Deoxyuridine is generated preferentially in the nontranscribed strand of DNA from cells expressing activation-induced cytidine deaminase

Journal of Immunology

Volumn 174, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 7787-7791

  Martomo, Stella A ^a   Fu, Dongtao ^a   Yang, William W ^a   Joshi, Nikhil S ^a   Gearhart, Patricia J ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION INDUCED CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; CYTOSINE; DEOXYCYTIDINE; DEOXYURIDINE; DNA; ENDONUCLEASE; PLASMID DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; URACIL; URACIL DNA GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASE;

ALKALINE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; APURINIC SITE; APYRIMIDINIC SITE; ARTICLE; B LYMPHOCYTE; DEAMINATION; DNA STRAND; ENZYME ACTIVATION; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; IMMUNOGLOBULIN CLASS SWITCH RECOMBINATION; IMMUNOGLOBULIN GENE; NONHUMAN; NONTRANSCRIBED DNA STRAND; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SOMATIC HYPERMUTATION; SOUTHERN BLOTTING;

EID: 20444426249     PISSN: 00221767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7787     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Li, Z., C. J. Woo, M. D. Iglesias-Ussel, D. Ronai, and M. D. Scharff. 2004. The generation of antibody diversity through somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. Genes Dev. 18: 1-11.
2. Barreto, V. M., A. R. Ramiro, and M. C. Nussenzweig. 2005. Activation-induced deaminase: controversies and open questions. Trends Immunol. 26: 90-96.
3. Honjo, T., M. Muramatsu, and S. Fagarasan. 2004. AID: how does it aid antibody diversity? Immunity 20: 659-668.
4. Petersen-Mahrt, S. K., R. S. Harris, and M. S. Neuberger. 2002. AID mutates E. coli suggesting a DNA deaminatiori mechanism for antibody diversification. Nature 418: 99-104.
5. Poltoratsky, V., S. H. Wilson, T. A. Kunkel, and Y. I. Pavlov. 2004. Recombinogenic phenotype of human activation-induced cytosine deaminase. J. Immunol. 172: 4308-4313.
6. Di Noia, J., and M. S. Neuberger. 2002. Altering the pathway of immunoglobulin hypermutation by inhibiting uracil-DNA glycosylase. Nature 419: 43-48.
7. Yoshikawa, K., I. Odazaki, T. Eto, K. Kinoshita, M. Muramatsu, H. Nagaoka, and T. Honjo. 2002. AID enzyme-induced hypermutation in an actively transcribed gene in fibroblasts. Science 296: 2033-2036.
8. Martin, A., P. D. Bardwell, C. J. Woo, M. Fan, M. J. Shulman, and M. D. Scharff. 2002. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase turns on somatic hypermutation in hybridomas. Nature 415: 802-806.
9. Martin, A., and M. D. Scharff. 2002. Somatic hypermutation of the AID transgene in B and non-B cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 12304-12308.
10. Okazaki, I. M., K. Kinoshita, M. Muramatsu, K. Yoshikawa, and T. Honjo. 2002. The AID enzyme induces class switch recombination in fibroblasts. Nature 416: 340-345.
11. Okazaki, I. M., H. Hiai, N. Kakazu, S. Yamada, M. Muramatsu, K. Kinoshita, and T. Honjo. 2003. Constitutive expression of AID leads to tumorigenesis. J. Exp. Med. 197: 1173-1181.
12. Harris, R. S., S. K. Peterson-Mahrt, and M. S. Neuberger. 2002. RNA editing enzyme APOBEC1 and some of its homologs can act as DNA mutators. Mol. Cell 10: 1247-1253.
13. Rada, C., G. T. Williams, H. Nilsen, D. E. Barnes, T. Lindahl, and M. S. Neuberger. 2002. Immunoglobulin isotype switching is inhibited and somatic hypermutation perturbed in UNO-deficient mice. Curr. Biol. 12: 1748-1755.
14. Imai, K., G. Slupphaug, W. I. Lee, P. Revy, S. Nonoyama, N. Catalan, L. Yel, M. Forveille, B. Kavli, H. E. Krokan, et al. 2003. Human uracil-DNA glycosylase deficiency associated with profoundly impaired immunoglobulin class-switch recombination. Nat. Immunol. 4: 1023-1028.
15. Begum, N. A., K. Kinoshita, N. Kakazu, M. Muramatsu, H. Nagaoka, R. Shinkura, D. Biniszkiewicz, L. A. Boyer, R. Jaenisch, and T. Honjo. 2004. Uracil DNA glycosulase activity is dispensable for immunoglobulin class switch. Science 305: 1160-1163.
