The EU as international environmental negotiator

The EU as International Environmental Negotiator

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-245

  Delreux, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899255694     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (267)

1. Council of Ministers, Council conclusions of the 1873rd Council meeting, 06/10/1995, 10208/95 (Press 275).
2. Council of Ministers, Council conclusions of the 1939th Council meeting, 25/06/1996, 8518/96 (Press 188).
3. Council of Ministers, Council conclusions of the 1990th Council meeting, 03/03/1997, 6309/97 (Press 60).
4. Council of Ministers, Council conclusions of the 2017th Council meeting, 19/06/1997, 9132/97 (Press 204).
5. Council of Ministers, Council conclusions of the 2033rd Council meeting, 16/10/1997, 11332/97 (Press 296).
6. Council of Ministers, Council conclusions of the 2106th Council meeting, 16/06/1998, 09402/98 (Press 205).
7. Council of Ministers, Council conclusions of the 2108th Council meeting, 17/06/1998, 09551/98 (Press 207).
8. Council of Ministers, Council conclusions of the 2235th Council meeting, 13/12/1999, 13854/99 (Press 409).
9. Council of Ministers, Council conclusions of the 2302nd Council meeting, 07/11/2000, 12924/00 (Press 416).
10. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Climate Change - The EU Approach for Kyoto, COM (1997) 481, 01/10/1997.
11. European Commission, Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the joint fulfilment of commitments thereunder, COM (2001) 579, 23/10/2001.
12. European Commission, Proposal for a Council decision approving, on behalf of the European Community, the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade, COM (2001) 802, 24/01/2002.
13. European Commission, Proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the Community, of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, COM(2002) 62, 13/03/2002.
14. European Commission, Proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, COM(2003) 331, 12/06/2003.
15. European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of the provisions of the Århus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to EC institutions and bodies, COM(2003) 622, 24/10/2003.
16. European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on access to justice in environmental matters, COM(2003) 624, 24/10/2003.
17. European Commission, Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision making and access to justice regarding environmental matters, COM(2003) 625, 24/10/2003.
18. European Commission, Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the Agreement on the Conservation of AfricanEurasian Migratory Waterbirds, COM(2004) 531, 03/08/2004.
19. European Community, Council Regulation of 23 July 1992 concerning the export and import of certain dangerous chemicals in Official Journal, 2455/92/EEC, L251, 29/08/1992, 13-22.
20. European Community, Council Directive of 16 September 1996 on the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB/PCT). Official Journal, L243, 96/59/EC, 24/09/1996, 31-35.
21. European Community, Council Directive of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control. Official Journal, L257, 96/61/EC, 10/10/1996, 26-40.
22. European Community, Council Directive of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official Journal, L73, 97/11/EC, 14/03/1997, 5-15.
23. European Community, Council Decision of 9 March 1998 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the United Nations Convention to combat desertification in countries seriously affected by drought and/or desertification, particularly in Africa. Official Journal, L83, 98/216/EC, 19/03/1998, 1-2.
24. European Community, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Official Journal, L197, 2001/42/EC, 21/07/2001, 30-37.
25. European Community, Council Decision of 25 April 2002 concerning the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the joint fulfilment of commitments thereunder. Official Journal, L130, 2002/358/EC, 15/05/2002, 1-3.
26. European Community, Council Decision of 25 June 2002 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Official Journal, L201, 2002/628/EC, 31/07/2002, 48-49.
27. European Community, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC. Official Journal, L41, 2003/4/EC, 14/02/2003, 26-32.
28. European Community, Council Decision of 19 December 2002 concerning the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade. Official Journal, L63, 2003/106/EC, 06/03/2003, 27-47.
29. European Community, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC. Official Journal, L156, 2003/35/EC, 25/06/2003, 17-25.
30. European Community, Council Decision of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. Official Journal, L124, 2005/370/EC, 17/05/2005, 1-3.
31. European Community, Council Decision of 14 October 2004 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Official Journal, L209, 2006/507/ EC, 31/07/2006, 1-2.
32. European Community, Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies. Official Journal, L264, 2006/1367/EC, 25/09/2006, 13-19.
33. European Community, Council Decision of 25 September 2006 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade. Official Journal, L299, 2006/730/EC, 28/10/2006, 23-25.
34. European Community, Council Decision of 18 July 2005 on the conclusion on behalf of the European Community of the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds. Official Journal, L345, 2006/871/EC, 08/12/2006, 24-25.
35. European Community, Council Decision of 20 October 2008 on the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context. Official Journal, L308, 2008/871/EC, 19/11/2008, 33-34.
36. European Court of Justice, Opinion 2/00 of the Court, 06/12/2001.
37. European Economic Community, Council Directive of 21 December 1978 prohibiting the placing on the market and use of plant protection products containing certain active substances. Official Journal, L33, 79/117/EEC, 08/02/1979, 36-40.
