The molecular physiology of taste transduction

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 519-527

  Gilbertson, Timothy A ^a   Damak, Sami ^b   Margolskee, Robert F ^b,c  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; ION CHANNEL;

CHANNEL GATING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TASTE BUD; TASTE DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0033862322     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00118-5     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Kinnamon S.C., Margolskee R.F. Mechanisms of taste transduction. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 6:1996;506-513.
2. Lindemann B. Taste reception. Physiol Rev. 76:1996;719-766.
3. Herness M.S., Gilbertson T.A. Cellular mechanisms of taste transduction. Annu Rev Physiol. 61:1999;873-900.
4. Lessing D., Carlson J.R. Chemosensory behavior: the path from stimulus to response. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 9:1999;766-771.
5. Smith D.V., St John S.J. Neural coding of gustatory information. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 9:1999;427-435.
6. Hoon M.A., Adler E., Lindemeier J., Battey J.F., Ryba N.J.P., Zuker C.S. Putative mammalian taste receptors: a class of taste-specific GPCRs with distinct topographic selectivity. Cell. 96:1999;541-551. T1R1 and T1R2 are two putative taste receptors selectively expressed in TRCs. Like the calcium-sensing receptors, vomeronasal receptors and mGluRs that they are most closely related to, T1R1 and T1R2 are predicted to have a large amino-terminal extracellular domain that may participate in ligand binding. To date, however, there are no functional data on their ligand-binding properties. The topographic pattern of expression of T1R1 and T1R2 in TRCs does not match the regional sensitivity of any tastants.
7. Smith D.V., Margolis F.L. Taste processing: whetting our appetites. Curr Biol. 9:1999;R453-R455.
8. Lindemann B. Receptor seeks ligand: on the way to cloning the molecular receptors for sweet and bitter taste. Nat Med. 5:1999;381-382.
9. McLaughlin S.K., McKinnon P.J., Margolskee R.F. Gustducin is a taste-cell-specific G protein closely related to the transducins. Nature. 357:1992;563-569.
10. Boughter J.D. Jr., Pumplin D.W., Yu C., Christy R.C., Smith D.V. Differential expression of alpha-gustducin in taste bud populations of the rat and hamster. J Neurosci. 17:1997;2852-2858.
11. Höfer D., Drenckhahn D. Identification of the taste cell G-protein, alpha-gustducin, in brush cells of the rat pancreatic duct system. Histochem Cell Biol. 110:1998;303-309.
12. Zancanaro C., Caretta C.M., Merigo F., Cavaggioni A., Osculati F. alpha-Gustducin expression in the vomeronasal organ of the mouse. Eur J Neurosci. 11:1999;4473-4475.
13. Ming D., Ruiz-Avila L., Margolskee R.F. Characterization and solubilization of bitter-responsive receptors that couple to gustducin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;8933-8938.
14. Wong G.T., Gannon K.S., Margolskee R.F. Transduction of bitter and sweet taste by gustducin. Nature. 381:1996;796-800.
15. Ruiz-Avila L., McLaughlin S.K., Wildman D., McKinnon P.J., Robichon A., Spickofsky N., Margolskee R.F. Coupling of bitter receptor to phosphodiesterase through transducin in taste receptor cells. Nature. 376:1995;80-85.
16. Spielman A.I. Gustducin and its role in taste. J Dent Res. 77:1998;539-544.
17. Kolesnikov S.S., Margolskee R.F. A cyclic-nucleotide-suppressible conductance activated by transducin in taste cells. Nature. 376:1995;85-88.
18. Misaka T., Ishimaru Y., Iwabuchi K., Kusakabe Y., Arai S., Emori Y., Abe K. A gustatory cyclic nucleotide-gated channel, CNGgust, is expressed in the retina. Neuroreport. 10:1999;743-746.
19. Misaka T., Kusakabe Y., Emori Y., Arai S., Abe K. Molecular cloning and taste bud-specific expression of a novel cyclic nucleotide-gated channel. Ann NY Acad Sci. 855:1998;150-159.
