Navigating the changing landscape of literacy: Current theory and research in computer-based reading and writing

Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy Through the Communicative and Visual Arts

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 77-92

  Reinking, David ^a   Labbo, Linda ^a   McKenna, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85085793848     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611161-19     Document Type: Chapter

References (117)

1. Atkinson, R.C., & Hansen, D.N. (1966). Computer-assisted instruction in initial reading: The Stanford project. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5-26.
2. Baumann, J.F., Dillon, D.R., Shockley, B.B., Alvermann, D.E., & Reinking, D. (1996). Perspectives in literacy research. In L. Baker, P.P. Afflerbach, & D. Reinking (Eds.), Developing engaged readers in school and home communities (pp. 217-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Beasley, R.E., & Lister, K.B. (1992). Application report: User orientation in a hypertext glossary. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19, 115-118.
4. Blohm, P.J. (1982). Computer-aided glossing and facilitated learning in prose recall. In J.A. Niles & L.A. Harris (Eds.), New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 24-28). Thirty-first Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
5. Blohm, P.J. (1987). Effect on [sic] lookup aids on mature readers’ recall of technical text. Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 77-88.
6. Bolter, J.D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Also available as hypertext computer program.
7. Bolter, J.D., Joyce, M., Smith, J.B., & Bernstein, M. (1993). Story space [Computer program]. Cambridge, MA: Eastgate Systems.
8. Brandt, D, (1990). Literacy as involvement: The acts of writers, readers, and texts. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.
9. Bruce, B., Michaels, S., & Watson-Gegeo, K. (1985). How computers can change the writing process. Language Arts, 62, 143-149.
10. Bruce, B.C., & Rubin, A. (1993). Electronic quills: A situated evaluation of using computers for writing in classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Chang, L., & Osguthorpe, R. (1990). The effects of computerized picture-word processing on kindergartner’s language development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 5(1), 73-84.
12. Chenyholmes, C.H. (1993). Reading research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25, 1-32.
13. Cochran-Smith, M., Kahn, J., & Paris, C. (1990). Writing with a felicitous tool. Theory into Practice, 29, 235-245.
14. The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University (1994). Multimedia environments for developing literacy in at-risk students. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise (pp. 23-56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Cooper, M.M., & Selfe, C.L. (1990). Computer conferences and learning: Authority, resistance, and internally persuasive discourse. College English, 52, 847-869.
16. Coover, R. (1993, August 29). Hyperfiction: Novels for the computer. The New York Times Book Review.
17. Cuban, L. (1986). Teaehers and Machines. NewYork: Teachers College Press.
18. Daniel, D.B., & Reinking, D. (1987). The construct of legibility in electronic reading environments. In D. Reinking (Ed.), Reading and computers: Issues for theory and practice (pp. 24-39). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Dickinson, D.K. (1986). Cooperation, collaboration, and a computer: Integrating a computer into a first-second grade writing program. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 357-378.
20. Duchastel, P. (1986). Computer text access. Computer Education, 10, 403-409.
21. Edwards, B.L. (1991). How computers change things: Literacy and the digitized word. Writing Instructor, 10(2), 68-76.
22. Feldmann, S.C., & Fish, M.C. (1991). Use of computer-mediated reading supports to enhance reading comprehension of high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 25-36.
23. Fey, M.H. (1994). Finding voice through computer communication: A new venue for collaboration. Journal of Advanced Composition, 14(1), 221-238.
24. Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1995). Broadening the lens: Toward an expanded conceptualization of literacy. In K.A. Hinchman, D.J. Leu, & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice: 44th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1-16). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
25. Friedman, B. (1990, April). Societal issues and school practices: An ethnographic investigation of the social context of school computer use. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
26. Gallego, M.A. (1992, December). Telecommunications: Beyond the dialogue journal. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
27. Gay, G., Trumbull, D., & Mazur, J. (1991). Designing and testing navigational strategies and guidance tools for a hypermedia program. Journal of Edticational Computing Research, 7, 189-202.
28. Green, J.O. (1984). New ways for special ed kids to communicate. Classroom Computer Learning, 5(3), 24-29.
29. Greenleaf, C. (1994). Technological indeterminacy: The role of classroom writing practices and pedagogy in shaping student use of the computer. Written Communication, 11(1), 85-130.
30. Hawisher, G.E., & Selfe, C.L. (Eds.). (1991). Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
31. Heap, J.L. (1986). Collaborative practices during computer writing in a first grade classroom (Report No. 143). Toronto: Ontario Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 273 979)
32. Heaviside, S., Malitz, G., & Carpenter, J. (1995). Advanced telecommunications in US schools, K-12. (Doc. No. NCES 95731). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
33. Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. (1991). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading, research, Vol. 2 (pp. 641-668). New York: Longman.
34. Horney, M. (1994, December). Project literacy. Hypermedia for hearing-impaired readers. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
35. Jonassen, D.H. (1986). Hypertext principles for text and courseware design. Educational Psychologist, 21, 269-292.
36. Kaplan, N. (1991). Ideology, technology, and the future of writing instruction. In G.E. Hawisher & C.L. Selfe (Eds.), Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies (pp. 11-42). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