38. European Economic Community, Council Directive of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds. Official Journal, L10, 379/409/EEC, 25/04/1979, 1-18.
39. European Economic Community, Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official Journal, L175, 85/337/EEC, 05/07/1985, 40-48.
40. European Economic Community, Council Directive of 23 April 1990 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms. Official Journal, L117, 90/219/EEC, 08/05/1990, 1-14.
41. European Economic Community, Council Directive of 23 April 1990 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms. Official Journal, L117, 90/220/EEC, 08/05/1990, 15-27.
42. European Economic Community, Council Directive of 7 June 1990 on the freedom of access to information on the environment. Official Journal, L158, 90/313/ EEC, 23/06/1990, 56-58.
43. European Economic Community, Council Directive of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal, L206, 92/43/EEC, 22/07/1992, 7-50.
44. European Parliament, Report on the proposal for a Council decision approving, on behalf of the European Community, the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade, A5-0290/2002, 11/09/2002.
45. Aarebrot F., Bakka P. (1997), Die Vergleichende Methode in der Politikwissenschaft, in Berg-Schlosser D., Müller-Rommel F. (eds.), Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Opladen, Leske & Burdrich, 49-66.
46. Aggarwal V., Fogarty E. (2004), Explaining Trends in EU Interregionalism, in Aggarwal V., Fogarty E. (eds.), EU Trade Strategies. Between Regionalism and Globalism, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 207-240.
47. Andrée P. (2005), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and Shifts in the Discourse of Precaution. Global Environmental Politics, 5(4), 25-46.
48. Arksey H., Knight P. (1999), Interviewing for Social Scientists, London, Sage Publications.
49. Arregui J., Stokman F., Thomson R. (2004), Bargaining in the European Union and Shifts in Actors' Policy Positions. European Union Politics, 5(1), 47-72.
50. Aspinwall M., Schneider G. (2001), Institutional research on the European Union: mapping the field, in Aspinwall M., Schneider G. (eds.), The rules of integration. Institutionalist approaches to the study of Europe, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1-18.
51. Aus J. (2005), Conjunctural Causation in Comparative Case-Oriented Research. Exploring the Scope Conditions of Rationalist and Institutionalist Causal Mechanisms, Oslo, ARENA, Working Paper WP 05/25, http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2005/papers/wp05_28.pdf.
52. Axelrod R. (1981), The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists. The American Political Science Review, 75(2), 306-318.
53. Bail C., Decaestecker J., Jørgensen M. (2002), European Union, in Bail C., Falkner R., Marquard H. (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment & Development?, London, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 166-185.
54. Baldwin M. (2006), EU Trade Politics - Heaven or Hell?. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 926-942.
55. Ballmann A., Epstein D., O'Halloran S. (2002), Delegation, Comitology, and the Separation of Powers in the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 551-574.
56. Bendor J., Glazer A., Hammond T. (2001), Theories of Delegation. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(-), 235-269.
57. Berg-Schlosser D., De Meur G., Rihoux B., Ragin C. (2009), Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an Approach, in Rihoux B., Ragin C. (eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, London, Sage Publications, 1-18.
58. Betz N. (2008), Mixed Agreements - EC and EU, paper presented at the Garnet Conference 'The European Union in International Affairs', Brussels.
59. Bevilacqua D. (2007), The International Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms: Uncertainty, Fragmentation, and Precaution. European Environmental Law Review, 16(12), 314-336.
60. Beyers J. (2005), Multiple Embeddedness and Socialization in Europe: The Case of Council Officials. International Organization, 59(4), 899-936.
61. Billiet S. (2006), From GATT to the WTO: The Internal Struggle for External Competences in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(5), 899-919.
62. Billiet S. (2009), Principal-agent analysis and the study of the EU: What about the EC's external relations?. Comparative European Politics, 7(4), 435-454.
63. Bretherton C., Vogler J. (2000), The European Union as Trade Actor and Environmental Activist: Contradictory Roles?. Journal of Economic Integration, 15(2), 163-194.
64. Bretherton C., Vogler J. (2003), The European Union as a Global Actor, London, Routledge.
65. Bueno de Mesquita B. (1994), Political Forecasting: An Expected Utility Method, in Bueno de Mesquita B., Stokman F. (eds.), European Community Decision Making. Models, Applications, and Comparisons, New Haven, Yale University Press, 71-104.
66. Bueno de Mesquita B. (2004), Decision-Making Models, Rigor and New Puzzles. European Union Politics, 5(1), 125-138.
67. Burgiel S. (2002), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Taking Steps from Negotiation to Implementation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 11(1), 53-61.
68. Bursens P. (1999), Impact van instituties op beleidsvorming. Een institutioneel perspectief op besluitvorming in de communautaire pijler van de Europese Unie, Antwerpen, Universiteit Antwerpen, Departement Politieke en Sociale Wetenschappen.
