Sticking together and sorting things out: Adhesion as a force in development

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 100-108

  McNeill, Helen ^a  

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VERTEBRATA;

CADHERIN;

ANIMAL; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; MORPHOGENESIS; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CADHERINS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; MORPHOGENESIS; OOCYTES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 0034328815     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35038540     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Wilson, H. V. On some phenomena of coalescence and regeneration in sponges. J. Exp. Zool. 5, 245-258 (1907).
2. Townes, P. L. & Holtfreter, J. Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic cells. J. Exp. Zool. 128, 53-118 (1955).
3. Steinberg, M. S. On the mechanism of tissue reconstruction by dissociated cells. I. Population kinetics, differential adhesiveness, and the absence of directed migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 48, 1577-1582 (1962).
4. Steinberg, M. S. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Science 141, 401-408 (1963). Description of the early experiments on cell sorting and models for how adhesive differences can lead to cell sorting and also engulfment of tissues, a related process found in many stages of development.
5. Steinberg, M. S. in Cellular Membranes in Development (ed. Leckes, M.) 321-366 (Academic, New York, 1964).
6. Steinberg, M. S. Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium configurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells. J. Exp. Zool. 173, 395-433 (1970).
7. Nose, A., Nagafuchi, A. & Takeichi, M. Expressed recombinant cadherins mediate cell sorting in model systems. Cell 54, 993-1001 (1988).
8. Friedlander, D. R., Mege, R. M., Cunningham, B. A. & Edelman, G. M. Cell sorting-out is modulated by both the specificity and amount of different cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) expressed on cell surfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 7043-7047 (1989).
9. Steinberg, M. S. & Takeichi, M. Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 206-209 (1994).
10. van Eeden, F. & St Johnston, D. The polarisation of the anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes during Drosophila oogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 396-404 (1999).
11. Godt, D. & Tepass, U. Drosophila oocyte localization is mediated by differential cadherin-based adhesion. Nature 395, 387-391 (1998).
12. Gonzalez-Reyes, A. & St Johnston, D. The Drosophila AP axis is polarised by the cadherin-mediated positioning of the oocyte. Development 125, 3635-3644 (1998). References 11 and 12 show that cadherin-mediated interactions between follicle cells and the oocyte are essential for oocyte positioning.
13. Peifer, M., Orsulic, S., Sweeton, D. & Wieschaus, E. A role for the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo in cell adhesion and cytoskeletal integrity during oogenesis. Development 118, 1191-1207 (1993).
14. White, P., Aberle, H. & Vincent, J. P. Signaling and adhesion activities of mammalian β-catenin and plakoglobin in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 140, 183-195 (1998).
15. Garcia-Bellido, A. Cell lineage in the wing disc of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 60, 181 (1968).
16. Garcia-Bellido, A., Ripoll, P. & Morata, G. Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nature New Biol. 245, 251-253 (1973). This classic paper showed both the existence and the time of establishment of the anterior/posterior and dorsal/ventral compartments in the wing through clonal analysis.
17. Garcia-Bellido, A. Genetic control of wing disc development in Drosophila. Ciba Found. Symp. 29, 161-182 (1975).
18. Lawrence, P. A. The structure and properties of a compartment border: the intersegmental boundary in Oncopeltus. Ciba Found. Symp. 29, 3-23 (1975).
19. Lawrence, P. A clonal analysis of segment development in Oncopeltus. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 30, 681-699 (1973).
20. Crick, F. H. & Lawrence, P. A. Compartments and polyclones in insect development. Science 189, 340-347 (1975).
21. Garcia-Bellido, A., Ripoll, P. & Morata, G. Developmental compartmentalization in the dorsal mesothoracic disc of Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 48, 132-147 (1976).
22. Kimmel, R. A. et al. Two lineage boundaries coordinate vertebrate apical ectodermal ridge formation. Genes Dev. 14, 1377-1389 (2000).
