The external environmental policy of the European union: Eu and international law perspectives

The External Environmental Policy of the European Union: Eu and International Law Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-417

  Morgera, Elisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924708200     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139152327     Document Type: Book

References (294)

1. Ahlborn, C., ‘The rules of international organizations and the law of international responsibility’, ACIL Research Paper 2011-03 (2011).
2. Akanle, T. and others, ‘Summary and analysis of the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen’, ENB, 12:459 (2009).
3. Akehurst, M. B., ‘International liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law’, NYIL, 16 (1985), 3.
4. Alf, L., C. Assmann, M. Beuer and J. Weinkopf, ‘Toward a transatlantic dialogue on trade and the environment: a comparison of approaches to environmental impact assessments of trade agreements in the United States and EU’, The Bologna Center Journal of International Affairs, Fall (2008), 137.
5. Alford, R. P., ‘Apportioning responsibility among joint tortfeasors for international law violations’, Pepperdine Law Review, 38 (2011), 233.
6. Andresen, S. and S. Agrawala, ‘Leaders, pushers and laggards in the making of the climate regime’, Global Environmental Change, 12 (2002), 41.
7. Angelsen, A., What Does REDD+ Really Cost? (Bogor Barat, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2011).
8. Angelsen, A. (ed.), Realising REDD+ (Bogor Barat, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2009).
9. Anonymous, ‘Free trade and preferential tariffs: the evolution of international trade regulation in GATT and UNCTAD’, Harvard Law Review, 81 (1968), 1806.
10. Augenstein, D. and others, ‘Study of the legal framework on human rights and the environment applicable to European enterprises operating outside the European Union’, study for the European Commission, University of Edinburgh (2010).
11. Aust, H. P., Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
12. Barents, R., The Autonomy of Community Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003).
13. Bargren, P., ‘Joint and several liability: protection for plaintiffs’, Wisconsin Law Review, 2 (1994), 453.
14. Bartels, L., ‘The WTO Enabling Clause and positive conditionality in the European Community’s GSP Program’, JIEL, 6 (2003), 507.
15. Beck, U., ‘Towards a new critical theory with a cosmopolitan intent’, Constellations, 10 (2003), 453.
16. Bergkamp, L., Liability and Environment: Private and Public Law Aspects of Civil Liability for Environmental Harm in an International Context (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001).
17. Bilder, R., ‘The role of unilateral state action in preventing international environmental injury’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 14 (1981), 51.
18. Birnie, P., A. Boyle and C. Redgwell, International Law and the Environment, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009).
19. Bjorklund, M., ‘Responsibility in the EC for mixed agreements - should nonmember parties care?’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 70 (2001), 373.
20. Blokker, N., ‘Abuse of the members, questions concerning Draft Article 16 of the Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations’, IOLR, 7 (2010), 35.
21. Bobinski, K., ‘Poland and climate change’, Open Democracy, 14 December 2010.
22. Bodansky, D., ‘A tale of two architectures: the once and future UN climate change regime’, (SSRN, 2011).
23. Bodansky, D., ‘W[h]ither the Kyoto Protocol? Durban and beyond’, (SSRN, 2011).
24. Bodansky, D., ‘What’s so bad about unilateral action to protect the environment?’, EJIL, 11 (2000), 339.
25. Bourgeois, J., K. Dawar and S.J. Evenett, ‘A comparative analysis of selected provisions in free trade agreements’, report to the Commission (2007).
26. Bowman, M., P. Davies and C. Redgwell, Lyster’s International Wildlife Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
27. Boyd, E., E. Corbera and M. Estrada, ‘UNFCCC negotiations (pre-Kyoto to COP 9): what the process says about the politics of CDM-sinks’, International Environmental Agreements, 8 (2008), 95.
28. Boyd, W., ‘Ways of seeing in environmental law: how deforestation became an object of climate governance’, Ecology Law Quarterly, 37 (2010), 843.
29. Boyle, A., ‘Human rights and the environment: a reassessment’, draft paper prepared for the High-level Expert Meeting on the New Future of Human Rights and Environment: Moving the Global Agenda Forward (Nairobi, 30 November-1 December 2009).
30. Boyle, A., ‘The role of international human rights law in the protection of the environment’, in A. Boyle and M. Anderson (eds), Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection (Oxford University Press, 1996), 43.
31. Boyle, A., ‘State responsibility and international liability for injurious consequences of acts not prohibited by international law: a necessary distinction?’, ICLQ, 39 (1990), 1.
32. Brack, D., ‘Controlling illegal logging and the trade in illegally harvested timber: the EU’s Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade initiative’, RECIEL, 14 (2005), 28.
33. Brack, D. and J. Buckrell, ControllingIllegal Logging: Consumer-Country Measures (London: Chatham House, 2011).
34. Bretherton, C. and J. Vogler, The European Union as a Global Actor, 2nd edn (London: Routledge, 2006).
35. Bronckers, M., ‘From “direct effect” to “muted dialogue”. Recent developments in the European Court’s case law on the WTO and beyond’, JIEL, 11 (2008), 885.
36. Brown, K. E., ‘The International Civil Aviation Organization is the appropriate jurisdiction to settle hushkit dispute between the United States and the European Union’, Pennsylvania State International Law Review, 20 (2002), 465.
