Unification of protein families

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 372-379

  Holm, Liisa ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE PRODUCT;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

EID: 0032104511     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(98)80072-9     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Smith MJ. Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature. 225:1970;563-564.
2. Crameri A, Raillard SA, Bermudez E, Stemmer WPC. DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution. of special interest Nature. 391:1998;288-291 An example of experimental exploration of sequence space with selection for enhanced activity, in this case antibiotic resistance.
3. Holm L, Sander C. An evolutionary treasure: unification of a broad set of amidohydrolases related to urease. of outstanding interest Proteins. 28:1997;72-82 Unification of 13 protein families on the basis of walking in sequence space and analysis of conservation patterns in three dimensions.
4. Russell RB, Saqi MAS, Sayle RA, Bates PA, Sternberg MJE. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: analysis of sequence and structure conservation. J Mol Biol. 269:1997;423-439.
5. Rost B. Protein structures sustain evolutionary drift. Fold Des. 2:1997;S19-S24.
6. Sander C, Schneider R. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Protein. 9:1991;56-68.
7. Abagyan RA, Batalov S. Do aligned sequences share the same fold? J Mol Biol. 273:1997;355-368.
8. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. Assigning folds to the proteins encoded by the genome of Mycoplasma genitalium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:1997;11929-11934.
9. Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Murzin A, Chothia C. Gene duplications in H. influenzae. Nature. 378:1995;140.
10. Eddy SR, Mitchison G, Durbin R. Maximum discrimination hidden Markov models of sequence consensus. J Comput Biol. 2:1995;9-23.
11. Karplus K, Sjölander K, Barrett C, Cline M, Haussler D, Hughey R, Holm L, Sander C. Predicting protein structure using hidden Markov models. Proteins. 1997;134-139. suppl 1.
12. Gribskov M, Veretnik S. Identification of sequence patterns with profile analysis. Methods Enzymol. 266:1996;198-212.
13. Bucher P, Karplus K, Moeri N, Hofmann K. A flexible motif search technique based on generalized profiles. Comput Chem. 20:1996;3-23.
14. Grundy WN, Bailey TL, Elkan CP, Baker ME. Meta-MEME: motif-based hidden Markov models of protein families. CABIOS. 13:1997;397-406.
15. Henikoff S. Scores for sequence searches and alignments. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 6:1996;353-360.
16. Karlin S, Altschul SF. Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:1990;2264-2268.
17. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. of outstanding interest Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1997;3389-3402 Introduction of new 'black-box' sequence search programs in the BLAST series with enhanced sensitivity to weak similarities.
18. Pearson WR. Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA. Methods Enzymol. 183:1990;63-98.
19. Pearson WR. Identifying distantly related protein sequences. of special interest CABIOS. 13:1997;325-332 Advocates walking in sequence space - a strategy of constructing statistically significant links between very distantly related proteins that is effective because of the implicit evolutionary tree that connects all the members of a protein family.
20. Park J, Teichmann SA, Hubbard T, Chothia C. Intermediate sequences increase the detection of homology between sequences. J Mol Biol. 273:1997;349-354.
21. Grundy WN. Family-based homology detection via pairwise sequence comparison. RECOMB-98. 1998;. in press.
22. Holm L, Sander C. Decision support system for the evolutionary classification of protein structures. Gaasterland T, Karp P, Karplus K, Ouzounis C, Sander C, Valencia A. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. 1997;140-146 AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California.
23. Neuwald AF, Liu JS, Lipman DJ, Lawrence CE. Extracting protein alignment models from the sequence database. of outstanding interest Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1997;1665-1677 The PROBE program constructs an alignment model of the protein family through a combination of Gibbs sampling, a genetic algorithm and database searches using progressively more refined alignment models.
24. Riley M, Labedan B. Protein evolution viewed through Escherichia coli protein sequences: introducing the notion of a structural segment of homology, the module. of special interest J Mol Biol. 268:1997;857-868 Automatic clustering of genes of E. coli genome.
25. Gerstein M, Levitt M. A structural census of the current population of protein sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:1997;11911-11916.
26. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. of special interest Science. 278:1997;631-637 Attacks the functional hierarchy problem in transfer of annotation between homologous genes by assuming that in cross-genome comparisons sequence similarity is stronger between orthologous genes than between paralogous genes.
