The polarisation of the anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes during Drosophila oogenesis

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 396-404

  Van Eeden, Fredericus ^a   St Johnston, Daniel ^a  

^a WELLCOME CRC INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CADHERIN; MESSENGER RNA;

ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL POLARITY; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO AXIS; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; OVARY FOLLICLE CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ARACHNIDA; DROSOPHILA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 0033523286     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(99)80060-4     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. St Johnston D, Nüsslein-Volhard C: The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 1992, 68:201-219.
2. Spradling AC: Developmental genetics of oogenesis. In The Development of Drosophila Melanogaster. Edited by M Bate, A Martínez-Arias. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor, Laboratory Press; 1993:1-70.
3. Lin H, Yue L, Spradling AC: The Drosophila fusome, a germline-specific organelle, contains membrane skeletal proteins and functions in cyst formation. Development 1994, 120:947-956.
4. McKearin D, Ohlstein B: A role for the Drosophila bag-of-marbles protein in the differentiation of cystoblasts from germline stem cells. Development 1995, 121:2937-2947.
5. McGrail M, Hays TS: The microtubule motor cytoplasmic dynein is required for spindle orientation during germline cell divisions and oocyte differentiation in Drosophila. Development 1997, 124:2409-2419.
6. de Cuevas M, Spradling AC: Morphogenesis of the Drosophila fusome and its implications for oocyte specification. Development 1998, 125:2781-2789. A detailed analysis of the behaviour of the fusome reveals that it segregates to one of the two daughter cells during each of the divisions that give rise to the 16-cell germline cyst. After each division, new fusome material appears in the newly formed ring canal between the two cells, and fuses with the existing fusome to give rise to a continuous structure that extends into each cell. This pattern of segregation means that the initial fusome material is inherited by one of the two cells with four ring canals inherits, and the authors argue that this may mark this cell as the future oocyte. Staining for Anillin in the follicle cells shows that these cells are also interconnected by tiny ring canals.
7. Gonzalez-Reyes A, St Johnston D: Role of oocyte position in establishment of anterior-posterior polarity in Drosophila. Science 1994, 266:639-642.
8. Gonzalez-Reyes A, St Johnston D: The Drosophila AP axis is polarised by the cadherin-mediated positioning of the oocyte. Development 1998, 125:3635-3644. The AP axis becomes polarised when the oocyte comes to lie posterior to the nurse cells during a rearrangement of the germ cells that occurs as the cyst moves from region 2b to region 3 of the germarium. The components of the DE-cadherin complex accumulate between the oocyte and the posterior follicle cells during this transition, and the removal of DE-cadherin from either cell type disrupts oocyte positioning. Thus, the upregulation of Cadherin-mediated adhesion between the oocyte and the posterior follicle cells plays an important role in ensuring that the oocyte (rather than the losing pro-oocyte) is anchored to the posterior when the cyst changes shape. The anterior follicle cells also upregulate DE-cadherin, and the authors propose that the oocyte always adheres preferentially to the posterior cells because these cells contact the oocyte first.
9. Godt D, Tepass U: Drosophila oocyte localization is mediated by differential Cadherin-based adhesion. Nature 1998, 395:387-391. This paper reports very similar results to [8••]. In addition, the authors find that when the posterior follicle cells lack DE-cadherin, the oocyte usually comes to lie next to anterior rather than lateral follicle cells. As the anterior cells express more Cadherin than the lateral cells, this observation lends further support to the idea that oocyte positioning is driven by quantitative differences in the levels of Cadherin-dependent adhesion.
10. Schüpbach T, Wieschaus E: Female sterile mutations on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mutations blocking oogenesis or altering egg morphology. Genetics 1991, 129:1119-1136.
11. Gonzalez-Reyes A, Elliott H, St Johnston D: Oocyte determination and the origin of polarity in Drosophila: The role of the spindle genes. Development 1997, 124:4927-4937.
