Environmental Integration in the EU’s External Relations: Beyond Multilateral Dimensions

Environmental Integration in the EU’s External Relations: Beyond Multilateral Dimensions

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-320

  Durán, Gracia Marín ^a   Morgera, Elisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85197565433     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (238)

1. Abass, A, ‘The Cotonou Regime and WTO Law’ (2004) 10(4) European Law Journal 439.
2. Abi-Saab, G, ‘Le Droit au Dévelopment’ (1988) XLIV Annuaire Suisse de Droit International 9.
3. Ackerman, F, Stanton, EA, Roach, B, and Andersson A-S, ‘Implications of REACH for Developing Countries’ (2008) 18(1) European Environment 16.
4. Adelle, C, Hertin, J, and Jordan, A, ‘Sustainable Development “Outside” the European Union: What Role for Impact Assessment’ (2006) 16(2) European Environment 57.
5. Aguilar, S, ‘Outcomes of the Cancún Conference’ (2011) 41(1) Environmental Policy and Law 10.
6. Alecu de Flers, N, and Regelsberger, E, ‘The EU and Inter-regional Cooperation’ in C Hill and M Smith, International Relations and the European Union (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005).
7. Alemanno, A, ‘The Better Regulation Initiative at the Judicial Gate: A Trojan Horse within the Commission’s Walls or the Way Forward?' (2009) 15(3) European Law Journal 381.
8. Alston, P, and Robinson, M (eds), Human Rights and Development: Towards Mutual Reinforcement (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005).
9. Alvarenga, K, Hajjar, R, Morgera, E, Schabus, N, Tsioumani, E and Zandaryaa, S, ‘Summary of the eighth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity’ (2006) 9(363) Earth Negotiations Bulletin.
10. Apea, Y, and Shaffer, G, ‘Institutional Choice in the GSP Case: Who Decides the Conditions for Trade Preferences? The Law and Politics of Rights’ (2005) 39(6) Journal of World Trade 977.
11. Appleton, A, Chiarolla, C, Johnson, T, Jonas, H, Jungcurt, S, and Moreau, MA, ‘Summary of the second meeting of the Ad hoc Open-ended Working Group on Protected Areas and the thirteenth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice of the Convention on Biological Diversity’ 9(247) Earth Negotiations Bulletin.
12. Appleton, A, Gnann, J, Morgera, E, Roemer-Mahler, A, and Rosen, T, ‘Summary of the fourteenth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity’ (2010) 9(514) Earth Negotiations Bulletin.
13. Arts, K, and Dickson, AK (eds), EU Development Cooperation. From Model to Symbol? (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2004).
14. Ashton, M, Cheng, Q, Kantai, T, Kohler, PM, and Templeton, J, ‘Summary of the fifth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants’ (2011) 15(182) Earth Negotiations Bulletin.
15. Augenstein, D, Boyle, A, Cabrelli, D, Harrison, J, Singh Ghaleigh, N, and Morgera, E, ‘Study of the Legal Framework on Human Rights and the Environment Applicable to European Union Companies Operating Outside the EU’ (Report, Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, 2010).
16. Ayers, J, Huq, S, and Chandani, A, ‘Assessing EU Assistance for Adaptation to Climate Change in Developing Countries: a Southern Perspective’ in S Oberthür and M Pallemaerts (eds), The New Climate Policies of the European Union: Internal Legislation and Climate Diplomacy (Brussels, VUB Press, 2010).
17. Babarinde, OA, The Lomé Conventions and Development (Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing, 1994).
18. Babarinde, OA, and Faber, G, ‘From Lomé to Cotonou: Business as Usual?' (2004) 9(1) European Foreign Affairs Review 27.
19. Babarinde, OA, and Faber, G, (eds), The European Union and Developing Countries: the Cotonou Agreement (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).
20. Baldwin, A, Davenport, D, Dimitrov, R, Hajjar, R, and Wood, P, ‘Summary of the fifth session of the United Nations Forum on Forests’ (2005) 13(133) Earth Negotiations Bulletin.
21. Barral, V, ‘Le Développement Durable en Droit International: essai sur les incidences juridiques d’un concept évolutif’ (Doctoral Thesis, European University Institute 2007).
22. Bartels, L, ‘Art XX of the GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction’ (2002) 6(2) Journal of World Trade 353.
23. Bartels, L, ‘The WTO Enabling Clause and Positive Conditionality in the European Community’s GSP Program’ (2003) 6(2) Journal of International Economic Law 513.
24. Bartels, L, Human Rights Conditionality in the EU’s International Agreements (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005).
25. Bartels, L, ‘The Appellate Body Ruling on EC-Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries and its Implications for Conditionality in GSP Programmes’ in T Cottier, J Pauwelyn and E Bürgi (eds), Human Rights and International Trade (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005).
26. Bartels, L, ‘The Trade and Development Policy of the European Union’ (2007) 18(4) European Journal of International Law 715.