37. Kaufer, D.S., & Carley, K.M. (1993). Communication at a distance: The influence of print on sociocultural organization and change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Kiesler, S. (1986). The hidden messages in computer networks. Harvard Business Review.
39. Kirby, D.R., & Kirby, K. (1985). The reading-writing connection. In L.W. Searfoss & J.E. Readence (Eds.), Helping children learn to read (pp. 338-353). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. Krendl, K.A., & Williams, R.B. (1990). The importance of being rigorous: Research on writing to read. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 81-86.
41. Labbo, L. (1994, December). Examining the influence of computers on young children’s opportunities for literacy development. Paper presented at the 44th meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
42. Labbo, L. (1995, May). Classroom, computer lab, and living room: Case studies of kindergartners’ home and school computer-related experiences. A report of findings related to NRRC funded research. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association, Anaheim, CA.
43. Labbo, L., Field, S., & Watkins J. (1995). Narrative as action research: One teacher’s story. Proceedings of the Qualitative Research Interest Group Conference for January 3-5, 1995. Athens, GA.
44. Labbo, L., Murray, B.A., & Phillips, M. (1995-1996). Writing to read: From inheritance to innovation and invitation. The Reading Teacher, 49, 314-321.
45. Labbo, L., Reinking, D., & McKenna, M. (1995). Examining teachers roles in incorporating a computer as an informal literacy tool in classrooms of young children. In K.A. Hinchman, D.J. Leu, & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice: 44th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 459-465). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
46. L’Allier, J.J. (1980). An evaluation study of a computer-based lesson that adjusts reading level by monitoring on task reader characteristics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
47. Landow, G. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48. Lanham, R.A. (1989). The electronic word: Literary study and the digital revolution. New Literary History, 20(2), 265-290.
49. Lanham, R.A. (1993). The electronic word: Democracy, technology, and the arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Larson, D. (1993). Marble Springs. [Computer software], Cambridge, MA: Eastgate Systems.
51. Lemke, J.L. (1994, April). Multiplying meaning: Composing multimedia text. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
52. Leu, D., & Hillinger, M. (1994, December). Reading comprehension in hypermedia: Supporting changes to children‘s conceptions of a scientific principle. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
53. MacGregor, S.K. (1988a). Instructional design for computer mediated text systems: Effects of motivation, learner control, and collaboration on reading performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 142-147.
54. MacGregor, S.K. (1988b). Use of self-questioning with a computer mediated text system and measures of reading performance. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20, 131-148.
55. Mannes, S.M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 91-115.
56. McConkie, G.W. (1983, December). Computer-aided reading: A help for illiterate adults. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
57. McIntyre, S.R. (1992, December). Computer-mediated discourse: Electronic journaling and effective practice. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
58. McKenna, M. (1994, December). Effects of a program of computer mediated books on the progress of beginning readers. Paper presented at the 44th meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
59. McGee, G.W. (1987). Social context variables affecting the implementation of microcomputers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 189-206.
60. Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Morocco, C.C., Remz, A.R., & Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
61. Mehan, H. (1989). Microcomputers in classrooms: Educational technology and social practice. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 20, 4-21.
62. Michaels, S., & Bruce, B. (1989). Classroom contexts and literacy development: How writing systems shape the teaching and learning of composition (Tech. Rep. No. 476). Urbana-Campaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
63. Miller, L., & Olson, J. (1994). Putting the computer in its place: A study of teaching with technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(2), 121-141.
64. Moulthrop, S., & Kaplan, N. (1994). They became what they beheld: The futility of resistance in the space of electronic writing. In C.L. Selfe & S.Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The conatications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 220-237). New York: The Modern Language Association.
65. Murphy, J.W. (1988). Computerization, postmodern epistemology, and reading in the postmodern era. Educational Theory, 38(2), 175-182.
66. Myers, J. (1993). Constructing community and intertextuality in electronic mail. In D.J. Leu & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice: 42nd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 251-262). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
67. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. NewYork: Knopf.
68. Neilsen, L. (in press). Coding the light. In L. Neilsen & J. Willinsky (Eds.), Coding the light: Gender, generation, and technologies of metamorphoses. New York: Teachers College Press.
69. Newman, D. (1990). Opportunities for research on the organizational impact of school computers. Educational Researcher, 19, 8-13.
70. Olson, R.K., Foltz, G., & Wise, B.W. (1986). Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 18, 93-99.
71. Olson, R.K., & Wise, B.W. (1987). Computer speech in reading instruction. In D. Reinking (Ed.), Reading and computers: Issues for theory and practice (pp. 156-177). NewYork: Teachers College Press.
72. Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York: Methuen.
73. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
74. Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. NewYork: Basic Books.
75. Phenix, J., & Hannan, E. (1984). Word processing in the grade one classroom. Language Arts, 8, 804-812.
76. Reinking, D. (1987). Computers, reading, and a new technology of print. In D. Reinking (Ed.), Reading and computers: Issues for theory and practice (pp. 3-23). New York: Teachers College Press.