23. Fraser, S., Keynes, R. & Lumsden, A. Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431-435 (1990).
24. Lawrence, P. A. & Morata, G. Compartments in the wing of Drosophila: a study of the engrailed gene. Dev. Biol. 50, 321-337 (1976).
25. Garcia-Bellido, A. & Santamaria, P. Developmental analysis of the wing disc in the mutant engrailed of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72, 87-104 (1972).
26. Morata, G. & Lawrence, P. A. Control of compartment development by the engrailed gene in Drosophila. Nature 255, 614-617 (1975). Demonstrates that engrailed is essential for the anterior/posterior compartment border, supporting the proposal that engrailed is a posterior selector gene, and acts to establish posterior type affinities.
27. Lawrence, P. & Morata, G. in Insect Development (ed. Lawrence, P.) 132-147 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1976).
28. Hidalgo, A. Three distinct roles for the engrailed gene in Drosophila wing development. Curr. Biol. 4, 1087-1098 (1994).
29. Ruiz i Altaba, A. Gli proteins and Hedgehog signaling: development and cancer. Trends Genet. 15, 418-425 (1999).
30. Dominguez, M., Brunner, M., Hafen, E. & Basler, K. Sending and receiving the hedgehog signal: control by the Drosophila Gli protein Cubitus interruptus. Science 272, 1621-1625 (1996).
31. Burke, R. & Basler, K. Dpp receptors are autonomously required for cell proliferation in the entire developing Drosophila wing. Development 122, 2261-2269 (1996).
32. Rodriguez, I. & Basler, K. Control of compartmental affinity boundaries by hedgehog. Nature 389, 614-618 (1997).
33. Blair, S. S. & Ralston, A. Smoothened-mediated Hedgehog signalling is required for the maintenance of the anterior-posterior lineage restriction in the developing wing of Drosophila. Development 124, 4053-1063 (1997).
34. Dahmann, C. & Basler, K. Opposing transcriptional outputs of Hedgehog signaling and engrailed control compartmental cell sorting at the Drosophila NP boundary. Cell 100, 411-422 (2000). Together references 32-34 showed that Hedgehog signalling acts in cell sorting at the anterior/posterior compartment boundary.
35. Blair, S. S., Brower, D. L. Thomas, J. B. & Zavortink, M. The role of apterous in the control of dorsoventral compartmentalization and PS integrin gene expression in the developing wing of Drosophila. Development 120, 1805-1815 (1994).
36. Cohen, B., McGuffin, M. E., Pfeifle, C., Segal, D. & Cohen, S. M. apterous, a gene required for imaginal disc development in Drosophila encodes a member of the LJM family of developmental regulatory proteins. Genes Dev. 6, 715-729 (1992).
37. Diaz-Benjumea, F. J. & Cohen, S. M. Interaction between dorsal and ventral cells in the imaginal disc directs wing development in Drosophila. Cell 75, 741-752 (1993).
38. Munro, S. & Freeman, M. The Notch signalling regulator Fringe acts in the Golgi apparatus and requires the glycosyltransferase signature motif DXD. Curr. Biol. 10, 813-820 (2000).
39. Moloney, D. J. et al. Fringe is a glycosyltransferase that modifies Notch. Nature 406, 369-375 (2000).
40. Bruckner, K., Perez, L., Clausen, H. & Cohen, S. Glycosyltransferase activity of Fringe modulates Notch-Delta interactions. Nature 406, 411-415 (2000).
41. Hicks, C. et al. Fringe differentially modulates Jagged1 and Delta1 signalling through Notch1 and Notch2. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 515-520 (2000).
42. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D. & Lake, R. J. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 284, 770-776 (1999).
43. Irvine, K. D. Fringe, Notch, and making developmental boundaries. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 434-441 (1999).
44. Micchelli, C. A. & Blair, S. S. Dorsoventral lineage restriction in wing imaginal discs requires Notch. Nature 401, 473-476 (1999).
45. Rauskolb, C., Correia, T. & Irvine, K. D. Fringe-dependent separation of dorsal and ventral cells in the Drosophila wing. Nature 401, 476-480 (1999). References 44 and 45 showed that the Notch pathway is acting in D/V compartmentation.
46. Milan, M. & Cohen, S. M. Notch signaling is not sufficient to define the affinity boundary between dorsal and ventral compartments. Mol. Cell 4, 1073-1078 (1999). Paper showing that Apterous has a role in D/V compartmentation, and that Notch signalling is not sufficient for compartmentation.
47. Becker, H. J. Über röntgenmosaikflecken und defektmutationen und die entwicklungsphysiologie des auges. Z. Undukt. Abstammungs-Vererbungsl. 88, 333-373 (1957).
