Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography

Science

Volumn 288, Issue 5463, 2000, Pages 113-116

  Unger, Marc A ^a   Chou, Hou Pu ^a   Thorsen, Todd ^a   Scherer, Axel ^a   Quake, Stephen R ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELASTOMER; SILICON;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CYTOARCHITECTURE; DEVICE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADHESIVENESS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; ELASTICITY; MATERIALS TESTING; PRESSURE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SILICONE ELASTOMERS;

EID: 0034615958     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5463.113     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. L. M. Roylance and J. B. Angell, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-26, 1911 (1979).
2. N. Yazdi, F. Ayazi, K. Najafi, Proc. IEEE 86, 1640 (1998).
3. O. N. Tufte, P. W. Chapman, D. Long, J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3322 (1962).
4. L. Kuhn, E. Bassous, R. Lane, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-25, 1257 (1978).
5. L. Y. Lin, E. L. Goldstein, R. W. Tkach, IEEE J. Selected Top. Quantum Electron. 5, 4 (1999).
6. R. S. Muller and K. Y. Lau, Proc. IEEE 86, 1705 (1998).
7. L. J. Hornbeck and W. E. Nelson, OSA Tech. Dig. Ser. 8, 107 (1988).
8. D. J. Harrison et al., Science 261, 895 (1993).
9. S. C. Jacobson, R. Hergenroder, L. B. Koutny, J. M. Ramsey, Anal. Chem. 66, 1114 (1994).
10. M. U. Kopp, A. J. de Mello, A. Manz, Science 280, 1046 (1998).
11. S. Shoji, Top. Curr. Chem. 194, 163 (1998).
12. P. Gravesen, J. Branebjerg, O. S. Jensen, J. Micromech. Microeng. 3, 168 (1993).
13. L. Buchaillot, E. Farnault, M. Hoummady, H. Fujita, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2 36, L794 (1997).
14. Y. N. Xia et al., Science 273, 347 (1996).
15. Y. N. Xia and G. M. Whitesides, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 37. 550 (1998).
16. C. S. Effenhauser, G. J. M. Bruin, A. Paulus, M. Ehrat, Anal. Chem. 69, 3451 (1997).
17. E. Delamarche, A. Bernard, H. Schmid, B. Michel, H. Biebuyck, Science 276, 779 (1997).
18. A. Y. Fu, C. Spence, A. Scherer, F. H. Arnold, S. R. Quake, Nature Biotechnol. 17, 1109 (1999).
19. K. Hosokawa, T. Fujii, I. Endo, Anal. Chem. 71, 4781 (1999).
20. D. C. Duffy, O. J. A. Schueller, S. T. Brittain, G. M. Whitesides, J. Micromech. Microeng. 9, 211 (1999).
21. D. C. Duffy, J. C. McDonald, O. J. A. Schuelter, G. M. Whitesides, Anal. Chem. 70, 4974 (1998).
22. P. J. A. Kenis, R. F. Ismagilov, G. M. Whitesides, Science 285, 83 (1999).
23. For multilayers, a thick layer was prepared as previously described; each thin layer was baked at 80°C for 20 min. The growing thick layer was assembled on each new thin layer and bonded by baking at 80°C for 20 min. Seven-layer devices have been produced by this method; no obvious limitations exist to limit the number of layers.
24. J. C. Lötters, W. Olthuis, P. H. Veltink, P. Bergveld, J. Micromech. Microeng. 7, 145 (1997).
25. -1. Magnetic silicone was created by the addition of iron powder (∼ 1 μm particle size); up to 20% Fe by weight was added. For both conductive and magnetic silicones, multilayer bonding functioned normally.
26. K. Ikuta, K. Hirowatari, T. Ogata, in Proceedings IEEE International MEMS 94 Conference (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1994), pp. 1-6.
27. R. B. M. Schasfoort, S. Schlautmann, J. Hendrikse, A. van den Berg, Science 286, 942 (1999).
28. S. C. Jacobson, T. E. McKnight J. M. Ramsey, Anal. Chem. 71, 4455 (1999).
29. C. S. Effenhauser, C. J. M. Bruin, A. Paulus, Electrophoresis 18, 2203 (1997).
30. M. Washizu, S. Suzuki, O. Kurosawa, T. Nishizaka, T. Shinohara, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 30, 835 (1994).
31. R. Pethig and G. H. Markx, Trends Biotechnol. 15, 426 (1997).
32. R. Brechtel, W. Hoffmann, H. Rudiger, H. Watzig, J. Chromatogr. A 716, 97 (1995).
33. C. A. Lucy and R. S. Underhill, Anal. Chem. 68, 300 (1996).
34. The magnitude of flow (and even its direction) depends in a complicated fashion on ionic strength and type, the presence of surfactants, and the charge on the walls of the flow channel; furthermore, because electrolysis is taking place continuously, the capacity of buffer to resist pH changes is finite. Precise control of flow thus requires calibration for each new buffer or solute and can be difficult when the exact composition of a sample is not known in advance. Electroosmotic flow can also induce unwanted electrophoretic separation of molecules, creating demixing problems. Dielectrophoresis does not require electrolysis and therefore does not cause bubble formation but still suffers from sample and solvent sensitivity.
35. Each control channel was connected to the common port of a miniature three-way switch valve (LHDA1211111H; Lee Valve, Westbrook, CT), powered by a fast Zener-diode circuit and controlled by a digital data acquisition card (AT-DIO-32HS; National Instruments, Austin, TX). Regulated external pressure was provided to the normally closed port, allowing the control channel to be pressurized or vented to atmosphere by switching the miniature valve.
36. If one used another actuation method that did not suffer from opening and closing lag, this valve would run at ∼375 Hz. The spring constant can be adjusted by changing the membrane thickness; this allows optimization for either fast opening or fast closing.
37. E. coli were pumped at 10 Hz through the channel. Samples of known volume were taken from the output well (pumped) and the input well (control), and serial dilutions of each were plated on Luria-Bertani agar plates and grown overnight at 37°C. Viability was assessed by counting colonies in the control and pumped samples and correcting for sample volumes and dilution.
38. J. Fahrenberg et al., J. Micromech. Microeng. 5, 77 (1995).
39. C. Goll et al., J. Micromech. Microeng. 6, 77 (1996).
40. X. Yang, C. Grosjean, Y. C. Tai, C. M. Ho, Sensors Actuators A 64, 101 (1998).
41. A. M. Young, T. M. Bloomstein, S. T. Palmacci, J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 121, 2 (1999).
42. This work was partially supported by NIH (NS-11756, DA-9121).