77. Reinking, D. (1988). Computer-mediated text and comprehension differences: The role of reading time, reader preference, and estimation of learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 484-498.
78. Reinking, D. (1992). Differences between electronic and printed texts: An agenda for research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1(1), 11-24.
79. Reinking, D. (1994). Electronic literacy, (Perspective in Reading Research No. 4). University of Georgia, University of Maryland: National Reading Research Center.
80. Reinking, D. (1995). Reading and writing with computers: Literacy research in a post-typographic world. In K.A. Hinchman, D.J. Leu & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice; 44th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 17-33). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
81. Reinking, D., & Bridwell-Bowles, L. (1991). Computers in reading and writing. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol.2 (pp. 310-340). New York: Longman.
82. Reinking, D., & Chanlin, L.J. (1994). Graphic aids in electronic texts. Reading Research and Instruction, 33, 207-232.
83. Reinking, D., & Pickle, J.M. (1993). Using a formative experiment to study how computers affect reading and writing in classrooms. In D.J. Leu & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice, The 42nd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 263-270). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
84. Reinking, D., Pickle, M., & Tao, L. (1996). The effects of inserted questions and mandatory review in computer-mediated texts(Research Report No. 50). The University of Georgia and the University of Maryland: National Reading Research Center.
85. Reinking, D., & Rickman, S.S. (1990). The effects of computer mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 395-411.
86. Reinking, D., & Schreiner, R. (1985). The effects of computer mediated text on measures of reading comprehension and reading behavior. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 536-552.
87. Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (in press). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary student independent reading (Research Report). University of Georgia, University of Maryland: National Reading Research Center.
88. Reitsma, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 219-235.
89. Rheingold, H. (1993). The The virtual community Homesteading on the the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
90. Rieber, L.P. (1990). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational Psychologye, 82, 135-140.
91. Riel, M. (1989). The impact of computers in classrooms, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22, 180-189.
92. Roth, S.F., & Beck, I.L. (1987). Theoretical and instructiana implications of assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 197-218.
93. Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
94. Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: The analytic and systemic approaches to educational research. Educational Researcher, 20(6), 10-18.
95. Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as; a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 620-627.
96. Salomon, G., Perkins, D.N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9.
97. Selfe, C.L., & Hilligoss, S. (Eds.). (1994). Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning technology. NewYork The Modern Language Association.
98. Sheingold, K. (1991). Restructuring for learning with technology: The potential for synergy. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 17-27.
99. Shirk, H.N. (1991), Hypertext and composition studies. In G.E. Hawisher & C.L. Selfe (Eds.), Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies (pp. 177-202). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
100. Smith, F. (1984). The promise and threat of microcomputers in language education. Victoria, BC: Abel Press.
101. Spior, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltorich, P.J., & Anderson, D.K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains (Tech. Rep. No. 441). Urbana-Campaign, II: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
102. Spivey, N. N., & King, J.R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 7-26.
103. Stahl, S. A, Hynd, C.R., Britton, B. N, McNish, M.M., & Bosquet, D. (in press). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly.
104. Stix, G. (1994). The speed of write. Sctentific American, 271(6), 106-111.
105. Sulzby, E. (1994, December). Emergent writing on and off the com. puter: A final report on project CIEL (computers in early literacy). Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
106. Tobias, S. (1987). Mandatory text review and interaction with student characteristics. Journal of Educational psychology, 79, 154-161.
107. Tobias, S. (1988). Teaching. strategic text review by computer and interaction with student characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 299-310.
108. Tuman, M.C. (1992a). Word perfect. Literacy in the computer age. London: Falmer Press.
109. Tuman, M.C. (Ed.) (1992b). Literacy online: Thepramise (andperil) of reading and writing with computers. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
110. Turner, S.V., & Depinto V.M. (1992). Students as hypermedia authors: Themes emerging from a qualitative study. Journal of Research or Computing in Education, 25, 187-199.
111. Venezky, R.L. (1983). Evaluating computer-assisted instruction on its own terms. In A.C.Wilkinson (Ed.), Classroom computers and cognitive science (pp. 31-49). New York: Academic Press
112. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
113. Weir, S. (1989). The computer in schools: Machine as humanizer. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 61-73.
114. Wilkinson, A.C. (1983). Learning to read in real time. In A.C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Classroom computers and cognitive science (pp. 183-199). New York: Academic Press.
115. Wise, B.W. (1992). Whole words and decoding for short-term learning: Comparisons on a “talking-computer” system. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 147-167.
116. Wright, P. (1987). Reading and writing for electronic journals. In B.K. Britton & S.M. Glynn (Eds.), Executive control processes in reading (pp. 23-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
117. Zorfass, J., & Remz, A.R. (1992). Successful technology integr The role of communication and collaboration. Middle School Journal, 23(5), 39-43.