12. Ghabrial A, Ray RP, Schüpbach T: Okra and spindle-B encode components of the RAD52 DNA repair pathway and affect meiosis and patterning in Drosophila oogenesis. Genes Dev 1998, 12:2711-2723. The cloning of okra and spindle-B reveals that these genes encode homologues of the yeast double-strand break repair protein Rad 54 and the meiosis-specific Rad-51-like protein DMC1. Consistent with this, spindle-B, spindle-D and okra mutants disrupt meiotic recombination and chromosome disjunction, while okra is also defective in mitotic DNA repair. These results indicate that the pattern defects caused by spn group mutants are an indirect consequence of a defect in meiosis. An attractive model is that a failure to repair the DNA breaks generated during recombination activates a meiotic checkpoint which then inhibits several processes, such as oocyte determination, and gurken and K10 mRNA translation.
13. Gillespie DE, Berg CA: Homeless is required for RNA localization in Drosophila oogenesis and encodes a new member of the DE-H family of RNA-dependent ATPases. Genes Dev 1995, 9:2495-2508.
14. Styhler S, Nakamura A, Swan A, Suter B, Lasko P: Vasa is required for GURKEN accumulation in the oocyte, and is involved in oocyte differentiation and germline cyst development. Development 1998, 125:1569-1578. The phenotypic analysis of a strong hypomorphic and null allele of vasa reveals that this RNA helicase is required for oocyte differentiation, the formation of the karyosome in the oocyte nucleus, and gurken mRNA translation, in addition to its well-characterised role in pole-plasm assembly. These phenotypes are very similar to those produced by mutants in the spindle group genes, suggesting that vasa is another member of this class.
15. Tomancak P, Guichet A, Zavorszky P, Ephrussi A: Oocyte polarity depends on regulation of gurken by Vasa. Development 1998, 125:1723-1732. See annotation [14•].
16. Tinker R, Silver D, Montell DJ: Requirement for the vasa RNA helicase in gurken mRNA localization. Dev Biol 1998, 199:1-10. This paper reports similar results to [14•] and [15•]. Furthermore, the authors show that the vasa defect in gurken mRNA translation is suppressed in double mutant combinations with fs(1)K10. As fs(1)K10 has previously been shown to suppress the gurken translation defects of the spindle mutations [10], this observation provides further evidence that vasa is a member of this group.
17. Gonzalez-Reyes A, Elliott H, St Johnston D: Polarization of both major body axes in Drosophila by gurken-torpedo signalling. Nature 1995, 375:654-658.
18. Roth S, Neuman-Silberberg FS, Barcelo G, Schüpbach T: Cornichon and the EGF receptor signaling process are necessary for both anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral pattern formation in Drosophila. Cell 1995, 81:967-978.
19. Neuman-Silberberg FS, Schüpbach T: The Drosophila dorsoventral patterning gene gurken produces a dorsally localized RNA and encodes a TGF alpha-like protein. Cell 1993, 75:165-174.
20. Ray RP, Schüpbach T: Intercellular signaling and the polarization of body axes during Drosophila oogenesis. Genes Dev 1996, 10:1711-1723.
21. Roth S, Jordan P, Karess R: Binuclear Drosophila oocytes: Consequences and implications for dorsal-ventral patterning in oogenesis and embryogenesis. Development 1999, 126:927-934. A transgenic line expressing a mutant form of squash frequently produces binuclear oocytes because of a defect in cytokinesis. The authors exploit this phenotype to show that the two oocyte nuclei translocate to random anterior cortical positions, indicating that the direction of nuclear migration is not predetermined. Thus, the movement of the nucleus is the first symmetry-breaking step in the polarisation of the DV axis. Although both nuclei signal to dorsalise the overlying follicle cells to produce many eggs with dorsalised eggshells, the embryos within these eggs are frequently normal, suggesting a substantial auto-regulation in the establishment of the DV axis of the embryo.
22. ts mutant.