27. Bartels, L, ‘The WTO Legality of the EU GSP+ Arrangements’ (2007) 10(4) Journal of International Economic Law 869.
28. Bartels, L, ‘Comments on CARFORUM-EU Economic Partnership Agreement’ (Comments to the European Commission, 13 February 2008).
29. Bartelt, S, ‘The Institutional Interplay regarding the New Architecture for the EU’s External Assistance’ (2008) 14(5) European Law Journal 655.
30. Bauler, T, ‘The Commission’s Impact Assessment Process: Handling the External Dimensions of Sustainability’ in M Pallemaerts and A Azmanova (eds), The European Union and Sustainable Development (Brussels, VUB Press, 2006).
31. Berdiyev, B, ‘The EU and Former Soviet Central Asia: An Analysis of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreements’ (2003) 22 Yearbook of Environmental Law 463.
32. Bilal, S, and Rampa, F, ‘Alternative(s) EPAs. Possible Scenarios for the Future ACP Trade Relations with the EU’ (2006) European Centre for Development Policy Management, Policy Management Report 11 (Maastricht, February 2006).
33. Biniaz, S, ‘Remarks about the CITES Compliance Regime’ in U Beyerlin, PT Stoll and R Wolfrum (eds), Ensuring Compliance with Multilateral Environmental Agreements (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 2006).
34. Birnie, P, Boyle, A, and Redgwell, C, International Law and the Environment 3rd edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009).
35. Björklund, M, ‘Responsibility of the EC and the Member States for Mixed Agreements -Should Non-Member Parties Care?' (2001) 70(3) Nordic Journal of International Law 373.
36. Blobel, D, Knigge, M, and Görlach, B, ‘Report on Trade, Environment and Sustainability Impact Assessment’ (Ecologic, 2005).
37. Bodansky, D, ‘What is So Bad about Unilateral Actions to Protect the Environment?' (2000) 11(2) European Journal of International Law 339.
38. Boyle, A, and Freestone, D, (eds) International Law and Sustainable Development. Past Achievements and Future Challenges (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
39. Brandtner, B, and Rosas, A, ‘Trade Preferences and Human Rights’ in P Alston (ed), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
40. Bretton, P, ‘Integrating the Least Developed Countries into the World Trading System: The Current Impact of the European Preferences under the “Everything But Arms Initiative”' (2003) 37(3) Journal of World Trade 623.
41. Breuss, F, Griller, S, and Vranes, E (eds), The Banana Dispute. An Economic and Legal Analysis (New York, Springer, 2003).
42. Brunnée, J, Bodansky, D, and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007).
43. Buck, M, and Hamilton, C, ‘The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity’ (2011) 20(1) Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 47.
44. Campling, L, ‘Fisheries Aspects of the EU-ACP Interim Economic Partnership Agreements: Trade and Sustainable Development Implications’ (2008) ICTSD Issue Paper No 6.
45. Chalmers, D, Davies, G, and Monti, G, European Union Law 2nd edn (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010).
46. Charnovitz, S, Bartels, L, Howse, R, Bradley, J, Pauwelyn, J, and Regan, D, ‘Internet Round: The Appellate Body’s Decision’ (2004) 3 World Trade Review 239.
47. Chaytor, B, ‘Environmental Issues in Economic Partnership Agreements: Implications for Developing Countries’ (2009) ICTSD Issue Paper.
48. Chiavari, J, ‘The Legal Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage in the EU (Directive 2009/31/EC)' in S Oberthür and M Pallemaerts (eds), The New Climate Policies of the European Union: Internal Legislation and Climate Diplomacy (Brussels, VUB Press, 2010).
49. Chowdhury, SR, Denters, EMG, and de Wart, P (eds), The Right to Development in International Law (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1992).
50. Christophe-Tchakaloff, MF (ed), Le Concept d’Association dans les Accords passés par la Communauté: Essai de Clarification (Brussels, Bruylant, 1999).
51. Coffey, C, ‘Integrating Environment into the Common Fisheries Policy’ (2000) Institute for European Environmental Policy.
52. Cole, A, ‘Labour Standards in the Generalised System of Preferences: the European Communities/India GSP Dispute’ (2004) 25(1) Michigan Journal of International Law 179.
53. Compa, L, and Vogt, J, ‘Labor Rights in the Generalized System of Preferences: A 20-Year Review’ (2001) 22(2-3) Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 199.
54. Cordonier-Segger, M-C, and Ahsfaq, K, Sustainable Development Law: Principles, Practices and Prospects (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004).
55. Cosbey, A, ‘Timing and Public Participation Issues’ in OECD, Assessing the Environmental Effects of Trade Liberalization Agreements: Methodologies (Paris, OECD, 2000).
56. Cosbey, A et al, ‘The Rush to Regionalism: Sustainable Development and Regional/Bilateral Approaches to Trade and Investment Liberalisation’ (International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2005).
