A bias-ed assessment of the use of SNPs in human complex traits

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 726-734

  Terwilliger, Joseph D ^a   Haghighi, Fatemeh ^a   Hiekkalinna, Tero S ^b   Göring, Harald H H ^c  

^a New York State Psychiatric Institute ^*  (United States)

^b NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c SOUTHWEST FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE MAPPING; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; CHROMOSOME MAP; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; METHODOLOGY; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHROMOSOME MAPPING; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0036888970     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(02)00357-X     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Couzin J. New mapping project splits the community. Science. 296:2002;1391-1392.
2. Collins F., Galas D. A new 5-year plan for the United-States Human Genome Project. Science. 262:1993;43-46.
3. Collins F.S., Patrinos A., Jordan E., Chakravarti A., Gesteland R., Walters L., Fearon E., Hartwelt L., Langley C.H., Mathies R.A., et al. New goals for the US Human Genome Project: 1998-2003. Science. 282:1998;682-689.
4. Collins F.S., McKusick V.A. Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. J Am Med Assoc. 285:2001;540-544.
5. Weiss K. Goings on in Mendel's Garden. Evol Anthropol. 11:2002;40-44. This commentary discusses the misappropriation of Mendel's concepts by those studying traits with complex modes of inheritance. As the author points out, Mendel himself recognized the difference, and realized that the only traits which could be understood in a straightforward manner were those that were deterministically influenced by specific genes.
6. Collins F.S., Guyer M.S., Chakravarti A. Variations on a theme: cataloging human DNA sequence variation. Science. 278:1997;1580-1581.
7. Collins F.S., Mansoura M.K. The human genome project: revealing the shared inheritance of all humankind. Cancer. 91:2001;221-225.
8. Reich D.E., Lander E.S. On the allelic spectrum of human disease. Trends Genet. 17:2001;502-510.
9. Risch N., Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science. 273:1996;1516-1517.
10. Nikali K., Suomalainen A., Terwilliger J., Koskinen T., Weissenbach J., Peltonen L. Random search for shared chromosomal regions in 4 affected individuals - the assignment of a new hereditary ataxia locus. Am J Hum Genet. 56:1995;1088-1095.
11. Pennisi E. A closer look at SNPs suggests difficulties. Science. 281:1998;1787-1789.
12. Patterson M. That damned elusive polygene. Nat Rev Genet. 1:2000;86-86.
13. Patterson M. Wake-up call for genome scanners. Nat Rev Genet. 3:2002;9.
14. Reich D.E., Cargill M., Bolk S., Ireland J., Sabeti P.C., Richter D.J., Lavery T., Kouyoumjian R., Farhadian S.F., Ward R., et al. Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nature. 411:2001;199-204.
15. Olivier M., Bustos V.I., Levy M.R., Smick G.A., Moreno I., Bushard J.M., Almendras A.A., Sheppard K., Zierten D.L., Aggarwal A., et al. Complex high-resolution linkage disequilibrium and haplotype patterns of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 2.5 Mb of sequence on human chromosome 21. Genomics. 78:2001;64-72.
16. Daly M.J., Rioux J.D., Schaffner S.E., Hudson T.J., Lander E.S. High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nat Genet. 29:2001;229-232.
17. Johnson G.C.L., Esposito L., Barratt B.J., Smith A.N., Heward J., Di Genova G., Ueda H., Cordell H.J., Eaves I.A., Dudbridge F., et al. Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes. Nat Genet. 29:2001;233-237.
18. Judson R., Salisbury B., Schneider J., Windemuth A., Stephens J.C. How many SNPs does a genome-wide haplotype map require? Pharmacogenomics. 3:2002;379-391.
19. Terwilliger J.D., Weiss K.M. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of complex disease: fantasy or reality? Curr Opin Biotechnol. 9:1998;578-594.
20. Pritchard J.K. Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases? Am J Hum Genet. 69:2001;124-137. One of the first legitimate attempts to resolve the debate about whether rare or common variants are more likely to be involved in human complex diseases from a sophisticated population genetics perspective. Of course, as one should expect, the author concludes by suggesting the truth will be a mixture of both forms of risk factors, the balance of which depends on difficult to measure parameters of population history. Nevertheless, it does make one question the validity of the CVCD model which underlies the proposed HapMap project.
