Digital Writing in the Early Years

Handbook of Research on New Literacies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 751-774

  Merchant, Guy ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145107945     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410618894-32     Document Type: Chapter

References (94)

1. Andrews, R. (Ed.). (2004). The impact of ICT on literacy. London: Routledge Falmer.
2. Andrews, R., Robinson, A., and Torgerson, C. (2004). Introduction. In R. Andrews (Ed.), The impact of ICT on literacy (pp. 1-33). London: Routledge Falmer.
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction.Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 69-93.
4. Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
5. Barton, D., and Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community.London: Routledge.
6. Bearne, E. (2003). Rethinking literacy: Communication, representation, and text. Reading Literacy and Language, 37(3), 98-103.
7. Becta (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers.Retrieved October 16, 2005, from http://becta.org.uk/research
8. Bigum, C. (2002). Managing new relationships: Design sensibilities, the new information, and communication technologies and schools. Retrieved February 23, 2005, from http://www.apapdc.edu.au?2002/archive/ASPA/2000/paapers/art429.html
9. Bredekamp, S., and Rosegrant, T. (1994). Learning and teaching with technology. In J. L. Wright, and D. D. Shade (Eds.), Young children: Active learners in a technological age (pp. 53-61). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
10. Breeze, C., Jackson, A., and Prince, T. (1996) Promise in impermanence, children writing with unlimited access to word processors. Early Childhood Development and Care 118, 67-91.
11. Carrington, V. (2005). New textual landscapes, information, and early literacy. In J. Marsh (Ed.), Popular culture, new media, and digital literacy in early childhood (pp. 13-27). London: Routledge Falmer.
12. Clay, M. (1975). What did I write? London: Heinemann Educational.
13. Clay, M. (1979). The early detection of reading difficulties (2nd edition). Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Educational.
14. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word-processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61, 107-55.
15. Cochran-Smith, M., Paris, C. L., and Kahn, J. L. (1991). Learning to write differently. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Dalton, D., and Hannafin, M. (1987). The effects of word processing on written composition.Journal of Educational Research, 80(6), 338-342.
17. Dauite, C. (1986). Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers.Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 141-159.
18. DfEE. (2000). Curriculum guidance for the foundation stage. London: QCA.
19. DfES. (2004). Learning and teaching using ICT: Example materials from foundation stage to year 6. London: DfES.
20. DfES. (2005). Harnessing technology: Transforming learning and children’s services. London:DfES.
21. Dyson, A. H. (2001). Where are the childhoods in childhood literacy? An exploration of outer (school) space. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(1), 9-39.
22. eMINTS. (2000). Teacher comments about working in an eMINTS classroom 12.08.00.Retrieved October 17, 2005, from http://www.emints.org/evaluation/reports/index. shtml
23. English Review Group. (2004). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning in English, 5-16' EPPI-Centre. Retrieved March 16, 2005, from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWeb/home.aspx?page=/reel/review_three.html
24. Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., and Sutherland, R. (2003). ScreenPlay: Children and computing in the home. London: Routledge Falmer.
25. Garner, R., and Gillingham, M. G. (1998). The Internet in the classroom: Is it the end of transmission- orientated pedagogy? In D. Reinking, L. D. Labbo, M. C. McKenna, and R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 221-241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Gee, J. P. (2000). New people in new worlds: Networks, the new capitalism, and schools. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 43-68). London: Macmillan.
27. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age.Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
28. Goldberg, A., Russell, M., and Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing:A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 1-24.
29. Hamilton, M. (2000). Expanding the new literacy studies: Using photographs to explore literacy as a social practice. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanic. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 16-34). London: Routledge.
30. Harris, R. (2000). Rethinking writing. London: Continuum.
31. Harris, S., and Kington, S. (2002). Innovative classroom practices using ICT in England.Retrieved February 27, 2005, from http://nfer.ac.uk/research/down_pub.asp
32. Holloway, S., and Valentine, G. (2002). Cyberkids: Youth identities and communities in an on-line world. London: Routledge Falmer.