57. Cremona, M, ‘External Relations and External Competence: The Emergence of an Integrated Policy’ in P Craig and G de Burca (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
58. Cremona, M, ‘Rhetoric and Reticence: EU External Commercial Policy in a Multilateral Context’ (2001) 38(2) Common Market Law Review 359.
59. Cremona, M, ‘Creating the New Europe: The Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe in the Context of EU-SEE Relations’ (2000) 2 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 464.
60. Cremona, M, ‘A Policy of Bits and Pieces? The Common Commercial Policy after Nice’ (2001) 4 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 61.
61. Cremona, M, ‘The Common Commercial Policy’ in C Saunders and G Triggs (eds), Trade and Cooperation with the European Union in the New Millennium (London, Kluwer, 2002).
62. Cremona, M, ‘The External Dimension of the Single Market. Building on Foundations’ in C Barnard and J Scott (eds), The Law of the Single European Market: Unpacking the Premises (Oxford, Hart, 2002).
63. Cremona, M, (ed), The Enlargement of the European Union (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003).
64. Cremona, M, ‘Enlargement: A Successful Instrument of Foreign Policy?' in T Tridimas and P Nebbia, (eds), European Union Law for the Twenty-First Century (Oxford, Hart, 2004).
65. Cremona, M, ‘The Union as a Global Actor: Roles, Models and Identity’ (2004) 41(2) Common Market Law Review 556.
66. Cremona, M, ‘A Constitutional Basis for an Effective External Action’ (2006) EUI Law Working Paper 2006/30.
67. Cremona, M, ‘Coherence and EU External Policy’ in E Morgera (ed), The External Environmental Policy of the European Union: EU and International Law Perspectives (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2012).
68. Curtin, J, The Copenhagen Conference: How Should the EU Respond? (Dublin, IIEA, 2010).
69. Dashwood, A, ‘Mixity in the Era of the Treaty of Lisbon’ in C Hillion and P Koutrakos (eds), Mixed Agreements Revisited: the EU and its Member States in the World (Oxford, Hart, 2010).
70. Dashwood, A, and Hillion, C, The General Law of EC External Relations (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).
71. Delreux, T, The EU as an International Environmental Negotiator (Surrey, Ashgate, 2011).
72. Del Sarto, R, and Schumacher, T, ‘From EMP to ENP: What’s at Stake with the European Neighbourhood Policy Towards the Southern Mediterranean?' (2005) 10(1) European Foreign Affairs Review 17.
73. Desta, MG, ‘EC-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements and WTO Compatibility: An experiment in North-South Inter-Regional Agreements?' (2006) 43(5) Common Market Law Review 1343.
74. de Vos, AE, ‘The Cotonou Agreement: A Case of Forced Regional Integration?' in G Kreijen, M Brus, J Dugard, J Duursma and AE de Vos (eds), State, Sovereignty and International Governance (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002).
75. de Witte, B, ‘The Emergence of a European System of Public International Law: the EU and its Member States as Strange Subjects’ in J Wouters, A Nollkaemper and E de Wet (eds), The Europeanisation of International Law (The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2008).
76. de Witte, B, ‘Too Much Constitutional Law?' in M Cremona and B de Witte (eds), EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford, Hart, 2008).
77. Dhondt, N, Integration of Environmental Protection into Other EC Policies - Legal Theory and Practice (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2003)
78. Dickson, AK, ‘The Demise of the Lomé Protocols: Revising European Development Policy’ (2000) 5 European Foreign Affairs Review 197.
79. Eeckhout, P, External Relations of the European Union: Legal and Constitutional Foundations (Oxford, Oxford University Press 2004).
80. Egenhofer, C, and Georgiev, A, ‘The Copenhagen Accord - A First Stab at Deciphering the Implications for the EU’ (2009) Centre for European Policy Studies, CEPS Commentaries.
81. Fierro Sedano, E, The EU’s Approach to Human Rights Conditionality in Practice (The Hague, Kluwer, 2003).
82. Fodella, A, ‘Mechanisms for Promoting Implementation and Compliance with the 1989 Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal’ in T Treves et al (eds), Non-compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2009).
83. Fujiwara, N, ‘Reinvigorating the EU’s Role in the post-Copenhagen Landscape’ (2010)
84. Centre for European Policy Studies, Climate Change, CEPS Commentaries.
85. Gasiorek, M, et al, ‘Mid-term Evaluation of the EU’s Generalised System of Preferences. Final Report’ (CARIS, 26 May 2010).
86. Gatto, A, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the External Relations of the EU’ (2005) 24 Yearbook of European Law 423
87. Gebhard, C, ‘Coherence’ in C Hill and M Smith (eds), International Relations and the EU 2nd edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011).
88. George, C, ‘Regional Trade Agreements and the Environment: Monitoring Implementation and Assessing Impacts: Report on the OECD Workshop’ (2011) OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers 2011/02.
