A study of graduate student end-users’ use and perception of electronic journals

Online Information Review

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 302-315

  li Liew, Chern ^a   Foo, Schubert ^a   Chennupati, K R ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Documents; Interaction; Library users; Puiblishing; User studies

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER MONITORS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LIBRARIES; PUBLISHING; STUDENTS;

DOCUMENTS; INTERACTION; LIBRARY USERS; USER STUDIES;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0000003208     PISSN: 14684527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14684520010350650     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Ard, A., Falcoz, F., Koch, T., Nielsen, M. and Sandfr, M. (1994), “Improving resource discovery and retrieval on the Internet: The Nordic WAIS/World Wide Web Project summary report”, http://www.ub2.lu.se/W4/summary.html
2. Bates, M. (1989), “The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface”, Online Review, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 407-24.
3. Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N. and Brooks, H.M. (1982), “ASK for information retrieval: part I. Background and theory”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 61-7.
4. Boyce, P.B. and Dalterio, H. (1996), “Electronic publishing of scientific journals”, Physics Today, Vol. 49, pp. 42-7. http://www.aas.org/∼pboyce/epubs/pt-art.htm
5. Chen, H., Schuffels, C. and Orwig, R. (1996), “Internet categorisation and search: a self-organising approach”, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 88-102.
6. ET-Space, University of Arizona, Department of Management Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (1996), http://ai.bpa.arizona. edu/Libraries/frame1_demos_1.html
7. Girill, T.R., Luk, C.H. and Norton, S. (1988), “The impact of usage monitoring on the evolution of an online-documentation system: a case study”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 18 No. 2, p. 327.
8. Harnad, S. (1992), “Interactive publications: extending the American Physical Society's discipline-specific model for electronic publishing”, Serials Review, (Special issue on economic models for networked information), Vol. 18 Nos 1/2, pp. 58-61.
9. Harnad, S. (1996), “Implementing peer review on the Net: scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals”, in Peek, R. and Newby, G. (Eds), Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp.103-18.
10. Harnad, S. (1997), “The paper house of cards and why it's taking so long to collapse”, Ariadne, Vol. 2 No. 8, http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue8/harnad
11. Heeter, C. (1989), “Implications of new interactive technologies for conceptualising communication”, in Salvaggio, J.L. and Bryant, J. (Eds), Media Use in the Information Age, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 217-35.
12. Ingwersen, P. (1996), “Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of a cognitive IR theory”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 52 No.1, pp. 3-50.
13. Liew, C.L. and Foo, S. (1999), “Derivation of interaction environment and information object properties for enhanced integrated access and value-adding to electronic documents”, Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 51 No. 8, pp. 256-68.
14. Liew, C.L., Foo, S. and Chennupati, K.R. (2000a), “A proposed integrated environment for enhanced user interaction and value-adding of electronic documents – an empirical evaluation”, accepted for publication in Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (Special topic issue of “Information science at the millennium”).
15. Liew, C.L., Foo, S. and Chennupati, K.R. (2000b), “A proposed information environment for enhanced integrated access and value-adding to electronic documents”, Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 58-75.
16. Odlyzko, A.M. (1996), “Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals”, in Peek, R. and Newby, G. (Eds), Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 91-101.
17. Patton, M.Q. (1990), Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed., Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
18. Pavlik, J.V. (1996), New Media Technology: Cultural and Commercial Perspectives, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
19. Pearce, C. (1997), The Interactive Book: A Guide to the Interactive Revolution, Macmillan Technical Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
20. Rafaeli, S. and Sudweeks, F. (1997), “Networked interactivity”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 2 No. 4, http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html
21. Rice, E. and Williams, F. (1984), “Theories: old and new: the study of new media”, in Rice, R. et al. (Eds), The New Media: Communication, Research and Technology, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 55-80.
22. Robins, D. (2000), “Shifts of focus on various aspects of user information problems during interactive information retrieval”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51 No. 10, pp. 913-28.
23. Rowland, F. (1997), “Print journals: fit for the future?”, Ariadne, Vol. 2 No. 7, http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue7/fytton
24. Scorpion Project (1999), http://orc.rsch.oclc.org:6109/
25. Sosteric, M. (1996), “Electronic journals: the grand information future?”, Electronic Journal of Sociology, Vol. 2 No. 2, http://www.sociology.org/vol002.002/sosteric.article.1996.html
26. Tufte, E.R. (1991), Dequantification in Scientific Visualization: Is this Science or Television?, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
27. Valauskas, E.J. (1994), “Reading and computers – paper-based or digital text: what's best?”, Computers in Libraries, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 44-7.