69. Cameron F. (2004), After Iraq: The EU and Global Governance. Global Governance, 10(2), 157-163.
70. Chagas V. (2003), The European Union bubble: Differentiation in the assignment of the greenhouse gas emission targets. Journal of European Integration, 25(2), 151-163.
71. Checkel J. (2001), Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization, 55(3), 553-588.
72. Checkel J. (2004), Social constructivisms in global and European politics: a review essay. Review of International Studies, 30(2), 229-244.
73. Checkel J. (2005a), It's the Process Stupid! Process Tracing in the Study of European and International Politics, Oslo, ARENA, Working Paper WP 05/26, http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2005/papers/wp05_26.pdf.
74. Checkel J. (2005b), International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801-826.
75. Checkel J. (2006), Tracing Causal Mechanisms. International Studies Review, 8(2): 362-370.
76. Christensen T., Lægreid P. (2007), Regulatory Agencies. The Challenges of Balancing Agency Autonomy and Political Control. Governance, 20(3), 499-520.
77. Clément C. (2004), Un modèle commun d'effondrement de l'Etat? Une AQQC du Liban, de la Somalie et de l'ex-Yougoslavie. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 11(1), 35-50.
78. Cœuré B., Pisani-Ferry J. (2003), One Market, One Voice? European Arrangements in International Economic Relations, paper prepared for the conference on "New Institutions for a New Europe", Vienna.
79. Coleman W., Tangermann S. (1999), The 1992 CAP reform, the Uruguay Round and the Commission: conceptualizing linked policy games. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(3), 385-404.
80. Collinson S. (1999), 'Issue-systems', 'multi-level games' and the analysis of the EU's external commercial and associated policies: a research agenda. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), 206-224.
81. Costa O. (2006), Why does the EU lead international climate negotiations? Actors, alliances and institutions, paper presented at the 3rd Pan-European ECPR Conference on EU Politics, Istanbul.
82. Cronqvist L. (2003), Using Multi-Value Logic Synthesis in Social Science, ECPR General Conference, Marburg.
83. Cutcher-Gershenfeld J., Watkins M. (1999), Toward a Theory of Representation in Negotiation, in Mnookin R., Susskind L. (eds.), Negotiating on behalf of others, London, Sage Publications, 23-51.
84. Damro C. (2006), EU-UN Environmental Relations: Shared Competence and Effective Multilateralism, in Smith K., Laatikainen K. (eds.), Intersecting Multilateralisms. The European Union and the United Nations, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 175-192.
85. Damro C. (2007), EU Delegation and Agency in International Trade Negotiations: A Cautionary Comparison. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 883-903.
86. Damro C., Hardie I., MacKenzie D. (2008), The EU and Climate Change Policy: Law, Politics and Prominance at Difference Levels. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 4(3), 179-192.
87. Damro C., Luaces P. (2001), Emissions trading - a Kyoto Nepi: From EU Resistance to Union Innovation, paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Grenoble.
88. Dashwood A., Heliskoski J. (2000), The Classic Authorities Revisited, in Dashwood A., Hillion C. (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 3-19.
89. De Bièvre D., Dür A. (2005), Constituency Interests and Delegation in European and American Trade Policy. Comparative Political Studies, 38(10), 1271-1296.
90. De Meur G., Rihoux B. (2002), L'Analyse Quali-Quantitative Comparée (AQQC- QCA). Approche, techniques et applications en sciences humaines, Louvainla-Neuve, Academia Bruylant.
91. Degrand-Guillaud A. (2009), Characteristics of and Recommendations for EU Coordination at the UN. European Foreign Affairs Review, 14(4), 607-622.
92. Delreux T. (2006), The European Union in international environmental negotiations: a legal perspective on the internal decision-making process. International Environmental Agreements, 6(3), 231-248.
93. Delreux T. (2008), The EU as a negotiator in multilateral chemicals negotiations: multiple principals, different agents. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(7), 1069-1086.
94. Delreux T. (2009a), The EU negotiates multilateral environmental agreements: explaining the agent's discretion. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 719-737.
95. Delreux T. (2009b), The EU in Environmental Negotiations in UNECE: An Analysis of its Role in the Aarhus Convention and the SEA Protocol Negotiations. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 18(3), 328-337.
96. Delreux T. (2009c), The European Union in International Environmental Negotiations: an Analysis of the Stockholm Convention Negotiations. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(1), 21-31.
97. Delreux T. (2009d), Cooperation and Control in the European Union. The Case of the European Union as International Environmental Negotiator. Cooperation and Conflict, 44(2), 189-208.
98. Delreux T., Hesters D. (2010), Solving contradictory simplifying assumptions in QCA: presentation of a new best practice, Louvain-la-Neuve, Compasss, http://www.compasss.org/files/WPfiles/Delreux2010.pdf.
99. Delreux T., Kerremans B. (2010), How Agents Weaken their Principals' Incentives to Control: The Case of EU Negotiations and EU Member States in Multilateral Negotiations. Journal of European Integration, 32(4), 247-264.