89. George, C, and Kirkpatrick, C, ‘Sustainability Impact Assessment of the World Trade Negotiations: Current Practice and Lessons for Further Development’ (New Directions in Impact Assessment for Development Conference, University of Manchester, 24-25 November 2003).
90. Greven, T, Leopold, A, and Molinari, E, ‘An Analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of Social and Environmental Norms in Free Trade Agreements’ (2009 Study, European Parliament).
91. Grilli, E, The European Community and Developing Countries (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993).
92. Hakura, S, ‘The Euro-Mediterranean Policy: The Implications of the Barcelona Declarations’ (1997) 34(2) Common Law 337.
93. Hall, R, ‘Undercutting Africa: Why EPAs Threaten the World’s Forests and Forest Peoples’ (2009) 8(1) Trade Negotiations Insights.
94. Hanf, D, and Dengler, P, ‘Accords d’Association’ (2004) 1 College of Europe Research Paper in Law 9.
95. Harrison, J, ‘Incentives for Development: The EC’s Generalised System of Preferences, India’s WTO Challenge and Proposals for Reform’ (2005) 42(6) Common Market Law Review 1663.
96. Hermann, CW, ‘Common Commercial Policy after Nice: Sisyphus Would Have Done a Better Job’ (2002) 39(1) Common Market Law Review 7.
97. Hession, M, and Macrory, R, ‘The Legal Duty of Environmental Integration: Commitment and Obligation or Enforceable Rights?' in T O’Riordan and H Voisey (eds), The Transition to Sustainability: The Politics of Agenda 21 in Europe (London, Earthscan, 1998).
98. Heyvaert, V, ‘Globalizing Regulation: Reaching Beyond the Borders of Chemical Safety’ (2009) 36(1) Journal of Law and Society 110.
99. Hillion, C, ‘Partnership and Cooperation Agreements between the European Union and the New Independent States of the Ex-Soviet Union’ (1998) 3 European Foreign Affairs Review 399.
100. Hillion, C, ‘The EU’s Neighbourhood Policy towards Eastern Europe’ in A Dashwood and M Maresceau, Law and Practice of EU External Relations (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008).
101. Hillion, C, ‘Tous pour un, un pour tous! Coherence in the External Relations of the European Union’ in M Cremona (ed), Developments in EU External Relations Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009).
102. Hillion, C, ‘Mixity and Coherence in the EU External Relations: the Significance of the Duty of Cooperation’ in C Hillion and P Koutrakos (eds), Mixed Agreements Revisited: the EU and its Member States in the World (Oxford, Hart, 2010).
103. Hillion, C, and Koutrakos, P (eds), Mixed Agreements Revisited: the EU and its Member States in the World (Oxford, Hart, 2010).
104. Holder, J, and Lee, M, Environmental Protection: Law and Policy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007).
105. Howarth, W, ‘The Interpretation of “Precaution” in the European Community Common Fisheries Policy’ (2008) 20 Journal of Environmental Law 213.
106. Howse, R, ‘India’s WTO Challenge to Drug Enforcement in the European Community Generalised System of Preferences. A Little Known Case with Major Repercussion for “Political” Conditionality in US Trade Policy’ (2003) 42 Chicago Journal of International Law 385.
107. Howse, R, ‘Back to the Court after Shrimp/Turtle: India’s Challenge to Labour and Environmental Linkages in the EC Generalised System of Preferences’ in E Benvenisti and M Hirsch (eds), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation. Theoretical Perspectives (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004).
108. Huber, J, ‘The Past, Present and Future of the ACP-EC Trade Regime and the WTO’ (2000) 11(2) European Journal of International Law 427.
109. Inama, S, ‘Market Access for LDCs. Issues to be Addressed’ (2002) 36(1) Journal of World Trade 85.
110. Inama, S, and Vermulst, E, Customs and Trade Law of the European Community (London, Kluwer, 1999).
111. Inglis, K, ‘Enlargement and the Environment Acquis’ (2004) 13 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 135.
112. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ‘Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage, Summary for Policy Makers’ (Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Montreal, 22-24 September 2005).
113. Jacobs, F, ‘The Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of the Environment’ (2006) 18(2) Journal of Environmental Law 185.
114. Jans, J, and Vedder, H, European Environmental Law 3rd edn (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2008).
115. Jansen, B, ‘The Limits of Unilateralism from an European Perspective’ (2000) 11(2) European Journal of International Law 309.
116. Jinnah, S, ‘Strategic Linkages: The Evolving Role of Trade Agreements in Global Environmental Governance’ (2011) 20(2) Journal of Environment and Development 191.
117. Johnson, SP, and Corcelle, G, The Environmental Policy of the European Communities (London, Kluwer, 1995).
118. Kaddous, C, ‘Effects of International Agreements in the EU Legal Order’ in M Cremona and B de Witte (eds), EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford, Hart, 2008).
119. Kelemen, RD, ‘Globalizing European Union Environmental Policy’ (Princeton Annual Workshop on European Integration, Princeton, New Jersey, 1 May 2009).