21. Weiss K.M., Terwilliger J.D. How many diseases does it take to map a gene with SNPs? Nat Genet. 26:2000;151-157. This commentary provides an overview of the current issues influencing complex trait gene mapping, highlighting some of the problems and popular misconceptions which may lead to overestimation of the prognosis for unraveling the aetiology of multifactorial traits using naïve approaches.
22. Terwilliger J.D., Goring H.H.H. Gene mapping in the 20th and 21st centuries: statistical methods, data analysis, and experimental design. Hum Biol. 72:2000;63-132. This review paper provides a general introduction to the conceptual underpinnings of gene mapping aimed at an audience of anthropologists. While heavy on concepts and light on mathematical detail, it surveys the field and reviews some of the existing data with insight into to why simple naïve study designs are likely to be doomed to failure in complex trait genetic studies.
23. Terwilliger J.D. On the resolution and feasiblity of genome scanning approaches. Adv Genet. 42:2001;351-391. This paper attempts to quantify the resolution of linkage and LD mapping in the presence of complete identity-by-descent information under some simple mathematical models of population structure and history. Further, the effects of ascertaining multiplex families as compared to singleton-affected individuals on association studies is quantified and explained.
24. Terwilliger J.D., Göring H.H.H., Magnusson P.K.E., Lee J.H. Study design for genetic epidemiology and gene mapping: the Korean diaspora project. Shengming Kexue Yanjiu (Life Science Research). 6:2002;95-115. An overview of the various study designs used in gene mapping and genetic epidemiology is presented, highlighting the advantages and weaknesses of each data structure and study design commonly used for estimating and detecting the effects of genetic, environmental, and cultural factors on the etiology of a given trait, with special emphasis on ways to combine data structures obtained with different ascertainment schemes in order to increase the accuracy of such prognostications.
25. Millikan R. The changing face of epidemiology in the genomics era. Epidemiology. 13:2002;472-480. This paper provides a nice synthesis of the epidemiologists' perspective on the genomics 'revolution'. Obviously, geneticists have a lot to learn from epidemiologists and vice versa and cross talk between both disciplines is imperative. We should try to study genetic and environmental risk factors jointly in common studies, using large pedigrees of related individuals rather than random population cohorts.
26. Holtzman N.A. Putting the search for genes in perspective. Int J Health Serv. 31:2001;445-461. This commentary discusses some of the false promises of the genomics era and describes the author's more realistic outlook on the situation, strongly questioning the enormous expenditure of the US government on the blind search for genomic approaches to public health problems.
27. Mackay T.F.C. The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annu Rev Genet. 35:2001;303-339. This is one of few attempts in the literature to glean information about the likely architecture of human complex traits by examining the question in a natural animal population. It makes one wonder why no-one is looking in earnest at subway rats to see if they can map any of the known rat quantitative trait loci in natural populations before making the huge jump from inbred rats to outbred 'subway' humans.
28. Peltonen L., Palotie A., Lange K. Use of population isolates for mapping complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 1:2000;182-190.
29. Rees J. Complex disease and the new clinical sciences. Science. 296:2002;698-701.
30. Schlichting C.D., Pigliucci M. Phenotypic Evolution: a Reaction Norm Perspective. 1998;Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA.
31. Weiss K.M. Genetic Variation and Human Disease: Principles and Evolutionary Approaches. 1993;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Weiss K.M. Is there a paradigm shift in genetics? Lessons from the study of human diseases. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 5:1996;259-265.
33. Weiss K.M. In search of human variation. Genome Res. 8:1998;691-697.
34. Weiss K.M., Clark A.G., Fullerton S.M., Taylor S.L., Nickerson D.A., Sing C.F. Evaluating the phenotypic effects of SNP variation: sampling issues. Am J Hum Genet. 65:(Suppl S):1999;8.
35. Weiss K.M., Buchanan A.V. Rediscovering Darwin after a Darwinian century. Evol Anthropol. 9:2000;187-200.
36. Weiss K.M., Fullerton S.M. Phenogenetic drift and the evolution of genotype-phenotype relationships. Theor Popul Biol. 57:2000;187-195. A nice overview of the evolutionary forces which have moulded the genetic structure of contemporary populations. Clearly it is the phenotype which is constrained in evolution, rather than the genetic mechanism through which the phenotype is obtained. As the authors demonstrate clearly, phenotypic similarity is not incompatible with great genotypic dissimilarity, something that it is very important to consider when designing genetic epidemiology studies, which are likely to be characterized by great heterogeneity.