23. Sapir A, Schweitzer R, Shilo BZ: Sequential activation of the EGF receptor pathway during Drosophila oogenesis establishes the dorsoventral axis. Development 1998, 125:191-200. In most examples of EGFR signalling, Rhomboid is required in the cells that produce the signal, where it is thought to control the processing of the active form of the EGFR ligand Spitz. During oogenesis, however, Rhomboid is required in the dorsal follicle cells that receive the Gurken signal. This paper resolves this apparent paradox by showing that Rhomboid functions non-autonomously in the follicle cells, most probably by activating another EGFR ligand that amplifies the Gurken signal.
24. Wasserman JD, Freeman M: An autoregulatory cascade of EGF receptor signaling patterns the Drosophila egg. Cell 1998, 95:355-364. Gurken signalling to the dorsal follicle cells is amplified by a positive feedback loop in which the activation of the EGFR induces Vein and Rhomboid, which then activates a third EGFR ligand, Spitz. High levels of EGFR activation also induce the expression of the inhibitory ligand, Argos, and the authors propose that Argos represses EGFR signalling in the dorsalmost cells to split the single peak of EGFR activation into two lateral peaks.
25. Ghiglione C, Carraway KL III, Amundadottir LT, Boswell RE, Perrimon N, Duffy JB: The transmembrane molecule Kekkon 1 acts in a feedback loop to negatively regulate the activity of the Drosophila EGF receptor during oogenesis. Cell 1999, 96:847-856. Like Argos and Sprouty, Kekkon is induced by the activation of EGFR in the dorsal follicle cells, and acts to inhibit EGFR signalling. This inhibition is mediated by the extracellular and transmembrane domains of Kekkon, which bind directly to the EGFR to downregulate its activity.
26. Peri F, Bökel C, Roth S: Local Gurken signaling and dynamic MAPK activation during Drosophila oogenesis. Mech Dev 1999, 81:75-88. A detailed analysis of the patterns of expression of activating and inhibitory EGFR ligands and the levels of EGFR signalling, as monitored by MAPK phosphorylation, reveals that the patterning of the dorsal follicle cells may be more complicated than suggested in [24••]. In particular, the refinement of the EGFR activation and Rhomboid expression patterns seems to precede that of Argos, suggesting that Argos is not the only factor that is responsible for these changes. In addition, the cells that give rise to the dorsal appendages seem to have lower levels of EGFR activation at stage 10b than more dorsal cells that do not form appendages.
27. Saunders C, Cohen RS: The role of oocyte transcription, the 5′UTR, and translation repression and derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and protein localisation. Mol Cell 1999, 3:43-54. gurken is the first example of a gene that is transcribed in the oocyte nucleus and not in the nurse cells, explaining why the localisation of the RNA to the oocyte is not dependent on microtubules. gurken is also unusual in that the major RNA localisation signals lie within the 5′UTR of the transcript. The GLE1 element in the first 35 nucleotides of the RNA mediates the early phases of localisation, first to the posterior of the oocyte and then to an anterior ring at stage 8, whereas the anterodorsal localisation at stage 9 requires the GLE2 element. As Gurken protein localises to the dorsal side of the oocyte before the RNA, the authors propose that RNA localisation is mediated by the activation of translation on the dorsal side, coupled to the degradation of untranslated RNA. In support of this model, the removal of the 3′UTR delays both dorsal restriction of the RNA and the translational repression of ventral RNA.
28. Ephrussi A, Dickinson LK, Lehmann R: Oskar organizes the germ plasm and directs localization of the posterior determinant nanos. Cell 1991, 66:37-50.
29. Kim-Ha J, Smith JL, Macdonald PM: Oskar mRNA is localized to the posterior pole of the Drosophila oocyte. Cell 1991, 66:23-35.
30. Ephrussi A, Lehmann R: Induction of germ cell formation by oskar. Nature 1992, 358:387-392.
31. Kim-Ha J, Kerr K, Macdonald PM: Translational regulation of oskar mRNA by bruno, an ovarian RNA-binding protein, is essential. Cell 1995, 81:403-412.
32. Webster PJ, Liang L, Berg CA, Lasko P, Macdonald PM: Translational represser Bruno plays multiple roles in development and is widely conserved. Genes Dev 1997, 11:2510-2521.
