A Comprehensive System for Student and Program Assessment: Lessons Learned

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 81-88

  Creighton, Susan Dabney ^a   Johnson, Robert L ^a   Penny, James ^a   Ernst, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035578633     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ABET, Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering in the United Sates, 3rd ed., Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. Baltimore, MD, December 1997.
2. E. Ernst, Review of reports, studies, and conferences on engineering education 1981-1997, Proceedings from Realizing the New Paradigm for Engineering Education, Engineering Foundation Conference, (June 3-6, 1998).
3. John W. Prados, Action agenda for systemic engineering education reform: next steps, Proceedings from Realizing the New Paradigm for Engineering Education, Engineering Foundation Conference, (June 3-6, 1998).
4. J. McGourty, C. Sebastian and W. Swart, Developing a comprehensive assessment program for engineering education, J. Eng. Educ., 87, 4, (1998) pp. 355-361.
5. A. Christy and M. Lima, M. The use of student portfolios in engineering instruction, Journal of Engineering Education, 87, 2 (1998) pp. 143-148.
6. B. Olds and R. Miller, Portfolio Assessment: Measuring Moving Targets at an Engineering School, NCA Quarterly, 71, 4 (1997).
7. R. Johnson, F. McDaniel and M. Willeke (at press) Using portfolios in program evaluation: an investigation of interrater reliability, Amer. J. Evaluation.
8. R. Johnson, M. Willeke and D. Steiner, Stakeholder collaboration in the design and implementation of a family literacy portfolio assessment, Amer. J. Evaluation, 19, 3 (1998) pp. 339-353.
9. R. Johnson, J. Penny and C. Johnson, Score resolution in the rating of performance assessments: practices and issues, presented at the Council of Chief State School Officers National Conference on Large Scale Assessment (June, 1998).
10. R. Johnson, J. Penny and B. Gordon, Score resolution methods and the reliability of holistic scores, presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal (April, 1999).
11. J. Penny, R. Johnson and Gordon, Score augmentation and the reliability of operational scores: an empirical study of a holistic rubric, presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal (April, 1999).
12. R. Johnson, J. Penny and B. Gordon, (in press) The relationship between score resolution methods and score reliability: an empirical study of an analytic scoring rubric, Applied Measurement in Education.
13. R. O'Sullivan, From judges to collaborators: Evaluators' roles in science curriculum reform. In R.G. O'Sullivan (Ed.), Emerging roles of evaluation in science education reform, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 65 (1995) Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, pp. 19-29.
14. C. Barrick and J. Cogliano, Stakeholder involvement: mythology or methodology? Evaluation Practice, 14, 1 (1993) pp. 33-37.
15. The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.) Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (1994).
16. Georgia Department of Education, Georgia High School Writing Test: Assessment and Instructional Guide (1993).
17. D. Koretz, B. Stecher, S. Klein and D. McCaffrey, The Vermont portfolio assessment program: Findings and implications, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 13, 3 (1994) pp. 5-16.