100. Dessai S., Schipper E. (2003), The Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol: analysis and future prospects. Global Environmental Change, 13(2), 149-153.
101. Druckman J., Lupia A. (2000), Preference Formation. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(-), 1-24.
102. Dür A. (2006), Assessing the EU's role in international trade negotiations. European Political Science, 5(4), 362-376.
103. Dür A., Zimmermann H. (2007), Introduction: The EU in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 771-787.
104. Dutzler B. (2002), The Representation of the EU and the Member States in International Organisations - General Aspects, Griller S., Weidel B. (eds.), External Economic Relations and Foreign Policy in the European Union, Vienna, Springer-Verlag, 151-189.
105. Eeckhout P. (2004), External Relations of the European Union, New York, Oxford University Press.
106. Elgström O. (2006), Leader or Foot-Dragger? Perceptions of the European Union in Multilateral International Negotiations, Stockholm, Swedish Institute for European Policy Issues.
107. Elgström O. (2007), Outsiders' Perceptions of the European Union in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 949-967.
108. Elgström O., Frennhoff Larsén M. (2010), Free to trade? Commission autonomy in the Economic Partnership Agreement negotiations. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(2), 205-223.
109. Elgström O., Jönsson C. (2000), Negotiation in the European Union: bargaining or problem-solving?. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(5), 684-704.
110. Elsig M. (2007a), The EU's Choice of Regulatory Venues for Trade Negotiations: A Tale of Agency Power?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 927-948.
111. Elsig M. (2007b), Delegation and Agency in EU Trade Policy Making: Bringing Brussels Back in, NCCR working paper 2007/21, Geneva.
112. Emiliou N. (1996), The Allocation of Competence Between the EC and its Member States in the Sphere of External Relations, in Emiliou N., O'Keefe D. (eds.), The European Union and World Trade Law, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 31-45.
113. Epstein D., O'Halloran S. (1999), Delegating Powers. A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers, New York, Cambridge University Press.
114. Falkner R. (2000), Regulating biotech trade: the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. International Affairs, 76(2), 299-313.
115. Falkner R. (2002), Negotiating the biosafety protocol: the international process, in Bail C., Falkner R., Marquard H. (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment & Development?, London, Royal Institute of International Affairs.
116. Falkner R. (2007), The political economy of 'normative power' Europe: EU environmental leadership in international biotechnology regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 507-526.
117. Feldmann L. (2004), Die strategische Umweltprüfung im Völkerrecht (SEA- Protokoll zur Espoo-Konvention), in Hendler R., Marburger P., Reinhart M., Schröder M. (eds.), Die strategische Umweltprüfung (sog. Plan-UVP) als neues Instrument des Umweltsrecht, Berlin, Erich Schmidt Verlag, 27-36.
118. Fernandez A. (2008), Change and Stability of the EU Institutional System: the Communitarization of the Council Presidency. Journal of European Integration, 30(5), 617-634.
119. Franchino F. (2007), The Powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU, New York, Cambridge University Press.
120. Frennhoff Larsén M. (2007), Trade Negotiations between the EU and South Africa: A Three-Level Game. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 857-881.
121. Frieden J. (2004), One Europe, One Vote?. European Union Politics, 5(2), 261-276.
122. Gilardi F. (2002), Regulation through Independent Agencies in Western Europe: New Institutionalist Perspectives, paper presented at the workshop 'Theories of Regulation', Oxford, Nuffield College.
123. Graff L. (2002), The precautionary principle, in Bail C., Falkner R., Marquard H. (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment & Development?, London, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 410-422.
124. Groenleer M., van Schaik L. (2007), United We Stand? The European Union's International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(5), 969-998.
125. Gupta A. (2000), Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Environment, 42(4), 22-33.
126. Gupta J., Ringius L. (2001), The EU's Climate Leadership: Reconciling Ambition and Reality. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1(2), 281-299.
127. Hall P., Taylor R. (1996), Political Science and the Three Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(4), 936-957.
128. Hawkins D., Jacoby W. (2006), How Agents Matter, in Hawkins D., Lake D., Nielson D., Tierney M. (eds.), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, New York, Cambridge University Press, 199-228.
129. Hawkins D., Lake D., Nielson D., Tierney M. (2006), Delegation Under Anarchy: States, International Organizations, and Principal-Agent Theory, in Hawkins D., Lake D., Nielson D., Tierney M. (eds.), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, New York, Cambridge University Press, 3-38.
130. Hayes-Renshaw F., Wallace H. (1997), The Council of Ministers, London, MacMillan Press.
131. Heliskoski J. (2000), Internal Struggle for International Presence: The Exercise of Voting Rights Within the FAO, in Dashwood A., Hillion C. (eds.), The General Law of E.C. External Relations, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 79-99.
132. Heliskoski J. (2001), Mixed Agreements as a Technique for Organizing the International Relations of the European Community and its Member States, Den Haag, Kluwer Law International.