120. Kingston, S, ‘Integrating Environmental Protection and EU Competition Law: Why Competition Isn’t Special’ (2010) 16(6) European Law Journal 780.
121. Klabbers, J, ‘Restraints Imposed on the Treaty-Making Powers of the Member States Deriving from EU Law: A Framework for Analysis’ in E Canizzaro (ed), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations (The Hague, Kluwer, 2002).
122. Knigge, M, and Leipprand, A, ‘Public Participation in Sustainability Impact Assessments’ (Ecologic, 2003).
123. Koutrakos, P, EU International Relations Law (Oxford, Hart, 2006).
124. Koutrakos, P, ‘Legal Basis and Delimitation of Competence in EU External Relations’ in M Cremona and B de Witte (eds), EU Foreign Relations Law: Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford, Hart, 2008).
125. Kramer, L, ‘The Genesis of EC Environmental Principles’ in R Macrory (ed), Principles of European Environmental Law (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2004).
126. Kramer, L, EC Environmental Law 6th edn (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2006).
127. Kramer, L, ‘Regional Economic International Organizations: The European Union as an Example’ in J Brunnée, D Bodansky and E Hey (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007).
128. Kramer, L, ‘Sustainable Development in the EC’ in H Bugge and C Voight (eds), Sustainable Development in International and National Law (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2008).
129. Kramer, L, ‘Environmental Justice in the European Court of Justice’ in J Ebbesson and P Okowa (eds), Environmental Law and Justice in Context (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009).
130. Kulovesi, K, ‘How to Prevent Babies from Being Thrown Away with the Bathwater: Perspectives on the International Climate Regime from Buenos Aires to the Future’ in E Morgera and F Francioni (eds), The Future of Environmental Law: International and European Perspectives (The Working Group on Environmental Law: Collected Reports 2004-2005) EUI Working Papers Law No 2006/01.
131. Kulovesi, K, and Gutiérrez, M, ‘Climate Change Negotiations Update: Process and Prospects for an Agreed Outcome in Copenhagen in December 2009' (2009) 18(3) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 229.
132. Kulovesi, K, Morgera, E, and Muñoz, M, ‘Environmental Integration and Multi-faceted International Dimensions of EU Law: Unpacking the EU’s 2009 Climate and Energy Package’ (2011) 48(3) Common Market Law Review 829.
133. Laffan, B, and Lindner, J, ‘The Budget: Who Gets What, When and How?' in H Wallace, MA Pollack and AR Young (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010).
134. Leal Riesco, I and Opoku, K, ‘Is REDD Undermining FLEGT?' (FERN Briefing Note 05, March 2009).
135. Lee, M, EU Environmental Law: Challenges, Change and Decision-making (Oxford, Hart, 2005).
136. Lee, M, ‘The Environmental Implications of the Lisbon Treaty’ (2008) 10(2) Environmental Law Review 131.
137. Lee, N, and Kirkpatrick, C, ‘Methodologies for Sustainability Impact Assessments of Proposals for New Trade Agreements’ (2001) 3(3) Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 395.
138. Leino, P, ‘The Journey Towards all that is Good and Beautiful: Human Rights and “Common Values” as Guiding Principles of EU Foreign Relations Law’ in M Cremona and B de Witte (eds), EU Foreign Relations Law (Oxford, Hart, 2008).
139. Lenschow, A, (ed), Environmental Policy Integration - Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe (London, Earthscan Publications, 2002).
140. Lyons, T, EC Customs Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001).
141. Macrory, L (ed), Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law: A High Level of Protection? (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2005).
142. Mahony, S, ‘Timing and Public Participation Issues in Undertaking Environmental Assessments of Trade Liberalization Agreements’ in OECD, Assessing the Environmental Effects of Trade Liberalization Agreements: Methodologies (Paris, OECD, 2000).
143. Marín Durán, G, Development-based Differentiation in the European Community’s External Trade Policy - Selected Issues under Community and International Trade Law (Doctoral thesis, European University Institute 2007).
144. Marín Durán, G, ‘Environmental Integration in EU Development Cooperation: Responding to International Commitments or Own Policy Priorities’ in E Morgera (ed), The External Environmental Policy of the European Union: EU and International Law Perspectives (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2012).
145. Marín Durán, G, ‘The EU Role in Shaping the Trade and Environment Regulatory Nexus: Multilateral and Regional Approaches’ in S Blockmans, B van Vooren and J Wouters (eds), The Legal Dimension of Global Governance - What Role for the EU? (forthcoming 2012).
146. Marín Durán, G, and Morgera, E, ‘Case note. WTO India-EC GSP Dispute: The Future of Unilateral Trade Incentives linked to Multilateral Environmental Agreements’ (2005) 14 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 173.
147. Marín Durán, G, and Morgera, E, ‘Towards Environmental Integration in EC External Relations: A Comparative Analysis of Selected Association Agreements’ (2006) 6 Yearbook of European Environmental Law 179.
