Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: Analysis of sequence and structure conservation

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 269, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 423-439

  Russell, Robert B ^a   Saqi, Mansoor A S ^b   Sayle, Roger A ^b   Bates, Paul A ^a   Sternberg, Michael J E ^a  

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fold recognition; Protein evolution; Protein structure prediction; Sequence identity; Substitution matrices

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 0031566432     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1019     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alexandrov N. N., Nussinov R., Zimmer R. M. Fast protein fold recognition via sequence to structure alignment and contact capacity potentials. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. 1996;World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore.
2. Altschuh D., Lesk A. M., Bloomer A. C., Klug A. Correlation of co-ordinate amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Mol. Biol. 193:1987;693-707.
3. Barton G. J. Protein multiple sequence alignment and flexible pattern matching. Methods Enzymol. 183:1990;403-428.
4. Barton G. J. Alscript: a tool to format multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 6:1993;37-40.
5. Barton G. J., Sternberg M. J. E. A strategy for the rapid multiple alignment of protein sequences: confidence levels from tertiary structure comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 198:1987;327-337.
6. Bates P. A., Jackson R. M., Sternberg M. J. E. Prediction of protein structures and their docking. Genomes Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery. 1996;Academic Press, London.
7. Chothia C., Lesk A. M. Evolution of proteins formed by β-sheets. I. Plastocyanin and azurin. J. Mol. Biol. 160:1982;309-323.
8. Chothia C., Lest A. M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:1986;823-826.
9. Chung S. Y., Subbiah S. A structural explanation of the twilight zone or protein sequence homology. Curr. Biol. 4:1996;1123-1127.
10. Dayhoff M. O., Schwartz R. M., Orcutt B. C. A model of evolutionary change in proteins, matrices for detecting distant relationships. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. 1978;National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington.
11. Fischer D., Eisenberg D. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci. 5:1996;947-955.
12. Flores T. P., Orengo C. A., Moss D. S., Thornton J. M. Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs. Protein Sci. 2:1993;1811-1826.
13. Gonnet G. H., Cohen M. A., Benner S. A. Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database. Science. 256:1992;1443-1444.
14. Hazes B., Hol W. G. J. Comparison of the hemocyanin β-barrel with other greek key β-barrels: possible improtance of the "β-zipper" in protein structure and folding. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 12:1992;278-298.
15. Henikoff S., Henikoff J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 89:1992;10915-10919.
16. Holm L., Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science. 273:1996a;595-602.
17. Holm L., Sander C. The fssp database - fold classification based on structure alignment of proteins. Nucl. Acids Res. 24:1996b;206-209.
18. Hubbard T. J. P., Blundell T. L. Comparison of solvent-inaccessible cores of homologous proteins - definitions useful for protein modelling. Protein Eng. 1:1987;159-171.
19. Johnson M. S., Overginton J. P., Blundell T. L. Alignment and searching for common protein folds using a data bank of structural templates. J. Mol. Biol. 231:1993;735-752.
20. Jones D. T., Taylor W. R., Thornton J. M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:1992;275-282.
21. Kabsch W., Sander C. A dictionary of protein secondary structure. Biopolymers. 22:1983;2577-2637.
22. Laurents D. V., Subbiah S., Levitt M. Different protein sequences can give rise to highly similar folds through different stabilizing interactions. Protein Sci. 3:1994;1938-1944.
23. Lemer C. M. R., Rooman M. J., Wodak S. J. Protein-structure prediction by threading methods - evaluation of current techniques. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;337-355.
24. Lesk A. M., Chothia C. How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J. Mol. Biol. 136:1980;225-270.
25. Lesk A. M., Chothia C. Evolution of proteins formed by β-sheets II. The core of the immunoglobulin domains. J. Mol. Biol. 160:1982;325-342.
26. Martin J. L. Thioredoxin - a fold for all reasons. Structure. 3:1995;245-250.
27. Martin J. L., Bardwell J. C. A., Kuriyan J. Crystal structure of the DsbA protein required for disulphide bond formation in vivo. Nature. 365:1993;464-468.
28. Matthews S., Barlow P., Boyd J., Barton G., Russell R., Mills H., Cunningham M., Meyers N., Burns N., Clark N., Kingsman S., Kingsman A., Campbell I. Structural similarity between the p17 matrix protein of HIV-1 and interferon-γ Nature. 370:1994;666-668.
29. Murzin A., Brenner S. E., Hubbard T., Chothia C. scop: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247:1995;536-540.
30. Murzin A. G. Sweet tasting protein monellin is related to the cystatin family of thiol proteinase inhibitors. J. Mol. Biol. 230:1993a;689-694.
31. Murzin A. G. Can homologous proteins evolve different enzymatic activities? J. Mol. Biol. 18:1993b;403-405.
32. Murzin A. G., Lesk A. M., Chothia C. β-trefoil fold patterns of structure and sequence in the Kunitz inhibitors interleukins-1β and 1α and fibroblast growth factors. J. Mol. Biol. 223:1992;531-543.
33. Murzin A. Z. OB(oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding)-fold: common structural and functional solution for non-homologous sequences. EMBO J. 12:1993;861-867.
34. Ollis D. L., Cheah E., Cygler M., Dijkstra B., Frolow S. M., Ranken S. M., Harel M., Remington S. J., Silman I., Schrag J. The alpha/beta hydrolase fold. Protein Eng. 5:1992;197-211.
35. Orengo C. A., Jones D. T., Thornton J. M. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature. 372:1994;631-634.
36. Overington J., Johnson M. S., Sali A., Blundell T. L. Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction. Proc. Roy. Soc. ser. B. 241:1990;132-145.
37. Pascarella S., Argos P. A data bank merging related protein structures and sequences. Protein Eng. 5:1992;121-137.
38. Pickett S. D., Saqi M. A. S., Sternberg M. J. E. Evaluation of the sequence template method for protein structure prediction. Discrimination of the β/α-barrel fold. J. Mol. Biol. 228:1992;170-187.
39. Rost B. TOPITS: treading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. Rawlings C., Clark D., Altman R., Hunter L., Lengauer T., Wodak S. Proc. 3rd. Int. Conf. Intel. Sys. Mol. Biol. 1995;AAAI Press, Menlo Park.
40. Rost B., Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;584-599.
41. Rost B., Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 20:1994;216-226.
42. Rost B., Sander C., Schneider R. Redefining the goals of protein secondary structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1994;13-26.
43. Russell R. B., Barton G. J. Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 14:1992;309-323.
44. Russell R. B., Barton G. J. The limits of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy from multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 234:1993;951-957.
45. Russell R. B., Barton G. J. Structural features can be unconserved in proteins with similar folds: An analysis of side-chain to side-chain contacts, secondary structure and accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 244:1994;332-350.
46. Russell R. B., Copley R. R., Barton G. J. Protein fold recognition from secondary structure assignments. Hunter L., Shriver B. D. Proc. 28th Hawaii. Int. Conf. Sys. Sci. 1995;IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos.
47. Russell R. B., Copley R. R., Barton G. J. Protein fold recognition by mapping predicted secondary structures. J. Mol. Biol. 259:1996;349-365.
48. Smith T. F., Waterman M. S. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147:1981;195-197.
49. Taylor W. R. Classification of amino acid conservation. J. Theoret. Biol. 119:1986;205-218.