Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 206-214

  Sturdevant, John R ^a,b   Bayne, Stephen C ^a,b   Heymann, Harald O ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b The American Association for Dental Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEREC;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MOLAR TOOTH; PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 0033290751     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00400.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 117: 115–120.
2. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M. Method and apparatus for the fabrication of custom-shaped implants. U.S. Patent No. 4575805, March 11, 1986.
3. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F, Gotsch T. CAD-CAM ceramic inlays and onlays: a case report after 3 years in place. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120:517–520.
4. Leinfelder KF, Isenberg BP, Essig ME. A new method for generating ceramic restorations: a CAD-CAM system. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 118:703–707.
5. Markowski A. A CAD-CAM ceramic inlay technique. J Esther Dent 1990; 2:170–176.
6. Brandestini M, Mormann WH. Computerized processing of ceramic fillings in the dental operatory. Bensheim, W. Germany : Siemens AG, Dental Sector, 1988.
7. Mörmann WH. Chairside computer-generated ceramic restorations: the Cerec third generation improvements. Pract Periodont Aesthetic Dent 1992; 4:9–16.
8. Mörmann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CAM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128:47–53.
9. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996; 12:245–249.
10. Berg NG, Derand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (CEREC). Swed Dent J 1997; 21:121–127.
11. Mörmann W, Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 109–115.
12. Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Leinfelder KF. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/ CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4:173–176.
13. O’Neal SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:48–54.
14. Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of CEREC CAD/CAM restorations emphasizing marginal integrity. J Dent Res 1991; 70:434. (Abstr).
15. Sjögren G. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53:24–28.
16. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993; 21:39–46.
17. Fett HP, Mörmann WH, Krejci I, Lutz F. The effects of short bevels and silanization on marginal adaptation of computer-machined mesio-occlusodistal inlays. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:823–829.
18. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of the marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994; 22:147–153.
19. Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, Siervo R. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:773–779.
20. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. Acta Odonotol Scand 1993; 51:201–206.
21. Sturdevant JR, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, Roberson TM, Bayne SC. Composite cement thickness of CEREC CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1991; 70:296. (Abstr).
22. Hembree JH Jr. Comparisons of fit of CAD-CAM restorations using three imaging surfaces. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 145–147.
23. Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanhyerle G. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992; 20:171–177.
24. Sjögren G, Molin M, Van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53:325–330.
25. Sjögren G, Molin M, Van Dijken JW. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56:263–267.
26. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:53–58.
27. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 1992; 8:305–309.
28. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM, Sockwell CL. Tooth-colored restorations for Classes I, II, and VI preparations. In: Sturdevant CM, ed. The art and science of operative dentistry. 3rd Ed. St. Louis : CV Mosby, 1995:617–619.
29. Pfeiffer J. Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression. 1. Int J Comput Dent 1998; 1:29–33.
30. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:405–408.
31. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:1171–1181.