Predicting protein three-dimensional structure

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 583-588

  Moult, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 0032751746     PISSN: 09581669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)00037-3     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Moult J. The current state of the art in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 7:1996;422-427.
2. Proteins, no 3, vol 23, 1995.
3. Proteins., Supplement, 1, 1997.
4. Proteins., Supplement, 3, 1999. This issue of Proteins reports on all aspects of the CASP3 experiment.
5. Fischer D., Eisenberg D. Predicting structures for genome proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 9:1999;208-211.
6. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Structural Genomics Initiatives on World Wide Web URL: http://www.nih.gov/nigms/funding/psi.html.
7. Shortle D. Structure prediction: the state of the art. Curr Biol. 9:1999;R205-R209.
8. Sternberg M.J.E., Bates P.A., Kelley L.A., MacCallum R.M. Progress in protein structure prediction: assessment of CASP3. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 9:1999;368-373.
9. Lackner P., Koppensteiner W.A., Domingues F.S., Sippl M.J. Automated large scale evaluation of protein structure predictions. Proteins. S3:1999;7-14. The authors describe one of two new methods for numerically evaluating predictions.
10. Zemla A., Venclovas C., Moult J., Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of Casp3 protein structure predictions. Proteins. S3:1999;22-29.
11. Hubbard T. RMS/coverage graphs: a qualitative method for comparing three-dimensional protein structure predictions. Proteins. S3:1999;15-21. A second new method for numerically evaluating predictions is described.
12. •], assessing progress over the CASP experiments.
13. •].
14. •].
15. Dixon S.J. Evaluation of CASP2 docking section. Proteins. S1:1997;198-204.
16. Chothia C., Lesk A.M. Relationship between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:1986;823-827.
17. Mosimann S., Melshko R., James M.N.G. A critical assessment of comparative modeling of tertiary structure of proteins. Proteins. 23:1995;301-317.
18. Martin A.C.R., MacArthur M.W., Thornton J.M. Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2. Proteins. S1:1997;14-18.
19. Jones T.A., Kleywegt G.J. CASP3 comparative modeling evaluation. Proteins. S3:1999;30-46. An assessment of comparative modeling in the CASP3 experiment. As such, the best current review of the state of the art in this area.
20. Fischer D. Modeling three-dimensional protein structures for amino acid sequences of the CASP3 experiment using sequence derived predictions. Proteins. S3:1999;61-65.
21. Samudrala R., Moult J. Determinants of side chain conformational preferences in proteins. Protein Eng. 11:1998;991-997.
22. Chung S.U., Subbiah S. How similar must a template protein be for homology modeling by side-chain packing methods? Hunter L., Klein T.E. Biocomputing: Proceedings of the 1996 Pacific Symposium. 1996;126-141 World Scientific, Singapore.
23. Dunbrack R.L. Jr. Comparative, modeling of CASP3 targets using PSI-BLAST and SCWRL. Proteins. S3:1999;81-87.
24. Fidelis K., Stern P., Bacon D., Moult J. Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure. Protein Eng. 7:1994;953-960.
25. Venclovas C., Zemla A., Fidelis K., Moult J. Criteria for evaluating protein structures derived by comparative modeling. Proteins. S1:1999;7-13.
26. Murzin A.G. Structure classification based assessment of CASP predictions for fold recognition targets. Proteins. S3:1999;88-103. An assessment of fold recognition based modeling in the CASP3 experiment. As such, the best current review of the state of the art in this area.
27. Murzin A.G., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T., Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol. 247:1995;536-540.
28. Sippl M.J. The calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force, an approach to the prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 213:1990;659-883.
29. Panchenko A., Marcheler-Bauer A., Bryant S.H. Threading with explicit models for evolutionary conservation of structure and sequence. Proteins. S3:1999;133-140.
30. Domingues F.S., Kopensteiner W.A., Jaritz M., Prlic A., Weichenberger C., Wiederstein M., Floeckner H., Lackner P., Sippl M. Sustained performance of knowledge based potentials in fold recognition. Proteins. S3:1999;112-120.
31. Koretke K.K., Russell R.B., Copley R.R., Lupas A.N. Fold recognition using sequence and secondary structure information. Proteins. S3:1999;141-148.
32. Jones D.T., Bryson K., Tress M.L., Hadley C. Successful protein fold recognition using sequence and secondary structure constrained threading methods. Proteins. S3:1999;104-111.
33. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schaffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Capped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Res. 25:1997;3389-33402.
34. Eddy S.R. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics. 14:1998;755-763.
35. Matsuo Y., Bryant S.H. Identification of homologous core structures. Proteins. 35:1999;70-79.
36. Fischer D., Barret C., Bryson K., Elofsson A., Godzik A., Jones D., Karplus K.J., Kelly L.A., MacCullum R.M., Pawowski K.et al. CAFASP-1: critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins. S3:1999;209-217.
37. Holm L., Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol. 233:1993;123-138.
38. Park J., Karplus K., Barrett C., Hughey R., Haussler D., Hubbard T., Chothia C. Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect three times as many remote homologues as pairwise methods. J Mol Biol. 284:1998;1201-1210. Benchmarking of new sequence profile methods.
39. Defay T., Cohen F.E. Evaluation of current techniques for ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins. 23:1995;431-445.
40. Lesk A.M. CASP2: report on ab initio predictions. Proteins. S1:1997;151-166.
41. Orengo C.A., Bray J.E., Hubbard T., LoConte L., Stillitoe I. Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction. Proteins. S3:1999;149-170. An assessment of ab initio methods in the CASP3 experiment.
42. Simons K.T., Bonneau R., Ruczinski I., Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASPIII targets using ROSETTA. Proteins. S3:1999;171-176.
43. Moult J. Comparison of database potentials and molecular mechanics force fields. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 7:1997;94-199.
44. Samudarla R., Xia Y., Hunag E., Levitt M. Bona fide ab initio protein structure prediction using a combined Heirarchial approach. Proteins. S3:1999;194-198.
45. Ortiz A.R., Koliniski A., Rotkiewicz P., Ilkowski B., Skolnick J. Ab initio folding of proteins using restraints derived form evolutionary information. Proteins. S3:1999;177-185.
46. Shortle D., Simons K.T., Baker D. Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;11158-11162. An interesting new theory on the nature of the folded state of proteins.
47. Rost B., Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol. 232:1993;584-599.
48. Barton G.J. Protein secondary structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 5:1995;372-376.
49. Minor D.L. Jr., Kim P.S. Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence. Nature. 380:1996;730-734.
50. Dodge C., Schneider R., Sander C. The HSSP database of protein structure-sequence alignments and family profiles. Nucleic Acid Res. 26:1998;313-315.
51. Bowie J.U. Helix packing in membrane proteins. J Mol Biol. 272:1997;780-789.
52. Guex N., Peitsch M.C.S.W.I.S. S. -MODEL and the Swiss-Pdb viewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis. 18:1997;2714-2723.
53. Sanchez R., Sali A. Large-scale protein structure modeling of the saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;13597-13602.