27. Yi TM, Lander ES. Iterative template refinement: protein-fold prediction using iterative search and hybrid sequence/structure templates. Methods Enzymol. 266:1996;322-343.
28. Bycroft M, Hubbard TJP, Proctor M, Freund SMV, Murzin AG. The solution structure of the S1 RNA binding domain: a member of an ancient nucleic acid-binding fold. of special interest Cell. 88:1997;234-242 Iterative sequence database searches using HMM models and checking of structural and functional signatures reveal hitherto unidentified S1 domains in several proteins.
29. Tatusov RL, Altschul SF, Koonin EV. Detection of conserved segments in proteins: iterative scanning of sequence database with alignment blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:1994;12091-12095.
30. Holm L, Sander C. Removing near-neighbour redundancy from large protein sequence collections. Bioinformatics. 14:1998;. in press.
31. Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Birney E, Bateman A, Durbin R. Pfam: multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains. of outstanding interest Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1998;320-322 Five hundred and twenty-seven semiautomatically created HMM-profiles match one or more domains in 50% of Swissprot 34 sequences, and 25% of a large sample of predicted proteins from C. elegans.
32. Holm L, Sander C. Touring protein fold space with Dali/FSSP. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1998;316-319.
33. Dodge C, Sander C, Schneider R. The HSSP database of protein structure-sequence alignments and family profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:1998;315-317.
34. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ, Clustal W. Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1994;4673-4680.
35. Feng DF, Doolittle RF. Progressive alignment and phylogenetic tree construction of protein sequences. Methods Enzymol. 183:1990;357-387.
36. Gotoh O. Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein sequence alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments. J Mol Biol. 264:1996;823-838.
37. Vingron M, von Haeseler A. Towards integration of multiple alignment and phylogenetic tree construction. of special interest J Comp Chem. 4:1997;23-34 On the basis of three-way alignments of pre-aligned groups of sequences a commonly used tree construction procedure is adapted to produce both tree and multiple alignment simultaneously. In contrast to existing iterative algorithms the new method can change alignments made early in the course of the computation at a later stage.
38. Notredame C, Holm L, Higgins DG. A new objective function for multiple alignment. Bioinformatics. 14:1998;. in press.
39. Lu JS, Neuwald AF, Lawrence CE. Markovian structures in biological sequence alignments. of outstanding interest J Am Stat Association. 1997; Explains an approximate Bayesian model selection procedure which in combination with an improved alignment algorithm is a key feature of a substantially more sensitive multiple alignment and database search methodology.
40. Zhu J, Liu JS, Lawrence CE. Bayesian adaptive sequence alignment algorithms. of outstanding interest Bioinformatics. 14:1998;25-39 See annotation to Liu et al., 1997 [39].
41. Altschul SF. Amino acid substitution matrices from an information theoretic perspective. J Mol Biol. 219:1991;555-565.
42. Ladunga I, Smith RF. Amino acid substitutions preserve protein folding by conserving steric and hydrophobicity properties. Protein Eng. 10:1997;187-196.
43. Rost B, Schneider R, Sander C. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J Mol Biol. 270:1997;471-480.
44. Rice DW, Eisenberg D. A 3D-1D substitution matrix for protein fold recognition that includes predicted secondary structure of the sequence. J Mol Biol. 267:1997;1026-1038.
45. DiFrancesco V, Garnier J, Munson PJ. Protein topology recognition from secondary structure sequences: application of the hidden Markov models to the alpha class proteins. J Mol Biol. 267:1997;446-463.
46. Zhang B, Jaroszwewski L, Rychlewski L, Godzik A. Similarities and differences between nonhomologous proteins with similar folds: evaluation of threading strategies. Fold Des. 2:1997;307-317.
47. Holm L, Sander C. New structure - novel fold? Structure. 5:1997;165-171.
48. Wallace AC, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. TESS: a geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases. Application to enzyme active sites. Protein Sci. 6:1997;2308-2323.
49. Murzin AG, Bateman A. Distant homology recognition using structural classification of proteins. of special interest Proteins. 1997;105-112 Screening sequences with weak sequence similarity by careful analysis of structural and functional signatures performed better than sequence - structure 'threading' methods in blind prediction contest.
