Genome-wide histone modifications: Gaining specificity by preventing promiscuity

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 756-762

  Van Leeuwen, Fred ^a   Gottschling, Daniel E ^a  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN DOT1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; REPRESSOR PROTEIN;

ACETYLATION; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; GENE SILENCING; GENOME; METHYLATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PHOSPHORYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TITRIMETRY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SACCHAROMYCES;

CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; GENE SILENCING; GENOME; HISTONES; METHYLATION; MODELS, GENETIC; NUCLEOSOMES; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 0036897852     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00393-9     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Gall J.G. Bethesda K.ampman R. A Pictorial History. Views of the Cell. 1996;The American Society for Cell Biology.
2. Wakimoto B.T. Beyond the nucleosome: epigenetic aspects of position-effect variegation in Drosophila. Cell. 93:1998;321-324.
3. Moazed D. Common themes in mechanisms of gene silencing. Mol Cell. 8:2001;489-498.
4. Richards E.J., Elgin S.C. Epigenetic codes for heterochromatin formation and silencing: rounding up the usual suspects. Cell. 108:2002;489-500.
5. Dillon N., Festenstein R. Unravelling heterochromatin: competition between positive and negative factors regulates accessibility. Trends Genet. 18:2002;252-258.
6. Grewal S.I., Elgin S.C. Heterochromatin: new possibilities for the inheritance of structure. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 12:2002;178-187.
7. Cosma M.P. Ordered recruitment: gene-specific mechanism of transcription activation. Mol Cell. 10:2002;227-236.
8. Ptashne M., Gann A. Genes and Signals. 2002;Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
9. Tham W.H., Zakian V.A. Transcriptional silencing at Saccharomyces telomeres: implications for other organisms. Oncogene. 21:2002;512-521.
10. Huang Y. Transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;1465-1482.
11. Gasser S.M., Cockell M.M. The molecular biology of the SIR proteins. Gene. 279:2001;1-16.
12. Luo K., Vega-Palas M.A., Grunstein M. Rap1-Sir4 binding independent of other Sir, yKu, or histone interactions initiates the assembly of telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. Genes Dev. 16:2002;1528-1539. This paper, together with Hoppe et al. (2002) [13•] and Rusche et al.(2002) [14•], delineates the stepwise assembly of silent chromatin in yeast. Sir4p, which is present in a complex with Sir2p, can bind to silencers in the absence of the Sir2p and Sir3p. These studies suggest that Sir4p has a high affinity for silencers and may be important for nucleation of silent chromatin formation. The histone deacetylase activity of Sir2p is required for the recruitment of Sir3p and the subsequent spreading of the Sir complex along the nucleosome arrays.
13. Hoppe G.J., Tanny J.C., Rudner A.D., Gerber S.A., Danaie S., Gygi S.P., Moazed D. Steps in assembly of silent chromatin in yeast: Sir3-independent binding of a Sir2/Sir4 complex to silencers and role for Sir2-dependent deacetylation. Mol Cell Biol. 22:2002;4167-4180. See annotation Luo et al. (2002) [12•].
14. Rusche L.N., Kirchmaier A.L., Rine J. Ordered nucleation and spreading of silenced chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 13:2002;2207-2222. See annotation Luo et al. (2002) [12•].
15. Hecht A., Laroche T., Strahl-Bolsinger S., Gasser S.M., Grunstein M. Histone H3 and H4 N-termini interact with SIR3 and SIR4 proteins: a molecular model for the formation of heterochromatin in yeast. Cell. 80:1995;583-592.
16. Carmen A.A., Milne L., Grunstein M. Acetylation of the yeast histone H4 N-terminus regulates its binding to heterochromatin protein SIR3. J Biol Chem. 19:2001;19.
17. Suka N., Suka Y., Carmen A.A., Wu J.S., Grunstein M. Highly specific antibodies determine histone acetylation site usage in yeast heterochromatin and euchromatin. Mol Cell. 8:2001;473-479. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments with new antibodies that are highly-specific for histone acetylation sites on histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 show that silent chromatin at telomeres and silent mating type loci is hypoacetylated at all sites. Silent chromatin (i.e. Sir3) is required to maintain the hypoacetylated state. Analysis of the histone acetylation state at a set of promoters in Rpd3p, Gcn5p and Esa1p deletion strains reveals which specific lysines are affected by each enzyme at the loci examined.
18. Imai S., Armstrong C.M., Kaeberlein M., Guarente L. Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. Nature. 403:2000;795-800.
19. Smith J.S., Brachmann C.B., Pillus L., Boeke J.D. Distribution of a limited Sir2 protein pool regulates the strength of yeast rDNA silencing and is modulated by Sir4p. Genetics. 149:1998;1205-1219.