33. Lie YS, Macdonald P: Apontic binds the translational represser Bruno and is implicated in regulation of oskar mRNA translation. Development 1999, 126:1129-1138. Apontic protein interacts with the represser of oskar translation, Bruno, in a yeast two-hybrid screen and co-immunoprecipitates with Bruno from ovary extracts. Furthermore, Apontic binds to several regions of the oskar 3′UTR, including the BREs, suggesting that it may collaborate with Bruno in repressing the translation of unlocalised oskar RNA. This view is supported by genetic interactions between apontic alleles and mutations in aret, which encodes Bruno, but is hard to prove genetically because strong alleles of both loci block oogenesis at an earlier stage.
34. Gunkel N, Yano T, Markussen FH, Olsen LC, Ephrussi A: Localization-dependent translation requires a functional interaction between the 5′ and 3′ ends of oskar mRNA. Genes Dev 1998, 12:1652-1664. A translational derepressor element maps between the two alternative start codons at the 5′ end of oskar mRNA. By UV crosslinking, two proteins, p68 and p50, were found to bind to this region. Interestingly, p50 also binds the BREs, and mutant BREs that do not bind p50 but still bind Bruno are impaired in oskar repression. Thus, p50 may play a role in both the translational repression of oskar mRNA and its derepression at the posterior pole.
35. Saffman EE, Styhler S, Rother K, Li W, Richard S, Lasko P: Premature translation of oskar in oocytes lacking the RNA-binding protein bicaudal-C. Mol Cell Biol 1998, 18:4855-4862. The bicaudal phenotype of Bicaudal-C mutants is caused by the premature translation of oskar mRNA. Although Bicaudal-C has not been shown to bind to oskar mRNA directly, it does encode an RNA-binding protein with five KH domains. A single amino acid change in the third KH domain reduces the affinity of the protein for RNA in vitro, and causes a strong mutant phenotype.
36. Markussen FH, Michon AM, Breitwieser W, Ephrussi A: Translational control of oskar generates short OSK, the isoform that induces pole plasma assembly. Development 1995, 121:3723-3732.
37. Markussen FH, Breitwieser W, Ephrussi A: Efficient translation and phosphorylation of Oskar require Oskar protein and the RNA helicase Vasa. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1997, 62:13-17.
38. St Johnston D, Beuchle D, Nüsslein-Volhard C: Staufen, a gene required to localize maternal RNAs in the Drosophila egg. Cell 1991, 66:51-63.
39. Wilson JE, Connell JE, Schlenker JD, Macdonald PM: Novel genetic screen for genes involved in posterior body patterning in Drosophila. Dev Genet 1996, 19:199-209.
40. Broadus J, Fuerstenberg S, Doe CQ: Staufen-dependent localization of prospero mRNA contributes to neuroblast daughter-cell fate. Nature 1998, 391 :792-795.
41. Schuldt AJ, Adams JH, Davidson CM, Micklem DR, Haseloff J, Johnston DS, Brand AH: Miranda mediates asymmetric protein and RNA localization in the developing nervous system. Genes Dev 1998, 12:1847-1857.
42. Bergsten SE, Gavis ER: Role for mRNA localization in translational activation but not spatial restriction of nanos RNA. Development 1999, 126:659-669. Although nanos RNA is concentrated at the posterior of the embryo, quantitation of the amounts of RNA in anterior vs. posterior half embryos shows that the majority of the RNA is unlocalised. This underlines the importance of the translational repression of unlocalised RNA, which is mediated by the TCE element in the 3′UTR. RNAs bearing several TCEs are translated less efficiently at the posterior, leading to the proposal that a single element can be bound by posterior localisation factors or by translational repressors, but not by both simultaneously.
43. Macdonald PM, Luk SK, Kilpatrick M: Protein encoded by the exuperantia gene is concentrated at sites of bicoid mRNA accumulation in Drosophila nurse cells but not in oocytes or embryos. Genes Dev 1991, 5:2455-2466.
44. Marcey D, Watkins WS, Hazelrigg T: The temporal and spatial distribution pattern of maternal exuperantia protein: Evidence for a role in establishment but not maintenance of bicoid mRNA localization. EMBO J 1991, 10:4259-4266.