148. Martenzuck, B, ‘From Lomé to Cotonou: The ACP-EC Partnership Agreement in a Legal Perspective’ (2000) 5(4) European Foreign Affairs Review 461.
149. Matambalya, F, and Wolf, S, ‘The Cotonou Agreement and the Challenges of Making the EU-ACP Trade Regime WTO Compatible’ (2001) 35(1) Journal of World Trade 123.
150. Mathis, JH, ‘Benign Discrimination and the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP)' (2004) 31(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 289.
151. McGillivray, D, and Holder, J, ‘Locating EC Environmental Law’ (2001) 2 Yearbook of European Environmental Law 139.
152. McKenzie, M, ‘Climate Change and the Generalised System of Preferences’ (2008) 11(3) Journal of International Economic Law 679.
153. McMahon, JA, The Development Cooperation of the EC (London, Kluwer, 1998).
154. McMahon, JA, ‘Negotiating at a Time of Turbulent Transition: The Future of Lomé' (1999) 36(3) Common Market Law Review 599.
155. McMahon, JA, ‘The Long-Standing Banana Saga-Towards an Acceptable Solution’ (2005) 11(6) International Trade Law and Regulation 181.
156. Miller, A, Morgera, E and Nyingi, DW, ‘Summary of the fourth meeting of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Informal Working Group to study issues relating to the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction’ (2011) 25(70) Earth Negotiations Bulletin.
157. Morgera, E, ‘An Update on the Aarhus Convention and its Continued Global Relevance’ (2005) 14(2) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 138.
158. Morgera, E, ‘The 2005 UN World Summit and the Environment: The Proverbial Half-Full Glass?' (2006) 15 Italian Yearbook of International Law 53.
159. Morgera, E, Corporate Accountability in International Environmental Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009).
160. Morgera, E, ‘Relevance Beyond Borders: Recent Developments in the EU’ (2010) 40 Environmental Policy and Law 234.
161. Morgera, E, ‘Environmental Dimension of the MDGs: Progress Made?' (2010) 40(6) Environmental Policy and Law 269.
162. Morgera, E, ‘Expert Report Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights in the Environmental Sphere’ (May 2010) at www.law.ed.ac.uk/euenterpriseslf/documents/files/CSREnvironment.pdf.
163. Morgera, E, ‘Far Away, So Close: A Legal Analysis of the Increasing Interactions between the Convention on Biological Diversity and Climate Change Law’ (2011) 2(1) Climate Law 85, 112.
164. Morgera, E, ‘Ambition, Complexity and Legitimacy of Pursuing Mutual Supportiveness through the EU’s External Environmental Action’ in B Van Vooren, S Blockmans and J Wouters (eds), The Legal Dimension of Global Governance: What Role for the EU? (Oxford, Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2012).
165. Morgera, E, ‘European Environmental Law’ in S Alam et al (eds), Routledge Handbook of International Environmental Law (London, Routledge, forthcoming 2012).
166. Morgera, E, (ed), The External Environmental Policy of the European Union: EU and International Law Perspectives (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2012).
167. Morgera, E, Kulovesi, K and Gobena, A (eds), Case Studies on Bioenergy Policy and Law: Options for Sustainability, FAO Legislative Study No 102 (Rome, FAO, 2010).
168. Morgera, E, and Marín Durán, G, ‘Enlargement and EU Development Policy: An Environmental Perspective’ (2004) 13(2) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 152.
169. Morgera, E, and Marín Durán, G, ‘The UN 2005 World Summit, the Environment and the EU: Priorities, Promises and Prospects’ (2006) 15(1) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 11.
170. Morgera, E and Tsioumani, E, ‘Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: Looking Afresh at the Convention on Biological Diversity’ (forthcoming) 21 Yearbook of International Environmental Law.
171. Morgera, E, Tsioumani, E, Aguilar, S, and Wilkins, H, ‘Implementation Challenges and Compliance in MEA Negotiations’ in P Chasek and L Wagner (eds), The Roads from Rio: Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Multilateral Environmental Negotiations (London, Routledge, forthcoming 2012).
172. Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet, G, ‘Perspective for a New Regionalism: Relations between the EU and MERCOSUR’ (2000) 5(4) European Foreign Affairs Review 561.
173. Najam, A, Halle, M, and Meléndez-Ortiz, R (eds), Trade and Environment. A Resource Book, (Geneva, IISD-ICSTD-The Ring, 2007).
174. Neuwahl, NA, ‘Shared Powers or Combined Incompetence? More on Mixity’ (1996) 33(4) Common Market Law Review 667.
175. Neuwahl, NA, ‘The EU-Turkey Customs Union: a Balance but No Equilibrium’ (1999) 4(1) European Foreign Affairs Review 37.
176. Oberthür, S, and Pallemaerts, M (eds), The New Climate Policies of the European Union: Internal Legislation and Climate Diplomacy (Brussels, VUB Press, 2010).