37. Brownlie, I., The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998).
38. Brownlie, I., System of the Law of Nations: State Responsibility (Part 1) (Oxford University Press, 1983).
39. Buck, M., ‘Making EU international environmental policy’, in N. Bayne and S. Woolcock (eds), The New Economic Diplomacy, 2nd edn (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), 241.
40. Buck, M. and C. Hamilton, ‘The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation to the Convention on Biological Diversity’, RECIEL, 20 (2011), 47.
41. Buckrell, J. and A. Hoare, Controlling Illegal Logging: Implementation of the EU Timber Regulation (London: Chatham House, 2011).
42. Cardwell, P. J. and D. French, ‘Who decides? The ECJ’s judgment on jurisdiction in the Mox Plant Dispute’, JEL, 19 (2006), 121.
43. Cavanagh, E. D., ‘Contribution, claim reduction, and individual treble damage responsibility: which path to reform of antitrust remedies?’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 40 (1987), 1298.
44. CBD Secretariat, Connecting Biodiversity and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change (Montreal: CBD, 2009).
45. Christiansen, A. and J. Wettestad, ‘The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed?’, Climate Policy, 3 (2003), 3.
46. Conant, A., ‘Recent developments in joint and several tort liability’, Baylor Law Review, 14 (1962), 423.
47. Costenbader, J. (ed.), Legal Frameworks for REDD. Design and Implementation at the National Level (Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2009).
48. Craig, P. and G. de Burca, The Evolution of EU Law, 5th edn (Oxford University Press, 2011).
49. Cremona, M., ‘Case Note on PFOS Case’, CMLR, 48 (2011), 1639.
50. Cremona, M., ‘Coherence in foreign policy - the legal dimension’, in P. Koutrakos (ed.), European Foreign Policy: Legal and Political Perspectives (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 55.
51. Cremona, M., ‘Member States as trustees of the Community interest: participating in international agreements on behalf of the European Community’, EUI Working Papers Law 2009/17 (2009).
52. Cremona, M., ‘Coherence through law: what difference will the Treaty of Lisbon make?’, Hamburg Review of Social Sciences, 3 (2008).
53. Cremona, M., ‘A constitutional basis for effective external action? An assessment of the provisions on EU external action in the Constitutional Treaty’, EUI Working Papers Law 2006/30 (2006).
54. Cremona, M., ‘External relations of the EU and the Member States: competence, mixed agreements, international responsibility and effects of international law’, EUI Working Papers Law 2006/22 (2006).
55. Curtin, J., ‘The Copenhagen Conference: how should the EU respond?’, report, Institute of International and European Affairs (2010).
56. Damro, C., ‘The EU and international environmental politics: the challenges of shared competence’ in K. V. Laatikainen and K. E. Smith (eds), Intersecting Multilateralisms: The European Union at the United Nations (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006), 175.
57. Damro, C. and D. MacKenzie, ‘The European Union and the politics of multi-level climate governance’, in H. Compston and I. Bailey (eds), Turning Down the Heat: Climate Policy in Affluent Democracies Basingstoke: Palgrave, 65.
58. Dannenbaum, T., ‘Translating the standard of effective control into a system of effective accountability: how liability should be apportioned for violations of human rights by Member State troop contingents serving as United Nations peacekeepers’, Harvard International Law Journal, 51 (2010), 113.
59. Dashwood, A., ‘Note on Opinion 2/00’, CMLR, 39 (2002), 353.
60. Dashwood, A., ‘The attribution of external relations powers’, in A. Dashwood and C. Hillion (eds), The General Law of EC External Relations (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2000), 132.
61. d’ Aspremont, J., ‘Abuse of the legal personality of international organizations and the responsibility of member states’, IOLR, 4 (2007), 91.
62. de Búrca, G., ‘The road not taken: the EU as a global human rights actor’, AJIL, 105 (2011), 649.
63. de Cock, G., ‘The European Union as a bilateral “norm leader” on climate change vis-à-vis China’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 16 (2011), 89.
64. Delreux, T., The EU as an International Environmental Negotiator (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2011).
65. Delreux, T., ‘The European Union in international environmental negotiations: a legal perspective on the internal decision-making process’, International Environmental Agreements, 6 (2006), 231.
66. De Schutter, O., ‘Globalisation and jurisdiction: lessons from the European Convention on Human Rights', Center for Human Rights and Global Justice Working Paper 9, NYU School of Law (2005).
67. De Schutter, O., ‘The accountability of multinationals for human rights violations in European law’, in P. Alston (ed.), Non–State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2005), 227.
68. Dhar, B. and K. Das, ‘The European Union’s proposed carbon equalization system: can it be WTO–compatible?’, (SSRN, 2009).
69. Dimitrov, R. S., ‘Hostage to norms: states, institutions and global forest politics', GEP, 5 (2005), 1.
70. Dolmans, M. J., Problems of Mixed Agreements (The Hague: TMC Asser Instituut, 1985).
71. Dooley, K. and others, ‘Smoke and mirrors. A critical assessment of the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility’, report, FERN and Forest Peoples Programme (2011).
72. dos Santos, N.B., R. Farias and R. Cunha, ‘Generalised System of Preferences in General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization: history and current issues’, JWT, 39 (2005), 637.
73. Downs, G. W., K. W. Danish and P. N. Barsoom, ‘The transformational model of international regime design: triumph of hope or experience?', Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 38 (2000), 465.