33. Hull, G., and Shultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 575-611.
34. Ireland Department of Education and Science. (1998). Schools IT 2000. Retrieved October 16, 2005, from http://195.7.52.179/overview/it2k.htm
35. Johanson, R. P. (1988). Computers, cognition, and curriculum: Retrospect and prospect.Journal of Computing Research, 4, 1-30.
36. Johnson, D. (2002). Web watch: Writing resources. Reading Online, 5(7). Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http://www.readingonline.org/electronic/webwatch/writing/index.html
37. Kamil, M. L., Intrator, S., and Kim, H. (2000). The effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, D. Reason, and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, 771-788). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Kamil, M. L., and Lane, D. M. (1998). Researching the relationships between technology and literacy: An agenda for the 21st century. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, and R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-343). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Kankaanranta, M., and Kangassalo, M. (2003). Information and communication technologies in Finnish early childhood environments. Childhood Education, 79(5), 287-292.
40. Kress, G. (1997). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication:The potentials of new forms of texts. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen:Taking literacy into the electronic age (pp. 53-79). London: Routledge.
41. Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). London: Macmillan.
42. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
43. Labbo, L. D. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young children’s symbol making in a classroom computer centre. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 356-385.
44. Labbo, L. D. (2000). ‘Towards a vision for the future role of technology in literacy education.' Report commissioned by the US Department of Education. Retrieved March 16, 2005, from http://www.air.org/forum/abLabbo.htm
45. Labbo, L. D., and Reinking, D. (2003). Computers and early literacy education. In N. Hall, J. Larson, and J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy education, (pp. 338-354).London: Sage.
46. Labbo, L. D., Sprague, L., Montero, M. K., and Font, G. (2000). Connecting a computer centre to theme’s literature and kindergarteners’ literacy needs. Reading Online, 4(1). Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http://www.readingonline.org/electronic/labbo/index. html
47. Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (2003a). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
48. Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (2003b). New technologies in early childhood research: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 59-82.
49. Larson, J., and Marsh, J. (2005). Making literacy real: Theories and practices for learning and teaching. London: Sage.
50. Leu, D. J. (1996). Sarah’s secret: Social aspects of literacy and learning in a digital information age. The Reading Teacher, 50, 162-165.
51. Leu, D. J. (2000a). Our children’s future: Changing the focus of literacy and literacy instruction.Reading Online. Retrieved March 11, 2005, from http://www.readingonline. org/electronic/RT/focus
52. Leu, D. J. (2000b). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. Kamil, P. Rosenthal, P. Pearson, and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., and Cammack, D. W. (2004). Towards a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies.Reading Online. Retrieved October 16, 2005, from http://www.readingonline. org/newliteracies/lit_index.asp?HREF=/newliteracies/leu
54. Lingau, A., Hoppe, H. U., and Mannhaupt, G. (2003). Computer supported collaborative writing in an early learning classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 186-194.
55. Livingstone, S., Bober, M., and Helsper, E. (2005). Internet literacy among children and young people: Findings from the U.K. children go online project. London: London School of Economics.
56. Livingstone, S., and Bovill, M. (1999). Young people, new media. London: London School of Economics.
57. Luke, A., and Luke, C. (2001). Adolescence lost/childhood regained: On early intervention and the emergence of the techno-subject Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(1), 91-120.
58. Marsh, J. (2003). The techno-literacy practices of young children. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(1), 51-66.
59. Matthewman, S., and Triggs (2004). Obsessive compulsory font disorder: The challenge of supporting writing with computers. Computers and Education, 43 (1-2), 125-135.
60. McKeon, C. A. (1999). The nature of children’s e-mail in one classroom. The Reading Teacher, 52(7), 698-706.
61. Mercer, N., Fernandez, M., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., and Sams, C. (2004). Talk about texts at the computer: Using ICT to develop children’s oral and literate abilities. Reading, Literacy, and Language, 37(2), 81-89.
62. Merchant, G. (2003). E-mail me your thoughts: Digital communication and narrative writing.Reading, Literacy, and Language, 37(3), 104-110.
63. Merchant, G. (2005a). Barbie meets Bob the Builder at the workstation: Learning to write on screen. In J. Marsh (Ed.), Popular culture, new media, and digital literacy in early childhood (pp. 183-200). London: Routledge Falmer.