20. Misaka T., Kusakabe Y., Emori Y., Gonoi T., Arai S., Abe K. Taste buds have a cyclic nucleotide-activated channel, CNGgust. J Biol Chem. 272:1997;22623-22629.
21. Spielman A.I., Huque T., Nagai H., Whitney G., Brand J. Generation of inositol phosphates in bitter taste transduction. Physiol Behav. 56:1994;1149-1155.
22. Spielman A.I., Nagai H., Sunavala G., Dasso M., Breer H., Boekhoff I., Huque T., Whitney G., Brand J. Rapid kinetics of second messenger production in bitter taste. Am J Physiol. 270:1996;C926-C931.
23. Rossler P., Kroner C., Freitag J., Noe J., Breer H. Identification of a phospholipase C beta subtype in rat taste cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 77:1998;253-261.
24. 3 in response to bitter compounds.
25. 2+ in response to sugars and non-sugar sweeteners in transduction of sweet taste in the rat. J Physiol. 490:1996;325-336.
26. ••]).
27. ••] used a similar approach to clone members of the same GPCR family, but started with genetic mapping of PROP bitter response loci of humans.
28. Chandrashekar J., Mueller K.L., Hoon M.A., Adler E., Feng L., Guo W., Zuker C.S., Ryba N.J.P. T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors. Cell. 100:2000;703-711. Using heterologous expression of chimeric T2R/TRB receptors containing the amino terminus of rhodopsin, it was demonstrated that cells transfected with chimeric mT2R-5 respond only to the bitter antibiotic cycloheximide (from among 55 bitter and sweet compounds tested). Five amino-acid differences were noted between mT2R-5 from cycloheximide-sensitive versus insensitive strains of mice: it was proposed that these sequence differences underlie the in vivo differences between the taster and nontaster strains. mT2R-5 selectively couples to α-gustducin over any other α-subunit tested, which is appropriate given the colocalization of gustducin and the T2R/TRB receptors and gustducin's demonstrated involvement in bitter taste transduction. The authors have convincingly demonstrated that mT2R-5 is a bona fide taste receptor, suggesting that the other members of this family may also be bitter receptors.
29. Reed D.R., Nanthakumar E., North M., Bell C., Bartoshuk L.M., Price R.A. Localization of a gene for bitter-taste perception to human chromosome 5p15. J Hum Genet. 64:1999;1478-1480.
30. Capeless C.G., Whitney G., Azen E.A. Chromosome mapping of Soa, a gene influencing gustatory sensitivity to sucrose octaacetate in mice. Behav Genet. 22:1992;655-663.
31. Lush I.E., Hornigold N., King P., Stoye J.P. The genetics of tasting in mice. VII. Glycine revisited, and the chromosomal location of Sac and Soa. Genet Res. 66:1995;167-174.
32. Kusakabe Y., Yamaguchi E., Tanemura K., Kameyama K., Chiba N., Arai S., Emori Y., Abe K. Identification of two alpha-subunit species of GTP-binding proteins, Galpha15 and Galphaq, expressed in rat taste buds. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1403:1998;265-272.
33. 3 generation. Their data are consistent with the generation of cGMP by GC and inhibition of PDE hydrolysis of cGMP by caffeine and theophylline.
34. Asanuma N., Nomura H. Cytochemical localization of guanylyl cyclase activity in rabbit taste bud cells. Chem Senses. 20:1995;231-237.
35. Kretz O., Bock R., Lindemann B. Occurrence of nitric oxide synthase in taste buds of the rat vallate papilla. Histochem J. 30:1998;293-299.
36. Tsunenari T., Kurahashi T., Kaneko A. Activation by bitter substances of a cationic channel in membrane patches excised from the bullfrog taste receptor cell. J Physiol. 519:1999;397-404.
37. Ogura T., Mackay-Sim A., Kinnamon S.C. Bitter taste transduction of denatonium in the mudpuppy Necturus maculosus. J Neurosci. 17:1997;3580-3587.