74. Du, M. M., ‘Autonomy in setting appropriate level of protection under the WTO law: rhetoric or reality?’, JIEL, 13 (2010), 1077.
75. Duke, S., ‘The Lisbon Treaty and external relations’, EIPASCOPE, 1 (2008), 14.
76. Dutschke, M. and A. Angelsen, ‘How do we ensure permanence and assign liability?’, in A. Angelsen (ed.), Moving Ahead with REDD (Bogor Barat, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2008), 77.
77. Dyer, N. and S. Counsell, McREDD: How McKinsey ‘Cost-Curves’ are Distorting REDD (London: Rainforest Foundation, 2010).
78. Eagleton, C., The Responsibility of States in International Law (New York University Press, 1928).
79. Eeckhout, P., EU External Relations Law (Oxford University Press, 2011).
80. Eeckhout, P., ‘Case Note on Biotech Patents’, CMLR, 46 (2009), 2041.
81. Ehlermann, C. D., ‘Mixed agreements - a list of problems’, in D. O’Keeffe and H. G. Schermers (eds), Mixed Agreements (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1983), 4.
82. Elgström, O., ‘Outsiders’ perceptions of the EU in international trade negotiations’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45 (2007), 949.
83. Eliasch, J., Climate Change: Financing Global Forests. The Eliasch Review (London: Earthscan, 2008).
84. Ellerman, A. D., F. J. Convery and C. de Perthius, Pricing Carbon. The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
85. European Commission, ‘Handbook for trade sustainability impact assessment’ (2006).
86. European Commission – Directorate-General Environment, ‘Final Report for the Assessment of the 6th Environment Action Programme’, report, Central European University (2011).
87. European Economic and Social Committee, ‘Opinion on sustainability impact assessments (SIA) and EU trade policy’ (Brussels: EESC, 5 May 2011).
88. European Forest Institute, E.F. Facility and European Commission, ‘FLEGT 6th Annual Coordination Meeting 12-14 January 2011’, final report, European Commission (2011).
89. European Group on Tort Law, Principles of European Tort Law. Text and Commentary (Heidelberg: Springer, 2005).
90. European Parliament, ‘Report on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements’, (2010).
91. Fajardo del Castillo, T., ‘Revisiting the external dimension of the environmental policy of the European Union: some challenges ahead’, JEEPL, 7 (2010), 365.
92. FAO, Global Forest Resources Assessment (New York: FAO, 2010).
93. FCPF, ‘Harvesting knowledge on REDD-plus: early lessons from the FCPF Initiative and beyond’, working paper, World Bank (2010).
94. FCPF, ‘Incorporating environmental and social considerations into the process of getting ready for REDD plus’, revised draft, World Bank (2010).
95. Figueres, C., ‘From tons to trends: the transformation of the climate regime’, in L. Swart and E. Perry (eds), Global Environmental Governance: Perspectives on the Current Debate (New York: Center for UN Reform Education, 2007).
96. Fitzmaurice, M. A. and C. Redgwell, ‘Non-compliance procedures and international law’, NYIL, 31 (2000), 35.
97. Forner, C. and F. Jotzo, ‘Future restrictions for sinks under the CDM: how about a cap on supply?’, Journal of Climate Policy, 2 (2002), 357.
98. Francioni, F., ‘International human rights in an environmental horizon’, EJIL, 21 (2010), 41.
99. Franck, R., ‘Why did a majority of French voters reject the European Constitution?’, European Journal of Political Economy, 21 (2005), 1071.
100. Gasiorek, M. and others, ‘Mid-term evaluation of the EU’s Generalised System of Preferences’, report to the European Commission (2010).
101. Gattinara, G., ‘La questione pregiudiziale di validità rispetto al diritto internazionale pattizio secondo la sentenza IATA’, Studi sull’integrazione europea, 1 (2006), 343.
102. Gebhard, C., ‘Coherence’, in C. Hill and M. Smith (eds), International Relations and the European Union, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2011), 101.
103. George, C., ‘Report on the OECD Workshop, Regional Trade Agreements and the Environment: monitoring implementation and assessing impacts’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper 2011-01 (2011).
104. George, C. and C. Kirkpatrick, ‘Have sustainability impact assessments of trade agreements delivered on development issues? A reflexive analysis of the emergence and main contributions of trade SIAs’, in P. Ekins and T. Voituriez (eds), Trade, Globalisation and Sustainability Impact Assessment, A Critical Look at Methods and Outcomes (London: Earthscan, 2009), 79.
105. Gerrard, M., ‘Climate change regulation without Congressional action', New York Law Journal, 244 (2010).
106. Ghazoul, J. and others, ‘REDD: a reckoning of environment and development implications’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25 (2010), 396.
107. Giddens, A., The Politics of Climate Change (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009).
108. Gómez-Baggethun, E. and others, ‘The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes’, Ecological Economics, 69 (2010), 1209.
109. Gondek, M., The Reach of Human Rights in a Globalising World: Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Mortsel, Belgium: Intersentia, 2009).
110. Graefrath, B., ‘Complicity in the law of international responsibility’, Revue Belge de Droit International, 29 (1996), 370.
111. Graichen, P., ‘Can forestry gain from emissions trading? Rules governing sinks projects under the UNFCCC and the EU Emissions Trading System', RECIEL, 14 (2005), 11.
