The EU’s neighbourhood policy towards eastern Europe

Law and Practice of EU External Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 309-333

  Hillion, Christophe ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920561679     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511494925.012     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. C. Timmermans, ‘The uneasy relationship between the Community and the second pillar of the Union: back to the Plan Fouchet?’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration(1996), p. 66.
2. E. Lannon and P. Van Elsuwege, ‘The EU’s emerging Neighbourhood Policy and its potential impact on the Euro-Mediterranean partnership’, in P. Xuereb (ed.), Euro-Med Integration and the ‘ring of friends’: The Mediterranean’s Europe Challenge (Malta: European Documentation and Research Centre, 2003), vol. IV, p. 21.
3. C. Hillion, ‘The Russian Federation’, in S. Blockmans and A. Łazowski (eds.), The European Union and its Neighbours(The Hague: Asser Press, 2006).
4. M. Cremona, ‘Enlargement: A Successful Instrument of Foreign Policy?’ in T.Tridimas and P. Nebbia (eds.), European Union Law for the Twenty-First Century: Rethinking the New Legal Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), vol. 1, p. 397.
5. A. Ott and K. Inglis (eds.), Handbook on European Enlargement(The Hague: Asser Press, 2002), p. 90.
6. C. Hillion, ‘The Copenhagen criteria and their progeny’, in C. Hillion (ed.), EU Enlargement – A Legal Approach(Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), p. 3.
7. M. Maresceau, ‘Pre-accession’, in M. Cremona (ed.), The enlargement of the European Union(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 9.
8. M. Maresceau and E. Montaguti, ‘The relations between the European Union and central and eastern Europe: a legal appraisal’, 32 CMLRev. (1995), p. 1327.
9. H. Grabbe, ‘A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European Applicants’, Working Paper no. 99/12, EUI Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, 1999.
10. T. Haenebalcke, K. Inglis and E. Lannon, ‘The Many Faces of EU Conditionality in Pan-Euro-Mediterranean Relations’, in M. Maresceau and E. Lannon (eds.), The EU’s Enlargement and Mediterranean Strategies: A Comparative Analysis(Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001), p. 97.
11. C. Hillion, ‘EU shapes for Eastern Enlargement’, EU Focus, 1998, p. 3.
12. A. Williams, ‘Enlargement of the Union and human rights conditionality: a policy’, 25 ELRev. (2000), p. 601.
13. D. Kochenov, The Failure of Conditionality, Groningen, PhD Dissertation, 2007.
14. K. Inglis, ‘The Union’s fifth accession treaty’: New means to make enlargement possible’, 41 CMLRev. (2004), p. 937.
15. C. Hillion, ‘The European Union is dead. Long live the European Union… A Commentary on the Accession Treaty 2003’, 29 ELRev. (2004), p. 583.
16. J. Kelley, ‘New Wine in Old Wineskins: Policy Adaptation in the European Neighbourhood Policy’, 44 JCMS (2006), p. 29.
17. A. Magen, ‘The Shadow of Enlargement: Can the European Neighbourhood Policy Achieve Compliance?’, Stanford, CDDRL Working Papers, Nr 68, 2006.
18. S. Lavenex, ‘EU external governance in wider Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy(2004), p. 680.
19. C. Hillion, ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbour: the draft European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan between the EU and Ukraine’, in A. Mayhew and N. Copsey (eds.), Ukraine and European Neighbourhood Policy(Brighton: Sussex European Institute, 2005), p. 17.
20. J. Solana, ‘The role of the EU in promoting and consolidating democracy in Europe’s East’ at the Common Vision for a Common neighbourhood Conference (Vilnius, 4 May 2006).
21. M. Cremona, ‘Accession to the European Union: Membership Conditionality and Accession Criteria’, Polish Yearbook of International Law(2002), pp. 234–8.
22. C. Hillion, ‘Enlargement of the European Union – A legal perspective’, in A. Arnull and D. Wincott (eds.), Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 401.
23. M. Cremona, ‘Human rights and democracy clauses in the EC’s trade agreements’, in N. Emiliou and D. O’Keeffe (eds.), The European Union and world trade law(Chichester: Wiley, 1996), p.62.
24. C. Hillion, ‘Introduction to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreements’, in A. Kellermann, J. De Zwaan and J. Czuczai (eds.), EU enlargement – The Constitutional Impact at EU and National Level(The Hague: Asser Press, 2001), p. 215.
25. M. Emerson (ed.), The Prospect of Deep Free Trade between the European Union and Ukraine(Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2006).
26. P. Van Den Bossche, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), p. 658.
27. R. Petrov, ‘Recent Developments in the Adaptation of Ukrainian Legislation to EU Law’, 8 EFARev. (2003), p. 125.
28. M.-F. Christophe-Tchakaloff (ed.), Le concept d’association dans les accords passés par la Communauté: essai de clarification(Brussels: Bruylant, 1999).
29. M. Maresceau, ‘A legal analysis of the Community’s Association Agreements with central and eastern Europe: general framework, accession objectives and trade liberalisation’, in S.V. Konstadinidis (ed.), The legal regulation of the European Community’s external relations after the completion of the internal market(Aldershot: Darmouth Press, 1996), p. 125.
30. J. Raux, ‘Les instruments juridiques de la Communauté avec les Etats de l’Europe de l’Est’, in J.-C. Gautron (ed.), Les relations Communauté européenne – Europe de l’Est(Paris: Economica, 1991), p. 41.
31. D. O’Keeffe and H. Schermers (eds.), Mixed agreements(Deventer: Kluwer Law, 1983).