Broad versus narrow facets of integrity: Predictive validity and subgroup differences

Human Performance

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 151-177

  Van Iddekinge, Chad H ^a   Taylor, Mary Anne ^b   Eidson Jr , Carl E ^c  

^a HUMAN RESOURCES RESEARCH ORGANIZATION   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Wilson Learning Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19844367713     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1802_3     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Alliger, G. M., & Dwight, S. A. (2000). A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59-72.
2. Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289-303.
3. Bauer, T. N., Maertz, C. P., Dolen, M. R., & Campion, M. A. (1998). Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 892-903.
4. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
6. Brown, T. S., & Joy, D. S. (1985). The predictive validity of the Personnel Selection Inventory in the grocery industry. Unpublished technical report. Rosemont, IL: London House.
7. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Chan, D., Schmitt, N., DeShon, R. P., Clause, C. S., & Delbridge, K. (1997). Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 300-310.
9. Cooper, W. (1981). Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218-244.
10. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, C. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11. Dwight, S. A., & Alliger, G. M. (1997). Reactions to overt integrity test items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 937-948.
12. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Civil Services Commission, Department of Labor, and Department of Justice. Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Fed. Reg. 43 (166), 38290-38309 (1978).
13. Frei, R. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1998). Validity of customer service measures in personnel selection: A review of criterion and construct evidence. Human Performance, 11, 1-27.
14. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
15. Harris, M. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1987). A factor analysis and item response theory analysis of an employee honesty test. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 122-135.
16. Hogan, J., & Brinkmeyer, K. (1997). Bridging the gap between overt and personality-based integrity tests. Personnel Psychology, 50, 587-599.
17. Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100-112.
18. Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627-637.
19. Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the future - remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 631-664.
20. Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection, and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence, and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152-194.
21. Hurtz, G. M., & Alliger, G. M. (2002). Influence of coaching on integrity test performance and unlikely virtues scale scores. Human Performance, 15, 255-273.
22. Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
23. Jones, J. W. (1989). Honesty and sales potential. Unpublished technical report. Rosemont, IL: National Computer Systems, Inc.
24. Jones, J. W., & Terris, W. (1984). Validity and factor structure of a dishonesty test that measures attitudes toward theft. Unpublished technical report. Park Ridge, IL: London House.
25. Joy, D. S. (1991). Basic psychometric properties of a preemployment honest test: Reliability, validity, and fairness. In J. W. Jones (Ed.), Preemployment honesty testing: Current research and future directions (pp. 65-88). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
26. Joy, D. S., & Rafilson, F. M. (1988). Validation of the Personnel Selection Inventory (PSI-7S)for the grocery store industry. Unpublished technical report. Rosemont, IL: National Computer Systems, Inc.
27. Kehoe, J. F. (2002). General mental ability and selection in private sector organizations: A commentary. Human Performance, 15, 97-106.
28. London House. (1995). Personnel selection inventory: PSI-CS with math. Rosemont, IL: McGraw-Hill/London House.
29. Macan, T. H., Avedon, M. J., Paese, M., & Smith, D. E. (1994). The effects of applicants' reactions to cognitive ability tests and an assessment center. Personnel Psychology, 47, 715-738.
30. McDaniel, M. A., & Jones, J. W. (1988). Predicting employee theft: A quantitative review of the validity of a standardized measure of dishonesty. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 327-345.
31. McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.
32. Meng, X. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172-175.
33. Neuman, G. A., & Baydoun, R. (1998). An empirical examination of overt and covert integrity tests. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 65-78.
34. Nicol, A. A. M., & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). Validity evidence for the different item styles of overt honesty measures. Journal of Business and Psychology. 16, 431-445.
35. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Ones, D. S. (1993). The construct validity of integrity tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
37. Ones, D. S., Schmidt, F. L., & Viswesvaran C. (1994, April). Do broader personality variables predict job performance with higher validity? In R. Page (Chair), Personality and job performance: Big Five versus specific traits. Symposium conducted at the 9th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.
38. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609-626.
39. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests: Results across four large-scale job applicant data sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35-42.
40. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validates: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 679-703.
41. Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524-539.
42. Paunonen, S. V., Rothstein, M. G., & Jackson, D. N. (1999). Narrow reasoning about the use of broad personality measures for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 389-405.
43. Rafilson, F. M. (1989). Temporal stability of a pre-employment integrity test. Psychological Reports, 65, 1384-1386.
44. Ree, M. J., Earles, J. A., & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19, 518-524.
45. Roth, P. L., BeVier, C. A., Bobko, P., Switzer, F. S., III, & Tyler, P. (2001). Racial differences in cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 54, 297-330.
46. Ryan, A. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1987). Pre-employment honesty testing: Fakability, reactions of test takers, and company image. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 248-256.
47. Sackett, P. R., & Wanek, J. E. (1996). New developments in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 49, 787-829.
48. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., & De Fruyt, F. (2003). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573-605.
49. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel selection: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
50. Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Applicant withdrawal: The role of test-taking attitudes and racial differences. Personnel Psychology, 50, 855-876.
51. Schneider, R. J., Hough, L. A., & Dunnette, M. D. (1996). Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 639-655.
52. Stanush, P. L. (1997). Factors that influence the susceptibility of self-report inventories to distortion: A meta-analytic investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, Laredo.
53. Stewart, G. L. (1999). Trait bandwidth and stages of job performance: Assessing differential effects for conscientiousness and its subtraits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 959-968.
54. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
55. Terris, W., & Jones, J. W. (1982). Psychological correlates of employee theft in department stores: Three separate studies. Unpublished technical report. Rosemont, IL: National Computer Systems, Inc.
56. Tett, R. P., Steele, J. R., & Beauregard, R. S. (2003). Broad and narrow measures on both sides of the personality-job performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 335-356.
57. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25-29.
58. Thorsteinson, T. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). The effect of selection ratio on perceptions of the fairness of a selection test battery. International journal of Selection and Assessment, 5, 159-168.
59. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225-251.
60. Vinchur, A. J., Schippman, J. S., Switzer, F. S., III, & Roth, P. L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586-597.
61. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2002). Agreements and disagreements on the role of general mental ability (GMA) in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. Human Performance, 15, 211-231.
62. Wanek, J. E. (1995). The construct of integrity: Item-level factor analysis of the dimensions underlying honesty testing and big-five measures of personality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
63. Wanek, J. E. (1999). Integrity and honesty testing: What do we know? How do we use it? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 183-195.
64. Wanek, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Ones, D. S. (2003). Towards an understanding of integrity test similarities and differences: An item-level analysis of seven tests. Personnel Psychology, 56, 873-894.