112. Gregersen, H. and others, Does the Opportunity Cost Approach Reflect the Real Cost ofREDD+? (Washington, DC: Rights and Resources Initiative, 2010).
113. Greven, T., A. Leopold and E. Molinari, ‘An analysis of the relative effectiveness of social and environmental norms in free trade agreements’, report to the European Parliament (2009).
114. D. Griswold, ‘Bilateral deals are no threat to global deal’, online paper (Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2003), available at www.cato.org/publi-cations/commentary/bilateral-deals-are-no-threat-global-trade.
115. Gupta, J. and N. van der Grijp (eds), Mainstreaming Climate Change in Development Cooperation (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
116. Gupta, J. and N. van der Grijp ‘Perceptions of the EU’s role. Is the EU a leader?’, in Gupta and Grubb (eds), Climate Change and European Leadership. A Sustainable Role for Europe?, 67.
117. Gupta, J. and M. Grubb (eds), Climate Change and European Leadership. A Sustainable Role for Europe? (The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000).
118. Gupta, J. and L. Ringius, ‘The EU's climate leadership: reconciling ambition and reality’, International Environmental Agreements, 1 (2001), 281.
119. Hall, R., ‘Undercutting Africa: why EPAs threaten the world's forests and forest peoples’, Trade Negotiations Insights, 8(1) (2009).
120. Hartley, T. C., The Foundations of European Union Law, 7th edn (Oxford University Press, 2010).
121. Hassan, R., R. Scholes and R. Ash (eds), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends (Washington DC: Island Press, 2005).
122. Hedeger, M., ‘Can the EU get its act together on climate finance for development cooperation?’, Institute of Development Studies, 1 May 2009.
123. Hedeger, M., ‘Climate finance and Europe: lost momentum and challenges ahead’, Institute of Development Studies, 3 August 2010.
124. Heliskoski, J., Mixed Agreements as a Technique for Organizing the International Relations of the European Community and its Member States (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001).
125. Heyvaert, V., ‘Globalizing regulation: reaching beyond the borders of chemical safety’, Journal of Law and Society, 36(1) (2009), 110.
126. Hillion, C. and P. Koutrakos (eds), Mixed Agreements Revisited. The EU and its Member States in the World (Oxford: Hart, 2010).
127. Hobbs, A. L., J. E. Hobbs and W. A. Kerr, ‘The Biosafety Protocol: multilateral agreement on protecting the environment or protectionist club?’, JWT, 39, (2005), 281.
128. Hoffmeister, F., ‘Litigating against the European Union and its Member States: who responds under the ILC's Draft Articles on International Responsibility of International Organizations?’, EJIL, 21 (2010), 723.
129. Hogg, M., ‘Causation and apportionment of damages in cases of divisible injury’, Edinburgh Law Review, 12 (2008), 99.
130. Holder, J. and M. Lee, Environmental Protection, Law and Policy (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
131. Homeyer, I. V., M. Collins and W. Ingwersen, ‘Improving public participation in sustainability impact assessments of trade agreements’, in P. Ekins and T. Voituriez (eds), Trade, Globalisation and Sustainability Impact Assessment, A Critical Look at Methods and Outcomes (London: Earthscan, 2009), 189.
132. Humphreys, D., ‘The politics of “avoided deforestation”: historical context and contemporary issues’, The International Forestry Review, 10 (2008), 433.
133. Humphreys, D., ‘The elusive quest for a global forests convention’, RECIEL, 14 (2005), 1.
134. International Energy Agency (IEA), CO2 Emission from Fuel Combustion Highlight (IEA, 2010).
135. Jacqué, J. P., ‘The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, CMLR, 48 (2011), 1016.
136. Jacquemont, F., ‘The Kyoto compliance regime, the European bubble: some legal consequences’, in M. Bothe and E. Rehbinder (eds), Climate Change Policy (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2005), 388.
137. Jans, J. H. and H. Vedder, European Environmental Law, 3rd edn (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2008).
138. Jenks, C. W., ‘Liability for ultra-hazardous activities in international law’, Recueil des Cours, 117 (1966), 105.
139. Jordan, A. and others (eds), Climate Change Policy in the European Union: Confronting Dilemmas of Mitigation and Adaptation? (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
140. Joseph, S., ‘Taming the leviathans: multinational enterprises and human rights’, Netherlands International Law Review, 46 (1999), 171.
141. Kelemen, R. D., ‘Globalizing European Union environmental policy’, presented at Princeton Annual Workshop on European Integration (2009).
142. Kilian, B. and O. Elgstrom, ‘Still a green leader? The European Union’s role in international climate negotiations”, Cooperation and Conflict, 45 (2010), 255.
143. Kill, J., ‘Sinks in the Kyoto Protocol: a dirty deal for forests, forest peoples and the climate’, report (Sparr, FL: FERN, 2001).
144. Kirkpatrick, C. and C. George, ‘Methodological issues in the impact assessment of trade policy: experience from the European Commission's Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) programme’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24 (2006), 325.
145. Knox, J., ‘Diagonal environmental rights’, in M. Gibney and S. Skogly (eds), Universal Human Rights and Extraterritorial Obligations (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010), 82.