64. Merchant, G. (2005b). Digikids: Cool dudes and the new writing. E-Learning, 2(1), 50-60.
65. Merchant, G. (2006). A sign of the times: Looking critically at popular digital writing. In J. Marsh and E. Millard (Eds.), Popular literacies, childhood, and schooling (pp. 93-109).London: Routledge Falmer.
66. Ministry of Education, New Zealand. (1998). Interactive education: An information and communication technologies strategy for schools. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
67. Ministry of Education, New Zealand. (2002). English in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Retrieved October 17, 2005, from http:// www.tki.org.nz/r/language/curriculum
68. Ministry of Education, Ontario. (1997). Ontario curriculum: Grades 1-8. Ontario, Canada:Ministry of Education. Retrieved October 17, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov.on.ca
69. Moseley, D., Higgins, S., Bramald, R., Hardman, F., Miller, J., Mroz, M., et al. (1999).Ways forward with ICT: Effective pedagogy using information and communication technology for literacy and numeracy in primary schools. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, U.K.:University of Newcastle.
70. Mumtaz, S., and Hammond, M. (2002). The word processor re-visited: Observations on the use of the word processor to develop literacy at key stage 2. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 345-347.
71. NCES. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Retrieved October 16, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo. asp?pubid=1999080
72. Nixon, H. (2003). New research literacies for contemporary research into literacy and new media? Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 407-413.
73. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2004). ICT literacy maps. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved October 16, 2005, from http://www.21stcenturyskills. org
74. Plowman, L., and Stephen, C. (2003). A ‘benign addition’? Research on ICT and pre-school children. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 149-164.
75. QCA. (2000). Information and communication technology, the national curriculum for England. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
76. Reinking, D. (1994). Electronic literacy. Perspectives in Reading Research No.4. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, National Reading Research Centre.
77. Roberts, R. F., Foehr, U. G., Rideout, V., and Brodie, M. (1999). Kids and media @ the new millenium. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
78. Roberts, R. F., Foehr, U. G., and Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M.: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
79. Robins, K., and Webster, F. (1999). Times of the Technoculture: From the information society to the virtual life. London: Routledge.
80. Selwyn, N., and Bullon, K. (2000). Pimary school children’s use of ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 321-332.
81. Snyder, I., Angus, L., and Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Building equitable literate futures:Home and school computer-mediated literacy practices and disadvantage. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(3), 367-383.
82. Street, B. (Ed.). (1993). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
83. Tao, L., Montgomery, T., and Pickle, M. (1997). Content analysis in e-mail research: A methodological review. In C. K. Kinzer, K. A. Hinchman, and D. J. Leu (Eds.), Inquiries into literacy theory and practice (pp. 474-482). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
84. Tao, L., and Reinking, D. (2000). E-mail and literacy education. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 169-174.
85. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York:McGraw-Hill.
86. Teale, W. H., and Sulzby, E. (Eds.). (1986). Emergent literacy: Writing and reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
87. Torgerson, C., and Zhu, D. (2004). Evidence for the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning.In R. Andrews (Ed.), The impact of ICT on literacy (pp. 34-68). London: Routledge Falmer.
88. Turbill, J. (2001). A researcher goes to school: Using technology in the kindergarten literacy curriculum. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(3), pp. 255-279.
89. Van der Meij, H., and Boersma, K. (2002). E-mail use in elementary school: An analysis of exchange patterns and content. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 189-200.
90. Vass, E. (2002). Friendship and collaborative creative writing in the primary classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 102-110.
91. Watts, M., and Lloyd, C. (2004). The use of innovative ICT in the active pursuit of literacy.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 50-58.
92. Wegerif, R., and Scrimshaw, P. (1997). Computers and talk in the primary classroom. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.
93. Williams, D., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., Tuson, J., and Coles, L. (1998). Teachers’ ICT skills and knowledge. Aberdeen, U.K.: Robert Gordon University. Retrieved October 16, 2005, from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library/ict/append-title.htm
94. Whitehead, M. (1997). Language and literacy in the early years. London: Paul Chapman.