177. Ozden, C, and Reinhardt, E, ‘The Perversity of Preferences: the Generalised System of Preferences and Developing Countries Trade Policies, 1976-2000' (2003) World Bank Policy Research Paper Series No 2955.
178. Pardo, S, and Zemer, L, ‘Towards a New Euro-Mediterranean Neighbourhood Space’ (2005) 10(1) European Foreign Affairs Review 39.
179. Passos, R, ‘Mixed Agreements from the Perspective of the European Parliament’ in C Hillion and P Koutrakos (eds), Mixed Agreements Revisited (Oxford, Hart, 2010).
180. Peers, S, ‘The Reform of the European Community’s General System of Preferences. A Missed Opportunity’ (1995) 29(6) Journal of World Trade 79.
181. Peers, S, ‘Living in Sin: Legal Integration under the EC-Turkey Customs Union’ (1996) 13(3) European Journal of International Law 411.
182. Peers, S, ‘EC Frameworks of International Relations: Cooperation, Partnership and Association’ in A Dashwood and C Hillion, The General Law of EC External Relations (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).
183. Perez, R, ‘Are Economic Partnership Agreements a First-Best Option for the ACP countries?' (2006) 40(6) Journal of World Trade 999.
184. Persson, A, ‘Environmental Policy Integration and Bilateral Development Assistance: Challenges and Opportunities with an evolving Governance Framework’ (2009) 9(4) International Environmental Agreements 409.
185. Philippart, E, ‘The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: A Critical Evaluation of an Ambitious Scheme’ (2003) 8(2) European Foreign Affairs Review 201.
186. Phinnemore, D, ‘Stabilisation and Association Agreements: Europe Agreements for the Western Balkans’ (2003) 8(1) European Foreign Affairs Review 77.
187. Pippan, C, ‘The Rocky Road to Europe: The EU’s Stabilisation and Association Process for the Western Balkans and the Principle of Conditionality’ (2004) 9(2) European Foreign Affairs Review 219.
188. Piris, JC, The Lisbon Treaty. A Legal and Political Analysis (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010).
189. Psychogiopoulou, E, The Integration of Cultural Considerations in EU Law and Policies (Doctoral thesis, European University Institute 2006).
190. Ragni, C, ‘Procedures and Mechanisms on Compliance under the 2000 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity’ in Treves, T, Pineschi, L, Tanzi, A, Pitea, C, Ragni, C, and Romanin Jacur, C (eds), Non-compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2009).
191. Rajamani, L, Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006).
192. Reischel, G, ‘The EU and the UN Forest Negotiations: a case of failed international environmental governance?' (Paper presented to Marie Curie European Summer School on Earth System Governance, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 24 May-6 June 2007).
193. Rosas, A, ‘The European Union and Mixed Agreements’ in A Dashwood and C Hillion, The General Law of EC External Relations (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).
194. Rosas, A, ‘The European Court of Justice and Public International Law’ in J Wouters, A Nollkaemper and E De Wet (eds), The Europeanisation of International Law (The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2008).
195. Ross-Robertson, A, ‘Is the Environment Getting Squeezed out of Sustainable Development?' (2003, Sum) Public Law 249.
196. Rowe, GC, ‘Tools for the Control of Political and Administrative Agents: Impact Assessment and Administrative Governance in the European Union’ in H Hoffman and A Türk (eds), EU Administrative Governance (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2005).
197. Sadeleer, N, ‘EC Law and Biodiversity’ in R Macrory (ed), Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law - a High Level Protection? (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2005).
198. Sadeleer, N, ‘Habitat Conservation in EC Law: From Nature Sanctuaries to Ecological Networks’ (2005) 5 Yearbook of European Environmental Law 215.
199. Sánchez Arnau, JC, The Generalised System of Preferences and the World Trade Organisation (London, Cameron, 2002).
200. Sands, P, ‘Unilateralism, Values and International Law’ (2000) 11(2) European Journal of International Law 291.
201. Sands, P, Principles of International Environmental Law 2nd edn (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003).
202. Santander, S, ‘EU-MERCOSUR Inter-regionalism: Facing up to the South American Crisis and the Emerging Free Trade Area of the Americas’ (2002) 7(4) European Foreign Affairs Review 491.
203. Savaresi, A, ‘Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries under the UNFCCC. Caveats and Opportunities for Biodiversity’ (forthcoming) 21 Yearbook of International Environmental Law.
204. Savaresi, A, ‘The EU External Action on Forests: FLEGT and the Development of International Law’ in E Morgera (ed), The External Environmental Policy of the European Union; EU and International Law Perspectives (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2012).
205. Scott, J, ‘REACH: Combining Harmonization and Dynamism in the Regulation of Chemicals’ in J Scott (ed), Environmental Protection: European Law and Governance (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009) 56.