146. Koester, V., ‘Aarhus Convention/MOP-4: the compliance mechanism - outcomes and a stocktaking’, Environmental Policy and Law, 41 (2011), 196.
147. Kornhauser, L. A. and R. L. Revesz, ‘Multidefendant settlements: the impact of joint and several liability’, The Journal of Legal Studies, 23 (1994), 41.
148. Koskenniemi, M., ‘International law in Europe: between tradition and renewal’, EJIL, 16 (2007), 113.
149. Koskenniemi, M., ‘Constitutionalism as a mindset: reflections on Kantian themes about international law and globalization’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8 (2007), 9.
150. Koskenniemi, M., ‘Breach of treaty or non-compliance? Reflections on the enforcement of the Montreal Protocol’, YbIEL, 3 (1992), 123.
151. Kramer, L., EU Environmental Law, 7th edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2011).
152. Kramer, L., EC Environmental Law, 6th edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2006).
153. Kravchenko, S., ‘The Aarhus Convention and innovations in compliance with multilateral environmental agreements’, Colorado Journal ofInternational Environmental Law and Policy, 18 (2007), 1.
154. Kuijper, P. J., ‘Introduction to the Symposium on Responsibility of International Organizations and of (Member) States: attributed or direct responsibility or both?’, IOLR, 7 (2010), 9.
155. Kuijper, P. J., ‘Fifty years of EC-EU external relations: continuity and the dialogue between judges and Member States as constitutional legislators’, Fordham International Law Journal, 31 (2007), 1571.
156. Kulovesi, K., E. Morgera and M. Muñoz, ‘Environmental integration and multifaceted international dimensions of EU law: unpacking the 2009 Climate and Energy Package’, CMLR, 48 (2011), 829.
157. Kunzemann, T. and V. Wish, ‘Germany Climate Change Profile’, The Good Entrepreneur, undated, available at www.goodentrepreneur.com/Knowledge/Features/Germany-Climate-Change-Profile.
158. Kunzmann, K., ‘The Non-legally Binding Instrument on Sustainable Management of All Types of Forests – towards a legal regime for sustainable forest management?’, German Law Journal, 9 (2008), 981.
159. Lavranos, N., ‘Protecting its exclusive jurisdiction: the Mox Plant judgment of the ECJ’, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 5,(2006), 479.
160. Lavranos, N., ‘The MOX Plant and IJzeren Rijn disputes: which court is the supreme arbiter?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (2006), 223.
161. Lawson, R., ‘Life after Bankovic: on the extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in F. Coomans and M. Kamminga (eds), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Mortsel, Belgium: Intersentia, 2004), 83.
162. Lawson, S. and L. MacFaul, Illegal Logging and Related Trade (London: Chatham House, 2010).
163. Lee, M., ‘The environmental implications of the Lisbon Treaty,’ ELR, 10 (2008), 131.
164. Lehmann, J. P., ‘Fallout from Copenhagen: has the EU lost its global relevance?’, Yale Global, 5 January 2010.
165. Leino, P., ‘The journey towards all that is good and beautiful: human rights and “common values” as guiding principles of EU foreign relations law’, in M. Cremona and B. de Witte (eds), EU Foreign Relations Law (Oxford: Hart, 2008), 279.
166. Lipschutz, R. D., ‘Why is there no international forestry law? An examination of international forestry regulation, both public and private’, UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 19 (2001), 153.
167. Lock, T., ‘Walking a tight rope: the draft Accession Agreement and the autonomy of the EU legal order’, CMLR, 46 (2011), 1025.
168. Lohmann, L. (ed.), Carbon Trading: A Critical Conversation on Climate Change, Privatisation, and Power (Uppsala, Sweden: Mediaprint, 2006).
169. Lütken, S. E. and A. Michaelowa, Corporate Strategies and the Clean Development Mechanism. Developing Country Financing for Developed Country Commitments? (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008).
170. Macleod, I., I. D. Hendry and S. Hyett, The External Relations of the European Communities (Oxford University Press, 1996).
171. Marín Durán, G. and E. Morgera, Environmental Integration in the EU’s External Relations: Beyond Multilateral Dimensions (Oxford: Hart, 2012).
172. Marsden, S., ‘Invoking direct application and effect of international treaties by the European Court of Justice: implications for international environmental law in the European Union’, ICLQ, 60 (2011), 737.
173. Mattoo, A., A. Subramanian, D. van der Mensbrugghe and J. He, ‘Reconciling climate change and trade policy’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5123 (2009).
174. May, L., Sharing Responsibility (University of Chicago Press, 1996).
175. Mayer, A. L. and others, ‘Ecology. Importing timber, exporting ecological impact’, Science, 359 (2005) 15 April
176. McCorquodale, R. and P. Simons, ‘Responsibility beyond borders: state responsibility for extraterritorial violations by corporations of international human rights law’, Modern Law Review, 70 (2007), 598.
177. Mehling, M. and L. Massai, ‘The EU and climate change: leading the way towards a post-2012 regime?’, CCLR, 1 (2007), 45.
178. Meilstrup, P., ‘The runaway summit: background story of the Danish Presidency of COP 15, the UN Climate Change Conference’, The Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2010 (2010), 113.
179. Mendez, M., ‘The enforcement of EU agreements: bolstering the effectiveness of treaty law?’, CMLR, 47 (2010), 1719.
180. Metz, B., O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave and L. A. Meyer (eds), Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
181. Meyfroidt, P., T. K. Rudel and E. F. Lambin, ‘Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107 (2010), 20917.