50. Neuwald AF. A shared domain between a spindle assembly checkpoint protein and Ypt/Rab-specific GTPase-activators. Trends Biochem Sci. 22:1997;243-244.
51. Neuwald AF, Landsman D. GCN5-related histone N-acetyltransferases belong to a diverse superfamily that includes the yeast SPT10 protein. Trends Biochem Sci. 22:1997;154-155.
52. Sjölander K. Phylogenetic inference in protein superfamilies: analysis of SH2 domains. ISMB. 6:1998;. in press.
53. Linial M, Linial N, Tishby N, Yona G. Global self-organization of all known protein sequences reveals inherent biological signatures. J Mol Biol. 268:1997;539-556.
54. Hubbard TJP, Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1997;236-239.
55. Gibrat JF, Madej T, Bryant SH. Surprising structural similarities. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 6:1996;377-385.
56. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. CATH ó a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure. 5:1997;1093-1108.
57. Holm L, Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science. 273:1996;595-603.
58. Schuler GD, Epstein JA, Ohkawa H, Kans JA. Entrez: molecular biology database and retrieval system. Methods Enzymol. 266:1996;141-162.
59. Jabri E, Carr MB, Hausinger RP, Karplus PA. The crystal structure of urease from Klebsiella aerogenes. Science. 168:1995;998-1004.
60. Kraulis P. MOLSCRIPTT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Cryst. 24:1991;946-950.
61. Rossjohn J, Buckley JT, Hazes B, Murzin AG, Read RJ, Parker MW. Aerolysin and pertussis toxin share a common receptor-binding domain. EMBO J. 16:1997;3426-3434.
62. Sette M, van Tilborg P, Spurio R, Kaptein R, Paci M, Gualerzi CO, Boelens R. The structure of the translational initiation factor IF1 from E. coli contains an oligomer-binding motif. EMBO J. 16:1997;1436-1443.
63. Ball LJ, Murzina NV, Broadhurst RW, Raine ARC, Archer SH, Stott FJ, Murzin AG, Singh PB, Domaille PJ, Laue ED. Structure of the chromatin binding (chromo) domain from mouse modifier protein 1. EMBO J. 16:1997;2473-2481.
64. Ichikawa S, Hatanaka H, Yuuki T, Iwamoto N, Kojima S, Nishiyama C, Ogura K, Okumura Y, Inagaki F. Solution structure of Der f 2, the major mite allergen for atopic diseases. J Biol Chem. 273:1998;356-360.
65. Savage H, Montoya G, Svensson C, Schwenn JD, Sinning I. Crystal structure of phosphoadenylyl sulphate (PAPS) reductase: a new family of adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases. Structure. 5:1997;895-906.
66. Bork P, Koonin EV. A P-loop-like motif in a widespread ATP pyrophosphatase domain: implications for the evolution of sequence motifs and enzyme activity. Proteins. 20:1994;347-355.
67. Holm L, Sander C. Enzyme HIT. Trends Biochem Sci. 22:1997;116-117.
68. Lima CD, Klein MG, Hendrickson WA. Structure-based analysis of catalysis and substrate definition in the HIT protein family. Science. 278:1997;286-290.
69. Mattevi A, Fraaije MW, Mozzarelli A, Olivi L, Coda A, van Berkel WJH. Crystal structures and inhibitor binding in the octameric flavoenzyme vanillyl-alcohol oxidase: the shape of the active-site cavity controls substrate specificity. Structure. 5:1997;907-920.
70. Jacob U, Mack M, Clausen T, Huber R, Buckel W, Messerschmidt A. Glutaconate CoA-transferase from Acidaminococcus fermentans: the crystal structure reveals homology with other CoA-transferases. Structure. 5:1997;415-426.
71. Cameron AD, Olin B, Ridderström M, Mannervik B, Jones TA. Crystal structure of human glyoxylase I - evidence for gene duplication and 3D domain swapping. EMBO J. 16:1997;3386-3395.
72. Martinez-Hackert E, Stock AM. Structural relationships in the OmpR family of winged-helix transcription factors. J Mol Biol. 269:1997;301-312.