38. Ogura T., Kinnamon S.C. IP(3)-independent release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores: a novel mechanism for transduction of bitter stimuli. J Neurophysiol. 82:1999;2657-2666.
39. Ming D., Ninomiya Y., Margolskee R.F. Blocking taste receptor activation of gustducin inhibits gustatory responses to bitter compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;9903-9908.
40. Formaker B.K., Frank M.E. Responses of the hamster chorda tympani nerve to binary component taste stimuli: evidence for peripheral gustatory mixture interactions. Brain Res. 727:1996;79-90.
41. Bachmanov A.A., Reed D.R., Ninomiya Y., Inoue M., Tordoff M.G., Price R.A., Beauchamp G.K. Sucrose consumption in mice: major influence of two genetic loci affecting peripheral sensory responses. Mammal Genome. 8:1997;545-548.
42. Blizzard D.A., Kotlus B., Frank M.E. Quantitative trait loci associated with short-term intake of sucrose, saccharin and quinine solutions in laboratory mice. Chem Senses. 24:1999;373-385.
43. + channels in taste. Corey D.P., Roper S.D. Sensory Transduction. 1992;271-279 Rockefeller University Press, New York.
44. Avenet P., Lindemann B. Noninvasive recording of receptor cell action potentials and sustained currents from single taste buds maintained in the tongue: responses to mucosal NaCl and amiloride. J Gen Physiol. 124:1991;33-41.
45. Doolin R.E., Gilbertson T.A. Distribution and characterization of functional amiloride-sensitive sodium channels in rat tongue. J Gen Physiol. 107:1996;545-554.
46. Gilbertson T.A., Fontenot D.T. Distribution of amiloride-sensitive sodium channels in the oral cavity of the hamster. Chem Senses. 23:1998;495-499.
47. Gilbertson T.A., Zhang H. Self-inhibition in amiloride-sensitive sodium channels in taste receptor cells. J Gen Physiol. 111:1998;667-677.
48. Gilbertson T.A. Role of the taste system in ingestive behavior. Studies in NaCl and fatty acid transduction. Ann NY Acad Sci. 855:1998;860-867.
49. + currents.
50. Canessa C., Schild L., Buell G., Thorens B., Gautschi I., Horisberger J.D., Rossier B.C. Amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature. 367:1994;463-467.
51. 2+. J Gen Physiol. 111:1998;825-846.
52. Kretz O., Barbry P., Bock R., Lindemann B. Differential expression of RNA and protein of the three pore-forming subunits of the amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel in taste buds of the rat. J Histochem Cytochem. 47:1999;51-64. Using immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR, the authors show that there are regional differences among the lingual taste buds in the distribution of the α, β and γ subunits of ENaC. All three types of lingual taste buds contain all three subunits, but taste buds from the anterior tongue (fungiform papillae) show greater expression of the β and γ subunits than do those from the posterior tongue (vallate papillae).
53. Simon S.A., Holland V.F., Benos D.J., Zamphigi G.A. Transcellular and paracellular pathways in lingual epithelia and their influence in taste transduction. Microsc Res Techn. 26:1993;196-208.
54. Li X.J., Blackshaw S., Snyder S.H. Expression and localization of amiloride-sensitive sodium channels indicate a role for non-taste cells in taste perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:1994;1814-1818.
55. Formaker B.K., Hill D.L. Lack of amiloride sensitivity in SHR and WKY glossopharyngeal taste responses to NaCl. Physiol Behav. 50:1991;765-769.
56. Gilbertson T.A., Zhang H. Characterization of sodium transport in gustatory epithelia from the hamster and rat. Chem Senses. 23:1998;283-293.
57. Miyamoto T., Fujiyama R., Okada Y., Sato T. Strain differences in amiloride-sensitivity of salt-induced responses in mouse non-dissociated taste cells. Neurosci Lett. 277:1999;13-16.
58. Benos D.J., Stanton B.A. Functional domains within the degenerin/epithelial sodium channel (Deg/ENaC) superfamily of ion channels. J Physiol. 520:1999;631-644.