20. Maillet L., Boscheron C., Gotta M., Marcand S., Gilson E., Gasser S.M. Evidence for silencing compartments within the yeast nucleus: a role for telomere proximity and Sir protein concentration in silencer-mediated repression. Genes Dev. 10:1996;1796-1811.
21. Smeal T., Claus J., Kennedy B., Cole F., Guarente L. Loss of transcriptional silencing causes sterility in old mother cells of S. cerevisiae. Cell. 84:1996;633-642.
22. Sinclair D.A., Guarente L. Extrachromosomal rDNA circles - a cause of aging in yeast. Cell. 91:1997;1033-1042.
23. Park P.U., Defossez P.A., Guarente L. Effects of mutations in DNA repair genes on formation of ribosomal DNA circles and life span in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 19:1999;3848-3856.
24. Renauld H., Aparicio O.M., Zierath P.D., Billington B.L., Chhablani S.K., Gottschling D.E. Silent domains are assembled continuously from the telomere and are defined by promoter distance and strength, and by SIR3 dosage. Genes Dev. 7:1993;1133-1145.
25. Hecht A., Strahl-Bolsinger S., Grunstein M. Spreading of transcriptional repressor SIR3 from telomeric heterochromatin. Nature. 383:1996;92-96.
26. Jenuwein T., Allis C.D. Translating the histone code. Science. 293:2001;1074-1080.
27. van Leeuwen F., Gafken P.R., Gottschling D.E. Dot1p modulates silencing in yeast by methylation of the nucleosome core. Cell. 109:2002;745-756. This study shows that Dot1p methylates Lys79 on histone H3, a site on the nucleosome core. Dot1p does not have a SET domain and only acts when histone H3 is packaged into a nucleosome. In vivo, the vast majority of histone H3 is methylated on histone H3-K79 in yeast. Loss of methylation of histone H3-K79 results in redistribution of Sir protein binding and loss of silencing at telomeres. As opposed to Ng et al. (2002) [28••], the authors propose that methylation of histone H3-K79 prevents nonspecific binding of Sir proteins.
28. Ng H.H., Feng Q., Wang H., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Zhang Y., Struhl K. Lysine methylation within the globular domain of histone H3 by Dot1 is important for telomeric silencing and Sir protein association. Genes Dev. 16:2002;1518-1527. This study shows that Dot1p methylates K79 on histone H3, a site on the nucleosome core. Dot1p does not have a SET domain and only acts when histone H3 is packaged into a nucleosome. Loss of methylation of histone H3-K79 results in reduced Sir protein binding and loss of silencing at telomeres. As opposed to van Leeuwen et al. (2002) [27••], the authors propose that Sir proteins may be recruited by the methylated form of histone H3-K79.
29. Feng Q., Wang H., Ng H.H., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Struhl K., Zhang Y. Methylation of H3-lysine 79 is mediated by a new family of HMTases without a SET domain. Curr Biol. 12:2002;1052-1058. The human Dot1-like protein methylates histone H3-K79 in the context of the nucleosome. Using mK79-specific antibodies, the authors show that methylation of histone H3-K79 is conserved from yeast to humans. Methylation of Lys79 is regulated during the cell cycle in HeLa cells.
30. Park J-H, Cosgrove MS, Youngman E, Wolberger C, Boeke JD: A core nucleosome surface critical for transcriptional silencing. Nat Genet 2002, in press. A histone mutant hunt reveals a surface on the nucleosome disk that is critical for silencing in yeast. The surface is centred around histone H3-K79 and is composed of amino acid side chains in the histone fold motifs of histones H3 and H4. Albeit in a distinct location, this region shows structural similarities to the region to which the sin mutations have been mapped.
31. Georgel P.T., Palacios DeBeer M.A., Pietz G., Fox C.A., Hansen J.C. Sir3-dependent assembly of supramolecular chromatin structures in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:2001;8584-8589. This study shows that recombinant Sir3p interacts with nucleosomal arrays, assembled from chicken histone octamers and 5S rDNA repeats. This in vitro interaction occurs with the nucleosome core even in the absence of the histone tails. The results suggest that Sir3p cross-links individual nucleosome arrays in vitro, which may be important for the formation of higher-order chromatin structures in vivo.
32. Nakayama J., Rice J.C., Strahl B.D., Allis C.D., Grewal S.I.S. Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly. Science. 292:2001;110-113.
33. Lachner M., O'Carroll D., Rea S., Mechtler K., Jenuwein T. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature. 410:2001;116-120.