182. Miles, L., E. Dunning and N. Doswald, ‘Safeguarding and enhancing the ecosystem-derived benefits of REDD+. Multiple benefits series 2’, report prepared on behalf of the UN-REDD Programme (2010).
183. Miller, D., ‘Distributing responsibilities’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 9 (2001), 453.
184. Morgera, E., ‘Far away, so close: a legal analysis of the increasing interactions between the Convention on Biological Diversity and climate change law’, Climate Law, 2 (2011), 85.
185. Morgera, E., ‘The 2005 UN World Summit and the environment: the proverbial half-full glass?’, Italian Yearbook ofInternational Law, 15 (2006), 53.
186. Morgera, E., K. Kulovesi and A. Gobena (eds), Case Studies on Bioenergy Policy and Law: Options for Sustainability (Rome: FAO, 2010).
187. Morgera, E. and G. Marin Duran, ‘The UN 2005 World Summit, the environment and the EU: priorities, promises and prospects’, RECIEL (2006), 15.
188. Morgera, E. and others, ‘Implementation challenges and compliance in MEA negotiations’, in P. Chasek and L. Wagner (eds), The Roads from Rio: Lessons Learned from 20 Years ofMultilateral Environmental Negotiations (London: Routledge, 2012), 222.
189. Morgera, E. and E. Tsioumani, ‘Yesterday, today and tomorrow: looking afresh at the Convention on Biological Diversity’, YbIEL, 21 (2011, online).
190. Morgera, E. and E. Tsioumani, ‘The evolution of benefit-sharing: linking biodiversity and community livelihoods’, RECIEL, 19 (2010), 150.
191. Morris, D., ‘Buckle up: tighten the cap and avoid the carbon crash - the 2011 environmental outlook for the EU ETS’, report for Sandbag, 2011.
192. Moss, N. and R. Nussbaum, ‘A review of three REDD+ safeguard initiatives’, report for FCPF and UN-REDD (2011).
193. Najam, A., M. Halle and R. Meléndez-Ortiz (eds), Trade and Environment - A Resource Book (Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2007).
194. Neframi, E., ‘International responsibility of the European Community and the Member States under mixed agreements’, in E. Cannizzaro (ed.), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations (The Hague, London, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2002), 193.
195. Nollkaemper, A., ‘Issues of shared responsibility before the International Court of Justice’, (SSRN, 2011).
196. Nollkaemper, A., ‘The European Community and international environmental co-operation: legal aspects of external Community powers’, Legal Issues of European Integration, 2 (1987), 55.
197. Nollkaemper, A. and D. Jacobs, ‘Shared responsibility in international law: a concept paper’, (SSRN, 2011).
198. Nordquist, M. H. (ed.), The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982: A Commentary (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2002).
199. Noyes, J. E. and B. D. Smith, ‘State responsibility and the principle of joint and several liability’, Yale Journal of International Law, 13 (1988), 225.
200. Nuttall, S., ‘Coherence and consistency', in C. Hill and M. Smith (eds), International Relations and the European Union, 1st edn (Oxford University Press, 2005), 91.
201. Oberthür, S. and M. Pallemaerts (eds), The New Climate Policies of the European Union: Internal Legislation and Climate Diplomacy (Brussels: VUB Press, 2010).
202. Oberthür, S. and C. Roche Kelly, ‘EU leadership in international climate policy: achievements and challenges’, The International Spectator, 43 (2008), 35.
203. O’Neil, K., The Environment and International Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
204. O’Sullivan, R. and others, ‘Local and global benefits of including LULUCF credits in the EU ETS’, ClimateFocus (March 2006).
205. Orakhelashvili, A., ‘Division of reparation between responsible entities’, in J. Crawford, A. Pellet and S. Olleson (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2010), 658.
206. OECD, Environment and Regional Trade Agreements (Paris: OECD, 2007).
207. Paasivirta, E. and P. J. Kuijper, ‘Does one size fit all? The European Community and the responsibility of international organizations’, NYIL, 36 (2005), 169.
208. Pachauri, R. K. and A. Reisinger (eds), Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Geneva: IPCC, 2007).
209. Pallemaerts, M. (ed.), The EU and Sustainable Development: Internal and External Dimensions (Brussels: VUB Press, 2010).
210. Pallemaerts, M. (ed.), The Aarhus Convention at Ten. Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Environmental Law (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2011).
211. Parker, C. and others, The Little REDD+ Book: A Guide to Governmental and Nongovernmental Proposals for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (Oxford: Global Canopy Programme, 2009).
212. Parry, M.L. and others (eds), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
213. Paterson, M., ‘Green politics’, in S. Burchill and A. Linklater (eds), Theories of International Relations, 4th edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2009), 260.
214. Pauwelyn, J., ‘Europe, America and the “unity” of international law’, Duke Law School Faculty Scholarship Series, paper 42 (2006).
215. Pavoni, R., ‘Mutual supportiveness as a principle of interpretation and lawmaking: a watershed for the “WTO-and-competing-regimes” debate?’, EJIL, 21 (2010), 649.
216. Pavoni, R., ‘Freedom to choose the legal means for implementing UN Security Council Resolutions and the ECJ Kadi judgment: a misplaced argument hindering the enforcement of international law in the EC’, YEL, 28 (2009), 626.