37. Weiss K.M., Clark A.G. Linkage disequilibrium and the mapping of complex human traits. Trends Genet. 18:2002;19-24. In this review paper, more challenges to the CVCD model are presented, along with a discussion of the difficulties in accurately estimating the quantity and quality of LD from small samples. An overview of various measures of LD, and what they mean is also given. Anyone seriously interested in exploiting the power of LD for mapping should make themselves familiar with the population genetics concepts introduced in this review.
38. Wright A.F., Carothers A.D., Pirastu M. Population choice in mapping genes for complex diseases. Nat Genet. 23:1999;397-404.
39. Kruglyak L., Nickerson D.A. Variation is the spice of life. Nat Genet. 27:2001;234-236.
40. Brookes A.J. Rethinking genetic strategies to study complex diseases. Trends Mol Med. 7:2001;512-516. Even the biotechnology folks are starting to question the power of SNP-based mapping approaches, after years of trying to work out some success stories. Nevertheless, this review presents a notably more optimistic viewpoint on the subject than our own.
41. Cardon L.R., Bell J.I. Association study designs for complex diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2:2001;91-99.
42. Ghosh S., Collins F.S. The geneticist's approach to complex disease. Annu Rev Med. 47:1996;333-353.
43. Horrobin D.E. Realism in drug discovery - could Cassandra be right? Nat Biotechnol. 19:2001;1099-1100. Pessimism is not confined to gene-mapping prospects; those involved in pharmacogenetics may have even greater difficulties, as this author points out. Most drug response traits are not even known to be heritable or genetic, and yet we have this blind faith that the genomics 'revolution' will give us technological solutions to these illusive problems. In some cases, maybe, but it is dangerous to assume this blindly, as the author clearly explains.
44. Goring H.H.H., Terwilliger J.D. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors I: Complex-valued recombination fractions and complex phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 66:2000;1095-1106.
45. Goring H.H.H., Terwilliger J.D. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors II: Marker-locus genotyping errors modeled with hypercomplex recombination fractions. Am J Hum Genet. 66:2000;1107-1118.
46. Goring H.H.H., Terwilliger J.D. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: Marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters. Am J Hum Genet. 66:2000;1298-1309.
47. Goring H.H.H., Terwilliger J.D. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: Joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified. Am J Hum Genet. 66:2000;1310-1327. This paper shows how various 'model-free' test statistics used in linkage and LD analysis, such as affected sib-pair tests, haplotype relative risk tests, TDT tests, and case-control tests, are all equivalent to the same 'model-based' parametric likelihood ratio test applied to slightly different data structures. By combining data from all available data structures - from case-control data to large extended pedigrees - in a single analysis, a much more powerful and appropriate series of test statistics is proposed, for which software is provided by the authors.
48. Goring H.H.H., Ott J., Terwilliger J.D. A common framework for model-based or model-free, twopoint or multipoint, linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium analysis of complex traits. Am J Hum Genet. 65:(Suppl S):1999;1397.
49. Terwilliger J.D. A likelihood-based extended admixture model of oligogenic inheritance in 'model-based' and 'model-free' analysis. Eur J Hum Genet. 8:2000;399-406. This paper debunks the mythology that one can gain power in linkage analysis from modeling epistatic interactions among multiple disease-predisposing loci, at least in the case of complex qualitative traits in human genetics.
50. Terwilliger J.D., Zollner S., Laan M., Paabo S. Mapping genes through the use of linkage disequilibrium generated by genetic drift: 'Drift mapping' in small populations with no demographic expansion. Hum Hered. 48:1998;138-154.
51. Göring H.H.H., Terwilliger J.D., Blangero J. Large upward bias in estimation of locus-specific effects from genomewide scans. Am J Hum Genet. 69:2001;1357-1369. In this paper, the bias in estimation of the locus-specific heritability in a genome scan, resulting from multiple testing, is described for variance-components linkage analysis. Clearly the same phenomenon described in this paper affects all methods of quantitative and qualitative linkage or LD analysis, as well as any epidemiological or other study in which multiple hypotheses are being tested.
52. Allison D.B., Fernandez J.R., Heo M., Zhu S.K., Etzel C., Beasley T.M., Amos C.I. Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias. Am J Hum Genet. 70:2002;575-585.
53. Hatfield F.C. Power: A Scientific Approach. 1989;Contemporary Books, Inc, Chicago.
54. Hiekkalinna T., Göring H.H.H., Peltonen L., Terwilliger J.D. PSEUDOMARKER: computer software for linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis of complex traits. Am J Hum Genet. 67:2000;1836.
