Simultaneous prompting: A review of the literature

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 153-168

  Morse, Timothy E ^a,c   Schuster, John W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c Division of Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 16244388236     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bandura, A. (1975). Analysis of modeling processes. School Psychology Digest, 4, 4-10.
2. Billingsley, F. F., & Romer, L. T. (1983). Response prompting and the transfer of stimulus control: Methods, research, and a conceptual framework. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 3-12.
3. Collins, B. C., Gast, D. L., Ault, M. J., & Wolery, M. (1991). Small-group instruction: Guidelines for teachers of students with moderate to severe handicaps. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 18-32.
4. Cooper, J. O. (1987). Stimulus control. In J. O. Cooper, W. L. Heron, & D. W. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (pp. 298-326). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
5. Dogan, O. S., & Tekin-Iftar, E. (2002). The effects of simultaneous prompting on teaching receptively identifying occupations from picture cards. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23, 237-252.
6. Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1988). System of least prompts: A literature review of procedural parameters, Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 13, 28-40.
7. Fetko, K. S., Schuster,J. W., Harley, D. A., & Collins, B. C. (1999). Using simultaneous prompting to teach a chained vocational task to young adults with severe intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 318-329.
8. Fickel, K. M., Schuster, J. W., & Collins, B. C. (1998). Teaching different tasks using different stimuli in a heterogeneous small group. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 219-244.
9. Gibson, A. N., & Schuster, J. W. (1992). The use of simultaneous prompting for teaching expressive word recognition to preschool children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 247-267.
10. Griffen, A. K., Schuster, J. W., & Morse, T. E. (1998). The acquisition of instructive feedback: A comparison of continuous versus intermittent presentation schedules, Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 42-61.
11. th Congress, June 4, 1997.
12. Johnson, P., Schuster, J., & Bell, J. K. (1996). Comparison of simultaneous prompting with and without error correction in teaching science vocabulary words to high school students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 437-458.
13. Kamps, D. A., Walker, D., Dugan, E. P., Leonard, B. R., Thibadeau, S. F., Marshall, K., et al. (1991). Small group instruction for school-aged students with autism and developmental disabilities. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 6, 1-18.
14. MacFarland-Smith, J., Schuster, J. W., & Stevens, K. B. (1993). Using simultaneous prompting to teach expressive object identification to preschoolers with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 50-60.
15. Maciag, K. G., Schuster, J. W., Collins, B. C., & Cooper, J. T. (2000). Training adults with moderate and severe mental retardation in a vocational skill using a simultaneous prompting procedure. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 306-316.
16. Munk, D. D., Laarhoven, T. V., Goodman, S., & Repp, A. C. (1998). Small-group direct instruction for students with moderate to severe disabilities. In A. Hilton & R. Ringlaben (Eds.), Best and promising practices in developmental disabilities (pp. 127-138). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
17. Palmer, T., Collins, B. C., & Schuster, J. W. (1999). The use of a simultaneous prompting procedure to teach receptive manual sign identification to adults with disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 179-191.
18. Parker, M. A., & Schuster,J. W. (2002). Effectiveness of simultaneous prompting on the acquisition of observational and instructive feedback stimuli when teaching a heterogeneous group of high school students. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 89-104.
19. Parrott, K. A., Schuster, J. W., Collins, B. C., & Gassaway, L. J. (2000). Simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback when teaching chained taste. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 3-19.
20. Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., Epstein, M. H., & Smith, T. E. C. (1989). Comprehensive curriculum for students with mild handicaps. Focus on Exceptional Children, 21(8), 1-12.
21. Riley, G. A. (1995). Guidelines for devising a hierarchy when fading response prompts. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 231-242.
22. Schuster, J. W., & Griffen, A. K. (1993). Teaching a chained task with a simultaneous prompting procedure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 299-315.
23. Schuster, J. W., Griffen, A. K., & Wolery, M. (1992). Comparison of simultaneous prompting and constant time delay procedures in teaching sight words to elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 305-325.
24. Schuster, J. W., Morse, T. E., Ault, M. J., Doyle, P. M., Crawford, M. R., & Wolery, M. (1998). Constant time delay with chained tasks: A review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 74-106.
25. Sewell, T. J., Collins, B. C., Hemmeter, M. L., & Schuster, J. W. (1998). Using simultaneous prompting within an activity-based format to teach dressing skills to preschoolers with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 132-145.
26. Singleton, D. K., Schuster, J. W., Morse, T. E., & Collins, B. C. (1999). A comparison of antecedent prompt and test and simultaneous prompting procedures in teaching grocery words to adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 182-199.
27. Singleton, K. C., Schuster, J. W., & Ault, M. J. (1995). Simultaneous prompting in a small group instructional arrangement. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 218-230.
28. Stonecipher, E. L., Schuster, J. W., Collins, B. C., & Grisham-Brown, J. (1999). Teaching gift wrapping skills in a quadruple instructional arrangement using constant time delay. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 139-158.
29. Tekin, E., & Kircaali-Iftar, G. (2002). Comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two response prompting procedures delivered by sibling tutors. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 283-299.
30. nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
31. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. New York: Longman.
32. Wolery, M., Bailey, D. B., & Sugai, G. M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional learners. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
33. Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Effective and efficient procedures for the transfer of stimulus control. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 52-77.
34. Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Werts, M. G., & Cipol loni, R. M. (1993). Effects of simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback. Early Education and Development, 4, 20-31.
35. Wolery, M., & Schuster, J. W. (1997). Instructional methods with students who have significant disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 61-79.
36. Wolfe, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.