Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 37, Issue SUPPL. 3, 1999, Pages 22-29

  Zemla, Adam ^a   Venclovas, Česlovas ^a,c   Moult, John ^b   Fidelis, Krzysztof ^a  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Ab initio prediction; Comparative modeling; Fold recognition; Prediction assessment; Prediction evaluation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; INTERNET; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYMOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FORECASTING; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

HELICASE; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DNA HELICASES; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FORECASTING; INTERNET; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 0032605828     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<22::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-W     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Zemla A. 1998. AL2TS program: translate sequence-structure alignment (AL) to tertiary structure (TS). Accessed at http:// PredictionCenter.llnl.gov/local/al2ts.
2. McLachlan AD. Gene duplications in the structural evolution of chymotrypsin. J Mol Biol 1979;128:49-79.
3. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
4. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
5. Lee B, Richards FM. Interpretation of protein structure: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 55:379-400.
6. Shrake A, Rupley JA. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J Mol Biol 1973;79:351-371.
7. Venclovas Č, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Criteria for evaluating protein structures derived from comparative modeling. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:7-13.
8. Venclovas Č, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Some measures of comparative performance in the three CASPs. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:231-237.
9. Sanchez R, Šali A. Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling by MODELLER-3. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:50-58.
10. Zemla A, Venclovas Č, Fidelis K, Rost B. A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment. Proteins 1999;34:220-223.
11. Zemla A, Venclovas Č, Reinhardt A, Fidelis K, Hubbard TJ. Numerical criteria for the evaluation of ab initio predictions of protein structure. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:140-150.
12. Zu-Kang F, Sippl M. Optimum superimposition of protein structures: ambiguities and implications. Folding & Design 1996;1:123-132.
13. Taylor WR, Orengo C. Protein structure alignment. J Mol Biol 1989;208:1-22.