133. Hodson D. (2009), Reforming EU economic governance: A view from (and on) the principal-agent approach. Comparative European Politics, 7(4), 455-475.
134. Hoffman A. (2002), A Conceptualization of Trust in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 375-401.
135. Hooghe L. (2005), Several Roads Lead to International Norms, but Few Via International Socialization: A Case Study of the European Commission. International Organization, 59(4), 861-898.
136. Hug S., König T. (2002), In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference. International Organization, 56(2), 447-476.
137. Jäger J., O'Riordan T. (1996), The History of Climate Change Science and Politics, in O'Riordan T., Jäger J. (eds.), Politics of Climate Change. A European Perspective, London, Routledge, 1-31.
138. Jamal A. (1997), The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa; Implementing Agenda 21. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 6(1), 1-6.
139. Joerges C., Neyer J. (1997), Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comitology in the foodstuffs sector. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 609-625.
140. Johnson M. (1998), European Community Trade Policy and the Article 133 Committee, London, Royal Institute for International Affairs.
141. Jokela M. (2002), European Union as a Global Policy Actor: The Case of Desertification, in Biermann F., Brohm R., Dingwerth K. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change 'Global Environmental Change and the Nation State', Potsdam, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 308-316.
142. Jupille J. (1999), The European Union and International Outcomes. International Organization, 53(2), 409-425.
143. Jupille J., Caporaso J. (1998), States, Agency, and Rules: The European Union in Global Environmental Politics, in Rhodes C. (ed.), The European Union in the World Community, London, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 213-229.
144. Kanie N. (2003), Leadership in Multilateral Negotiation and Domestic Policy: The Netherlands at the Kyoto Protocol Negotiation. International Negotiation, 8(2), 339-365.
145. Kassim H., Menon A. (2003), The principal-agent approach and the study of the European Union: promise unfulfilled?. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 121-139.
146. Kay A. (2003), Path dependency and the CAP. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(3), 405-420.
147. Kelemen D. (2010), Globalizing European Union environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3): 335-349.
148. Keohane R. (1986), Reciprocity in international relations. International Organization, 40(1), 1-27.
149. Kerremans B. (1996a), Do Institutions Make a Difference? Non-Institutionalism, Neo-Institutionalism, and the Logic of Common Decision-Making in the European Union. Governance, 9(2), 217-240.
150. Kerremans B. (1996b), Besluitvorming en integratie in de externe economische betrekkingen van de Europese Unie, Brussels, Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België.
151. Kerremans B. (2003), Coordination on External Trade Policies, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.
152. Kerremans B. (2004a), What Went Wrong in Cancun? A Principal-Agent View on the EU's Rationale Towards the Doha Development Round. European Foreign Affairs Review, 9(3), 363-393.
153. Kerremans B. (2004b), The European Commission and the EU Member States as Actors in the WTO Negotiating Process: Decision-Making between Scylla and Charibdis?, in Reinalda B., Verbeek B. (eds.), Decision Making Within International Organizations, London, Routledge, 45-58.
154. Kerremans B. (2006), Pro-Active Policy Entrepreneur or Risk Minimizer? A Principal-Agent Interpretation of the EU's Role in the WTO, in Elgström O., Smith M. (eds.), The European Union's Roles in International Politics, Oxford, Routledge, 172-188.
155. Kiewiet D., McCubbins M. (1991), The Logic of Delegation. Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
156. Kirsop B. (2002), The Cartagena (Biosafety) Protocol. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 8(3), 214-218.
157. Koenig-Archibugi M. (2004), Explaining Government Preferences for Institutional Change in EU Foreign and Security Policy. International Organization, 58(1), 137-174.
158. Kostadinova P. (2003), Membership of the European Union: necessary and sufficient conditions (Boolean analysis based on the European Commission reports on Eastern Europe), paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
159. Koutrakos P. (2006), EU International Relations Law, Portland, Hart Publishing.
160. Kummer K. (1999), Prior Informed Consent for Chemicals in International Trade: the 1998 Rotterdam Convention. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 8(3), 323-330.
161. Lacasta N., Dessai S., Powroslo E. (2002), Consensus among many voices: articulating the European Union's position on Climate Change, San Francisco, Golden Gate University, http://www.uea.ac.uk/~e120782/papers/consensus.html.
162. Lamy P. (2002), Europe's Role in Global Governance: The Way Ahead, speech at Humbolt University, Berlin.
163. Langlet D. (2003), Prior Informed Consent for Hazardous Chemicals Trade - Implementation in EC Law. European Environmental Law Review, 12(11), 292-308.
164. Leal-Arcas R. (2001), The European Community and Mixed Agreements. European Foreign Affairs Review, 6(4), 483-513.
165. Leal-Arcas R. (2003), United we Stand, Divided we Fall. The European Community and its Member States in the WTO Forum: towards greater Cooperation on Issues of Shared Competence?. European Political Economy Review, 1(1), 65-79.