45. Wilsch-Brauninger M, Schwarz H, Nüsslein-Volhard C: A sponge-like structure involved in the association and transport of maternal products during Drosophila oogenesis. J Cell Biol 1997, 139:817-829.
46. Theurkauf WE, Hazelrigg TI: In vivo analyses of cytoplasmic transport and cytoskeletal organization during Drosophila oogenesis: Characterization of a multi-step anterior localization pathway. Development 1998, 125:3655-3666. Detailed analysis of the dynamics of GFP-Exu localisation to the oocyte using time-lapse confocal microscopy. The movement of GFP-Exu particles in the nurse cells is blocked by microtubule depolymerisation and is probably mediated by several motor proteins because the particles move at a wide range of speeds. In contrast, transport through the ring canals is insensitive to both microtubule and actin depolymerisation.
47. Macdonald PM, Kerr K: Redundant RNA recognition events in bicoid mRNA localization. RNA 1997, 3:1413-1420.
48. Macdonald PM, Kerr K: Mutational analysis of an RNA recognition element that mediates localization of bicoid mRNA. Mol Cell Biol 1998, 18:3788-3795. Stem loops IV and V of the bicoid 3′UTR mediate early localisation to the anterior of the oocyte (event A) and this can be mimicked by a dimer of the BLE1 element from stem-loop V. On the basis of the predicted structures of both RNAs and the effects of various mutations, the bases required for event A have been mapped to a short helix and a flanking recognition element. This element is distinct from the Exl-binding sequence that has previously been defined in 2x BLE1.
49. Surdej P, Jacobs-Lorena M: Developmental regulation of bicoid mRNA stability is mediated by the first 43 nucleotides of the 3′ untranslated region. Mol Cell Biol 1998, 18:2892-2900. bicoid mRNA is stable during oogenesis and in the early embryo but is specifically degraded at cellularisation. The main element responsible for this activity, the BIE, maps to the first 43 nucleotides of the 3′UTR, and can confer instability on heterologous RNAs.
50. Ferrandon D, Koch I, Westhof E, Nüsslein-Volhard C: RNA-RNA interaction is required for the formation of specific bicoid mRNA 3′ UTR-STAUFEN ribonucleoprotein particles. EMBO J 1997, 16:1751-1758.
51. Chasan R, Anderson K: Maternal control of dorso-ventral polarity and pattern in the embryo. In The Development of Drosophila Melanogaster. Edited by M Bate, A Martinez-Arias. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993:387-424.
52. Sen J, Goltz JS, Stevens L, Stein D: Spatially restricted expression of pipe in the Drosophila egg chamber defines embryonic dorsal-ventral polarity. Cell 1998, 95:471-481. pipe expression is shown to provide the link between the dorsal Gurken signal, which polarises the follicle cell layer, and the ventral signal that polarises the DV axis of the embryo. The expression of the ST2 isoform of pipe is restricted to the ventral follicle cells in response to the Gurken signal, and this expression domain defines where the ventral side of the embryo will form, as the ectopic expression of pipe ST2 in the dorsal cells in a pipe mutant background leads to development of embryos with a reversed DV axis, pipe encodes a glycosaminoglycan (GAG) modifying enzyme, indicating a previously unsuspected role for GAGs in regulating the proteolytic cascade leading to DV patterning. Interestingly, GAGs are also known to regulate the similar proteolytic cascade that leads to blood clotting.
53. Nilson LA, Schüpbach T: Localized requirements for windbeutel and pipe reveal a dorsoventral prepattern within the follicular epithelium of the Drosophila ovary. Cell 1998, 93:253-262. The defective chorion mutation allows the position of mutant follicle cell clones to be scored after these cells have secreted the chorion and degenerated. Using this marker, it was found that nudel mutant follicle cell clones on the ventral side of the egg chamber do not cause DV patterning defects in the embryo, whereas windbeutel and pipe mutant clones do. Thus, pipe and wind are required in the follicle cells that produce the ventral signal whereas Nudel acts non-autonomously.
