Effect of composite basing on the resistance to bulk fracture of industrial porcelain inlays

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 183-189

  Moscovich, Hila ^a   Roeters, F J M ^a   Verdonschot, N ^b   De Kanter, R J A M ^a   Creugers, N H J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bases; Ceramics; Composites; Inlays

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CLEARFIL PORCELAIN BOND; CLEARFIL RAY POSTERIOR; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT; TWINLOOK CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 0032015359     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00008-0     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Elderton, R. J., A new look at cavity preparation. Proceedings of the British Paedodontic Society, 1979, 9, 25-30.
2. Millar, B. J., Robinson, P. B. and Davies, B. R., Effects of the removal of composite resin restorations on class II cavities. British Dental Journal 1992, 173, 210-212.
3. Moscovich, H., Snoek, P. A. and Creugers, N. H. J., Substance loss in converting amalgam restorations into adhesive porcelain inlays. Journal of Dental Research, 1995, 74, 553.
4. Reinhardt, J. W. and Swift, E. J. Jr. and Bolden, A. J., A national survey on the use of glass ionomer cements. Operative Dentistry, 1993, 18, 56-60.
5. McKinney, J. E., Antonucci, J. M. and Rupp, N. W., Wear and microhardness of glass ionomer cements. Journal of Dental Research, 1987, 66, 1134-1139.
6. Stanley, H. R., Pulpal responses to ionomer cements-biological characteristics. Journal of the American Dental Association, 1990, 120, 25-29.
7. Dietschi, D., Magne, P. and Holz, J., Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Quintessence International, 1994, 25, 659-677.
8. Dietschi, D., Maeder, M., Meyer, J.-M. and Holz, J., In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence International, 1990, 21, 823-831.
9. Höglund Aberg, C., van Dijken, J. W. V. and Olofsson, A.-L., Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontologica Scandinavian, 1994, 52, 140-149.
10. Attin, T., Vataschki, M. and Hellwig, E., Properties of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence International, 1996, 27, 203-209.
11. Milleding, P., Örtengren, U. and Karlsson, S., Ceramic inlay systems: some clinical aspects. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1995, 22, 571-580.
12. Gere, M. G. and Timoshenko, S. P., Mechanics of Materials, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall. London, 1991.
13. Willems, G., Lambrechts, P., Braem, M., Celis, J. P. and Vanherle, G., A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dental Materials, 1992, 8, 310-319.
14. Produktinformation Vita, CELAY® Blanks. VITA Zahnfabrik, H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG, Postfach 13 38, D-79704, Bad Säckingen, Germany. Measurement done by Professor G. H. Frischat, Technische Universität Clausthal, Institut für Nichtmetallische Werkstoffe.
15. Isidor, F. and Brøndum, K., A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1995, 74, 140-144.
16. Qualtrough, A. J. E. and Wilson, N. H. F., A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. Journal of Dentistry, 1996, 24, 317-323.
17. Isenberg, B. P., Essig, M. E. and Leinfelder, K. F., Three year clinical evaluation of CAD-CAM restorations. Journal of Aesthetic Dentistry, 1992, 4, 173-176.
18. Reiss, B. and Walter, W., Überlebensanalyse und klinische Nachuntersuchungen von zahnfarbenen Einlagefüllungen nach dem CEREC-Verfahren. ZWR, 1991, 100, 329-332.
19. Craig, R. G., Selected properties of dental composites. Journal of Dental Research, 1979, 58, 1544-1550.
20. Willems, G., Celis, J. P., Lambrechts, P., Braem, M. and Vanherle, G., Hardness and Young's modulus determined by nanoindentation technique of filler particles of dental restorative materials compared with human enamel. Journal of Biomedical Materials, 1993, 27, 747-755.
21. Roulet, J. F. and Herder, S., Bonded Ceramic Inlays. Quintessence Publishing, Chicago, IL, 1990.
22. Sorensen, J. A. and Munksgaard, E. C., Relative gap formation of resin-cemented ceramic inlays and dentine bonding agents. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996, 76, 374-378.
23. El-Mowafy, O. M., Brown, J. W. and McComb, D., Radiopacity of direct ceramic inlay restoratives. Journal of Dentistry, 1991, 19, 366-368.
24. Willems, G., Noack, M. J. and Inokoshi, S., Radiopacity of composites compared with human enamel and dentine. Journal of Dentistry, 1991, 19, 362-365.