16. Bransteitter, R., P. Pham, M. D. Scharff, and M. F. Goodman. 2003. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates deoxycytidine on single-stranded DNA but requires the action of RNase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 4102-4107.
17. Dickerson, S. K., E. Market, E. Besmer, and F. N. Papavasiliou. 2003. AID mediates hypermutation by deaminating single stranded DNA. J. Exp. Med. 197: 1291-1206.
18. Shen, H. M., and U. Storb. 2004. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) can target both DNA strands when the DNA is supercoiled. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 12997-13002.
19. Pham, P., R. Bransteitter, J. Petruska, and M. F. Goodman. 2003. Processive AID-catalysed cytosine deamination on single-stranded DNA simulates somatic hypermutation. Nature 424: 103-107.
20. Yu, K., F.-T. Huang, and M. R. Lieber. 2004. DNA substrate length and surrounding sequence affect the activation-induced deaminase activity at cytidine. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 6496-6500.
21. -/- mice. Immunogenetics 56: 840-845.
22. Rogozin, I. B., and N. A. Kolchanov. 1992. Somatic hypermutagenesis in immunoglobulin genes. II. Influence of neighbouring base sequences on mutagenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1171: 11-18.
23. Chaudhuri, J., M. Tian, C. Khuong, K. Chua, E, Pinaud, and F. W. Alt. 2003. Transcription-targeted DNA deaminaiion by the AID antibody diversification enzyme. Nature 422: 726-730.
24. Ramiro, A. R., P. Stravropoulos, M. Jankovic, and M. C. Nussenzweig. 2003. Transcription enhances AID-mediated cytidine deamination by exposing single-stranded DNA on the nontemplate strand. Nat. Immunol. 4: 452-456.
25. Sohail, A., J. Klapacz, M. Samaranayake, A. Ullah, and A. S. Bhagwat. 2003. Human activation-induced cytidine deaminase causes transcription dependent, strand-biased C to U deaminations. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 2990-2994.
26. Bohr, V. A., C. A. Smith, D. S. Okumoto, and P. C. Hanawalt. 1985. DNA repair in an active gene: removal of pyrimidine dimers from the DHFR gene of CHO cells is much more efficient than in the genome overall. Cell 40: 359-369.
27. Mellon, I. G. Spivak, and P. C. Hanawalt. 1987. Selective removal of transcription-blocking DNA damage from the transcribed strand of the mammalian DHFR gene. Cell 51: 241-249.
28. Kong, Q., and N. Maizels. 2001. Breaksite batch mapping, a rapid method for assay and identification of DNA breaksites in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: E33.
29. Matsumoto, Y., and K. Kim. 1995. Excision of deoxyribose phosphate residues by DNA polymerase β during DNA repair. Science 269: 699-702.
30. Kavli, B., O. Sundheim, M. Akbari, M. Otterlei, H. Nilsen, F. Skorpen, P. A. Aas, L. Hagen, H. E. Krokan, and G. Slupphaug. 2002. hUNG2 is the major repair enzyme for removal of uracil from U:A matches, U:G mismatches, and U in single-stranded DNA, with hSMUG1 as a broad specificity backup. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 39926-39936.
31. Wilson, D. M. III. 2005. Ape1 abasic endonudease activity is regulated by magnesium and potassium concentrations and is robust on alternative DNA structures. J. Mol. Biol. 345: 1003-1014.
32. Zeng, X., G. A. Negrete, C. Kasmer, W. W. Yang, and P. J. Gearhart. 2004. Absence of DNA polymerase η reveals targeting of C mutations on the nontranscribed strand in immunoglobulin switch regions. J. Exp. Med. 199: 917-924.
33. Kong, Q., and N. Maizels. 2001. DNA breaks in hypermutating immunoglobulin genes: evidence for a break-and-repair pathway of somatic hypermulation. Genetics 158: 369-378.
34. Rush, J. S., S. D. Fugmann, and D. G. Schatz. 2004. Staggered AID-dependent DNA double strand breaks are the predominant DNA lesions targeted to Sμ in Ig class switch recombination. Int. Immunol. 16: 549-557.
35. Arudchandran, A., R. M. Bernstein, and E. E. Max. 2004. Single-stranded DNA breaks adjacent to cytosines occur during Ig gene class switch recombination. J. Immunol. 173: 3223-3229.