34. Bannister A.J., Zegerman P., Partridge J.F., Miska E.A., Thomas J.O., Allshire R.C., Kouzarides T. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature. 410:2001;120-124.
35. Jacobs S.A., Taverna S.D., Zhang Y.N., Briggs S.D., Li J.M., Eissenberg J.C., Allis C.D., Khorasanizadeh S. Specificity of the HP1 chromo domain for the methylated N-terminus of histone H3. EMBO J. 20:2001;5232-5241.
36. San-Segundo P.A., Roeder G.S. Role for the silencing protein Dot1 in meiotic checkpoint control. Mol Biol Cell. 11:2000;3601-3615.
37. Bannister A.J., Schneider R., Kouzarides T. Histone methylation: dynamic or static? Cell. 109:2002;801-806.
38. Spellman P.T., Sherlock G., Zhang M.Q., Iyer V.R., Anders K., Eisen M.B., Brown P.O., Botstein D., Futcher B. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol Biol Cell. 9:1998;3273-3297.
39. Roguev A., Schaft D., Shevchenko A., Pijnappel W.W., Wilm M., Aasland R., Stewart A.F. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Set1 complex includes an Ash2 homologue and methylates histone 3 lysine 4. EMBO J. 20:2001;7137-7148.
40. Briggs S.D., Bryk M., Strahl B.D., Cheung W.L., Davie J.K., Dent S.Y.R., Winston F. Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation is mediated by Set1 and required for cell growth and rDNA silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 15:2001;3286-3295. This study, together with Roguev et al. (2001) [39], Bryk et al. (2002) [42•] and Nagy et al. (2002) [43•], shows that Set1p is required for methylation of histone H3-K4 in yeast. While methylated histone H3-K4 is abundant at the rDNA locus and low at telomeres, Set1p is involved in silencing at both loci.
41. Miller T., Krogan N.J., Dover J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Johnston M., Greenblatt J.F., Shilatifard A. COMPASS: a complex of proteins associated with a trithorax-related SET domain protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:2001;12902-12907.
42. Bryk M., Briggs S.D., Strahl B.D., Curcio M.J., Allis C.D., Winston F. Evidence that Set1, a factor required for methylation of histone H3, regulates rDNA silencing in S. cerevisiae by a Sir2-independent mechanism. Curr Biol. 12:2002;165-170. See annotation Briggs et al. (2001) [40•].
43. Nagy P.L., Griesenbeck J., Kornberg R.D., Cleary M.L. A trithorax-group complex purified from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for methylation of histone H3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:2002;90-94. See annotation Briggs et al. (2001) [40•].
44. Strahl B.D., Ohba R., Cook R.G., Allis C.D. Methylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 is highly conserved and correlates with transcriptionally active nuclei in Tetrahymena. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;14967-14972.
45. Bernstein B.E., Humphrey E.L., Erlich R.L., Schneider R., Bouman P., Liu J.S., Kouzarides T., Schreiber S.L. Methylation of histone H3 Lys 4 in coding regions of active genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 11:2002;11. While Set1p and H3-K4 methylation have been linked to silencing in yeast, genome-wide analysis of histone methylation and acetylation patterns by chromatin immunoprecipitation shows that H3-K4 methylation correlates with transcriptional activity. The modification is enriched in coding regions. Telomeres and silent mating type loci are hypomethylated. These findings suggest that Set1p and H3-K4 methylation affect silencing indirectly.
46. Noma K., Allis C.D., Grewal S.I. Transitions in distinct histone H3 methylation patterns at the heterochromatin domain boundaries. Science. 293:2001;1150-1155.
47. Litt M.D., Simpson M., Gaszner M., Allis C.D., Felsenfeld G. Correlation between histone lysine methylation and developmental changes at the chicken beta-globin locus. Science. 293:2001;2453-2455.
48. Boggs B.A., Cheung P., Heard E., Spector D.L., Chinault A.C., Allis C.D. Differentially methylated forms of histone H3 show unique association patterns with inactive human X chromosomes. Nat Genet. 30:2002;73-76.
49. Narlikar G.J., Fan H.Y., Kingston R.E. Cooperation between complexes that regulate chromatin structure and transcription. Cell. 108:2002;475-487.
50. Marmorstein R. Protein modules that manipulate histone tails for chromatin regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2:2001;422-432.
51. Robyr D., Suka Y., Xenarios I., Kurdistani S.K., Wang A., Suka N., Grunstein M. Microarray deacetylation maps determine genome-wide functions for yeast histone deacetylases. Cell. 109:2002;437-446. Genomewide histone acetylation maps reveal the in vivo target genes and target histone sites of all the histone deacetylases in yeast. The datasets suggest that acetylation of histone H4-K5 and H4-K12 correlates with increased transcription in the rpd3Δ strain. Acetylation of histone H4-K16 is much less affected, indicating that it may not be directly involved in transcriptional regulation. This study identified subtelomeric regions, called HAST domains, that are deacetylated and repressed by Hda1p.
