The nature of children's e-mail in one classroom

Reading Teacher

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 698-706

  McKeon, Christine A ^a  

^a WALSH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039626673     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bloome, D., & Green, J. (1984). Directions in the sociolinguistic study of reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 395-421). New York: Longman.
2. Cambourne, B. (1995). Towards an educationally relevant theory of literacy learning: Twenty years of inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 49, 182-190.
3. Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459.
4. Clark, R. (1985). Evidence for confounding in computer-based instruction studies: Analyzing the meta-analyses. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 33, 249-262.
5. Clark, R. (1991). When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media. Educational Technology, 31(2), 34-40.
6. Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
7. El-Hindi, A.E. (1998). Beyond classroom boundaries: Constructivist teaching with the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 51, 694-700.
8. Flood, D., & Lapp, D. (1997). Broadening conceptualizations of literacy: The visual and communicative arts. The Reading Teacher, 51, 342-344.
9. Garner, R., & Gillingham, M.G. (1996). Internet communication in six classrooms: Conversations across time, space, and culture. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
11. Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Language as a social semiotic: Towards a general sociolinguistic theory. In M. Makkai & L. Heilman (Eds.), Linguistics at the crossroads (pp. 13-38). The Hague: Mouton.
12. Hancock, M.R. (1993). Exploring and extending personal response through literature journals. The Reading Teacher, 46, 466-474.
13. Harris, T.L., & Hodges, R.E. (Eds.). (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association
14. Iannone, P.V. (1998). Just beyond the horizon: Writing-centered literacy activities for traditional and electronic contexts. The Reading Teacher, 51, 438-443.
15. Kasten, W.C. (1997). Learning is noisy: The myth of silence in the reading-writing classroom. In J.R. Paratore & R.L. McCormack (Eds.), Peer talk in the classroom: Learning from research (pp. 88-101). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16. Kelly, P.R. (1990). Guiding young students' response to literature. The Reading Teacher, 43, 464-470.
17. Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179-211.
18. Kozma, R.B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-19.
19. LeBlanc, P.J. (1994). The politics of literacy and technology in secondary school classrooms. In C.L. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 22-36). New York: Modern Language Association.
20. Leu, D.J., Jr. (1996). Sarah's secret: Social aspects of literacy and learning in a digital information age. The Reading Teacher, 50, 162-165.
21. Leu, D.J., Jr. (1997). Caity's question: Literacy as deixis on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 51, 62-67.
22. Mason, G.E., & Blanchard, J.S. (1979). Computer applications and reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23. McMahon, S.I., & Raphael, T.E. (Eds.). (1997). The book club connection: Literacy and learning and classroom talk. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Neuman, D. (1989). Naturalistic inquiry and computer-based instruction: Rationale, procedures, and potential. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(3), 39-52.
25. Paratore, J.R., & McCormack, R.L. (Eds.). (1997). Peer talk in the classroom: Learning from research. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
26. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Peyton, J.K. (1988). Mutual conversations: Written dialogue as a basis for building student-teacher rapport. In J. Staton, R.W. Shuy, J.K. Peyton, & L. Reed (Eds.), Dialogue journal communication: Classroom, linguistic, social, and cognitive views (pp. 183-201). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Rasinski, T., & Padak, N. (1996). Holistic reading strategies: Teaching children who find reading difficult. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
29. Reinking, D. (1997). Me and my hypertext:) A multiple digression analysis of technology and literacy (sic). The Reading Teacher, 50, 626-643.
30. Reinking, D., Labbo, L., & McKenna, M. (1997). Navigating the changing landscape of literacy: Current theory and research in computer-based reading and writing. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 77-92). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
31. Roblyer, M. (1992). Computers in education. In G. Bitter (Ed.), Macmillan encyclopedia of computers (pp. 332-345). New York: Macmillan.
32. Roblyer, M.D., Edwards, J., & Havriluk, M.A. (1997). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
33. Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
34. Rosenblatt, L. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory Into Practice, 21, 268-277.
35. Ross, S.M. (1994). Delivery trucks or groceries? More food for thought on whether media (will, may, can't) influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 5-6.
36. Seidel, J., Friese, S., & Leonard, D.C. (1995). The ethnograph [computer software]. Amherst, MA: Qualis Research Associates.
37. Selfe, C.L. (1989). Redefining literacy: The multi-layered grammars of computers. In G.E. Hawisher & C.L. Selfe (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 3-15). New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Selfe, C.L., & Hilligoss, S. (Eds.). (1994). Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. New York: Modern Language Association.
39. Smith, R.K. (1984). The war with grandpa. New York: Bantam.
40. Staton, J. (1988). Contributions of the dialogue journal research to communicating, thinking, and learning. In J. Staton, R.W. Shuy, J.K. Peyton, & L. Reed (Eds.), Dialogue communication: Classroom, linguistic, social, and cognitive views (pp. 312-321). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978).Thinking and speech. In R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (N. Minick, Trans., pp. 144-188). New York: Plenum.
42. Wollman-Bonilla, J.E. (1989). Reading journals: Invitations to participate in literature. The Reading Teacher, 43, 112-120.
43. Wollman-Bonilla, J.E., & Werchadlo, B. (1995). Literature response journals in a first-grade classroom. Language Arts, 72, 562-570.