59. Gilbertson T.A., Avenet P., Kinnamon S.C., Roper S.D. Proton currents through amiloride-sensitive Na channels in hamster taste cells: role in acid transduction. J Gen Physiol. 100:1992;803-824.
60. + channels in isolated hamster taste cells: enhancement by vasopressin and cAMP. Neuron. 10:1993;931-942.
61. Waldmann R., Champigny G., Bassilana F., Heurteaux C., Lazdunski M. A proton-gated channel involved in acid-sensing. Nature. 386:1997;173-177.
62. Chen C.C., England S., Akopian A.N., Wood J.N. A sensory neuron-specific, proton-gated ion channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;10240-10245.
63. Ugawa S., Minami Y., Guo W., Saishin Y., Takatsuji K., Yamamoto T., Tohyama M., Shimada S. Receptor that leaves a sour taste in the mouth. Nature. 395:1998;555-556.
64. Miyamoto T., Fujiyama R., Okada Y., Sato T. Sour transduction involves activation of NPPB-sensitive conductance in mouse taste cells. J Neurophysiol. 80:1998;1852-1859.
65. Lindemann B. A taste for umami. Nat Neurosci. 3:2000;99-100.
66. Chaudhari N., Yang H., Lamp C., Delay E., Cartford C., Than T., Roper S. The taste of monosodium glutamate: membrane receptors in taste buds. J Neurosci. 16:1996;3817-3826.
67. Caicedo A., Kim K-N., Roper S.D. Glutamate-induced cobalt uptake reveals non-NMDA receptors in rat taste cells. J Comp Neurol. 417:2000;315-324. Glutamate-induced cobalt uptake into taste cells reveals concentration dependence in the range of 10 μM to 1 mM glutamate, consistent with uptake via synaptic receptors and not by the less sensitive umami receptors. CNQX (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione), a non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist, inhibits cobalt uptake. These data are consistent with the presence in taste cells of both taste and synaptic glutamate receptors types.
68. Chaudhari N., Roper S.D. Molecular and physiological evidence for glutamate (umami) taste transduction via a G protein-coupled receptor. Ann NY Acad Sci. 855:1998;398-406.
69. Lin W., Kinnamon S.C. Physiological evidence for ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors in rat taste cells. J Neurophysiol. 82:1999;2061-2069. Using whole-cell patch clamp recording of isolated rat taste buds, two types of glutamate responses are seen. A depolarizing response to glutamate (mimicked by NMDA and inhibited by NMDA antagonists) is suggested to represent synaptic glutamate receptor activity. Hyperpolarizing responses are also seen that are mimicked by the metabotropic receptor agonist, L-AP4, and antagonized by cAMP. This response has the properties predicted for a current activated by the putative umami receptor, taste-mGluR4.
70. Chaudhari N., Landin A.M., Roper S.D. A metabotropic glutamate receptor variant functions as a taste receptor. Nat Neurosci. 3:2000;113-119. A truncated variant of mGluR4, designated taste-mGluR4, is cloned from taste tissue and shown to be selectively expressed in taste tissue. Functional expression of taste-mGluR4 in CHO cells demonstrates that this receptor has reduced sensitivity to L-glutamate than does brain-expressed mGluR4, that is similar to the umami taste receptor. The effects of L-Glu on the cloned and expressed taste-mGluR4 are mimicked by the mGluR4 agonist, L-AP4, which elicits a similar taste response to monosodium glutamate. In CHP cells, the expressed receptor is shown to be negatively coupled to cAMP production, suggesting possible involvement of a cyclic-nucleotide-gated channel in the umami response. The results are consistent with the taste-mGluR4 being the transduction channel for glutamate taste.
71. Monastryrskaia K., Lundstrom K., Plahl D., Acuna G., Schweitzer C., Malherbe P., Mutel V. Effect of the umami peptides on the ligand binding and function of rat mGlu4a receptor might implicate this receptor in the monosodium glutamate taste transduction. Brit J Pharmacol. 128:1999;1027-1034.