206. Scott, J, ‘The Multi-level Governance of Climate Change’ (2011) 4(1) Carbon and Climate Law Review 25.
207. Shaffer, G, Defending Interests: Public-Private Partnerships in the WTO Litigation (Washington, DC, Brooking Institution Press, 2003).
208. Simmonds, KR, ‘The Lomé Convention and the New International Economic Order’ (1976) 13(3) Common Market Law Review 315.
209. Simmonds, KR, ‘The Second Lomé Convention: the Innovative Features’ (1980) 17(3) Common Market Law Review 99.
210. Simmonds, KR, ‘The Third Lomé Convention’ (1985) 22(3) Common Market Law Review 389.
211. Simmonds, KR, ‘The Fourth Lomé Convention’ (1991) 28(3) Common Market Law Review 521.
212. Sindico, F, ‘Climate Change: A Security (Council) Issue?' (2007) 1(1) Carbon and Climate Law Review 26.
213. Smith, F, ‘Renegotiating Lomé: the Impact of the World Trade Organisation on the European Community’s Development Policy after the Bananas Conflict’ (2000) 25(3) European Law Review 247.
214. Soveroski, M, ‘EC Enlargement and the Development of European Environmental Policy: Parallel Histories, Divergent Paths?' (2004) 13(2) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 127.
215. Spence, C, and Vavilov, A, ‘Summary of the First Session of the Preparatory Committee for the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development’ (2010) 27(1) Earth Negotiations Bulletin.
216. Switzer, S, ‘Environmental Protection and the Generalised System of Preferences: A Legal and Appropriate Linkage?' (2008) 57(1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 113.
217. Sykes, AO, ‘A Preference for Development: the Law and Economics of the GSP’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review 41.
218. Taxil, B, L’OMC et les Pays en Dévelopment (Paris, Monchrestien, 1998).
219. Tébar Less, C, and Kim, JA, ‘Checklist for Negotiators of Environmental Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements’ (2008) OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers 2008/02.
220. The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiveristy (TEEB), ‘The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB’ (TEEB, 2010).
221. Thompson, P, ‘EPAs and Natural Resources: The European Sustainability Agenda’ (2009) 8(4) Trade Negotiations Insights.
222. Tietje, C, ‘The Legal Status of International Law in the European Legal Order: The Case of International Treaties and Non-binding International Instruments’ in J Wouters, A Nollkaemper and E de Wet (eds), The Europeanisation of International Law (The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2008).
223. UNEP, Reference Manual for the Integrated Assessment of Trade-related Policies (Geneva, UNEP, 2001).
224. van Asselt, H, ‘Managing the Fragmentation of International Environmental Law: Forests at the Intersection of the Climate and Biodiversity Regime’ (forthcoming) NYU Journal of International Law and Politics.
225. van der Grijp, N, and Etty, T, ‘Incorporating Climate Change into EU Development Cooperation Policy’ in J Gupta and N van der Grijp (eds), Mainstreaming Climate Change in Development Cooperation (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010).
226. van Homeyer, I, ‘The Evolution of EU Environmental Governance’ in J Scott (ed), Environmental Protection, European Law and Governance (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009).
227. Vedder, H, ‘The Treaty of Lisbon and European Environmental Policy’ (2010) 22(2) Journal of Environmental Law 285.
228. Vedder, H, ‘Diplomacy by Directive: An Analysis of the International Context of the Emissions Trading Directive’ (2009) Social Science Research Network Working Paper No 1477371.
229. Vogler, J, ‘The European Union as an Actor in International Environmental Politics’ (1999) 8(3) Environmental Politics 25, 32-34.
230. Vogler, J, and Bretherton, C, ‘The European Union as a Sustainable Development Actor: the Case of External Fisheries Policy’ (2008) 30(3) Journal of European Integration 401.
231. Wallace, H, Wallace, W, and Pollack, MA, Policy-Making in the European Union 6th edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011).
232. Wasmeier, M, ‘The Integration of Environmental Protection as a General Rule for Interpreting Community Law’ (2001) 38(1) Common Market Law Review 159.
233. Wiers, J, Trade and Environment in the EC and the WTO - A Legal Analysis (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2002).
234. Winters, LA, ‘Post-Lomé Trading Arrangements: the Multilateral Alternative’ in J von Hagen and M Widgren (eds), Regionalism in Europe. Geometries and Strategies after 2000 (Boston, Kluwer, 2001).
235. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1987).
236. WWF, ‘Changing the Balance of Trade’ WWF Briefing on Sustainability Assessment of EU Trade Policy (WWF, 2002).
237. WWF, BirdLife and FERN, ‘Environmental Tools in EC Development Cooperation -Transparency and Public Availability of Documentation’ (WWF, BirdLife and FERN, September 2007).
238. WWF, BirdLife and FERN, ‘Environmental Tools in EC Development Cooperation - An Analysis of Country and Regional Environmental Profiles’ (WWF, BirdLife and FERN, April 2009).