54. Konsolaki M, Schüpbach T: Windbeutel, a gene required for dorsoventral patterning in Drosophila, encodes a protein that has homologies to vertebrate proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum. Genes Dev 1998, 12:120-131. windbeutel is expressed in all follicle cells between stage 8 and 11, and shows homology to rat ERp29, a protein of unknown function that localises in the ER. As Wind is only required in the ventral follicle cells, it may be involved in the processing or modification of the unidentified ventral signal or Pipe.
55. Xie T, Spradling AC: Decapentaplegic is essential for the maintenance and division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Cell 1998, 94:251-260. decapentaplegic (dpp) is required to maintain female germline stem cells and the Dpp signal is directly received by these cells. Overexpression of dpp blocks germline stem cell differentiation, whereas mutations in dpp or its receptor accelerate stem cell loss and retard stem cell division. Interestingly, mutant clones of the Dpp antagonist daughters against dpp lead to increased survival of germline stem cells compared to wild type. Although its endogenous source remains unknown, Dpp signaling helps to create a microenvironment that permits germline stem cell self-renewal.
56. Hong CC, Hashimoto C: An unusual mosaic protein with a protease domain, encoded by the nudel gene, is involved in defining embryonic dorsoventral polarity in Drosophila. Cell 1995, 82:785-794.
57. LeMosy EK, Kemler D, Hashimoto C: Role of Nudel protease activation in triggering dorsoventral polarization of the Drosophila embryo. Development 1998, 125:4045-4053. Antibodies to different regions of Nudel reveal that this multidomain protein is secreted onto the egg membrane and undergoes a complex series of proteolytic processing events both before and after fertilisation. The most important of these is the autocatalytic activation of the Nudel serine protease domain, as the activity of this protease is required for the ventral cleavage of Spätzle, to produce the ligand for Toll. Unlike the germline-dependent serine proteases that also control the activation of Spätzle, Nudel activation does not depend on the ventral signal from the follicle cells, suggesting that it may be involved in the temporal rather than the spatial control of this pathway.
58. Chasan R, Jin Y, Anderson KV: Activation of the easter zymogen is regulated by five other genes to define dorsal-ventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Development 1992, 115:607-616.
59. Smith CL, DeLotto R: Ventralizing signal determined by protease activation in Drosophila embryogenesis. Nature 1994, 368:548-551.
60. Konrad KD, Goralski TJ, Mahowald AP, Marsh JL: The gastrulation defective gene of Drosophila melanogaster is a member of the serine protease superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:6819-6824.
61. Misra S, Hecht P, Maeda R, Anderson KV: Positive and negative regulation of Easter, a member of the serine protease family that controls dorsal-ventral patterning in the Drosophila embryo. Development 1998, 125:1261-1267 Western blots reveal that processed free Easter is of very low abundance, because most of the protein is found in a stable complex with another unknown factor that may be an inhibitor. Mutants in the dorsal group genes that act downstream of Easter seem to increase the amount of processed Easter, suggesting the existence of a negative feedback loop that downregulates Easter cleavage.
62. DeLotto Y, DeLotto R: Proteolytic processing of the Drosophila Spätzle protein by Easter generates a dimeric NGF-like molecule with ventralising activity. Mech Dev 1998, 72:141-148. Active Easter is shown to process Spätzle in vitro. Structural analysis indicates that Spätzle is a disulphide-linked dimer and a novel member of the Neurotrophin/NGF family
63. Grosshans J, Schnorrer F, Nüsslein-Volhard C: Oligomerisation of Tube and Pelle leads to nuclear localisation of Dorsal. Mech Dev 1999, 81:127-138. The signal from Toll is transmitted via Tube and Pelle to induce nuclear localisation of Dorsal. It is shown that oligomerisation of Tube and Pelle is required for signal transduction and that membrane association alone is insufficient. Pellino interacts with the kinase domain of activated Pelle and may be involved in the transduction of the ventral signal, but mutants of pellino will be required to establish its precise role.