166. Leal-Arcas R. (2004), The EC in the WTO: The three-level game of decisionmaking. What multilateralism can learn from regionalism, s.l., European Integration online Papers, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-014a.htm.
167. Leefmans P. (1998), Externe milieubevoegdheden. Communautairrechtelijke grenzen aan externe milieubevoegdheden van de EG-lidstaten, Deventer, Kluwer.
168. Lenaerts K., Van Nuffel P., Bray R. (2005), Constitutional Law of the European Union, London, Sweet & Maxwell.
169. Lewis J. (1998), Is the 'Hard Bargaining' Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Elections Directive. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(4), 479-504.
170. Lewis J. (2000), The methods of community in EU decision-making and administrative rivalry in the Council's infrastructure. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2), 261-289.
171. Lewis J. (2003a), Informal integration and the supranational construction of the Council. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 996-1019.
172. Lewis J. (2003b), Institutional Environments and Everyday EU Decision Making. Rationalist or Constructivist? in Comparative Political Studies, 36(1/2), 97-124.
173. Lewis J. (2005), The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union. International Organization, 59(4), 937-971.
174. Liberatore A. (1997), The European Union: bridging domestic and international environmental policy-making, in Schreurs M., Economy E. (eds.), The Internationalization of Environmental Protection, New York, Cambridge University Press, 188-212.
175. Lijphart A. (1975), The Comparable-Cases strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 158-177.
176. Lutz K., Boye P., Haupt H. (2000), Zur Entstehungsgeschichte des AEWA. Schriftenr. Landschaftspflege Naturschutz, 60(-), 7-12.
177. Lyne M., Nielson D., Tierney M. (2003), A Problem of Principals: Common Agency and Social Lending at the Multilateral Development Banks, meeting on Delegation to International Organizations, Del Mar.
178. Macleod I., Hendry I., Hyett S. (1998), The External Relations of the European Communities. A Manual of Law and Practice, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
179. Macrory R., Hession M. (1996), The European Community and Climate Change. The role of law and legal competence, in O'Riordan T., Jäger J. (eds.), Politics of Climate Change. A European Perspective, London, Routledge, 106-154.
180. Maher I., Billiet S., Hodson D. (2009), The principal-agent approach to EU studies: Apply liberally but handle with care. Comparative European Politics, 7(4), 409-413.
181. Martin L., Simmons B. (1998), Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization, 52(4), 729-757.
182. Maskin E., Tirole J. (1990), The Principal-Agent Relationship with an Informed Principal: The Case of Private Values. Econometrica, 58(2), 379-409.
183. Maurer A., Kietz D., Völkel C. (2005), Interinstitutional Agreements in the CFSP: Parliamentarization through the Back Door?. European Foreign Affairs Review, 10(4), 175-195.
184. McGoldrick D. (1997), International Relations Law of the European Union, London, Longman.
185. McNamara K. (2002), Rational Fictions: Central Bank Independence and the Social Logic of Delegation. West European Politics, 25(1), 47-76.
186. Menon A. (2003), Member States and International Institutions: Institutionalizing Intergovernmentalism in the European Union. Comparative European Politics, 1(2), 171-201.
187. Metcalfe D. (1998), Leadership in European Union Negotiations: The Presidency of the Council. International Negotiation, 3(3), 413-434.
188. Meunier S. (1998), Divided but United: European Trade Policy Integration and EC-U.S. Agricultural Negotiations in the Uruguay Round, in Rhodes C. (ed.), The European Union in the World Community, London, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 193-211.
189. Meunier S. (2000), What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU-U.S. Trade Negotiations. International Organization, 54(1), 103-135.
190. Meunier S. (2005), Trading Voices. The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
191. Meunier S. (2007), Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 905-926.
192. Meunier S., Nicolaïdis C. (2006), The European Union as a conflicted trade power. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 906-925.
193. Meunier S., Nicolaïdis K. (2000), EU Trade Policy: The Exclusive versus Shared Competence Debate, in Cowles M., Smith M. (eds.), The State of the European Union. Risks, Reform, Resistance, and Revival, New York, Oxford University Press, 325-346.
194. Milner H. (1997), Interests, institutions and information. Domestic politics and international relations, Princeton New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
195. Mo J. (1995), Domestic Institutions and International Bargaining: The Role of Agent Veto in Two-Level Games. American Political Science Review, 89(4), 914-924.
196. Moravcsik A. (1993), Introduction. Integrating international and domestic theories of international bargaining. Evans P., Jacobson H., Putnam R. (eds.), International bargaining and domestic politics. Double-edged diplomacy, Los Angeles, University of California Press, 3-42.
197. Moser P., Schneider G. (2000), Rational Choice and the Governance of the European Union: An Introduction, in Moser P., Schneider G., Kirchgässner G. (eds.), Decision Rules in the European Union. A Rational Choice Perspective, London, MacMillan Press, 1-15.