55. Enattah N.S., Sahi T., Savilahti E., Terwilliger J.D., Peltonen L., Jarvela I. Identification of a variant associated with adult-type hypolactasia. Nat Genet. 30:2002;233-237. Lactoseintolerance appears to be the normal state for humans, as all lactose-tolerant individuals studied across a variety of populations seem to share a common variant at one genomic location, which, frighteningly enough, is located in an intron of a gene 15kb away from the gene whose regulation it seems to control. While this is an example of a common variant for a common trait, which was mapped by joint analysis of linkage and LD in large extended pedigrees using microsatellite markers, it should send shudders down the spine of people involved in candidate gene studies, with respect to how far away from a gene a strong regulatory variant can be located!
56. Tamiya G., Oka A., Okamoto K., Endo T., Makino S., Hayashi H., Iizuka M., Tokubo E., Sato R., Takaki A., et al. A genome-wide association study of psoriasis vulgaris using polymorphic microsatellite markers and microarray technology. Am J Hum Genet. 69:2001;2232.
57. Okamoto K., Makino S., Endo T., Hayashi H., Oka A., Fujimoto K., Denda A., Watanabe H., Tokubo E., Sato R., et al. Comprehensive setting of 30,000 polymorphic microsatellite markers throughout human genome. Am J Hum Genet. 69:2001;1617. In Japan, some investigators are proposing to perform genome scans with a dense map of 30,000 microsatellites rather than the 30,000 SNPs being proposed by the proponents of the HapMap. This is of special interest because the microsatellite map presents a potentially more powerful resource competing with the HapMap, as these markers may be as informative about LD as the SNPs in the HapMap, at least in many genomic regions, and at the same time, as they have a mix of rare and common alleles, they may be potentially useful in detecting rare variants as well as common ones in some cases.
58. Ohashi J., Tokunaga K. A comparison of cost-effectiveness between microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism markers in genomewide linkage disequilibrium testing. Am J Hum Genet. 69:2001;1345.
59. Ohashi J., Tokunaga K. The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers. J Hum Genet. 46:2001;478-482.
60. Hovatta I., Varilo T., Suvisaari J., Terwilliger J.D., Ollikainen V., Arajarvi R., Juvonen H., Kokko-Sahin M.L., Vaisanen L., Mannila H., et al. A genomewide screen for schizophrenia genes in an isolated Finnish subpopulation, suggesting multiple susceptibility loci. Am J Hum Genet. 65:1999;1114-1124.
61. Goring H.H.H., Terwilliger J.D., Blangero J. Genome scans for quantitative trait loci using variance components linkage analysis: upward bias in heritability estimates attributable to individual quantitative trait loci at lod score peaks. Am J Hum Genet. 67:2000;1176.
62. Patil N., Berno A.J., Hinds D.A., Barrett W.A., Doshi J.M., Hacker C.R., Kautzer C.R., Lee D.H., Marjoribanks C., McDonough D.P., et al. Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21. Science. 294:2001;1719-1723.
63. Zapata C., Carollo C., Rodriguez S. Sampling variance and distribution of the D′ measure of overall gametic disequilibrium between multiallelic loci. Ann Hum Genet. 65:2001;395-406. A theoretical description of the bias in estimation of D′ from small samples is provided by the authors. Those investigators basing their future study designs on such things as the amount of LD seen in comparisons of random SNPs should familiarize themselves with the details of the measures and associated biases to avoid making unadvised extrapolations.
64. Gabriel S.B., Schaffner S.F., Nguyen H., Moore J.M., Roy J., Blumenstiel B., Higgins J., DeFelice M., Lochner A., Faggart M., et al. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science. 296:2002;2225-2229.
65. Lewontin R.C. On measures of gametic disequilibrium. Genetics. 120:1988;849-852.
66. Clark A.G., Weiss K.M., Nickerson D.A., Taylor S.L., Buchanan A., Stengard J., Salomaa V., Vartiainen E., Perola M., Boerwinkle E., et al. Haplotype structure and population genetic inferences from nucleotide-sequence variation in human lipoprotein lipase. Am J Hum Genet. 63:1998;595-612.
67. Pritchard J.K., Cox N.J. The allelic architecture of human disease genes: common disease-common variant... or not? Hum Mol Genet. 11:2002;2417-2423. See 'Update'.