RMS/coverage graphs: A qualitative method for comparing three- dimensional protein structure predictions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 37, Issue SUPPL. 3, 1999, Pages 15-21

  Hubbard, Tim J P ^a  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CASP; Protein structure comparison; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FORECASTING; INTERNET; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FORECASTING; INTERNET; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 0032606104     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<15::AID-PROT4>3.0.CO;2-Z     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Mosimann S, Meleshko R, James MN. A critical assessment of comparative molecular modeling of tertiary structures of proteins. Proteins 1995;23:301-317.
2. Lemer CMR, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: evaluation of current techniques. Proteins 23:337-355.
3. Defay T, Cohen FE. Evaluation of current techniques for ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins 23:431-445.
4. Martin AC, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:14-28.
5. Venclovas Č, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Criteria for evaluating protein structures derived from comparative modeling. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:7-13.
6. Levitt M. Competitive assessment of protein fold recognition and alignment accuracy. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:92-104.
7. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. Measures of threading specificity and accuracy. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:74-82.
8. Lesk AM. CASP2: report on ab initio predictions. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:151-166.
9. Zemla A, Venclovas Č, Reinhardt A, Fidelis K, Hubbard TJP. Numerical criteria for the evaluation of ab initio predictions of protein structure. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:140-150.
10. Feng ZK, Sippl MJ. Optimum superimposition of protein structures: ambiguities and implications. Fold Des 1996;1:123-132.
11. Zemla A, Venclovas Č, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins Suppl 1999;3: 22-29.
12. Birney E, Durbin R. Dynamite: a flexible code generating language for dynamic programming methods used in sequence comparison. Ismb 1997;5:56-64.
13. Sippl MJ, Lackner P, Domingues FS, Koppensteiner WA. An attempt to analyse progress in fold recognition from CASP1 to CASP3. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:226-230.