Survival rate of ceramic inlays

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 623-626

  Fuzzi, M ^a   Rappelli, G ^a  

^a 7 Piazza P ta Mascarella ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

Ceramic inlays; Indirect restorations; Survival rate

Indexed keywords

3M RESIN CEMENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND 2; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; ULTRABOND;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PULPITIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BICUSPID; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; PULPITIS; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032159828     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00004-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Porcelain and composite inlays and onlays. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1994.
2. Banks R. G. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1990;63:619-626.
3. Dietschi D., Holz J. Restauration des dents postérieures. Revue Suisse de Odontostomatologie, 1990;100:1325-1332.
4. Roulet JF, Herder S. Bonded ceramic inlays. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1991.
5. Douglas WH. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. Proceedings of the 3M Symposium, The Netherlands. Peter Szulc Publ Co., 1985, pp. 433-442.
6. Mörmann W., Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence International, 1992;23:109-115.
7. Studer S., Lehner C., Scharer P. Glass-ceramic inlays and onlays made by IPS empress: first clinical results. Journal of Dental Research, 1992;71:658.
8. Reiss B. Klinische langzeiterfahrungen mit Cerec-Inlays. Der Freie Zahnarzt, 1994;38:30-33.
9. Noack M. J., Roulet J.-F. Survival rates and mode of failure of Dicor inlays after 4 years. Journal of Dental Research, 1994;73:196. Abstract No. 759.
10. Roulet J.-F. The longevity of glass ceramic inlays. Journal of Dental Research, 1995;74:405. Abstract No. 36.
11. Hintze JL. SOLO Statistical system BMDP Statistical Software, Survival Analysis Module, Cork, Ireland, 1991.
12. El-Mowafy O. M., Lewis D. W., Benmergui C., Levinton C. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry, 1994;22:33-43.
13. Molin M., Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of the Optec inlay system. Acta Odontologica Scandinava, 1992;50:227-233.
14. Åberg C. H., Van Dijken J. W. V., Olofsson A. L. Three years comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontologica Scandinava, 1994;52:140-149.
15. Van Dijken J. W. V., Aberg C. H. et al. Five year evaluation of ceramic inlays. Journal of Dental Research, 1996;75(Abstr. No. 72): 1302.
16. Molin M., Karlsson S. A clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) inlay system. Acta Odontologica Scandinava, 1996;54:145-149.
17. Qualtrough A. J. E., Wilson N. H. F. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. Journal of Dentistry, 1996;24:317-323.
18. Isidor F., Brøndum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1995;74:140-144.