Beyond usage: Understanding the use of electronic journals on the basis of information activity analysis

Information Research

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Mahé, Annaïg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644304572     PISSN: 13681613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barry, C.A. (1995). Critical issues in evaluating the impact of IT on information activity in academic research: developing a qualitative research solution. Library & Information Science Research, 17, 107-134.
2. Brown, D.J. (1996). Electronic publishing and libraries. Planning for the impact and growth to 2003. London: Bowker-Saur.
3. Covi, L.M. (1999). Material mastery: situating digital library use in university research practices. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 293-316.
4. Eason, K., Richardson, S., & Yu, L. (2000). Patterns of use of electronic journals. Journal of Documentation, 56(5), 477-504.
5. Ginsparg, P. (1995). First steps towards electronic research communication in physics. Solaris, dossier no3: Médiations scientifiques et réseaux électroniques. Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://biblio-fr.info.unicaen.fr/bnum/jelec/Solaris/d03/3ginspar.html
6. Gomes, S., & Meadows, A.J. (1998). Perceptions of electronic journals in British universities. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 29, 174-181.
7. Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg galaxy: the fourth revolution in the means of production of knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2(1), 39-53. Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/ Harnad/HTML/harnad91.postgutenberg.html
8. Harter, S. (1998). Scholarly communication and electronic journals: an impact study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 507-516.
9. Kling, R., & Covi, L.M. (1995). Electronic journals and legitimate media in the systems of scholarly communication. The Information Society, 11(4), 261-271. Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/epc/chwp/ kling/
10. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Not just a matter of time: field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14). Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.CY/9909008
11. Mackie-Mason, J.K., Riveros, J.F., Bonn, M.S. , & Lougee, W.P. (1999). A report on the PEAK experiment. Usage and economic behavior. D-Lib Magazine, 5(7/8). Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ july99/mackie-mason/07mackie-mason.html
12. Mahé, A., Andrys, C., & Chartron, G. (2000). How French researchers are making use of electronic journals: a case study conducted at the Pierre et Marie Curie and Denis Diderot Universities. Journal of Information Science, 26(5), 291-302. Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://archivesic.ccsd. cnrs.fr/sic_00000399.html
13. Mahé, A. (2002). L'intégration des revues électroniques dans les pratiques: un processus d'appropriation observé auprès de chercheurs du Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique. In Chartron G. (Dir.), Les chercheurs et la documentation numérique: nouveaux services et usages. (pp. 173-187). Paris: Editions du Cercle de la Librairie.
14. Mallein, P. (1996). La conception assistée par l'usage. In Mémento 7, Les techniques de services en ligne: du Minitel à Internet. France Telecom R&D, Mémentos techniques. Retrieved 30 January from http://www.rd.francetelecom.com/fr/conseil/mento7/c5.pdf
15. McKnight, C. (1995). Digital library research at Loughborough: the last fifteen years. Loughborough University of Technology: Department of Information and Library Studies.
16. Okerson, A. (2000). Are we there yet ? Online e-resources ten years after. Library Trends. Collection Development in an Electronic Environment, 48(4), 671-693.
17. Peterson Bishop, A. (1998). Measuring access, use, and success in digital libraries. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(2). Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-02/bishop.html
18. Pullinger, D. (1999). Academics and the new information environments: the impact of local factors on use of electronic journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(2), 164-172.
19. Pullinger, D., & Baldwin, C. (1997). SuperJournal: what readers really want from electronic journals. ELVIRA4: Electronic library and visual information research, 6-8 May, 1997. Milton Keynes.
20. Rowland, F., McKnight, C. & Meadows, A.J. (1995). Project Elvyn: an experiment in electronic journal delivery. Facts, figures and findings. London: Bowker-Saur.
21. Royal Society and British Library and Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. (1993). The Scientific, Technical and Medical Information System in the U.K. London: British Library R&D. Report 6123.
22. Rusch-Feja, D. & Siebeky, U. (1999). Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals. Results of an electronic survey of Max Planck Society researchers including usage statistics from Elsevier, Springer and Academic Press. D-Lib Magazine, 5(10). Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-summary.html
23. Sanville, T.J. (2001). Use of electronic journals in OhioLINK'S electronic journal center. In 67th IFLA Council and General Conference, 16-25 August 2001. Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla67/ papers/118-141e.pdf
24. Scardigli, V. (1992). Les sens de la technique. Paris: PUF.
25. Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), 73-100.
26. Senders, J.W. (1981). I have seen the future and it doesn't work: the electronic journal experiment. In Scholarly publishing in an era of change: Proceedings of the Society for Scholarly Publishing 2nd annual meeting, June 1980, Minneapolis. (pp. 8-9). Washington: Society for Scholarly Publishing.
27. Speier, C., Palmer, J., Wren, D. & Hahn, S. (1999). Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication: a question of prestige and legitimacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6), 537-543.
28. Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources.
29. Tenopir, C. & King, D.W. (2002). Reading behavior and electronic journals. Learned Publishing, 15(4), 259-266.
30. Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Boyce, P., Grayson, M., Zhang, Y. & Ebuen, M. (2003). Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine, 9(5). Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may03/king/05king.html
31. Tenopir C., King, D. W. & Bush A. Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and comparison with other scientists. Draft. (To be published, Journal of the Medical Library Association), April 2004. Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://web.utk.edu/~tenopir/eprints/ tenopir_jmla_article_042203.pdf
32. Tomney, H. & Burton, P.F. (1998). Electronic journals: a study of usage and attitudes among academics. Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 419-429.
33. Vakkari, P., Savolainen, R. & Dervin, B. (Eds.) (1997). Information seeking in context. Proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts, August 14-16, 1996, Tampere, Finland. London & Los Angeles: Taylor Graham 1997.
34. Woodward, H. (1997). Electronic journals in an academic environment. Serials, 10(1), 53-57.
35. Woodward, H., Rowland, F., McKnight, C., Meadows, A.J. & Pritchett, C. (1997). Electronic journals: myths and realities. Library Management, 18(3), 155-162.
36. Woodward, H., Rowland, F., McKnight, C., Pritchett, C. & Meadows, A.J. (1998). Café jus: an electronic journals user survey. Journal of Digital Information, 1(3). Retrieved 30 January, 2004 from http://jodi.ecs. soton.ac.uk/Articles/v01/i03/Woodward/