Dilemmas in framing research studies in engineering education

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 11524-11536

  Radcliffe, David F ^a   Jolly, Lesley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; RESEARCH; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; TEACHING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

ENGINEERING FACULTY; SCHOLARSHIP;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 8744251195     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Institution of Engineers, Australia, Changing the Culture: Engineering Education into the Future, Institution of Engineers, Australia, (1996).
2. Trevisan, M.S., Davis, D.D., Calkins, D.E. and Gentili, K.I. (1999) Designing sound scoring criteria for assessing performance, J. Engng. Ed., 89(1), 79-85.
3. Creighton, S.D., Johnson, R.L. Penny, J. and Ernst, E. (2001) A comprehensive system for student and program assessment: lessons learned, Int. J. Engng. Ed, 17(1), 81-88.
4. McGourty, J., Shuman, L., Besterfield-Scare, M., Atman, C., Miller, R., Olds, B., Rogers and Wolfe, H. (2002) Preparing for ABET EC2000: research-based assessment methods and processes, Int. J. Engng. Ed. 18(2), 157-167.
5. Miller, R.L. (2002) Reflections on outcomes assessment and ABET accreditation processes, Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June, Session 2513.
6. Olmesdah, P. (1999) Preoccupation with quality, Teaching in Higher Education, 4 (3), 419-424.
7. Fortenberry, N.L. (1999) An educational research agenda for SMET higher education, Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Charotte, June, Session 2230
8. Mann, C.R. (1918) A Study of Engineering Education, Bulletin Number Eleven, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, New York, N.Y.
9. Wankat, P.C., Felder, R.N., Smith, K.A. and Oreovicz, F.S. (2002) The Scholarship of Teaching and learning in engineering, Chapter 11 in Huber, M.T. and Morreale, S., eds, Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground, AAHE/Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Washington, 2002.
10. Liang, T., Bell, D.G. and Leifer, L.J (2001) Re-use or re-invent? understanding and supporting learning from experience of peers in a product development community, J. Engng Ed. (90), 519-526.
11. Hannan, A., English, S. and Silver, H. (1999) Why innovate? Some preliminary findings from a research project on Innovations in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Studies in Higher Ed., 24(3), 279-289.
12. Taylor, P. (1998) Institutional change in uncertain times: lone ranging is not enough, Studies in Higher Ed., 23, 269-279.
13. Stice, J.E. (1998) Thirty years of educational innovations, Proceedings of ASEE Conference and Exposition, Seattle, June, Session 2230.
14. Wankat, P.C (1999) An analysis of the articales in the Journal of Engineering Education, J. Engng. Ed. 88(1), 37-42.
15. Neuman, R. (2001) Disciplinary differences and university teaching, Studies in Higher Ed., 26 (2), 135-146.
16. Neuman, R., Parry, S., and Becher, T. (2002) Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: a conceptual study, Studies in Higher Ed., 27(4), 403-417.
17. Hativa, N. and Marincovich, M. (eds) (1995) Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: implications for practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francise.
18. Rowland, S. The role of theory in a pedagogical model for lecturers in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 24 (3), 303-314.
19. Elton, L. (1987) Teaching in Higher Education: Appraisal and Training, Kogan Page, London.
20. Kendall, G. (2002) The Crisis in Doctoral Education: a sociological diagnosis, Higher Education Research & Development, 21 (2), 131-141.
21. Holt, J.E. (1994) On the nature of engineering work- foundations of practice, Int. J. Engng Educ., 11, 420-426.
22. Beder, S. (1998) The New Engineer. Macmillan, Melbourne.
23. Downey, G.L and J.C. Lucena. (1997) Engineering selves: hiring in to a contested field of education, pp.117-141 in G.L. Downey and J Dumit (eds) Cyborgs and Citadels. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
24. Ferguson, E.S. (1992) Engineering and the Mind's Eye, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Culver, R. S., and Hockos, J.T. (1982). Perry's model of intellectual development, Engineering Education (December 1982): 221-226.
26. Holt, J.E. (2002) The status of engineering in the age of technology: principles of practice, Int. J. Engng. Educ., 18(1), 2-7.
27. Boyer, E. (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities for the Professoriate, Carnigie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.
28. Anderson, L.W. (2000) A useable, trans-disciplinary conception of scholarship, Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 137-353.
29. Healey, M. (2000) Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: a discipline-based approach, Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 169-189.
30. Kreber, C. (2002) Controversy and consensus on the scholarship of teaching, Studies in Higher Education, 27 (2), 151-167.
31. Felder, R.M. (2000) The scholarship of teaching, Chem Engng Ed., 83(2), 105-110.
32. Ditcher, A.K. (2001) Effective teaching and learning in higher education with particular reference to the undergraduate education of professional engineers, Int J. Engng Ed., 17(1), 24-29.
33. Jolly, L and Radcliffe, D.F. (2000), Strategies for Developing Reflexive Habits in Students, Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, St Louis, June, Session 1353
34. Bleakley, A. (1999) From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity, Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 315-330.
35. Cribb, A. and Bignold, S. (1999) Towards the reflexive medical school: the hidden curriculum and medical education research, Studies in Higher Ed., 24(2), 195-209.