198. Murphy A. (2000), In the maelstrom of change. The Article 133 Committee in the governance of external economic policy. Christiansen T., Kirchner E. (eds.), Committee Governance in the European Union, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 98-114.
199. Najam A. (2004), Dynamics of the Southern Collective: Developing Countries in Desertification Negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 4(3), 128-154.
200. Newell P. (1998), Who 'CoPed' out in Kyoto? An Assessment of the Third Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. Environmental Politics, 7(2), 153-159.
201. Nicolaïdis K. (1999), Minimizing Agency Costs in Two-Level Games. Lessons From the Trade Authority Controversies in the United States and the European Union, in Mnookin R., Susskind L. (eds.), Negotiating on behalf of others, London, Sage Publications, 87-126.
202. Nielson D., Tierney M. (2003), Delegation to International Organisations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform. International Organization, 57(2), 241-276.
203. Niemann A. (2004), Between communicative action and strategic action: the Article 133 Committee and the negotiations on the WTO Basic Telecommunications Services Agreement. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 379-407.
204. Oberthür S., Ott H. (1999), The Kyoto Protocol. International Climate Change Policy for the 21st Century, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
205. Oberthür S., Roche Kelly C. (2008), EU Leadership in International Climate Policy: Achievements and Challenges. The International Spectator, 45(3), 35-50.
206. Ott H. (2001), Climate change: an important foreign policy issue. International Affairs, 77(2), 277-296.
207. Pajala A., Widgrén M. (2004), A Priori versus Empirical Voting Power in the EU Council of Ministers. European Union Politics, 5(1), 73-97.
208. Palerm J. (1999), Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making: Examining the Aarhus Convention. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 1(2), 229-244.
209. Pallemaerts M. (2004), De Europese Gemeenschap als Verdragsluitende Partij bij het Protocol van Kyoto, in Maes F. (ed.), Verhandelbare emissierechten als klimaatbeleidsinstrument. L'échange des droits de pollution comme instrument de gestion du climat, Bruges, Die Keure, 6-27.
210. Pattersson L. (1997), Agricultural policy reform in the European Community: a three-level-game analysis. International Organization, 51(1), 135-165.
211. Peterson J., Bomberg E. (1999), Decision-making in the European Union, London, MacMillan Press.
212. Pierson P. (2000), Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-267.
213. Pinholt K. (2004), Influence through arguments? A study of the Commission's influence on the climate change negotiations, Oslo, Arena Report 03/2004.
214. Pocar F. (2002), The Decision-Making Process of the European Community in External Relations, in Cannizzaro E. (ed.), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations, Den Haag, Kluwer Law International, 3-16.
215. Pollack M. (2002), Learning from the Americanists (Again), Theory and Method in the Study of Delegation. West European Politics, 25(1), 200-219.
216. Pollack M. (2003a), The Engines of European Integration. Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU, New York, Oxford University Press.
217. Pollack M. (2003b), Control Mechanism or Deliberative Democracy? Two Images of Comitology. Comparative Political Studies, 36(1/2), 125-155.
218. Pollack M. (2004), The New Institutionalisms and European Integration, in Wiener A., Diez T. (eds.), European Integration Theory, New York, Oxford University Press, 137-156.
219. Putnam R. (1988), Diplomacy and domestic policies: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427-460.
220. Raffensperger C., Tickner J. (1999), Protecting Public Health and the Environment, Washington DC, Island Press.
221. Ragin C. (1987), The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Los Angeles, University of California Press.
222. Ragin C., Berg-Schlosser D., De Meur G. (1996), Political Methodology: Qualitative Methods, in Goodin R., Klingemann H. (eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science, New York, Oxford University Press, 749-768.
223. Rasmussen A. (2000), Institutional Games Rational Actors Play. The empowering of the European Parliament, s.l., European Integration online Papers, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-001a.htm.
224. Rasmussen A. (2005), EU Conciliation Delegates: Responsible or Runaway Agents?. West European Politics, 28(5), 1015-1034.
225. Rhinard M., Kaeding M. (2006), The International Bargaining Power of the European Union in 'Mixed' Competence Negotiations: The Case of the 2000 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(5), 1023-1050.
226. Rihoux B. (2003), Bridging the Gap between the Qualitative and Quantitative Worlds? A Retrospective and Prospective View on Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Field Methods, 15(4), 351-365.
227. Rihoux B., Ragin C. (2004), Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), State of the Art and Prospects, Chicago, paper presented at annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p61198_index.html.
228. Rittberger B., Schimmelfennig F. (2005), The Constitutionalization of the European Union: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Oslo, paper presented at Arena, http://www.arena.uio.no/events/seminarpapers/Rittberger_Nov05.pdf.
229. Rodenhoff V. (2002), The Aarhus Convention and its Implications for the "Institutions" of the European Community. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 11(3), 343-357.