217. Pavoni, R., ‘Norme non self-executing in materia di diritti umani e diritto umanitario e violazione del diritto di accesso alla giustizia nella recente prassi statunitense’, in F. Francioni, M. Gestri, N. Ronzitti and T. Scovazzi (eds), Accesso alla giustizia dell’individuo nel diritto internazionale e dell’Unione europea (Milan: Giuffrè, 2008), 305.
218. Pavoni, R., ‘Assessing and managing biotechnology risk under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety’, Italian Yearbook of International Law, 10 (2000), 113.
219. Peters, A., ‘Treaty making power’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009, online edition).
220. Petersen, M., ‘The legality of the EU’s stand-alone approach to climate impacts of aviation: the express role given to ICAO by the Kyoto Protocol’, RECIEL, 17 (2008), 196.
221. Picolotti, R. and J. D. Taillant (eds), Linking Human Rights and the Environment (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2003).
222. Piris-Cabezas, P., ‘The European Union’s position on REDD financing’, in V. Bosetti and R. Lubowski (eds), Deforestation and Climate Change (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010), 39.
223. Pressler, L. and K. V. Schieffer, ‘Joint and several liability: a case for reform’, Denver University Law Review, 64 (1987-8), 679.
224. Prosser, W. L., ‘Joint torts and several liability’, California Law Review, 25 (1936), 422.
225. Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today. Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).
226. Rajamani, L., Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, 2006).
227. Rayner, J., A. Buck and P. Katila, Embracing Complexity: Meeting the Challenges of International Forest Governance. A Global Assessment Report. Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime (Vienna: IUFRO, 2010).
228. Reinisch, A., ‘Aid or assistance and direction and control between states and international organizations in the commission of internationally wrongful acts’, IOLR, 7 (2010), 63.
229. Reischel, G., ‘The EU and the UN Forest Negotiations: a case of failed international environmental governance?’, presented at the Marie Curie European Summer School on Earth System Governance, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 2007.
230. Ryall, A., ‘Access to environmental information in Ireland: implementation challenges’, JEL, 23 (2011), 45.
231. Ryall, A., Effective Judicial Protection and the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive in Ireland (Oxford: Hart, 2009).
232. Sack, J., ‘The European Community’s membership ofinternational organizations’, CMLR, 32 (1995), 1227.
233. Sadeleer, N., ‘EC law and biodiversity’, in R. Macrory (ed.), Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law - a High Level Protection? (Groningen, Netherlands: Europa Law Publishing, 2005), 351.
234. Sands, P., Lawless World. America and the Making and Breaking of Global Rules (Harmondsworth: Allen Lane, Penguin Books, 2005).
235. Savaresi, A., ‘Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries under the UNFCCC. Caveats and opportunities for biodiversity’, YbIEL, 21 (2011, online).
236. Schaap, A., ‘Power and responsibility: should we spare the King’s head?’, Politics, 20 (2000), 129.
237. Schilling, T., ‘The autonomy of the Community legal order: an analysis of possible foundations’, Harvard International Law Journal, 37 (1996), 389.
238. Schreurs, M. A. and Y. Tiberghien, ‘Multi-level reinforcement: explaining European Union leadership in climate change mitigation', GEP, 7 (2007), 19.
239. Schrijver, N., ‘Case C-459/03, Commission of the European Communities v Ireland, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 May 2006’, CMLR, 47 (2010), 863.
240. Scott, J., ‘The multi-level governance of climate change,’ CCLR, 4 (2011), 25.
241. Shany, Y. and T. Broude, Multi-sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).
242. Shelton, D., Human Rights and the Environment (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011).
243. Shelton, D., ‘Human rights and environment: past, present and future linkages and the value of a declaration’, draft papers prepared for the High-level Expert Meeting on the New Future of Human Rights and Environment: Moving the Global Agenda Forward (Nairobi, 30 November-1 December 2009).
244. Sikor, T. and others, ‘REDD-plus, forest peoples’ rights and nested climate governance’, Global Environmental Change, 20 (2010), 423.
245. Skodvin, T. and S. Andresen, ‘Leadership revisited’, GEP, 6 (2006), 13.
246. Skogly, S. and M. Gibney, ‘Transnational human rights obligations’, Human Rights Quarterly, 24 (2002), 781.
247. Springate-Baginski, O. and E. Wollenberg (eds), REDD, Forest Governance and Rural Livelihoods (Bogor Barat, Indonesia: CIFOR, 2010).
248. Stein, E., ‘External relations of the European Community; structure and process’, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, 1 (1991), 115.
249. Stern, N., The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
250. Switzer, S., ‘Environmental protection and the Generalised System of Preferences: a legal and appropriate linkage?’, ICLQ, 57 (2008), 113.
251. Tabau, A. S. and M. Maljean-Dubois, ‘Non-compliance mechanisms: interaction between the Kyoto Protocol system and the European Union’, EJIL, 21 (2010), 749.
252. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers (London: Earthscan, 2011).
253. Thieme, D., ‘European Community external relations in the field of the environment’, European ELR (2001), 252.
254. Thompson, P., ‘EPAs and natural resources: the European Sustainability Agenda', Trade Negotiations Insights, 8(4) (2009).
