Intermediate sequences increase the detection of homology between sequences

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 273, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 349-354

  Park, Jong ^a   Teichmann, Sarah A ^b   Hubbard, Tim ^c   Chothia, Cyrus ^b  

^a MRC CENTRE FOR PROTEIN ENGINEERING   (United Kingdom)

^b MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

FASTA; OWL database; SCOP; Sequence search

Indexed keywords

AMICYANIN; ASCORBATE OXIDASE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PLASTOCYANIN;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; ERROR; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 0031576361     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1288     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:1990;403-410.
2. Baldi P., Chauvin Y., Hunkapiller T., McClure M. A. Hidden Markov models of biological primary sequence information. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;1059-1063.
3. Bashford D., Chothia C., Lesk A. M. Determinants of a protein fold: unique features of the globin amino acid sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 196:1987;199-216.
4. Bleasby A. J., Akrigg D., Attwood T. K. OWL-a non-redundant composite protein sequence database. Nucl. Acids Res. 22:1994;3574-3577.
5. Brenner, S. E. 1996, University of Cambridge.
6. Eddy S. R. ISMB 95, Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology conference, Multiple Alignment Using Hidden Markov Models. 1995.
7. Eddy S. R., Mitchison G., Durbin R. Maximum discrimination hidden Markov models of sequence consensus. J. Comput. Biol. 2:1995;9-23.
8. Gribskov M., McLachlan A. D., Eisenberg D. Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 84:1987;4355-4358.
9. Krogh A., Brown M., Mian I. S., Sjolander K., Haussler D. Hidden Markov models in computational biology: Applications to protein modeling. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1994;1501-1531.
10. Luthy R., Xenarios I., Bucher P. Improving the sensitivity of the sequence of the sequence profile method. Protein Sci. 3:1994;139-146.
11. Murzin A. G., Brenner S. E., Hubbard T., Chothia C. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247:1995;536-540.
12. Pearson W. R. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 85:1988;2444-2448.
13. Pearson W. R. Effective protein sequence comparison. Methods Enzymol. 266:1996;227-258.
14. Schuler G. D., Epstein J. A., Ohkawa H., Kans J. A. Entrez-Molecular Biology Database and Retrieval System. Methods Enzymol. 266:1996;141-162.
15. Tatusov R. L., Altschul S. F., Koonin E. V. Detection of conserved segments in proteins: iterative scanning of sequence databases with alignment blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;12091-12095.
16. Taylor W. R. Identification of protein sequence homology by consensus template alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 188:1986;233-258.
17. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. Improved sensitivity of profile searches through the use of sequence weights and gap excision. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10:1994;19-29.
18. Yi T. M., Lander E. S. Recognition of related proteins by iterative template refinement (ITR). Protein Sci. 3:1994;1315-1328.