230. Salacuse J. (1999), Law and Power in Agency Relationships, in Mnookin R., Susskind L. (eds.), Negotiating on behalf of others, London, Sage Publications, 157-175.
231. Sandholtz W. (1996), Membership Matters: Limits of the Functional Approach to European Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 403-429.
232. Sartori G. (1994), Bien comparer, mal comparer. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 1(1), 19-36.
233. Sbragia A. (1998), Institution-Building from below and above: The European Community in Global Environmental Politics, in Sandholz W., Stone Sweet A. (eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance, New York, Oxford University Press, 283-303.
234. Schalk J., Torenvlied R., Weesie J., Stokman F. (2007), The Power of the Presidency in EU Council Decision-making. European Union Politics, 8(2), 229-250.
235. Schmidt J. (2008), Why Europe Leads on Climate Change. Survival, 50(4), 83-96.
236. Schmidt S. (2000), Only an Agenda Setter? The European Commission's Power over the Council of Ministers. European Union Politics, 1(1), 37-61.
237. Schout A., Vanhoonacker S. (2006), Evaluating Presidencies of the Council of the EU: Revisiting Nice. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(5), 1051-1077.
238. Schreurs M., Tiberghien Y. (2007), Multi-Level Reinforcement: Explaining European Union Leadership in Climate Change Mitigation. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 19-46.
239. Shapiro S. (2005), Agency Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(-), 263-284.
240. Sjöstedt G. (1998), The EU Negotiates Climate Change. External Performance and Internal Structural Change. Cooperation and conflict, 33(3), 227-256.
241. Smith K. (2006), The European Union, Human Rights and the United Nations, in Smith K., Laatikainen K. (eds.), Intersecting Multilateralisms. The European Union and the United Nations, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 154-174.
242. Smyrl M. (1998), When (and How) Do the Commission's Preferences Matter?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(1), 79-99.
243. Svensson A. (2000), In the Service of the European Union. The Role of the Presidency in Negotiating the Amsterdam Treaty 1995-97, Uppsala, Uppsala University.
244. Tallberg J. (2002), Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences?. West European Politics, 25(1), 23-46.
245. Tallberg J. (2003), The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 1-19.
246. Tallberg J. (2006), Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union, New York, Cambridge University Press.
247. Thieme D. (2001), European Community External Relations in the Field of the Environment. European Environmental Law Review, 11(8-9), 252-264.
248. Tiberghien Y., Starrs S. (2004), The EU as Global Trouble-Maker in Chief: A Political Analysis of EU Regulations and EU Global Leadership in the Field of Genetically Modified Organisms, paper presented at the Conference for Europeanists, Chicago.
249. Toulmin C. (1995), Combating desertification by conventional means. Global Environmental Change, 5(5), 455-457.
250. Tsebelis G. (2002), Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
251. van Calster G., Lee M. (2002), European Case Law Report September 2001 - March 2002. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 11(2), 235-245.
252. van den Hoven A. (2004), Assuming Leadership in Multilateral Economic Institutions: The EU's "Development Round" Discourse and Strategy. West European Politics, 27(2), 256-283.
253. Van Schendelen M. (1996), 'The Council Decides': Does the Council Decide?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(4), 531-548.
254. Vanden Bilcke C. (2002), The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 11(3), 328-342.
255. Veinla H., Relve K. (2005), Influence of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in Estonia. European Environmental Law Review, 14(12), 326-331.
256. Verwey D. (2004), The European Community, the European Union and the International Law of Treaties, Den Haag, TMC Asser Press.
257. Vogler J. (1999), The European Union as an Actor in International Environmental Politics. Environmental Politics, 8(3), 24-48.
258. Vogler J. (2005), The European contribution to global environmental governance. International Affairs, 81(4), 835-850.
259. Vogler J. (2009), Climate change and EU foreign policy: The negotiation of burden sharing. International Politics, 46(4), 469-490.
260. Wallström M. (2002), European Commission, in Bail C., Falkner R., Marquard H. (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment & Development?, London, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 244-250.
261. Waterman R., Meier K. (1998), Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 173-202.
262. Winfield M. (2000), Reflections on the Biosafety Protocol Negotiations in Montreal, s.l., Bio-Tech Info, http://www.biotech-info.net/BSP_reflections.html.
263. Woll C. (2006), The road to external representation: the European Commission's activism in international air transport. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 52-69.
264. Worsham J., Eisner M., Ringquist E. (1997), Assessing the Assumptions. A Critical Analysis of Agency Theory. Administration & Society, 28a(4), 419-440.
265. Yamin F. (1998), The Kyoto Protocol: Origins, Assessment and Future Challenges. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 7(2), 113-127.
266. Young A. (2003), What game? By which rules? Adapting and flexibility in the EC's foreign economic policy, in Knodt M., Princen S. (eds.), Understanding the European Union's External Relations, London, Routledge, 54-71.
267. Zito A. (2005), The European Union as an Environmental Leader in a Global Environment. Globalizations, 2(3), 363-375.