Mixity and Coherence in EU External Relations: The Significance of the ‘Duty of Cooperation’

Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 87-115

  Hillion, Christophe ^a,b,c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Swedish Institute of European Policy Studies   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194772716     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. J H HWeiler, ‘The transformation of Europe’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2403
2. C Hillion, ‘Tous pour un, un pour tous! Coherence in the External Relations of the European Union’ in M Cremona (ed), Developments in EU External Relations Law, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008) 10;
3. A Dashwood, ‘The relationship between the Member States and the European Union/European Community’ (2004) 41 CMLRev 355 at 377.
4. M Cremona, ‘Defending the Community Interest: The Duties of Cooperation and Compliance’ in MCremona and B deWitte (eds), EU Foreign Relations Law—Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford, Hart Publising, 2008) 125 at 157;
5. P Koutrakos, ‘The interpretation of mixed agreements under the preliminary reference procedure’ (2002) 7 European Foreign Affairs Review 25 at 49.
6. J Heliskoski, ‘Should there be a new article on external relations’ in M Koskenniemi (ed), International law aspects of the European Union (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1998) 276 at 276–77
7. R Leal-Arcas, ‘Unitary character of EC external trade relations’ (2001) 7 Columbia Journal of European Law 355.
8. I McLeod, I D Hendry and S Hyett, The external relations of the European Communities (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996) 145
9. M Cremona, ‘External relations and external competence: the emergence of an integrated policy’ in P Craig and G de Búrca (eds), The evolution of EU law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999) 137 at 170
10. R Frid, The relations between the EC and international organisations. Legal theory and practice (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1995) 149
11. E Neframi, ‘L’exercice en commun des compétences illustré par le devoir de loyauté’ in P-Y Monjal and E Neframi (eds), Le ’commun’ dans l’Union européenne (Brussels, Bruylant, 2009) 179.
12. K Mortelmans ‘The principle of loyalty to the Community (Article 5 EC) and the obligations of the Community institutions’ (1998) 5 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 67;
13. M Blanquet, L’article 5 du Traité CEE (Paris, LGDJ, 1994) 417–26;
14. O Due, ‘Artikel 5 van het EEG-Verdag. Een bepaling met een federal karakter’ (1992) Social-Economische Wetgeving 82;
15. V Constantinesco, ‘L’article 5 EEC: de la bonne foi à la loyauté communautaire’ in F Capotorti et al (eds), Du droit international au droit de l’intégration: liber amicorum Pierre Pescatore (Baden Baden, Nomos Verlag, 1987) 97;
16. Temple Lang, ‘Article 5 of the EEC Treaty: the emergence of constitutional principles in the case-law of the Court of Justice’ (1987) 10 Fordham International Law Journal 503.
17. R A Wessel, ‘The international legal status of the European Union’ (1997) 2 European Foreign Affairs Review 109 at 120.
18. N Neuwahl, ‘Shared powers or combined incompetence? More on mixity’ (1996) 33 CMLRev 667 at 678ff.
19. J Heliskoski, ’Annotation’ (2002) 39 CMLRev 159.
20. A Dashwood, ‘Preliminary rulings on the interpretation of mixed agreements’ in D O’Keeffe and A Bavasso (eds), Judicial review in EU law—Liber Amicorum in Honour of Lord Slynn of Hadley, vol I (The Hague/London/Boston, Kluwer Law International, 2000) 173 at 173–74.
21. E Neframi, ‘La mixité éclairée dans l’affaire Commission contre Irlande du 30 mai 2006 (Affaire MOX): une double infraction, un triple apport’ (2007) Revue du Droit de l’Union européenne 687.
22. C Hillion, ‘A Look Back at the Open Skies’ in M Bulterman, L Hancher, A McDonnell and A Sevenster (eds), Views of European Law from the Mountain (Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2009) 257;
23. G de Baere, Constitutional Principles of EU External Relations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008) 256.
24. A Rosas, ‘International disputes settlement: EU practices and procedures’ (2003) 46 German Yearbook of International Law 284 at 312–13.
25. A Barav, ‘The division of external relations power between the European Economic Community and the Member States in the case law of the Court of Justice’ in CWA Timmermans and E L M Völker (eds), Division of powers between the European Communities and their Member States in the field of external relations (Deventer, Kluwer, 1981) 29 at 90.
26. M J F M Dolmans, Problems of mixed agreements: division of powers within the EEC and the rights of third States (The Hague, Asser Institute, 1985) 39–42;
27. H G Schermers, ‘A typology of mixed agreements’ in D O’Keeffe and H G Schermers (eds), Mixed agreements (Deventer, Kluwer, 1983) 23
28. C Kaddous, Le droit des relations extérieures dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes (Bâle, Helbing and Lichtenhahn—Brussels, Bruylant, 1998) 173–74
29. J Groux and P Manin, Les Communautés européennes dans l’ordre international (Luxembourg, Office des publications officielles des Communautés européennes, 1984) 150.
30. C Hillion, The European Union and its East-European Neighbours —A Laboratory for the Organisation of EU External Relations (Oxford, Hart Publishing, forthcoming).