In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins

Nature

Volumn 399, Issue 6733, 1999, Pages 267-271

  Xu, Qiling ^a   Mellitzer, Georg ^a   Robinson, Vicky ^a   Wilkinson, David G ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; EPHRIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL SELECTION; EMBRYO; EPIDERMIS CELL; INSECT; NEUROMERE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; RECEPTOR INTRINSIC ACTIVITY; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MOVEMENT; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; EPHRIN-A4; FETAL PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MOSAICISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; RECEPTOR PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; RECEPTOR, EPHA4; RECEPTOR, EPHB2; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ZEBRAFISH;

ANIMALIA; INSECTA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0033587129     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/20452     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lawrence, P. A. The cellular basis of segmentation in insects. Cell 26, 3-10 (1981).
2. Fraser, S., Keynes, R. & Lumsden, A. Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431-435 (1990).
3. Guthrie, S., Prince, V. & Lumsden, A. Selective dispersal of avian rhombomere cells in orthotopic and heterotopic grafts. Development 118, 527-538 (1993).
4. Wizenmann, A. & Lumsden, A. Segregation of rhombomeres by differential chemoaffinity. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 448-459 (1997).
5. Xu, Q., Alldus, G., Hlder, N. & Wilkinson, D. G. Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. Development 121, 4005-4016 (1995).
6. Xu, Q. & Wilkinson, D. G. Eph-related receptors and their ligands mediators of contact dependent cell interactions. J. Mol. Med. 75, 576-586 (1993).
7. Flanagan, J. G. & Vanderhaeghen, P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu. Rev. Neurobiol. 21, 309-345 (1998).
8. O'Leary, D. D. M. & Wilkinson, D. G. Eph receptors and ephrins in neural development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 65-73 (1999).
9. Holland, S. J. et al. Bidirectional signalling through the Eph-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands. Nature 313, 722-725 (1996).
10. Bruckner, K., Pasquale, E. B. & Klein, R. Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors. Science 275, 1640-1643 (1997).
11. Gale, N. W. et al. Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses, and are reciprocally compartmentalised during embryogenesis. Neuron 17, 9-19 (1996).
12. Eph Nomenclature Committee. Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands, the ephrins. Cell 90, 403-404 (1957).
13. Ellis, C. et al. A juxtamembrane autophosphorytation site in the Eph family receptor tyrosine kinase, Sek, mediates high affinity interaction with p59fyn. Oncogene 12, 1727-1736 (1996).
14. Theil, T. et al. Segmental expression of the EphA4 (Sek-1) gene is under direct transcriptional control of Krox-20. Development 125, 443-452 (1998).
15. Woo, K. & Fraser, S. E. Order and coherence in the fate map of the zebrafish nervous system. Development 121, 2555-2409 (1995).
16. Townes, P. L. & Holfreter, J. Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. J. Exp. Zool. 128, 53-120 (1955).
17. Steinberg, M. S. Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium processes and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells. J. Exp. Zool. 173, 395-434 (1970).
18. Nose, A., Nagafuchi, A. & Takeichi, M. Expressed recombinant cadherins mediate cell sorting in model systems. Cell 54, 993-1001 (1988).
19. Friedlander, D. R., Mege, R. M., Cunningham, B. A. & Edelman, G. M. Cell sorting-out is modulated by both the specificity and amount of different cell adhesion molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 7043-7047 (1989).
20. Godt, D. & Tepass, U. Drosophila oocyte localization is mediated by differential cadherin-based adhesion. Nature 395, 387-391 (1998).
21. Gonzalez-Reyes, A. & St Johnston, D. The Drosophila A-P axis is polarised by the cadherin-mediated positioning of the oocyte. Development 125, 3635-3644 (1998).
22. Meima, L. et al. AL-1-induced growth cone collapse of rat cortical neurons is correlated with REK7 expression and rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton Eur J. Neurosci. 9, 177-188 (1997).
23. Zisch, A. H. et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of L1 family adhesion molecules implication of the Eph kinase Cek5. J. Neurosci. Res. 47, 655-665 (1997).
24. Lumsden, A. & Keynes, R. Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 337, 424-428 (1989).
25. Heyman, I., Kent, A. & Lumsden, A. Cellular morphology and extracellular space at rhombomere boundaries in the chick embryo hindbrain. Dev. Dynamics 198, 241-253 (1993).
26. Xu, Q., Hlder, N., Patient, R. & Wilson, S. W. Spatially regulated expression of three receptor tyrosine kinase genes during gastrulation in the zebrafish. Development 120, 287-299 (1994).
27. Irving, C., Nieto, M. A., DasGupta, R., Charnay, & Wilkinson, D. G. Progressive spatial restriction of Sek-1 and Krox-20 gene expression during hindbrain segmentation. Dev. Biol. 173, 26-38 (1996).