52. Clarke D.J., O'Neill L.P., Turner B.M. Selective use of H4 acetylation sites in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem J. 294:1993;557-561.
53. Meijsing S.H., Ehrenhofer-Murray A.E. The silencing complex SAS-I links histone acetylation to the assembly of repressed chromatin by CAF-I and Asf1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 15:2001;3169-3182. This study, together with Osada et al. (2001) [54•], shows that the putative acetyltransferase, Sas2p, is found in a nuclear protein complex with the chromatin assembly factors Cac1p and Asf1p. Deletion of any of these genes weakens silencing in yeast, as does mutation of H4-K16 to arginine, suggesting that Sas2p acts through acetylation of H4-K16, possibly in coordination with chromatin assembly.
54. Osada S., Sutton A., Muster N., Brown C.E., Yates J.R. iii, Sternglanz R., Workman J.L. The yeast SAS (something about silencing) protein complex contains a MYST-type putative acetyltransferase and functions with chromatin assembly factor ASF1. Genes Dev. 15:2001;3155-3168. See annotation Meijsing et al. (2001) [53•].
55. Waterborg J.H. Dynamic methylation of alfalfa histone H3. J Biol Chem. 268:1993;4918-4921.
56. Waterborg J.H. Dynamics of histone acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry. 40:2001;2599-2605.
57. Katan-Khaykovich Y., Struhl K. Dynamics of global histone acetylation and deacetylation in vivo: rapid restoration of normal histone acetylation status upon removal of activators and repressors. Genes Dev. 16:2002;743-752.
58. Lieb J.D., Liu X.L., Botstein D., Brown P.O. Promoter-specific binding of Rap1 revealed by genome-wide maps of protein-DNA association. Nat Genet. 28:2001;327-334. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, this study shows that Rap1p binds to 5% of all the yeast genes. Rap1p binds the most heavily transcribed genes and predominantly in intergenic regions. One hundred and eighty five new binding sites are found. Sir2, Sir3 and Sir4 protein binding was mapped at a genome-wide scale and found at silent loci, but also at multiple nonsilenced loci, the significance of which remains unclear. Some of the new Sir binding sites co-localize with Rap1p and/or origin of replication complex binding sites.
59. Wyrick J.J., Aparicio J.G., Chen T., Barnett J.D., Jennings E.G., Young R.A., Bell S.P., Aparicio O.M. Genome-wide distribution of ORC and MCM proteins in S. cerevisiae: high-resolution mapping of replication origins. Science. 294:2001;2357-2360. This study identifies binding sites for origin of replication complex (ORC) and mini-chromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins in the yeast genome by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Origins of replication were predicted based on co-localization of MCM or ORC proteins, or both. The yeast genome is estimated to contain ∼400 origins of replication.
60. Zegerman P., Canas B., Pappin D., Kouzarides T. Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation disrupts binding of nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) repressor complex. J Biol Chem. 277:2002;11621-11624.
61. Fong Y., Bender L., Wang W., Strome S. Regulation of the different chromatin states of autosomes and X chromosomes in the germ line of C. elegans. Science. 296:2002;2235-2238. Maternaleffect sterile proteins MES-2, MES-3, MES-4 and MES6 are required to keep the X chromosomes in a repressed state in the C. elegans germ line. Immunolocalization studies reveal that MES-4 is restricted to autosomes. The (repressor) complex MES-2-MES-3-MES6 is required to exclude MES-4 from X chromosomes. MES-4, in turn, may provide specificity of silencing by excluding the MES-2-MES-3-MES6 complex and other repressors from the autosomes, thereby targeting the repressors to the X-chromosomes.
62. Santos-Rosa H., Schneider R., Bannister A.J., Sherriff J., Bernstein B.E., Emre N.C., Schreiber S.L., Mellor J., Kouzarides T. Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3. Nature. 419:2002;407-411. This paper demonstrates that histone H3-K4 dimethylation occurs both in active and inactive euchromatic genes but that trimethylation is an exclusive mark of active genes. The authors confirm that Set1p is the enzyme responsible for both forms of methylation in vivo and in vitro. SET1 is required for maximal expression of a large number of euchromatic genes. The authors suggest that dimethylated Lys4 keeps chromatin in a transcriptionally permissive state and that trimethylated Lys4 is important for a transcriptionally active chromatin conformation.