A preference for development: The law and economics of GSP

World Trade Review

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 41-67

  Grossman, Gene M ^a   Sykes, Alan O ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010411431     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745605002156     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger (1999), ‘An Economic Theory of GATT’, American Economic Review, 89: 215–248.
2. Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger (2002), The Economics of The World Trading System, Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press.
3. Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger (2004), ‘Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Bilateral Opportunism and the Rules of GATT’, Journal of International Economics, 63: 1–29.
4. Borrmann, Axel, Christine, Borrmann, and Manfred, Steger (1981), The EC’s Generalized System of Preferences, The Hague: Martinus Nijhof Publishers.
5. Brown, Drusilla, K. (1987), ‘General Equilibrium Effects of the US Generalized System of Preferences’, Southern Economic Journal, 54: 27–47.
6. Brown, Drusilla, K. (1989), ‘Trade and Welfare Effects of the European Schemes of the Generalized System of Preferences’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 37: 757–776.
7. Dollar, David (1992), ‘Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–1985’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40: 523–544.
8. Edwards, Sebastian (1993), ‘Openness, Trade Liberalization, and Growth in Developing Countries’, Journal of Economic Literature, 31: 1358–1393.
9. Finger, J. Michael, and L. Alan Winters (1998), ‘What Can the WTO Do for Developing Countries?’, in A. O. Krueger (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 365–392.
10. Frankel, Jeffrey, A. and David, Romer (1999), ‘Does Trade Cause Growth’, American Economic Review, 89: 379–399.
11. Grossman, Gene M. and Petros C. Mavroidis (2003), ‘United States – Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products Originating in the United Kingdom: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Privatization and the Injury Caused by Non-Recurring Subsidies’, in H. Horn and P. C. Mavroidis (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2001, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–200.
12. Hallak, Juan, Carlos and James, A. Levinsohn (2004), ‘Fooling Ourselves: Evaluating the Globalization and Growth Debate’, NBER Working Paper No. 10244, Cambridge MA.
13. Howse, Robert (2003), ‘India’s WTO Challenge to Drug Enforcement Conditions in the European Community Generalized System of Preferences: A Little Known Case with Major Repercussions for “Political” Conditionality in US Trade Policy’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 4: 385–405.
14. Karsenty, Guy and Sam Laird (1986), ‘The Generalized System of Preferences: A Quantitative Assessment of the Direct Trade Effects and of Policy Options’, UNCTAD Discussion Paper 18, UNCTAD, Geneva.
15. MacPhee, Craig, R. and Victor, Iwuagwu, Oguledo (1991), ‘The Trade Effects of the US Generalized System of Preferences’, Atlantic Economic Journal, 19: 19–26.
16. Murray, Tracy (1977), Trade Preferences for Developing Countries, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. OECD Secretary General (1983), The Generalized System of Preferences: Review of the First Decade, Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.
18. Özden, Çzaglar and Eric, Reinhardt (2003), ‘The Perversity of Preferences: GSP and Developing Country Trade Policies, 1976–2000’, World Bank Working Paper 2955, The World Bank.
19. Rodríguez, Francisco and Dani Rodrik (2001), ‘Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to Cross-National Evidence’, NBER Macroeconomic Annual, 15: 261–324.
20. Sachs, Jeffrey, D. and Andrew, M. Warner (1995), ‘Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1: 1–95.
21. Sapir, Andre and Lars, Lundberg (1984), ‘The US Generalized System of Preferences and its Impacts’, in R. E. Baldwin and A. O. Krueger (eds.), The Structure and Evolution of Recent US Trade Policy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 195–231.
22. Schwartz, Warren, F. and Alan O. Sykes (1997), ‘The Economics of the Most Favored Nation Clause’, in J. S. Bhandani and A. O. Sykes (eds.), Economic Dimensions of International Law: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–79.
23. UNCTAD (1981), ‘Operation and Effects of the Generalized System of Preferences, Fifth Review’, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York.
24. UNCTAD (1999), ‘Quantifying the Benefits Obtained by Developing Countries from the Generalized System of Preferences’, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York.