROWLAND F, MCKNIGHT C, PRITCHETT C, MEADOWS J. Café Jus: an electronic journals user survey. J Digit Inf [Internet], 1998 Sep 18;1(3). [cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v01/i03/Woodward/〉.
6. WRIGHT SM, TSENG WT, KOLODNER K. Physician opinion about electronic publications. Am J Med 2001 Apr 1;110(5):373-7.
7. LUTHER, op. cit.
8. HOUSETON, op. cit.
9. MERCER LS. Measuring the use and value of electronic journals and books. Issues Sci Technol Libr [Internet], 200(Winter;(25). [cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://wwwlibrary.ucsb .edu/istl/00-winter/article1.html〉.
10. SCHLOMAN BF. Nursing faculty and scholarly publishing: survey of perceptions and journal use. Online J Issues Nurs [Internet], 2001 Apr;5(1). [cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://nursingworld.org/ojin/topic11/tpc11_8.htm〉.
11. MORSE DH, CLINTWORTH WA. Comparing patterns of use of print and electronic journal use in an academic health science library. Issues Sci Technol Libr [Internet], 2000 Fall;(28) [cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/00-fall/refereed.html〉.
12. RUSCH-FEJA D, SIEBEKY U. Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals: results of an electronic survey of Max Planck Society researchers including usage statistics from Elsevier, Springer, and Academic Press. D-Lib Magazine [Internet], 1999 Oct;5(10). [cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja- summary.html〉.
13. ROGERS S. Electronic journal usage at Ohio State University. Coll Res Libr 2001 Jan;62(1):25-34.
14. BAUER K. Indexes as tools for measuring usage of print and electronic resources. Coll Res Libr 2001 Jan;62(1):36-42.
15. POMFRETT S. Types of electronic journal users. [Web document]. SuperJournal Conference, Birkbeck College, London, U.K.; 21 April 1999. [rev. 10 Mar 2001; cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://www.superjournal.ac.uk/sj/confpomfret.htm〉.
16. HARTER S, KIM HJ. Electronic journals and scholarly communication: a citation and reference study. [Web document]. Paper presented at: Midyear meeting of the American Society for Information Science, San Diego, CA; May 20-22, 1996. [cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://InformationR.net/ir/2-1/paper9a.html〉.
17. MILNE P. Electronic access to information and its impact on scholarly communication. [Web document]. Paper presented at: Ninth Australasian Information Online & On Disc Conference and Exhibition, Sydney Convention and Exhibition Centre, Sydney, Australia; January 19-21, 1999. [cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://www.csu.edu.au/special/online99/proceedings99/305b.htm〉.
18. STEWART, op. cit.
19. ROGERS, op. cit.
20. STEWART, op. cit.
21. I B I D.
22. JONES SL, COOK CB. Electronic journals: are they a paradigm shift? Online J Issues Nurs [Internet], 2000 Jan 31;5(1). [cited 1 Jun 2001]. 〈http://nursingworld.org/ojin/topic11/tpc11_1.htm〉.
23. BUTLER D. The writing is on the Web for science journals in print. Nature 1999 Jan 21;397(6716):195-200.
24. TENOPIR C. Should we cancel print? Libr J 1999 Sep 1;124(14):138,142.
25. LUTHER J. Whither electronic journals? Against the Grain 2000 Apr;12(2):24-6.