255. Tipper, R. and others, ‘Real-time evaluation of Norway's International Climate and Forest Initiative contributions to a global REDD+ regime 2007–2010’, report, NORAD (2011).
256. Tomuschat, C., ‘Liability for mixed agreements’, in D. O'Keefe and H. G. Schermers (eds), Mixed Agreements (The Hague: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1983), 130.
257. Trakman, L. E., ‘The proliferation offree trade agreements: bane or beauty?’, JWT, 42 (2008), 367.
258. Treves, T. and others (eds), Non-Compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2009).
259. Trouwborst, A., ‘Conserving European biodiversity in a changing climate: the Bern Convention, the European Union Birds and Habitats Directives and the adaptation of nature to climate change’, RECIEL, 20 (2011), 62.
260. Tsagourias, N., ‘The responsibility of international organisations for military missions’, in M. Odello and R. Piotrowisz (eds), International Military Missions and International Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, forthcoming).
261. Turksen, U., ‘The WTO Law and the EC's GSP+ arrangement’, JWT, 43 (2009), 927.
262. Ulfstein, G. and others (eds), Making Treaties Work: Human Rights, Environment and Arms Control (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
263. UNEP, Compliance Mechanism under Selected Multilateral Environmental Agreements (Nairobi: UNEP, 2006).
264. UNEP and IISD, Environment and Trade, A Handbook, 2nd edn (Winnipeg: IISD, 2005).
265. Van Elsuwege, P., ‘Note to Commission v Sweden’, AJIL, 105 (2011), 307.
266. van den Bossche, P., The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
267. Vedder, H., ‘Diplomacy by Directive? An analysis of the international context of the Emissions Trading Scheme Directive’, in M. Evans and P. Koutrakos (eds), Beyond the Established Legal Orders (Oxford: Hart, 2011), 105.
268. Vedder, H., ‘Competition in the EU energy sector - an overview of developments in 2009 and 2010’, in U. Hammer and M. M. Roggenkamp (eds), European Energy Law Reports VIII (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2011), 3.
269. Vedder, H., ‘The Treaty of Lisbon and European environmental law’, JEL, 22 (2010), 285.
270. Vihma, A., ‘Arrested development: UN climate talks have lost the momentum of Cancún’, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Comment 8/2011, June 2011.
271. Vogler, J., ‘Europe and global environmental governance, International Affairs, 81 (2005), 835.
272. Vogler, J., ‘The European Union as an actor in international environmental politics’, Environmental Politics, 8 (1999), 24.
273. Vogler, J. and H.R. Stephan, ‘The European Union in global environmental governance: leadership in the making, International Environmental Agreements, 7 (2007), 389.
274. Wade, J. W., ‘Joint tortfeasors and the conflict of law, Vanderbilt Law Review, 6 (1953), 464.
275. Weidner, H. and L. Metz, ‘German climate change policy - a success story with some flaws’, The Journal of Environment and Development, 17 (2008), 356.
276. Wendel, P., State Responsibility for Interferences with the Freedom of Navigation in Public International Law (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007).
277. Wennerås, P., ‘Towards an ever greener Union? Competence in the field of the environment and beyond’, CMLR, 45 (2008), 1645.
278. Werksman, J. and K. Herbertson, ‘The aftermath of Copenhagen: does international law have a role to play in a global response to climate change?, Maryland Journal of International Law, 25 (2010), 109.
279. Wettestad, J., ‘The complicated development of the EU Climate Policy’, in J. Gupta and M. Grupp (eds), Climate Change and European Leadership: A Sustainable Role for Europe? (The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000), 25.
280. Whitman, R., ‘The EU: standing aside from the changing global balance of power#x003F;’, Politics, 30 (2010), 24.
281. Wiersum, F. and D. van Oijen, ‘Implementing FLEGT: impacts on local people’, policy brief (Wageningen University, 2010).
282. Williams, G., Joint Obligations (London: Butterworths, 1949).
283. Winter, J. A., ‘Direct applicability and direct effect. Two distinct and different concepts in Community law’, CMLR, 9 (1972), 425.
284. World Energy Council, ‘2010 survey of energy resources’, report, 2010.
285. Wouters, J., ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights - some reflections on its external dimension’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 8 (2001), 3.
286. Wouters, J. and P. De Man, ‘Case note on Intertanko’, AJIL, 103 (2009), 555.
287. WWF and Centre for International Environmental Law, ‘Biodiversity and intellectual property rights: reviewing intellectual property rights in light of the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity’, joint discussion paper (2001).
288. WWF, BirdLife and FERN, ‘Environmental tools in EC development cooperation - transparency and public availability of documentation’, joint report (September 2007).
289. WWF, FERN and Birdlife, ‘Environmental tools in EC development cooperation: an analysis of Country and Regional Environmental Profiles’, joint report(2009).
290. Yamin, F. and J. Depledge, The International Climate Change Regime. A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
291. Young, O., International Cooperation. Building Regimes for Natural Resource and the Environment (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).
292. Zemanek, K., ‘State responsibility and liability’, in W. Lang, H. Neuhold and K. Zemanek (eds), Environmental Protection and International Law (London: Graham and Trotman, 1991), 197.
293. Zerk, J., Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
294. Zito, A., ‘The European Union as an environmental leader in a global environment’, Globalizations, 2 (2005), 363.