48. Ready, D. F., Hanson, T. E. & Benzer, S. Development of the Drosophila retina, a neurocrystalline lattice. Dev. Biol. 53, 217-240 (1976).
49. McNeill, H., Yang, C. H., Brodsky, M., Ungos, J. & Simon, M. A. mirror encodes a novel PBX-class homeoprotein that functions in the definition of the dorsal-ventral border in the Drosophila eye. Genes Dev. 11, 1073-1082 (1997).
50. Cavodeassi, F., Diez Del Corral, R., Campuzano, S. & Dominguez, M. Compartments and organising boundaries in the Drosophila eye: the role of the homeodomain Iroquois proteins. Development 126, 4933-4942 (1999).
51. Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L. del Corral, R. D., de la Calle-Mustienes, E., Ferre-Marco, D. & Modolell, J. Araucan and caupolican, two members of the novel iroquois complex, encode homeoproteins that control proneural and vein-forming genes. Cell 85, 95-105 (1996).
52. Papayannopoulos, V., Tomlinson, A., Panin, V. M., Rauskolb, C. & Irvine, K. D. Dorsal-ventral signaling in the Drosophila eye. Science 281, 2031-2034 (1998).
53. Dominguez, M. & de Celis, J. F. A dorsal/ventral boundary established by Notch controls growth and polarity in the Drosophila eye. Nature 396, 276-278 (1998).
54. Cho, K. O. & Choi, K. W. Fringe is essential for mirror symmetry and morphogenesis in the Drosophila eye. Nature 396, 272-276 (1998).
55. Yang, C. H., Simon, M. A. & McNeill, H. mirror controls planar polarity and equator formation through repression of fringe expression and through control of cell affinities. Development 126, 5857-5866 (1999).
56. Usui, T. et al. Flamingo, a seven-pass transmembrane cadherin, regulates planar cell polarity under the control of Frizzled. Cell 98, 585-595 (1999).
57. Guthrie, S. & Lumsden, A. Formation and regeneration of rhombomere boundaries in the developing chick hindbrain. Development 112, 221-229 (1991).
58. Xu, Q., Mellitzer, G., Robinson, V. & Wilkinson, D. G. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 399, 267-271 (1999). Shows that Eph receptors and ephrins each transduce signals that drive cell sorting in the vertebrate hindbrain.
59. Mellitzer, G., Xu, Q. & Wilkinson, D. G. Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature 400, 77-81 (1999). Uses ectopic expression of Ephs and ephrins in cultured animal caps to show that bidirectional signalling is necessary to restrict cell intermingling.
60. Holder, N. & Klein, R. Eph receptors and ephrins: effectors of morphogenesis. Development 126, 2033-2044 (1999).
61. Xu, Q., Alldus, G., Holder, N. & Wilkinson, D. G. Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. Development 121, 4005-4016 (1995).
62. Heyman, I., Kent, A. & Lumsden, A. Cellular morphology and extracellular space at rhombomere boundaries in the chick embryo hindbrain. Dev. Dyn. 198, 241-253 (1993).
63. Meima, L., Moran, P., Matthews, W. & Caras, I. W. Lerk2 (ephrin-B1) is a collapsing factor for a subset of cortical growth cones and acts by a mechanism different from AL-1 (ephrin-A5). Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 314-328 (1997).
64. Miao, H., Burnett, E., Kinch, M., Simon, E. & Wang, B. Activation of EphA2 kinase suppresses integrin function and causes focal-adhesion-kinase dephosphorylation. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 62-69 (2000).
65. Huynh-Do, U. et al. Surface densities of ephrin-B1 determine EphB1-coupled activation of cell attachment through αvβ3 and α5β1 integrins. EMBO J. 18, 2165-2173 (1999).
66. Lawrence, P. A.,Casal, J. & Struhl, G. The hedgehog morphogen and gradients of cell affinity in the abdomen of Drosophila. Development 126, 2441-2449 (1999).
67. Adams, C. L. & Nelson, W. J. Cytomechanics of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 572-577 (1998).
68. Kaibuchi, K., Kuroda, S. & Amano, M. Regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases in mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 459-486 (1999).
69. Hynes, R. O. Cell adhesion: old and new questions. Trends Cell Biol. 9, M33-M37 (1999).
70. Kusumi, A., Suzuki, K. & Koyasako, K. Mobility and cytoskeletal interactions of cell adhesion receptors. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 582-590 (1999).
71. Behrens, J. Cadherins and catenins: role in signal transduction and tumor progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 18, 15-30 (1999).
72. Perrimon, N. Creating mosaics in Drosophila. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 42, 243-247 (1998).
73. Lumsden, A. Closing in on rhombomere boundaries. Nature Cell Biol. 1, E83-E85 (1999).